Dhimmi News for Dhimmies

20,000 Muslims attack Christian church in Egypt

More disturbing — but telling — details regarding this story. “20,000 Muslims Attack a Church in Cairo,” from AINA, November 26:

One thousand Christians were today trapped inside the Coptic Orthodox Church of the Virgin Mary in West Ain Shams,Cairo, after more than twenty thousand Muslims attacked them with stones and butane gas cylinders. The Church’s priest Father Antonious said that the situation is extremely dangerous.

*  Human rights organizations and lawyers were refused entry into the besieged Church.   Pic’s & Vid’s here

Meanwhile, the Egyptian, and soon to follow, no doubt, Western press, portray this as “sectarian strife” where both sides, Muslims and Christians, are equally guilty of “intolerance.”

Netherlands Plans To Ban Burkas From University – Ministry

THE HAGUE (AFP)–The Netherlands plans to ban face coverings worn by some Muslim women from universities, not only for students but also mothers and anyone else entering the grounds, the Education Ministry said Wednesday. 

Film producer plans dreary, propagandizing Muhammad biopic

As you can see below, Nonie Darwish and I don’t think this film is going to make cinematic history. Raymond posted this article here yesterday, but I didn’t want to let it pass without chiming in as well. “Critics Decry Plans for a Movie Depicting Life of Prophet Muhammad,” by Maxim Lott for FoxNews, 

Shocker in modern, moderate Indonesia: Survey finds most Islamic studies teachers oppose pluralism

Tiny Minority of Extremists Alert. “Most Islamic studies teachers oppose pluralism, survey finds,” by Abdul Khalik for the Jakarta Post, 

God and Allah are not the same:

Malaysia: Eight Islamic groups included as petitioners against Catholic weekly in dispute over use of the word “Allah”

“The interior security minister had prohibited the Herald from using the word ‘Allah’ in its articles, affirming that its use ‘ by non-Muslims could increase tension and create confusion among Muslims in the country’.”

Funny how there’s no concern about creating confusion the other way around. That is because, while Qur’an 29:46says “And argue not with the People of the Scripture unless it be in (a way) that is better, save with such of them as do wrong; and say: We believe in that which hath been revealed unto us and revealed unto you; our Allah and your Allah is One, and unto Him we surrender,” that line of discourse is meant to be part of a one-way conversation: Clearly, a non-Muslim would be forbidden under Islamic law from preaching to Muslims along those lines in favor of another religion.

Still, the excuse of “creating confusion” does not cast the Islamic councils’ opinion of their own faithful in a good light: Are they that prone to confusion and apostasy? Apparently, that matter is one the scholars are willing to sacrifice for the sake of sticking it to the unbelievers.

An update on this story. “Islamic councils against Catholic magazine of Kuala Lumpur: forbidden to use the word ‘Allah’,” from Asia News,

All links with thanks to JW/DW

2 thoughts on “Dhimmi News for Dhimmies”

  1. Myth no.1

    “Allah is the universal name for God in Arabic, so Arabic speaking Christians all do use it in unity with Muslims”.

    Pathetic lie spewed by Muslims for purposes of deception that doped some ignorant Christians into this.

    The truth.

    God in Arabic is “ILAH”, “Allah” is a specific name of a pre-Islamic deity.

    ‘”Allah” is a pre-Islamic name . . . corresponding to the Babylonian Bel’ (Encyclopedia of Religion, I:117 Washington DC, Corpus Pub., 1979).

    For those who find it hard to believe that Allah was a pagan name for a peculiar pagan Arabian deity in pre-Islamic times, the following quotations may be helpful:

    “Allah is found . . . in Arabic inscriptions prior to Islam” (Encyclopedia Britannica, I:643).

    “The Arabs, before the time of Mohammed, accepted and worshipped, after a fashion, a supreme god called Allah” (Encyclopedia off Islam, I:302, Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1913, Houtsma).

