Category: General

 From LGF:

Slick European Islamist spokesman Tariq Ramadan, currently the object of a large media legitimization campaign aimed at getting him into the US, has pleaded guilty of “insulting a public agent” in an altercation with a female police officer at a French airport, and fined 2500 euros.

UPDATE:

More information on the incident at The Terror Finance Blog: “Moderate” Muslim Tariq Ramadan was detained, charged and ordered to trial in France after insulting a police officer.

Tariq Ramadan, the so-called “moderate” Islamic “intellectual”, was briefly detained and charged for “insulting a public agent” on Sunday at Paris Roissy Charles de Gaulle International Airport, while in transit to London.

From informed police sources, we have learned that when Ramadan tried to enter a prohibited area, a young policewoman stopped him. He began shouting at her and was then taken into police custody; the officer filed a complaint against him.

While in custody, he admitted the offense and was ordered to appear before a criminal court of Bobigny on April 6. Tariq Ramadan faces up to 6 months of imprisonment and 7,500 Euros of penalty.

UPDATE:

Tariq Ramadan in his own words: According to the own Tariq Ramadan’s account of his detention in Paris last week, published by a Swiss newspaper today, he acknowledged he insulted a policewoman, calling her a “bitch” after she stopped him from going through a security gate without a boarding pass. When a second police officer arrived to assist the first, Ramadan admitted he shouted “you are real bastards”. Ramadan claims he had to spend the whole night in a dirty cell because of the police “overzealousness”.

Ilya Gridneff/The Daily Telegraph gives us the usual ‘outspoken’ and ‘controversial’ BS -labels on the double:

MUSLIM schools in Australia should be abolished, a controversial Somali-born writer told the Sydney’s Writers Festival last night.

Amid intense security and the police riot and public order squad, Ayaan Hirsi Ali received a standing ovation from a full house at the Sydney Recital Hall after speaking on the importance of Western values influencing Islamic thought.
Her calls for reforming Islam along with collaborations with assassinated Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh has made her a leading voice in the debate on Islam.

It has also made her need 24-hour security.

* Hmmm, wonder why that is? Will Iliya Griffith tell us?

“I don’t hate Muslims but I detest the submission of the free will,” she said last night.

Calling for Islam to accept and not be above criticism, she asked the audience to consider the need for separate Muslim schools in Australia.

“Australians’ must ask why there is need for Saudi Arabian financed Muslim schools? Young people should be groomed to be Australians first, to see their nationality first not religion,” she said.

The distinguished author who fled Somalia to The Netherlands, became a member of Parliament and now lives in the US.

Her speech outlined her evolution of thinking, from denouncing Salman Rushdie to reading forbidden texts.

* Great report, Iliya!

We need more reporters like you, effectively saying nothing about the RoP- but how would you know? Who ever did educate you about the cult of Islam? 

Watch out where the huskies go and don’t you eat that yellow snow…

*

Meanwhile in Holland, the far left nutroots who got rid of Ali Hirsi continue to shoot themselves in the foot:

Dutch political party, fearing it will lose Muslim votes, tries to muzzle party member who is working to protect Muslim apostates

Who cares about human rights if it will mean losing votes? “PvdA Tries to Muzzle Muslim Apostate,” from NIS News, with thanks to Fjordman:

THE HAGUE, 05/06/07 – Labour (PvdA) has been trying to muzzle a young PvdA member who is fighting for the rights and safety of Muslim apostates. An internal memo shows that the party fears the campaign of Ehsan Jami will cause it electoral damage and enrage Muslims.
Jami announced in May he was setting up a Committee for Ex-Muslims. The committee wants to break the taboo on lapsing from the Islamic faith. The 22 year old Jami, himself an apostate of Islam, says many Muslims do not dare to renounce Islam for fear of reprisals, including death.

Jami, who is a PvdA council member in the town of Leidschendam-Voorburg, will launch the committee officially in September with an international press conference. He says he has already had hundreds of e-mails from Muslims from throughout the world who support him. But his own PvdA is trying to muzzle him, it emerges from internal correspondence obtained by newspaper NRC Handelsblad.

