Mecca Watch: World should tick to Mecca time, because Mecca is the true centre of the world…

“The English imposed GMT on the world when Britain was a big colonial power, its about time for that to change…”

BBC

mecca.jpg

Muslim scientists and clerics have called for the adoption of Mecca time to replace GMT, arguing that the Saudi city is the true centre of the Earth.

*   “Saudi scientists..” what have they ever discovered? Any idea?


Mecca is the direction all Muslims face when they perform their daily prayers.

schweinchenuhr.jpg
The call was issued at a conference held in the Gulf state of Qatar under the title: Mecca, the Centre of the Earth, Theory and Practice.
One geologist argued that unlike other longitudes, Mecca’s was in perfect alignment to magnetic north.
He said the English had imposed GMT on the rest of the world by force when Britain was a big colonial power, and it was about time that changed.

images22.jpeg

 Sheikh Youssef al-Qaradawy, said modern science had at last provided evidence that Mecca was the true centre of the Earth; proof, he said, of the greatness of the Muslim “qibla” – the Arabic word for the direction Muslims turn to when they pray.
The meeting also reviewed what has been described as a Mecca watch, the brainchild of a French Muslim.

*
The watch is said to rotate anti-clockwise and is supposed to help Muslims determine the direction of Mecca from any point on Earth.
The meeting in Qatar is part of a popular trend in some Muslim societies of seeking to find Koranic precedents for modern science.
It is called “Ijaz al-Koran”, which roughly translates as the “miraculous nature of the holy text”.
The underlying belief is that scientific truths were also revealed in the Muslim holy book, and it is the work of scholars to unearth and publicise the textual evidence.
But the movement is not without its critics, who say that the notion that modern science was revealed in the Koran confuses spiritual truth, which is constant, and empirical truth, which depends on the state of science at any given point in time.

Londonistan mayor defends his jihadist friend Qaradawi

What Quaradawi really wants:

*  Livingstone says that Al-Qaradawi doesn’t support jihad against the West. Apparently the jihad against Israel, in the context of which this great reformist Sheikh has defended suicide attacks, is just fine with Red Ken. “Ken Livingstone defends his extremist backer,” by Aislinn Simpson in the Telegraph (via DW)

Ken Livingstone defended his decision to share a platform with a homophobic Islamic preacher as he and his challenger, Boris Johnson, were neck and neck in the race for the capital yesterday.

Update from the Illustrated PIG:

Red Ken goes whoring for the gay vote

kenpal.jpg

Red Ken Livingstone likes to hunt with the hounds and run with the fox. Last week he was promising the last few parts of London to the Moslems in return for their votes, such is his desperation to cling onto power.

Link to PIG

Yusuf al-Qaradawi has described homosexuality as an “unnatural and evil practice” and said the Koran permitted wife-beating in certain circumstances.

The Qatar-based Egyptian cleric has also advocated the use of Palestinian children as suicide bombers and once claimed that Asian tsunami victims were punished by Allah because their countries were centres of perversion.

But speaking on BBC1’s Politics Show yesterday, the London Mayor insisted he was right to welcome the cleric to City Hall as an “honoured guest” in July 2004. He said that while he did not agree with some of his views, al-Qaradawi did not support terrorism against the West. “He is a man who is prepared to say al-Qa’eda is wrong and to be very strong in that condemnation,” he said….

*

But Boris goes whoring too:

boris.jpg

Boris is everything to all men.

“My grandfather was a Muslim and so was my great-grandfather. I am proud of my Muslim ancestry.”

*  So which bits is Boris proud of? The murders of millions of people? The paedophilia of their prophet? Honour killings? When will Boris tell us?

Boris Johnson submits to Muhammedan overlords:

London mayoral candidate has to say ‘Islam is a religion of peace” — after saying Islam was the problem after 7/7

* Can’t get elected unless you adhere to State Dogma. “Boris defends stance on Islam,” from the Chronicle Live (via DW):

Tory London mayoral candidate Boris Johnson was forced to defend his stance on Islam, insisting he believed it was a “religion of peace”.
Mr Johnson has been criticised for an article he wrote in the wake of the 7/7 London terror attacks in 2005 claiming “Islam is the problem”.

But Mr Johnson said the problem was extremists taking the words of the Koran ‘out of context’.

He said: “The problem is people who wrench out of context quotes from the holy book of Islam, the Koran, and use it to inspire evil in men’s hearts.

“That is a fact that few serious people would deny and we need to tackle the extremists.”

