Islamic Immigration: "we're coming to blow you away, haha…"

Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration

(American Thinker)

This immigration is not to a romanticized melting pot wherein newcomers gratefully search for opportunities for a better life in liberty and freely offer their talents and loyalty to benefit their new homeland.

IMG_0002

Shem’s latest cartoon. You like?

The Hijra

By Janet Levy

Within the past few decades, mosques have increasingly dotted the landscapes of American and European cities and towns, with mega mosques often overshadowing adjacent, centuries-old churches in predominantly Christian regions.  Islamic schools or academies and a host of Muslim organizations have become omnipresent across the West.

Meanwhile, Americans and Europeans have made countless accommodations to Muslim demands. They have included footbaths; high-decibel, five-times-daily calls to prayer; segregated male-female gym and swimming pool hours; halal food; workplace dispensations for handling pork products and for female head and face coverings; and special, public prayer rooms. Also, shari’ah-compliant financial transactions, the expunging of offensive likenesses of Mohammed or imagined depictions of Arabic characters that connote “Allah,” official swearings-in on Korans in place of customary Bibles, the neutralizing of official descriptive language about Islamists and the jihad, the revision of so-called offensive content in movies and television programs, the removal of representations of pigs from the public sphere, and many other acculturations to Muslim entreaties have all been made in the service of respecting Muslim religious beliefs and practices.

To those in Western democracies, these accommodating actions appear, on the surface, to be little more than harmless civil gestures, respecting the needs of a growing religion in their midst and welcoming a new addition to their proud, multicultural tradition.  Many Westerners pat themselves on the back for their liberal bent, their tolerance and their open-mindedness.

Continue reading Hijra

News links:

Continue reading Islamic Immigration: "we're coming to blow you away, haha…"

Question 1 for Solkhar: Who Gets The 72 Virgins Now?

“My Allah is better than yours”

Photos of 72 Virgins

Andrew Bolt: Jihad against jihadists. Allah confused

My fundamentalist Islamist state is better than yours:

DIVISIONS within the Palestinian side of politics reached crisis point yesterday after 24 people were killed and more than 100 wounded in a seven-hour shoot-out in the Gaza Strip between Hamas and hardline Islamists linked to al-Qa’ida.

Security officers from Hamas, which runs Gaza, moved against Jund Ansar Allah – also known as Jihadi Soldiers of God, or Soldiers of the Partisans of God – after its leader Sheik Abdel-Latif Moussa, declared Gaza was “an Islamic emirate”.

Now, if Israel had attacked those jiahidsts… But when it’s Muslims yet again killing Muslims, it’s barely a story…

Kuwait: Muslim takes 2 maids home for trial, rapes and returns them next day…

“Not fit for the job..!”

Arab Times

Kuwait : A man in charge of a maid recruiting agency has accused a Kuwaiti citizen of raping two Eritrean maids recruited by him, reports Al-Shahid.
In a case registered at the Jahra police station, the man said the citizen had come to his office and taken the girls on a trial basis. The citizen had promised to transfer their residence if their work was good. The man said he was surprised when the citizen returned the maids the next day claiming they were not fit for the job, taking advantage of the maids’ inability to understand Arabic. After he left the two maids revealed they were raped by the Kuwaiti and his friend.
Investigations are underway to find and arrest the citizen and his friend.

