All your Leonardo’s are belong to us!
“A French writer in the 19th century has evaluated the issue of Da Vinci’s conversion to Islam in a treatise, but the west has banned the publication of this treatise.” Â — No shiite!
Why not?Â ShakespeareÂ Â (sheik Speer) Â was a Muslim (and so wasÂ Hamlet).Â Abraham LincolnÂ was a Muslim. Christopher Columbus was a multiculturalist,Â heavily influenced by Islam. EvenÂ D’ArtagnanÂ of theÂ Three MusketeersÂ converted to Islam. So why not Da Vinci?
Both Islamic supremacists and non-Muslim multiculturalist dhimmis promote this nonsense, albeit for vastly different reasons: the non-Muslims think that by falsifying history and exaggerating the achievements of Muslims and the legacy of Islam, they can show Muslims that they’re welcome in the West, ease the concerns that more sensible non-Muslims have about jihad and Islamization, and prove that they’re not “racist,” “bigoted” and “Islamophobic.” Islamic supremacists, meanwhile, think that these claims advance and demonstrate the superiority of Islam and of Muslims as the “best of nations” (Qur’an 3:110).
Meanwhile, no one is going around claiming that Rumi was actually an Assyrian Christian, or that Suleiman the Magnificent was secretly Greek Orthodox. It manifests a deep cultural inferiority complex to persist in claiming the great figures of other cultures as one’s own.
“Da Vinci was a Muslim?,” from theÂ Ahlul Bayt News Agency, April 9
- Jerusalem, (the cozmic airport) Â was stolen from us … Â it will be restored by resistance— thanks to Mullah
- Syria’s biggest problem is… Jerusalem!
All your profits are belong to us!