*  Indeed, but few serious people also have noticed that this much-discussed true, peaceful context of the Qur’an’s violent verses has never actually been produced, or that Islamic theological tradition tends to favor a more violent understanding.

But the MCB’s Bunglawussy ain’t buying any:

On his ‘Islamophobia Watch’ website he lists all selected Boris sins, here

* Watch out, Boris: the ummah has a long memory…

*

The War on Brigitte Bardot

By Jacob Laksin
FrontPageMagazine.com

c7602f4d-bc39-4a56-93b5-c6b03e677ed6.gif
In the 1960s, Brigitte Bardot was France’s national icon, a pouty-lipped poster girl for the glories of her home country. So it is sign of how radically times have changed that yesterday’s silver-screen darling is today’s enemy of the people.
Bardot’s “crimes,” such as they are, are straightforward: She has committed the sin of speaking frankly and unapologetically about her country’s hostile Muslim immigrant population and – what is evidently worse – questioning the compatibility of some Muslim religious practices with Western society. Common sense, one might think, or least subjects fit for fruitful debate.

Not in modern France. Last week, the erstwhile cinema siren went on trial on the charge of inciting “racial hatred against Muslims.” If convicted, she could face a two-month suspended prison sentence and nearly $24,000 in fines.

The basis for the charge is utterly bogus. It stems from a letter that Bardot wrote to President Nicolas Sarkozy in 2006, in which she complained about the practices of Islamic immigrants. In particular, Bardot was put off by the ritual of Eid al-Adha, a Muslim feast in which sheep and goats are slaughtered by having their throats slit. A longtime animal-rights activist, Bardot found the practice abominable.

Her mistake was in thinking that she had the freedom to say so. But as France struggles to control a large (Muslims make up nearly ten percent of the country) and increasingly radicalized Muslim population critics of Islamism are finding themselves more actively persecuted by national authorities than the Islamists themselves.

Bardot is a case in point. Her latest legal woes may seem troubling, but they are only the latest battle in a larger war waged by Islamic radicals and their allies to suppress all criticism of Islam and its more militant and anti-Western incarnations. It speaks to the success of these state-backed exercises in intimidation that Bardot has been convicted for “inciting racial hatred” on four separate occasions.

Bardot’s trials, literal and figurative, at the hands of the Fifth Republic’s multicultural enforcers date back to the early 1990s, when she first spoke out against the slaughtering of animals for religious purposes. Although Bardot directed her attacks against Muslims and Jews, it was her criticism of the former that got her branded as a racist. By 1997, Bardot stood convicted on the charge of “inciting racial hatred” after suggesting in the French daily Le Figaro that France was beset by a “foreign over-population,” including with Muslim immigrants.

It was unclear, then as now, how criticism of a non-racial group, in this case Muslims, could be considered “racist.” Nor was it apparent why an issue as fundamental to the welfare of a nation as immigration was suddenly to be deemed off-limits for discussion. But the Orwellian subtext of the case was impossible to miss: There were some things that French citizens simply were not allowed to discuss.

Bardot pointedly ignored the lesson. The following year, she likened the slaughter of animals in Islamic rituals to the throat-slitting favored by Islamic fundamentalists in North Africa, implying that the connection was not coincidental. It was a provocative point, to be sure, but by no means an unreasonable one. Where the world’s leading religions have shed their cruelest tendencies, Islam as practiced in much of the world – one need only recall the gruesome decapitation murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl – retains its more savage elements.


117_1784.JPG
In any case, criticizing religious practices would seem to be entirely consistent with European free-speech statutes, especially in anticlerical France. And, indeed, a lower court initially found Bardot’s comments to be protected by free-speech laws. That was too much for an appeals court, however, and before long it reversed the decision and slapped Bardot with a fine. Free speech was a fine thing, apparently, so long as it didn’t offend Muslims.

It would not be the last time that Bardot incurred the wrath of French censors. In 2000, she was again convicted of “racist” thought crimes for writing what she called an “Open Letter to My Lost France,” in which she raised concerns about Muslim immigration. As on past occasions, the merits of her concerns were not specifically examined, their focus on Muslims being deemed sufficient proof their unacceptability for public discussion – this even as French banlieues, home to unassimilated Muslim immigrants, seethed with the violent hatred that would erupt in riots across France in 2005.

