* Â There is no end to this. Stupidity & cupidity goes hand in hand. When the halfwitted socialists cooked this indigestible nonsense up on the advice of their Muslim peers infil-traitors in olde England, the completely PC-infested US was eager to gobble it up, and now this DRECK seems to have come around and ended up in Denmark, where it belongs like Â Pali-sewage.
Besides refraining from using the phrase “war against terror” PET recommends to refrain from speaking of Muslims as a population group related to terror and extremism.Â Other expression to refrain from using are “jihad”, “holy war”, “Islamism”, “fundamentalism” or “mujahedines”.
PET suggests that authorities don’t use the term “Islamist terrorist” and instead use just ‘terrorist’.Â Other terms suggested by the report are “extremist”, “militant” and “violent”
The head of PET’s department for preventing security, Anja Dalgaard-Nielsen, says that this isn’t an issue of political correctness but of ensuring a use of language that is as precise and objective as possible.Â Terrorists don’t just engage in a violent war but also in a war of words, of a specific outlook on the world.
The report, titled “Language Use and Fighting Terrorism (Sprogbrug og TerrorbekÃ¦mpelse) advises in general against tying Islam and terrorism together, since the typical person doesn’t differentiate between Islam the religion and Islamism the political ideology.
The report says that in order to prevent stigmatizing the Muslim population CTA recommends to always consider how much it contributes to coherence to use religious terms in describing terrorism (for example, “Islamic”).
PET will endeavor to follow the recommendations.
An earlier report by a former PET analyst also suggested not using the combination “Muslim terrorists”.
Mehdi Mozzafari, head of the Center for Research in Islamism and Radicalization processes at Aarhus University, says that the intention is good, but that they risk ignoring reality if they don’t call Osama Bin Laden and Islamist terrorist.Â It’s not tenable and Islamism certainly comes out of Islam.
Justice minister Lene Espersen, Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Integration Minister Birthe RÃ¸nn Hornbech refused to say whether they will follow the recommendations.
What Western Security Services should be learning about:
Jihadi spokesman makes clear the purpose of “cease-fires” with infidels
GAZA, Aug. 14 (Xinhua) — Islamic Jihad movement’s armed wing on Thursday said the ceasefire with Israel in Gaza Strip was “fragile and was expected to end at any time.”Â
“We are using the lull to prepare fighters for the coming phase of confrontation,” a spokesman for al-Quds Brigades, the Islamic Jihad’s armed wing, said.
In one short, honest sentence, a simple jihadi declares whatÂ allÂ cease-fires and truces are in essence: time for the weakened jihadis to regroup and prepare “for the coming phase of confrontation” (which, of course, short of world domination, is perpetual, e.g.,Â ‘Umdat al-Salik, 9.16).