‘Progressive’ filmmaker Eddy Terstall, who is active on behalf of the PvdA behind the scenes, spoke with Jami on behalf of the party. An e-mail in which he reported to PvdA MPs and ministers last week on this meeting leaked to NRC Handelsblad….

The e-mail reveals an attempt to manipulate Jami on 11 points. Terstal advised him to “choose his words more carefully” and take into account the fact that his message could go down badly with the PvdA’s big immigrant following. Terstall concluded with the message that he is prepared to “guide” Jami further.

Jami is supported by philosopher and political commentator Afshin Ellian. NRC Handelsblad quoted MP Wolfsen as saying that Ellian has “a very anti-Islam agenda.” But apart from Ellian, who is an Irani refugee, Jami is “almost exclusively surrounding himself with whites”, which is unwise, Terstal’s email states.

Read it all…

Another vidclip from UK Channel 4, an interview with Abdurahman Jafar from the Muslim Safety Forum (key advisory body to the Metropolitan Police) and Shahid Malik, MP for Dewsbury, on the disturbing new survey of UK Muslims. Jafar tells the interviewer that “two thirds of the US public overall believe 9/11 was an inside job.”

From a poster on youtube:

“I don’t think that this poll really means that many muslims don’t believe they were responsible. it just means that when faced with siding with the umma, or siding with the infidels, many muslims are going to lie no matter what. It goes against their religion to side with infidels. I’m sure many of the ones polled were the same ones who said the 4 men were ‘martyrs’ too. Just like the celebrate bin laden but publicly blame 9/11 on the jews “

All the while making sure that his love falls where the money lies.

But as we all know, the real money nowadays lies in Arabia.

Arabia here we come:

* Like Peanut Khadr and Willie Clitman before him, this eager social raiser and his egregious wife Cherie Blair, a ‘human rights lawyer’– (in this case a rather euphemistic term for a petro-dollar sucking scamster ) make no beef about their intentions.

Once out of politics, the real fun $$$$$ begins.

Tony BLair and his wife Cherie will get really busy:

* Speaking tours to the ME, just like Clitman and Khadr. The only worry now is:

Is Tony BLair, your lowly English labor prop, worth as much as Jimmah and Willie? Or will he have to eat couscous with the Bedouins?

Anyway: The decision is made, nobody can stop him now:

Blair launches fund to improve teaching of Islam

Tony Blair today launched a passionate defence of Islam as a religion of “moderation and modernity”, as he announced a £1m government fund to aid teaching of the religion and train UK imams.
The prime minister, in his final days in Downing Street, placated an audience of more than 200 Muslim scholars by saying that many Christians as well as Muslims disagreed with his foreign policy over Afghanistan and Iraq.

 Interview with Toni BLiar:

What do you know about Islam? 

Blair: “I do not pretend in any shape or form to be an expert, but I do read….”
Interviewer: “What do you read, what interests you?”
Blair: “I read the message of the Koran, as far it can be translated. And I read about Islam. And I enjoy doing that. And I have learned things about the Koran that I never knew before, and I think a lot of Christians would be interested. It’s one of the reasons I say to you, It would be good if we had some more dialogue and faith…and the reason I have to leave you now, is that I am going to meet some religious leaders, both [sic] Muslim and Christian and Jewish upstairs in order to discuss with them how we can bring the faiths closer together.”

One can only come to the conclusion that Blair has not really studied Islam. So he is a downright liar. Note also how he repeats all the apologetic nonsense about interfaith dialogue, the ‘hard to be translated Koran’ and the lack of knowledge about Islam by Christians.

Sadly, when it comes to our leader, Blair is the rule not the exception

But he said the voices of “calm” Islam had been hijacked by extremists, who were no more representative of the true faith than Christians in the Middle Ages who used torture to convert people to their faith.
And he praised a book called The Muslim Jesus as highlighting where the two religions overlapped.

* The Winds of Jihad bullshit detector just exploded again, damit!

Blair was opening a two-day conference on Islam hosted by Cambridge University, which also marked the publication of a government-commissioned report into the teaching of Islam in the UK.