Bardot was undaunted. In 2003, she again ran afoul of “anti-racism laws” when she published A Cry in the Silence, a book decrying what she called “the Islamisation of France,” and pointing out the obvious ties between the September 11 attacks and Islamic extremism. In that book, Bardot also cautioned against the dangers of rubbishing Western freedoms to accommodate political sensitivities. “For 20 years we have submitted to a dangerous and uncontrolled underground infiltration,” she wrote. “Not only does it fail to give way to our laws and customs. Quite the contrary, as time goes by it tries to impose its own laws on us.” As if to demonstrate her point, French authorities proceeded to fine her 5,000 euros for offending Muslims. (Revealingly, Bardot’s views proved far more popular among the French public, which turned A Cry of Silence into a bestseller.)

To understand just how sinister are the attacks on Bardot it is useful to consider the group that repeatedly has brought suit against her, the Movement Against Racism And For Friendship Between Peoples (MRAP). Inaccurately called a human-rights group, the MRAP is in fact an aggressive silencer of free-speech.

Its most famous contribution to French political life was to thwart the sale of the late Oriana Fallaci’s 2002 book, Anger and Pride, on the grounds that it supposedly incited racial hatred against Muslims. Similarly, when Bardot published A Cry in the Silence in 2003, the MRAP pronounced it “unacceptable,” thus appointing itself the arbiter of what French citizens should and should not be allowed to read.

But of course groups like the MRAP would be inconsequential were it not for the dangerous proclivity of the French legal establishment for treating their fictitious allegations of racism with unmerited seriousness. In this context, it was illuminating when a French prosecutor last week called for unusually stiff penalties against Bardot in the current case against the actress because she was a “bit tired of trying Madame Bardot.” How much easier it would be for that civil servant and countless others like her if nuisances like Bardot would simply surrender their right to speak freely.

Bardot may not be the most artful of social commentators, but then she doesn’t need to be. Nothing demonstrates the prescience of her warnings – not least her warning about the dangers of sacrificing Western liberties to accommodate the extreme demands of hostile minority groups – so much as the ongoing efforts of the French state to silence the woman it once hailed as an idol.

2002602824.jpg

German 'Islam Expert': "Islam is easier to deal with, the less you interfere"

*  Germany’s version of John Esposito or just another useful idiot?

*  In the spirit of “lie down and let them rape you, it won’t hurt a bit…”

‘Muslims Have a Right to Be Different’

01020112349800.jpg
Islam expert Dietrich Reetz of Berlin’s Center for Modern Oriental Studies (ZMO) speaks to SPIEGEL about Muslims in Germany, social tensions and the prospects for dialogue between the communities.

01020115564000.jpg

* Looks like the ‘Islam Expert’ at the  ‘Center for Modern Oriental Studies’ needs some urgent history lessons…

Link

*

Bunglawussy Worries

 inayat_bunglawala.jpg

* Inayat Bunglawala,  spokesman for the MCB, is keeping a keen eye on the upcoming election in Londonistan. The Bungla knows what is at stake: its  unlikely that  the MCB will ever get a better friend than Red Ken Livingstone, who sold his soul to the mob ummah. The Islamic propaganda machine is spinning like an Iranian centrifuge.

richard_littlejohn.jpg

* Richard Littlejohn at the Daily Mail shows that there are still some Englishmen left who stand up and call a spade a spade: he doesn’t mince words and tells it like it is: Importing a Muhammedan proletariat to replace the natives may have not been the greatest idea to establish a socialist utopia after all.

images20.jpeg

*  The egregious George Galloway sees nothing short of  “a counter-revolution against the progressive stances which Livingstone has adopted against racism and Islamophobia”

ken-livingstone_trash.jpg

Red Ken: there’s method in his vileness

This column has long argued that mass, uncontrolled immigration was a deliberate policy to secure electoral advantage for Labour.

* Spiegel: The Bizarre Fight to Be Mayor of London

Back in 1987, after Mrs Thatcher’s third victory, Labour concluded it could no longer rely on the old white working class.

So it decided that it would import a new working class, which would then return the favour by loyally voting Labour.

This was part of a wider strategy that also included the creation of a vast client state and putting as many members of the middle classes as possible on the payroll. It’s now coming to fruition in the London mayoral elections.

There are 350,000 new voters on the electoral roll in the capital, most of them immigrants.

There’s also a huge Muslim vote. Ken Livingstone reckons that 200,000 of them will swing it for him.

So he’s sent his goons into mosques to rustle up support and lavished hundreds of thousands of pounds in grants on Muslim organisations.

One of his most dedicated cheerleaders in the Islamic community is a big fan of suicide bombings and a supporter of Hamas, which wants to wipe Israel off the map.

Now you know why Livingstone embraces Islamist headbangers, insults Jews and smears anyone who challenges him as a “racist” or “Islamophobe”.