Women in Islam: Zaynab and the Beast - Mumin Salih

  • Op-Ed: Somalia and Christian Martyrs Killed by Muslims - Lee Jay Walker

  • Op-Ed: Is ‘Petro Jihad’ Behind Western Abandoning of Iran’s Uprising? - Dr. Walid Phares

  • Satire: The Search for Yaser Abdel Said (part 24) - Denis Schulz

  • Jihad & Terrorism: Islamists: ‘Moderate Muslims are fair game’ - Acharya S/D.M. Murdock

  • Women in Islam: Does Allah really value women? - Poma

  • Apostates: Awakened to Truth - admin

  • Criticism of Islam: Justice in Islam - Ibn Kammuna

  • Op-Ed: U.S. Taxpayers Fund Pro-Hamas Propaganda - Steve Emerson

  • Op-Ed: Al Qaeda Under Pressure and Changing Tactics - Douglas Farah

  • Modernism & Reformism: Arabs’ Language Oppression Squelches Intellectual Growth - Sami Alrabaa

  • Jihad & Terrorism: Nigeria Challenged by Radical Islamists - Lee Jay Walker

  • Articles: Distortion of Indian History for Muslim appeasement, Part 6C - Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari

  • Criticism of Islam: Dennis Prager on Islam (Video) - admin

  • Jihad & Terrorism: Buddhists Fear to Walk in Southern Thailand - Lee Jay Walker

  • Satire: The Search for Yaser Abdel Said (part 23) - Denis Schulz

  • Criticism of Islam: Will Muslims Be The Cause Of The Armageddon? - Mohammad Asghar

  • Politics: No Room for Public in the Islamic Republic - Arash Irandoost

  • Meet Yuman Rites Watch Joe Storck: Marxist, Jew-hating POS

    Infiltration Watch:

    How in the f*#kc did everything get so perverted?

    Who Is Human Rights Watch’s Joe Stork?

    Noah Pollak

    He is, of course, the author of last week’s Human Rights Watch report, which claimed that IDF soldiers murdered white-flag-waving Palestinian civilians in cold blood. He is also the deputy director of HRW’s Middle East and North Africa programs. We already knew from NGO Monitorthat he has—to put it politely—a rather extremist history on all matters Israel.

    But now there is a better accounting. Ben-Dror Yemini of the Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv has a blockbuster article laying out the ugly truth of Stork’s history. The Hebrew is available here; below is a complete English translation. That HRW would place in a senior position someone who has written in explicit support of terrorism against Israel, lauded the murder of Israeli athletes at Munich in 1972 as providing “an important boost in morale among Palestinians,” and stated that “Zionism may be defeated only by fighting imperialism”—this should be the final verdict on a cretinous organization’s already tattered credibility.

    AUTHOR OF REPORT AGAINST ISRAEL SUPPORTED MUNICH MASSACRE
    By Ben-Dror Yemini, Ma’ariv, 16.8.09, p. 13

    Joe Stork, a senior official in Human Rights Watch, which accuses the IDF of killing Palestinians who waved white flags, is a fanatical supporter of the elimination of Israel. He was a friend of Saddam, ruled out negotiations and supported the Munich Massacre, which “provided an important boost in morale among Palestinians.”

    Read it all

    Answering "Islamophobia"

    Islamophobe (is-slahm-o-fohb) – A non-Muslim who knows too much about Islam

    piedocul

    Hugh Fitzgerald:

    The word “Islamophobia” must be held up for inspection, its users constantly asked precisely how they would define that word, and they should be put on the defensive for waving about what is clearly meant to be a scare-word that will silence criticism.
    So let us ask them which of the following criticisms of Islam is to be considered “Islamophobia”:

    1) Muhammad is a role-model for all time. Muhammad married Aisha when she was 6 and had sexual intercourse with her when she was 9. I find appalling that Muslims consider this act of Muhammad to be that of the man who is in every way a role model, and hence to be emulated. In particular, I am appalled that virtually the first act of the Ayatollah Khomeini, a very orthodox and learned Shi’a theologian, was to lower the marriageable age of girls in Iran to 9 — because, of course, it was Aisha’s age when Muhammad had sexual relations with her.

    2) I find appalling that Islam provides a kind of Total Regulation of the Universe, so that its adherents are constantly asking for advise as to whether or not, for example, they can have wear their hair in a certain way, grow their beards in a certain way, wish an Infidel a Merry Christmas (absolutely not!).

