Migrants have placed their babies; toddlers and young children on railway tracks in Greece in a bid to blackmail EU authorities into reopening the borders.–BREITBART.COM
As I’ve always said, demographics sneaks up on you. The overall statistical picture for a country is muddled because there’s a high number of elderly natives balanced against a young Muslim population.
Sharia law (Arabic: شريعة) is the body of Islamic law. The term means “way” or ” path”; it is the legalframework within which the public and some private aspects of life are regulated for those living in a legalsystem based on Islam.
Here is the fulcrum around which so much of the problem turns: the belief that Islamic law has every right to be put into practice in non-Muslim countries, and the insistence that a parallel, if unequal, legal system can function alongside civil and criminal law codes adhered to by a majority of a country’s citizens.
Salafism is a form of Islam that insists on the application of whatever was said or done by Muhammad or his companions, brooking no adaptation to changing times, no recognition of democracy or man-made laws.
The greatest expression of this failure to integrate, indeed a determined refusal to do so, may be found in the roughly 750 Muslim-dominated no-go zones in France, which the police, fire brigades, and other representatives of the social order dare not visit for fear of sparking off riots and attacks. Similar zones now exist in other European countries, notably Sweden and Germany. According to the 2011 British census there are over 100 Muslim enclaves in the country.
The Muslim scholars Yusuf al-Qaradawi (left) and Taha Jabir al-Alwani (right) developed a new form of Islamic “jurisprudence of the minorities,” which partly concerns whether non-Muslim countries with large Muslim minorities are still considered the “Realm of War.”
As millions of Muslims flow into Europe, some from Syria, others from as far away as Afghanistan or sub-Saharan Africa, several countries are already experiencing high levels of social breakdown. Several articles have chronicled the challenges posed in countries such as Sweden and Germany. Such challenges are socio-economic in nature: how to accommodate such a large influx of migrants; the rising costs of providing then with housing, food, and benefits, and the expenses incurred by increased levels of policing in the face of growing lawlessness in some areas. If migrants continue to enter European Union countries at the current rate, these costs are likely to rise steeply; some countries, such as Hungary, have already seen how greatly counterproductive and self-destructive Europe’s reception of almost anyone who reaches its borders has been.
The choice is either the survival of Europe and its many unique ethnicities and cultures, or its complete destruction as these unique groups become minorities within their own ancient, native homelands. As Chandan says, the goal is to ‘take back everything they took from us, and more on top.” The choice is yours. Europe or Replacement. You watch, you decide.
In other news:
Migrants lay children across railway tracks demanding ‘racist’ Europe re-opens borders
DESPERATE migrant families laid their own children across railway tracks in an attempt to force European leaders to open their borders.
The motive? Of course! Its nothing-to-do-with-Islam!
This segment is from earlier today, before al-Qaeda claimed responsibility. Robert Spencer speculated in the segment that Boko Haram, aka the Islamic State in West Africa, was behind the attack. In either case, the global jihad advances.
• At least 12 people reportedly killed after attack on hotel in Ivory Coast
• Some reports suggest as many as 15 including a five-year-old
• Two gunmen believed to have entered Etoile du Sud…
Shooting under way at hotel in resort popular with Westerners, according to reports, saying as many as 11 people have been killed by four gunmen—TELEGRAPH.CO.UK
Those in England who deplore its Islamization are afraid to express their thoughts out loud.
Will Britain, will all Europe, fight to remain Western countries? Or, hoisted on their own petard of political correctness, will they simply become vassal states of Islam?
To be or not to be–that is the question.
Prof. Phyllis Chesler
England: Shakespeare’s heroic fairy realm; the world of Blake, Milton, Keats, Byron, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Austen, the Brontes, George Eliot, Charles Dickens, and Virginia Woolf.
England: The country of William Wilberforce, who successfully fought to abolish the slave trade; the land of the bravest suffrage movement anywhere; Churchill’s own country–that fair and glorious Kingdom is still there but it is also fraying, fading away.
I’ve just returned from a visit to this storied Isle. I saw the most sublime production of “The Tempest” at The Sam Wanamaker/Globe Theater; a wondrous production of “As You LIke It” at the National Theater; and a riveting performance of Bellini’s opera about the Druid priestess, “Norma,” at the Coliseum. Every seat was filled by Brits of all ages. High Culture still lives on there–and yet, London is no longer as I first encountered it in 1961 or again, in 1969, or even in 1989.
Now, all London only dares whisper about the Arab and Muslim takeover of their city. Nearly every single luxury hotel is owned by the Sultan of Brunei, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia as is the historic department store Harrods. (Dodi Al-Fayed’s father, an Egyptian, bought it long ago when he envisioned his son marrying Princess Diana, the mother of the future King of England).
PHOTO: Australian Liberty Alliance party director Debbie Robinson (C) with candidates Bernard Gaynor (L) and Kiralee Smith. (ABC News: Charlotte Hamlyn)
The head of a new anti-Islamic Australian political party says members are vilified as bigots and shut down in mainstream channels if they speak out against the religion.