It’s all done with a cynical eye on the ballot box.

Vile he may be, daft he ain’t.

*

Voluntary Dhimmitude in Bradford:

stgeorgepa_228×406.jpg

Cancelled on police advice: St George’s Day parade through the Bradford race-riot zone

“Unfortunately, there’s a fear that someone may have used it to cause violence”

* Hmm. ‘Race riots?’ Really. ‘Someone may use it to cause violence?’ Who would do a thing like that, any idea?

*

Iran: "Law not Islamic enough, more shariah needed.." sez Ayatollah

*  A bit like communism, really. Just worse; like Goebbles “wollt ihr den totalen Islam?” Only more totalitarian Islam can cure this halfassed mullah-thugocracy: (sarc off)

frisk_me.jpg

Iran: Justice tainted by western laws, says ayatollah

Tehran, 18 April(AKI) – Iran’s chief prosecutor, Ayatollah Dori Najafabadi says that his country’s justice is tainted by the west, and does not work.

“Justice in Iran does not work,” the Ayatollah said on Friday. “People are unhappy because our penal code is tainted with principles of western law.”

“If we limited ourselves to follow Islamic legislation, many criminals would not relapse, and many others, in fear, would not commit crimes.”

According to the Ayatollah, a better deterrent would be punishment based on the Islamic Sharia law.

“The criminals’ behaviour would be different if they were punished according to Islamic law with floggings and cutting of limbs,” said the Ayatollah during an interview with Tehran’s Berna news agency.

“Sharia law does not consider a prison term an effective form of punishment. It is a legacy stemming from western law,” said Najafabadi.

“Criminals, instead of becoming reformed characters, actually improve their criminal techniques and as soon as they are freed, they go back to commit the same crimes,” concluded the chief prosecutor.

1pubicflogpst_468×348.jpg

Saeed Ghanbari receives 80 lashes for abusing alcohol and having sex outside marriage

* More hangings in Iran

In 2007 Iran made more use of the death penalty than any other country other than China, executing 317 people during the year.

More

zawahiri.jpg

“We need more Jihad”, sez Al Zawahiri

“Muslims should turn mosques, schools, factories, universities into “centers of support for jihad”

More

*

"Islam elevates women"- by genital mutilation

Yemeni Parliament votes down bill to outlaw female genital mutilation

* While Islamic spokesmen lie and deny and even blame ‘ indigenous pre-Islamic practices’,  clit-cutting continues and increases, wherever the prophets followers pitch their tents:

liars-11.jpg

 Yusuf Irfan: “Perhaps our imams can remind Indonesian imams that not all vestiges of Indonesia’s indigenous pre-Islamic customs are worth holding onto.”

We keep hearing from Islamic spokesmen in the West how this practice has nothing to do with Islam — and yet Yemen now votes down attempts to outlaw it. Jordan did the same thing a few years ago on another practice that is supposed to be solely cultural: the Parliament voted down attempts to stiffen penalties for it, on Islamic grounds. And here a Yemeni pol explains that since religious authorities haven’t forbidden genital mutilation, they can’t very well outlaw it.

“Yemen’s MPs debate female circumcision, pre-marriage tests,”

from the Yemen Times via DW

*
SANA’A, April-13 — Preventing female circumcision and pre-marriage medical tests evoked turmoil and disagreement among Parliament members (MPs) in last week’s session.
The session ended with a unanimous agreement to cancel the term 3, which would prevent female circumcision, and delay the discussion of pre-marriage tests.

The two terms were part of a draft written by the Safe Motherhood Law Project, and introduced by the heath committee inside Parliament.

Najeb Ghanem, the Chairman of the Health Committee in Parliament, expressed his sorrow over the way Parliament discussed the two issues.

“These two topics are very important for guaranteeing women’s rights in Yemen,” he commented in a phone call to the Yemen Times after the session.

According to Ghanem, who belongs to the Islah party, most of the MPs who disagreed with the terms represent the conservative attitudes of most Yemeni citizens. “The committee is aware of the Yemeni conservative community’s positions on these issues. So we [the committee] suggested applying the law of emphasizing pre-marriage medical tests after ten years… that is after we carry out extensive awareness campaign to educate people about the importance of such tests.”

Zid Al-Shami, an MP who suggested delaying the approval of the two terms, confirmed that such topics are “sensitive and need more awareness.”