    Continue reading Answering "Islamophobia"

    Yale and the dreaded cartoons of blasphemy

    MuhammadCartoon.jpg

    Stand for free speech

    Yale & the Danish Cartoons: The Plot Thickens

    Pajamas Media/Andrew Bolt

    So why did Yale University refuse to publish not only the Danish cartoons, but famous historial images of Muhammad, even when Muslim scholars gave it the go-ahead?

    The suspicion was at first the normal one – that the university was simply too scared to stand up for free speech. ButRoger Kimball digs deeper and smells money….

    When the Danish cartoons were first published I was completely delighted, and then was just flummoxed when nearly all of a cowardly free press failed to publish the cartoons in a show of support for a) freedom of speech and expression, and b) support and protect the cartoon authors.

    The oil-slick princes  of Arabia must be wondering  if there is anything petrodollars can’t buy in a country whose president bowed to a Moslem king as one of his first acts in office:

    Follow the money:

    …energetic investigative reporters are looking into Yale’s financial relationships with some of the spots where Linda Lorimer, Vice President and Secretary of the University, told Professor Klausen she has often traveled recently: Saudi Arabia, for example. Quite soon, I suspect, we will know why the Yale administration insisted that the Yale University Press dim the lux and veritas when it came to Professor Klausen’s book.

    A book about Mohammed cartoons without the cartoons. What does that make us?

    Would it surprise you if  Yale is planning to remove the hebrew lettering from its seal because it could be perceived as offensive?

    Geert Wilders Plucks Muslim Goose

    SupportWilders.jpg

    From the Gates of Vienna:

    Our Flemish correspondent VH reports on the latest scandal from the Netherlands: Geert Wilders called a socialist Muslim politician a “super dumb goose”. The horror!

    Here’s the report from De Telegraaf, as translated by VH:

    Geert Wilders: “Fatima Elatik is super dumb goose”

    Geert Wilders made mincemeat of the Amsterdam PvdA district mayorFatima Elatik [the appointed leader of the Amsterdam district council of Zeeburg, and a fellow party member and fan of the Muslim Brotherhood supporter Ahmed Marcouch[1]], who compared the politics of the PVV member with those of Adolf Hitler. “What a super dumb goose she is,” Wilders replied yesterday.

    The Moroccan-Dutch Elatik has worked herself into a lather over the questions in Parliament of the PVV, which wants to know how the Muslim population will develop in the Netherlands over the coming decades. “Just give it a while and they will analyze our DNA to show that we are no good”, Elatik twittered. “I think there was once another politician in Europe, some 60 years ago, who did the same thing to another Semitic people.”

    In response, Wilders fought back with: “The demonization by the Labor Party (PvdA) keeps going on. I hope they realize where this may lead.”

    Comment posted at The Daily Standard (De Dagelijkse Standaard):

    fatima

    Well now, there we have the PvdA alderman Fatima Elatik once again making a remarkable statement on Twitter. Where only a while ago she wanted to expel the entire PVV electorate from Amsterdam, today she creates a beautiful dummy so as to become “bon ton” [all okay] in left-wing circles by making a Wilders-Hitler comparison.

    Soon she realized that as a politician — and particularly one of a party that is on the verge of collapsing, like the PvdA (Socialists) — she really cannot say such things. But she still quickly adds a clincher to it: “that we sometimes forget that Hitler was also democratically elected”. Who “we” are and what Elatik wants to say with this is not quite clear …

    Read it all…

    Britain's dumbest Jew: "There Are Circumstances in Which Terrorism is Justifyable"

    News first:

    Al-Maqdessi (R) announced the start of theocratic rule in the Palestinian territories

    Counter Jihad News:

    David Miliband:

    “There are circumstances in which terrorism can be justifiable“

    Counter Jihad has  graphic pic’s

    milibandg270906_228x3022

    Pamela is right: this guy doesn’t know the difference between good and bad or right and wrong.  That’s why our world is turning to mush. A careering creature like Miliband  who stands for nothing will fall for anything… Miliband is the strawman for the value-free society…
    Daily Mail via Atlas Shrugs

    Foreign Secretary David Miliband was accused last night of condoning terrorism after declaring that there were circumstances in which it was ‘justifiable’.