    “Allah was known to the pre-Islamic . . . Arabs; he was one of the Meccan deities” (Encyclopedia off Islam, I:406, ed. Gibb).

    “Ilah . . . appears in pre-Islamic poetry . . . By frequency of usage, al-ilah was contracted to Allah, frequently attested to in pre-Islamic poetry” (Encyclopedia off Islam, III:1093, 1971).

    “The name Allah goes back before Muhammad” (Encyclopedia of World Mythology and Legend, I:41, Anthony Mercatante, New York, The Facts on File, 1983).

    “The origin of this (Allah) goes back to pre-Muslim times. Allah is not a common name meaning “God” (or a “god”), and the Muslim must use another word or form if he wishes to indicate any other than his own peculiar deity” (Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, I:326, Hastings).

    To the testimony of the above standard reference works, we add those of such scholars as Henry Preserved Smith of Harvard University who has stated:

    “Allah was already known by name to the Arabs” (The Bible and Islam: or, The Influence of the Old and New Testament on the Religion of Mohammed, New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1897, p. 102).

    Dr. Kenneth Cragg, former editor of the prestigious scholarly journal Muslim World and an outstanding modern Western Islamic scholar, whose works are generally published by Oxford University, comments:

    “The name Allah is also evident in archeological and literary remains of pre-Islamic Arabia” (The Call of the Minaret, New York: Oxford University Press, 1956, p. 31).

    Dr. W. Montgomery Watt, who was Professor of Arabic and Islamic Studies at Edinburgh University and Visiting Professor of Islamic studies at College de France, Georgetown University, and the University of Toronto, has done extensive work on the pre-Islamic concept of Allah. He concludes:

    “In recent years I have become increasingly convinced that for an adequate understanding of the career of Muhammad and the origins of Islam great importance must be attached to the existence in Mecca of belief in Allah as a “high god.” In a sense this is a form of paganism, but it is so different from paganism as commonly understood that it deserves separate treatment” (William Montgomery Watt, Muhammad’s Mecca, p. vii. Also see his article, “Belief in a High God in Pre-Islamic Mecca”, Journal of Semitic Studies, Vol. 16, 1971, pp. 35-40).

    Caesar Farah in his book on Islam concludes his discussion of the pre-Islamic meaning of Allah by saying:

    “There is no reason, therefore, to accept the idea that Allah passed to the Muslims from the Christians and Jews” (Islam: Beliefs and Observations, New York, Barrons, 1987, p. 28).

    According to Middle East scholar E.M. Wherry, whose translation of the Quran is still used today, in pre-Islamic times Allah-worship, as well as the worship of Ba-al, were both astral religions in that they involved the worship of the sun, the moon, and the stars (A Comprehensive Commentary on the Quran, Osnabruck: Otto Zeller Verlag, 1973, p. 36).

    Myth no.2

    “Jesus is rendered Isa from Arabic”

    The truth.

    This one is so obvious it hard to imagine why so many people give Islam & Muslims such a free pass on this. “Isa” is not even close, the correct rendering is “Yashu’a”. Muslims perverted this for good reason, because “Yeshua” [Jesus is a english rendering the Greek trying to say the Hebrew with “Iesous”] has a specific meaning…in exalting the Hebrew/Jewish deity “YHWH our salvation”. The Islamic Isa is nothing that remotely parallels the biblical Jesus. They deny most of His testimony and must claim the bible has been corrupted into exalting Jesus as the only begotten Son of God, shedding His blood, dying on the cross and rising on the third day. They reduce Him as just another prophet along with Muhammad. but actually lower in status, in that Jesus did not deliver the Quran inspiration. Muhammad replaces Jesus as the “perfect man”.

    Just more examples of why Islam is the largest parasite cult in the history of humanity.


    Your comments can also be extended to a significant fraction of scientific and mathematic works claimed by the muslims as their own but in reality done by others.

Comments are closed.