“I suggested canceling term number three, about preventing female circumcision, for many reasons. First, the term, which was written in the draft, included inappropriate and shameful sentences. Second, female circumcision exists in few regions in Yemen, like in Hodeidah and Hadramout, so it not common practice. And finally, there is still religious debate regarding the issue, so as we have no directives by the heads of religion to forbid female circumcision, we do not have the right to ban it,” Al-Shami explained….

42269447_82cbd77492.jpg

Update:

For Kurdish Girls, a Painful Ancient Ritual

 “We don’t know why we do it, but we will never stop because Islam and our elders require it.”

By Amit R. Paley
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, December 29, 2008; A09

 

TUZ KHURMATU, Iraq

Sheelan Anwar Omer, a shy 7-year-old Kurdish girl, bounded into her neighbor’s house with an ear-to-ear smile, looking for the party her mother had promised.

There was no celebration. Instead, a local woman quickly locked a rusty red door behind Sheelan, who looked bewildered when her mother ordered the girl to remove her underpants. Sheelan began to whimper, then tremble, while the women pushed apart her legs and a midwife raised a stainless-steel razor blade in the air. “I do this in the name of Allah!” she intoned.

As the midwife sliced off part of Sheelan’s genitals, the girl let out a high-pitched wail heard throughout the neighborhood. As she carried the sobbing child back home, Sheelan’s mother smiled with pride.

“This is the practice of the Kurdish people for as long as anyone can remember,” said the mother, Aisha Hameed, 30, a housewife in this ethnically mixed town about 100 miles north of Baghdad. “We don’t know why we do it, but we will never stop because Islam and our elders require it.”

Kurdistan is the only known part of Iraq –and one of the few places in the world–where female circumcision is widespread. More than 60 percent of women in Kurdish areas of northern Iraq have been circumcised, according to a study conducted this year. In at least one Kurdish territory, 95 percent of women have undergone the practice, which human rights groups call female genital mutilation.

The practice, and the Kurdish parliament’s refusal to outlaw it, highlight the plight of women in a region with a reputation for having a more progressive society than the rest of Iraq. Advocates for women point to the increasing frequency of honor killings against women and female self-immolations in Kurdistan this year as further evidence that women in the area still face significant obstacles, despite efforts to raise public awareness of circumcision and violence against women.

“When the Kurdish people were fighting for our independence, women participated as full members in the underground resistance,” said Pakshan Zangana, who heads the women’s committee in the Kurdish parliament. “But now that we have won our freedom, the position of women has been pushed backwards and crimes against us are minimized.”

Zangana has been lobbying for a law in Kurdistan, a semiautonomous region with its own government, that would impose jail terms of up to 10 years on those who carry out or facilitate female circumcision. But the legislation has been stalled in parliament for nearly a year, because of what women’s advocates believe is reluctance by senior Kurdish leaders to draw international public attention to the little-noticed tradition.

The Kurdish region’s minister of human rights, Yousif Mohammad Aziz, said he didn’t think the issue required action by parliament. “Not every small problem in the community has to have a law dealing with it,” he said.

The practice of female circumcision is extremely rare in the Arab parts of Iraq, according to women’s groups. They say it is not clear why the practice — common in some parts of Africa and the Middle East — became popular with Iraqi Kurds but not Iraqi Arabs.

Supporters of female circumcision said the practice, which has been a ritual in their culture for countless generations, is rooted in sayings they attribute to the prophet Muhammad, though the accuracy of those sayings is disputed by other Muslim scholars. The circumcision is performed by women on women, and men are usually not involved in the procedure. In the case of Sheelan, her mother informed her father that she was going to have the circumcision performed, but otherwise, he played no role.

Kurds who support circumcising girls say the practice has two goals: It controls a woman’s sexual desires, and it makes her spiritually clean so that others can eat the meals she prepares.

“I would not eat food from the hands of someone who did not have the procedure,” said Hurmet Kitab, a housewife who said she was 91 years old.

Kitab, who lives in the village of Kalar in Kurdistan’s eastern Germian area, where female circumcision is prevalent, has had the procedure done on herself and all her daughters. When asked if she would have her 10-month-old granddaughter Saya circumcised, Kitab said “Of course” and explained that the procedure is painless.

“They just cut off a little bit,” she said, flicking her finger at the top part of a key, which she then dropped on the floor.

Women’s rights groups in Kurdistan are working eagerly to change the perception that the procedure is harmless and that it is required under Islam. They go to villages in rural areas where the practice is most ingrained and tell women and religious leaders of the physical and psychological damage the circumcision can cause. Health experts say the procedure can result in adverse medical consequences for women, including infections, chronic pain and increased risks during childbirth.

