Koran 8:55Â Shakir | Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve… |
From PI:
The Junge SVP submitted  the charge because of racial discrimination and incitement  against the Imam of the mosque in Basel St. Johann, after he  quoted in a documentary from one of its lectures, broadcast on Swiss television. The Imam used a relevant Koranwort (Sure 8.55 -below the fold.)  If the complaint is successful, completely new legal possibilities would arise in dealing with Islam.
al-Anfal (The Spoils of War) 8:55
Here’s the link in German from PI:
Strafanzeige gegen Imam wegen Koranzitats
Transliteration | Inna sharra alddawabbi AAinda Allahi allatheena kafaroo fahum la yu/minoona |
Literal | That the worst walkers/creepers at God (are) those who disbelieved, so they do not believe. |
|
|
Yusuf Ali | For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are those who reject Him: They will not believe. |
Pickthal | Lo! the worst of beasts in Allah’s sight are the ungrateful who will not believe. |
Arberry | Surely the worst of beasts in God’s sight are the unbelievers, who will not believe, |
Shakir | Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve, then they would not believe. |
Sarwar | The most wicked creatures in the sight of God are the unbelievers who never have faith, |
Khalifa | The worst creatures in the sight of GOD are those who disbelieved; they cannot believe. |
Hilali/Khan | Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allah are those who disbelieve, – so they shall not believe. |
H/K/Saheeh | Indeed, the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are those who have disbelieved, and they will not [ever] believe |
Malik | The worst of animals in the sight of Allah are those who reject the truth and do not become believers.[55] |
QXP | The worst among creatures in Allah’s Sight are those who are bent on denying the Truth. They show ingratitude by not using their God-given faculties and thus fail to believe. |
Maulana Ali | Surely the vilest of beasts in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve, then they would not believe. |
Free Minds | The worst creatures to God are those who reject, for they do not believe. |
Qaribullah | Indeed, the basest creatures before Allah are the unbelievers for they will not believe; |
|
|
George Sale | Verily the worst cattle in the sight of God are those who are obstinate infidels, and will not believe. |
JM Rodwell | The worst beasts truly in the sight of God are the thankless who will not believe; |
|
|
Asad | Verily, the vilest creatures in the sight of God are those who are bent on denying the truth and therefore do not believe.`’ |
Go, Switzerland, go!!! And may other European countries go down the same road. At last.
This line of litigation anti-Jihad is not without precedence. I recall a similar suit in India from a while ago, which ended in failure. The SVP would do well to research that Indian case for their trial preparation.
Thanks for the tip Abu Abdullah – Can you post more details – I will see if I can pass these onto their lawyers.
Go to this link for references to the Indian case.
Associate Professor Barbara Baird, head of Flinders University’s Women’s Studies Department, appears from her/his/…whatever profile page to have taken his/ her/…whatever studies to heart.
Yep! That’s queer enough for me.
This is exactly what I’ve been saying all along…We have to start launching suits against Islam, not the people, but the ideology itself.
I have proposed that, if we could get together a crack legal team, I mean one that makes O.J.’s legal tema look like a kindergarten class, and we could draft up a list of teachings from the unholy Koran that could be used to defeat it in a supreme court like the Hague, we may just eliminate it from being practised in the west.
Sound impossible? Nothing is impossible! I have a lot of faith in the human spirit. Christians, Buddhhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Atheists, people of all stripes, could lead the way to a new world of peace without Islam.
This is a very good idea. Now the ground work has to start.
Thanks for the link Abu Abdullah.
It’s true, nothing is impossible. I’m sure there are lawyers who would take on this case pro bono or for a nominal fee.
After all, in a world of sharia there won’t be any use for them, so it’s in their interest to stop its progress.
I will be following the Switzerland case with more than my normal eagle-osity!
By the way Sheik, can you do something with your site so we get an email when somebody posts a comment where we have commented? The news on your site is coming in so thick and fast, it’s easy to lose track of all the postings.
Yeh! Good idea Cecilie.
When I sleep the world keeps reporting in or commenting.
I often miss a reply, or it is ‘Now what article did I reply to last time.’ because it has been churned through.
Things are certainly hotting up on our side.
Notice how quiet the babies are? No more squarking!
Okay, Cecilie.
With the next update we’ll see if we can make this improvement.
I’ll talk to our computer doctor….
Sheik, I’m not sure how difficult it would be but, if its possible, can you change your comments setup to Intense Debate? It makes direct replies easier and you can check your own profile to see if there are replies.
Here’s an example of how it looks –
http://eye-on-the-world.blogspot.com/2010/04/tourist-attacked-by-4-youths-in.html
Okay!
We’ll do it with the next upgrade!
That’s fantastic, sheik!