    Continue reading Britain's dumbest Jew: "There Are Circumstances in Which Terrorism is Justifyable"

    Muhammad & Zainab: The Wives of Profit Moe

    Zaynab and the Beast

    This is what Allah (aka Muhammad) had to say:

    وَإِذْ تَقُولُ لِلَّذِي أَنْعَمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَأَنْعَمْتَ عَلَيْهِ أَمْسِكْ عَلَيْكَ زَوْجَكَ وَاتَّقِ اللَّهَ وَتُخْفِي فِي نَفْسِكَ مَا اللَّهُ مُبْدِيهِ وَتَخْشَى النَّاسَ وَاللَّهُ أَحَقُّ أَن تَخْشَاهُ فَلَمَّا قَضَى زَيْدٌ مِّنْهَا وَطَرًا زَوَّجْنَاكَهَا لِكَيْ لَا يَكُونَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَرَجٌ فِي أَزْوَاجِ أَدْعِيَائِهِمْ إِذَا قَضَوْا مِنْهُنَّ وَطَرًا وَكَانَ أَمْرُ اللَّهِ مَفْعُولًا

    Written by Mumin Salih
    Saturday, 15 August 2009
    Beauty and the beastAn analysis of Zaynab’s divine marriage to Mohammed

    “Your marriages were arranged for you by your fathers, but my marriage was arranged for me by Allah from above the seven heavens”

    Zaynab to Mohammed’s other wives

    The above assertion was Zaynab’s claim to fame, which no other woman had been able to match. Indeed, no other woman was privileged to have her marriage and family life planned for her by Allah, and carefully documented in the preserved tablet and the Quran. Zaynab’s ‘divine’ marriage was not a private matter because its implications still affect the Muslims’ lives today. As a corollary to satisfying Mohammed’s sexual desires, Allah had to ban the highly moral practice of adoption and introduce instead a morally corrupt legislation that allows women to breast feed adult men. Another upshot of this saga is that the Muslims today are still perplexed and divided regarding the wisdom of the ‘barrier (=hijab) verse’ that in effect locks women behind the dark shields of Islam. The historical events mentioned in this article are well documented in the Quran and the reputed sira books and no Muslim can question their authenticity. The analysis, however, is mine and is an attempt to read the small prints to understand that famous Islamic love, or rather lust, story.

    More from Islam Monitor

    American Females on Wild Goose Chase For 'Hearts & Minds' in Afghanistan (by voluntarily wearing the burka)

    By ALFRED de MONTESQUIOU, Associated Press Writer

    KHAWJA JAMAL, Afghanistan – Put on body armor, check weapons, cover head and shoulders with a scarf.

    Afghan Woman To Woman

    That was the drill for female American Marines who set out on patrol this week with a mission to make friends with Afghan women in a war zone by showing respect for Muslim standards of modesty.

    The all-female unit of 46 Marines is the military’s latest innovation in its rivalry with the Taliban for the populace’s loyalty. Afghan women are viewed as good intelligence sources, and more open to the basics of the military’s hearts-and-minds effort — hygiene, education and an end to the violence.

    “It’s part of the effort to show we’re sensitive to local culture,” said Capt. Jennifer Gregoire, of East Strasburg, Pa. She leads the Female Engagement Team in the Now Zad Valley of Helmand province, the heartland of the Taliban insurgency.

    Related links:

    “If you show your hair, its kind of like seeing a nude picture here, because women are very covered up,” she said.

    Continue reading American Females on Wild Goose Chase For 'Hearts & Minds' in Afghanistan (by voluntarily wearing the burka)