Ghamjeen Shaker, a 13-year-old from the Kurdish capital of Irbil, said she is still traumatized from the day she was circumcised. She sits with her legs clenched together and her hands clasped tightly on her lap, as if protecting herself from another operation. Indeed, Shaker says she sometimes dreams that the midwife who circumcised her is coming back to perform the procedure again.

She was 5 when her mother sent her out to buy parsley and then locked her in the front yard of their home with six other girls. “I knew something bad was going to happen, but I didn’t know exactly where they were going to cut,” she recalled. “My family just kept saying, don’t worry, this is a social custom we have been doing forever.”

“They pinned me to the ground, and I just cried and cried,” said Shaker, who spoke barely above a whisper. “I was just so astonished. But now I realize that they want to prevent women from living their lives normally.”

Her mother, Shukria Ismaeel Jarjees, a 38-year-old housewife, said she was forced by her relatives and elderly women in the community to have her daughter circumcised. “I made a huge mistake, and now my daughter is always complaining of pain in her pelvis,” Jarjees said. Her eyes began to fill with tears. “I now advise my daughters to never circumcise their children.”

Shaker hopes to become a social worker focusing on women’s issues, in particular other girls traumatized by female circumcision.

“I want to make sure the world understands they cannot silence girls like this,” she said.

Susan Faqi Rasheed, president of the Irbil branch of the Kurdistan Women’s Union, said that even in the cosmopolitan capital, as many as a third of young girls are circumcised. “When the Kurds hold on to something, they hold on to it strongly,” she said. “So now they hold to Islam more than the Arabs.”

One of the religious leaders who have been less vocal in demanding female circumcisions is Hama Ameen Abdul Kader Hussein, preacher at the Grand Mosque of Kalar and head of the clergymen’s union in Germian. Previously, he preached that female circumcision was required. Now he says it is optional, which Hussein believes has caused the area’s rate of female circumcision to drop from 100 percent to about 50 percent.

“If there is any harm in this exercise,” he said, “we should not do it.”

Despite the outreach efforts, a study of women in more than 300 Kurdish villages by WADI, a German nongovernmental group that advocates against female circumcision, found that 62 percent underwent the procedure.

In Tuz Khurmatu, the most famous practitioner of female circumcision is Maharoub Juwad Nawchas, a 40-year-old midwife with traditional Kurdish tattoos covering her chin. She learned from her mother, who used to perform the procedure for free, though Nawchas now charges 4,000 Iraqi dinars, or just under $3.50, because her husband is disabled and can’t work. She has circumcised about 30 girls a year for the past two decades.

On the day she circumcised Sheelan, the midwife began the ritual by laying down an empty white potato sack to serve as her working area. AK-47 assault rifles hung from the wall of the dingy concrete house, and watermelons rested below.

When Sheelan entered the room, her mother, Nawchas and a local woman placed the girl on a tiny wooden stool the size of a brick. The midwife applied yellow antiseptic to her pelvic area and injected her with lignocaine, an anesthetic. Little children peeked through the window to see what the noise was about.

“It’s all right, it’s all right,” Sheelan’s mother whispered, as the girl screamed so loudly her face turned red. She tried to bunch up her skirt over her pelvis and shield the area with her hand, but the women jerked her arms back.

Then Nawchas uttered the prayer, made a swift cut, and immediately moved the girl over a pile of ashes to control the bleeding.

The entire ritual took less then 10 minutes.

Back home, Sheelan lay on the floor, unable to move or talk much. She clutched a bag filled with orange soda and candy and barely said anything except that she was in pain.

But she became more animated when asked whether it was worth it to have the operation so her friends and neighbors would be comfortable eating food she prepared. “I would do anything not to have this pain, even if meant they would not eat from my hands,” she rasped slowly.

“I just wish that I could be the way I was before the procedure,” she said.

Staff photographer Andrea Bruce and special correspondents Nian Ahmed and Dlovan Brwari contributed to this report.

UK Jihad: sensitive police raids cause a few blasts

More blasts at home of man held under terror laws

cops-11.jpg

Bomb disposal experts carried out two more controlled explosions Saturday at the Bristol home of a 19-year-old man arrested under anti-terrorism laws.

Dozens of people from surrounding houses in Comb Paddock, Bristol were evacuated after the arrest of the man, reportedly a recent convert to Islam.

Police have until next Thursday to question the man who was held after a tip-off. Officers say their investigation is likely to be long and complex.

“This is a genuine incident which we are taking extremely seriously,” said assistant chief constable Jackie Roberts of the local police.

