Sample: “Why are many Americans distrustful of a religion and people they know very little about?”
Islam deserves a media makeover. At a time when the United States is mired in two wars in locations where the majority of the people practice Islam, the future of American-Islamic relations is at stake.
Sheik sez:
Why does Islam “deserve a media makeover?” What makes Islam deserve anything at all?
The future of  “American-Islamic relations” ended with 9/11.
And long before that. Aiding & abetting the enemy in a time of war is treason. What are these wankers on about?
If you can be bothered to take a closer look  you’ll quickly discover that the CSM offered a soapbox to Amjad Mahmood Khan, a Mohammedan agit prop who promptly used the opportunity to do his Islamic duty to promote Islam, to engage in the usual lies and dissimulation, otherwise known as taqiyya.
Worthless, useless, infuriating to some, but our media seems to believe it is easier to pull the Islamic wool over our eyes and ears than to tell the ugly truth about the marauding serial killer Muhammad.
Here’s another article from the NYT, Â again putting lipstick on a pig and pitting hope against the ugly reality:
Then, there is Wikipedias definition of “Islamophobia”, conflated with “racism”, which it is not:
It is viewed as a new form of racism whereby Muslims, an ethno-religious group, not a race, are nevertheless constructed as a race.
Right. So Islam is not a race, but should be viewed as a “form of racism”. Strange that Wiki doesn’t tell us why it should be viewed as “a form of racism”. Interesting also, that Wiki states correctly that “the belief that all or most Muslims are religious fanatics, have violent tendencies towards non-Muslims, and reject as directly opposed to Islam such concepts as equality, tolerance, and democracy” and does not  even deny it.  I think these good people have their knickers in a twist.
Bunglawussi has a new definition of “Islamophobia” on his website.
Whereas before these creeps claimed that “Islamophobia is anti-Islam bigotry” they now  have a time wasting page that  offers you different kinds of poison, but at least you can chose.
—————————————————————————————————————–
Meanwhile, the UK produces hit records every week day:
Fighting for the right to wear her cross: Mrs Chaplin is being supported by the Church of England community including Reverend John Eustice, left, and barrister Paul Diamond
Christian nurse ‘ordered to remove crucifix… at hospital where Muslims are  allowed to wear headscarves’    Read more:
Litigation Jihad
Look at what the Australian media is doing:
Sydney’s Daily Telegraph attacks Christians with the scathing headline:
(smearing a decent bloke)
Indonesia offers to solve  another problem KRudd created
Say what you want about any previous ALP Prime Ministers but at least they had some substance, some backbone. This train-wreck of a leader that we have now has displayed once again just how distant he really is from the true Australian ethos.
Not only is he not demanding that the Indonesians should sign the UN Refugee Convention of 1951 — thus actually dealing with these country shoppers before they sail (or fly) off to the great southern land of liberal softies and no border security — but now he is doing a deal by asking the Indonesians to do the right thing in controlling the disgusting trade of people-smuggling before it becomes our issue. He is even asking if we catch them first, can we can send them back to Indonesia and the Australian taxpayer will foot the bill for the costs incurred by the Indonesian Government?!? How can this be true?
Media comment here