The Australian Liberty Alliance (ALA) had its WA launch on Saturday night at the Perth Convention Centre, calling for an end to “Islamisation of Australia” and guarantees of free speech, finishing one leg of what organisers said was a national tour leading up to the next federal election.
Almost 200 hundred people attended the event, which had Senate candidates from across the state address the crowd on their policies and values.
ALA director and WA Senate candidate Debbie Robinson said members were all passionate about their beliefs and deserved the right to express them.
“If this is not allowed to progress through the normal democratic, political channels, and people are constantly told that they’re not understanding Islam, you don’t know what you’re talking about, one day there will be anarchy,” she said.
“I’m not saying anyone here would do that.”
These people here … they’re not a bunch of redneck racist bogans, they’re very informed intelligent people, they understand completely what Islam is about, and we’re being talked to like fools.
Listen to Soddy Barbaria’s al Jubeir, grand master of taqiyya and Islam-apologies:
In response to a question generalizing Islam’s role in the Islamic State (ISIS), Saudi Foreign Minster Abdel al-Jubeir claims that every religion has extremist “perverts and psychopaths” that seek to hi-jack them, and that categorizing extremists and moderates in any religion is dangerous.
No one tried to set al-Jubair straight. No one bothered to tell al Jubair that Islam is the religion of hijackers, that we are not concerned about other extremist “perverts and psychopaths”, and that the world is in fear of Islam.
Al Jubair invokes the KKK. But the KKK doesn’t claim to be Christian and its members don’t quote from the bible. Besides, they are nothing but a marginal group. If they had a billion members, things might be different.
Yes the Qu’ran says “you have your faith and I have mine”, which is a Meccan verse from the days when Muhammad had no power. Later, in Medina, where Muhammad became a powerful warlord, it became “kill the unbelievers wherever you find them”. The previous verse is abrogated and serves only to confuse gullible kafirs. The later verse is the one that matters.
No, in Saudi Arabia no one is free to practice their faith unless they are sunni Muslims; non Muslims are not allowed to visit Mecca. That is not “a sign of great tolerance”, that is barbarian intolerance.
Then he cites the “innocent soul” verse, 5:32, which is a warning to Jews not to kill Muslims, because only Muslims are innocent. Al Jubeir conveniently ignores the the next verse Quran 5:33.
There is no compassion or mercy in this. The OT says indeed ‘an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’, but no one in the west lives by the OT and again, nobody bothered to tell al Jubair.
But no, they let him go on, with his “I caution people…” which is a threat, and with his gibberish about “the Islamic civilisation that preserved… whatever Muslims say it preserved… blah blah…
No. Islam preserved nothing. Islam destroyed all the remnants of the Jahiliyya, and then it destroyed the evidence that remained. That is a constant throughout 1400 years of Islamic history, and the Islamic state, “Dash”, did exactly that in Palmyra. The history of the Greeks and Rome was not “passed on” by Muslims, and the “Islamic Arab civilisation” did not connect China with Europe. Islam did not “preserve Aristotle and Sokrates” and it did not “pass it on to the west. These are fantastic Arab fairytales, and we should not give Arab savages the light of day for peddling these lies.
‘This is our house’ French protestors take control of bridges
The group took over bridges with burning barrels and banners claiming they are ‘defending’ their city and calling for an end to the ‘invasion of Europe’.Génération Identitaire said a group of 130 were involved in the rally against mass migration.
A statement from the group said European leaders have failed to protect people on both sides of the refugee crisis.
Jonathan Power and the “Expressio Unius…” by Hugh Fitzgerald
(“… to express one thing is to exclude another.”)
Here’s a guy who sold out to the Arabs. He tells us that Karen Armstrong is “an authority” (of what?) and peddles the “Islam is defensive” meme. He fantasises about “murderous bombs” and suggests “Islam is not violent because most Muslims don’t commit acts of violence”
Mohammed’s last order was to “respect and give gifts (bribery) to the foreign delegations as you have seen me dealing with them.”
Bribery to further the ends of Islam is normative Islam, rather than an aberration.
Jonathan Power, a well-known foreign-affairs columnist for the past 30 years, whose work now appears in 40 papers, has latterly become a prominent Defender of the Faith (that faith being Islam), and has just produced one more of those bizarre defenses of Islam that we long-suffering Infidels keep receiving, world without end.
In his latest piece, Power asks rhetorically “Is Islam Violent?” and attempts to convince readers that the only conceivable answer, in a world reeling from Muslim violence everywhere you turn, is the counterintuitive “No.”
In his very first paragraph, Power offers what is clearly meant to demonstrate that he recognizes that some examples of Muslim violence can be found, and he lists a few for us. It’s not a list, however, intended to suggest that “this is only a small sample” of Muslim violence, but rather, a disingenuous attempt to disarm potential critics. It’s what he leaves out that’s important.
Here’s that first paragraph:
Is Islam violent? ISIS in Syria and Iraq. In Pakistan, there is the Lashkar-e-Taiba, and the attempted murderer of the schoolgirl, Malala Yousafzai. Immigrant Moroccan men roughly pushing women and fondling them in the crowd in Cologne. Murderous bombs in Paris.
Let’s take those sentences and incomplete sentences, one by one.