“At this stage, I cannot rule out that he was acting alone or that there won’t be further arrests.”

*

First it was Life, then it was 4 1/2 years, now its 14 months:

HATE MUSLIM FREE IN JUST 14 MONTHS

britain_muslims_lon128.jpg

ANGER erupted last night after it was revealed hate preacher Abu Izzadeen – jailed for four and a half years for terror-related offences – could be out in just 14 months.
Izzadeen and fellow Brit-born Muslim convert Simon Keeler were found guilty of inciting terrorism and fundraising for it.

The charges related to a series of rabble-rousing speeches made at a London mosque by the two men.

Izzadeen, infamous for verbally attacking Home Secretary John Reid, was born Trevor Brooks to Jamaican parents. He told young Muslims it was their duty to join “holy war”.

He also raised cash for attacks on British and US troops and praised the 9/11 plotters.

With good behaviour Izzadeen and Keeler will only have to serve half their sentences. Izzadeen could be out in 14 months as he has already served 352 days.

Rose Gentle, whose son Gordon, 19, was killed in Iraq, said last night: “It’s very sad if he’s called on people to kill our soldiers who are trying to help the people of Iraq.

“It’s a very short sentence. He’s just going to come out and start trying to recruit more people in a few years.”

Keeler, 36, received the same sentence as Izzadeen, who was 33 yesterday and lived off benefits.

Abdul Saleem, 31, also found guilty at Kingston Crown Court of inciting terrorism, was jailed for three years, nine months.

Ibrahim Hassan, 25, was given two years, nine months for the same charge.

Abdul Muhid, 24, found guilty of fundraising for terrorists, was jailed for two years. It will begin when he has completed an earlier jail term for soliciting murder during protests.
Shah Jalal Hussain, 24, absconded while the jury was deliberating, but handed himself in at court yesterday.

He was sentenced to two years for his part in the fundraising charge and three months, to be served consecutively, for breaking his bail conditions.

Judge Nicolas Price told the defendants they had “abused” the freedom to express views in a democracy.

He told Keeler: “You are someone with extremist and dangerous views.”

He and Izzadeen were both sentenced to two and a half years for fundraising and four and half years for inciting terrorism overseas, to be served concurrently.

*  Update from the ‘poverty breeds terrorism’ department:

A 19-year-old British Muslim whose father works as an NHS consultant has been questioned by terrorist squad officers after they found a bomb at his home.

The Daily Telegraph has learned that Mr Ibrahim’s father, Nassif, is a consultant pathologist at the Frenchay Hospital in Bristol. He qualified as a doctor in Egypt. His wife, Victoria, is from West Yorkshire.

The couple have another son, Peter, 25, and live in an £800,000 detached home with a walled garden on a private road in the smart suburb of Frenchay. Mr Ibrahim said last night: “I can’t talk about this.”

* Why Not, Mr Ibrahim?

Read it all

*

"Islam teaches respect for women"

“Islam elevates women”

hang4a-11.jpg

“In some instances, ignorance allows you to retain power”

From Jihad Watch:

Islamic spokesmen in the West routinely claim that non-Muslims are only suspicious of Muslim intentions out of “ignorance” of the true, peaceful Islam. This, of course, goes hand-in-hand with the idea that it is not Muslims, but non-Muslims (like Geert Wilders in Fitna), who are responsible for linking Islam with violence. This approach deftly shifts the focus away from acts of violence committed by Muslims in the name of Islam, and onto the alleged “Islamophobes” who are supposedly victimizing Muslims by connecting Islam with violence.

Anyway, today in The Ranger Online, a publication of San Antonio College and Alamo Community College, there is an article entitled “Islam teaches respect for women” by Martin R. Herrera. It reports on a lecture series held on women in the Islamic world.

Meneses and the other two women on the panel, Aurora Deiri and Narjis Pierre, acknowledged conditions for women vary from country to country but they stem largely from the culture that existed prior to Islam’s spread throughout the world and the nuances of varied interpretations of the theology.


Deiri likened it to the subtleties of the many Christian faiths that exist today.

Except for extreme instances of disparity, which Meneses said is becoming more rare, Islam has pushed women’s rights sooner and more significantly than Christianity. “If you ask me if there is any feminism in the Muslim world I say … it is in the Muslim world,” Pierre said.

It is difficult for the Western world to see this, Deiri said, because there is very limited understanding of the Islamic religion.

This ignorance causes people to misinterpret some of the external practices of Muslims that Westerners often cite as oppressive, she said, such as the wearing of head scarves by women.

When asked how Christianity and Islam can be so far apart today when they have so much they share in common ancestry, Deiri replied, “In some instances, ignorance allows you to retain power.”

o31a8vv3.jpg

“Women in Malaysia, in spite of the laws of Islam, have considerable power in Malay society, and more freedom than their sisters in the Middle East.”

*
So any oppression of women in the Islamic world is simply a remnant of pre-Islamic culture, and Islam has been better for women than Christianity. It is doubtful that Deiri mentioned any of this:

Rather than regarding women as human beings equal to men, the Qur’an likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will” (2:223).

The Qur’an also declares that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man: “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her” (2:282).

It allows men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls also: “If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice” (4:3).

It rules that a son’s inheritance should be twice the size of that of a daughter: “Allah (thus) directs you as regards your children’s (inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females” (4:11).

Worst of all, the Qur’an tells husbands to beat their disobedient wives: “Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them” (4:34).

It allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated” (65:4).

womenfleecmp30capt_1000565819pakistan_afghanistan.jpg

None of that is cultural. Nor is reporting on it, or on how women still suffer from these and other Islamic teachings, a matter of “ignorance.” In fact, paradoxically enough, it is Deiri and others like her who are spreading genuine ignorance by ignoring, denying, and downplaying all this. And indeed, ignorance allows you to retain power — in light of that precise and apposite statement, it is important to ask: to what end is Deiri retailing these half-truths and distortions? What power are people who do this trying to retain?

* Earlier this month we had a similar article on this subject featuring the pathological BS-peddler Yusuf Irfan who suggested that Australian imam’s should instruct Indonesians to drop their “pre-Islamic clit cutting”. Hubris, lies and BS  seem to be inseparable from this mad cult…

1_61_041608_arrangeddivorce.jpg

Update: Eight-Year-Old Girl Divorces Husband From Arranged Marriage

* Those who believe this thing is over will be in for a surprise: little Nojud may have gotten her divorce, but its unlikely that she can go back to her family, because that would call for an ‘honor killing…’

An eight-year-old Yemeni girl was granted a divorce from an arranged marriage she was forced into in just the second grade.

Nojud Mohammed Ali said she was forced to marry under an agreement reached between her unemployed father and 28-year-old former husband, Faez Ali Thameur, earlier this year, AFP reported.

“They asked me to sign the marriage contract and remain in my father’s house until I was 18,” the girl told AFP. “But a week after signing, my father and my mother forced me to go live with him.”

Thameur told a judge that he married Nojud with her consent and her parents’, and that the marriage “was consummated, but I did not beat her.” He did not object to the divorce petition.

Nojud’s father said he married off his daughter with her consent out of fear that she might be kidnapped, as he claimed her two older sisters had been, AFP reported.

Nojud said she has no desire to see her father and will instead live with a maternal uncle.

“I am happy that I am divorced now. I will be able to go back to school,” Nojud told AFP.

Her lawyer compared the case to thousands of others in Yemen, which has no minimum age of marriage. She said advocates are pushing for laws that would make 18 the minimum age of marriage.

*

* Spencer: Oh, then I guess Muslim women really do have equal rights

*

Yemen: Al Qaeda-sheikh claims he found cure for AIDS

An Al-Qaida sheikh who  sports a red beard and hides in Yemen is claiming to have discovered the cure for Aids from a Hadith.

* As we all know, Yemen is a hotbed of scientific development…

* Your chance to get rich: buy shares in camel urine corp. now! 

Fatwa over printing of holy names on bottles of urine samples

* Thanks to Michael 

By Afkar Abdullah (Kaleej Times) from the ‘Islam is a mental disorder’ department:

DUBAI — A fatwa has been issued by Dubai Islamic Affairs Department (DIAD) to ban printing of names that include the 99 names of Almighty God such as Abdul Rahman, Abdullah, Abdul Salam as well as names of prophets and saints on the labels of sample bottles provided by hospitals and laboratories to the patients.

doggie-art-1024.jpg

A top official at DIAD said the fatwa bans writing or printing the name of Almighty God on stool or urine samples desecrates the glorious names of God.

The DIAD advised the hospitals and laboratories to write the file number of the patients on the bottles. 

The DIAD has alerted the Ministry of Health and Dubai Department of Health and Medical Services (DOHMS) to implement the decision in order to stop this practice immediately.

The official explained that “Asma-ul Husnaa” means the Excellent Names of Allah, which are also known as the 99 Attributes of God that are considered glorious and sacred.