Written by leading scholar Dr Ataullah Siddiqui for the Department of Education, it says that teaching of Islam fails to reflect the “realities” of the faith in modern day multicultural Britain, instead focusing too narrowly on the Middle East.

The PM pledged a fund to implement the report’s findings, such as helping train Muslim imams in UK universities to reduce mosques’ reliance on overseas ministers who may not understand British society or speak good English.

The government will also announce that Islamic studies will be designated “strategically important” to the British national interest – allowing tighter official scrutiny of university courses.

Mr Blair told the conference its purpose was to “let the authentic voices of Islam … speak for themselves.

The PM said most Muslims complained more about the image of their faith as violent and extremist than about UK foreign policy.

“The predominant complaint [from Muslims] is about how they believe their true faith is constantly hijacked and subverted by small, unrepresentative groups who get disproportionately large amounts of publicity.”

But the prime minister was himself attacked over the conference.

The Labour peer Lord Ahmed of Rotherham accused Mr Blair of using Cambridge University as a “front” to organise the event and exclude political opponents.

Dhimmi Watch has a good take on this here…

He told Radio 4 “The conference is fronted by Cambridge University, but organised by Downing Street, the Foreign Office, and the communities department, who have deliberately chosen to exclude those Muslims who disagree with government policy.”

Read it if you have the nerve for it.

BLair is going to meet an old friend there…

UK: Muhammad to top boys’ names list

Islamization of Britain Alert: “Muhammad to top boys’ names list,” by Helen Nugent and Nadia Menuhin for the TimesOnline, with thanks to Dhimmi Watch

Muhammad is now second only to Jack as the most popular name for baby boys in Britain and is likely to rise to No 1 by next year, a study by The Times has found. The name, if all 14 different spellings are included, was shared by 5,991 newborn boys last year, beating Thomas into third place, followed by Joshua and Oliver.

But wait:

He wouldn’t rat on anyone who goes to fight in ‘Allah’s way’- which means jihad…

Because ‘that wouldn’t be nice’ 

Muslim students seek clerics’ jihad advice

Richard Kerbaj The Australian

with thanks to Rosie

AUSTRALIAN Muslim university students eager to become jihadis are regularly seeking advice from Islamic spiritual leaders in the hope of winning religious approval to travel overseas and fight.
Leaders have warned that the obsession among some young Muslims to become holy warriors was also driving them to “shop around” for fatwas – religious rulings – should their initial request be turned down.

Moderate Sydney-based Islamic cleric Khalil Shami said young Muslims, “predominantly university students”, frequently asked his advice on travelling to war-torn countries to fight in the name of Islam.

This comes two years after hardline Islamic university students were involved in the London bombings that killed 52 people and injured 700 others.

It also follows The Australian’s revelations in January that a 25-year-old Somali Australian, Ahmed Ali, died fighting alongside Islamists in his country of birth in December last year.

Sheik Shami said he always warned aspiring Islamists against fighting because he believed Muslim countries were being run by corrupt leaders who were more interested in making money and advancing their political profiles than liberating their people.

“There are some people who would like to go and perform jihad,” he told The Australian in an Arabic and English interview.

“I say don’t go. Because those fighting aren’t truly fighting in the path of God. I’ve been asked numerous times and I’ve advised against going,” added Sheik Shami, an imam at Penshurst Mosque in Sydney’s southwest.

He said young Muslims interested in jihad either called him anonymously to ask his advice or approached him at the mosque.

Sheik Shami, who is also an Australian Federal Police chaplain, said he had not notified authorities about Muslims interested in jihad because he did not want to betray the trust of people making the inquiries.

“If you come to me and tell me about something, it’s not nice for me to go and tell the authorities about you because you trust me and I have to just keep your secret,” he said.

“I know I have enough faith in myself. I’m not going to hurt the person or hurt the authorities.”

The federal Attorney-General’s department last night said clerics were not obligated under common law to pass on national security information.

“A Muslim cleric would have the same obligations as any other member of the community,” a department spokesman said. “The Government would expect that any person in receipt of such information, whatever their religious beliefs, would have a duty to prevent terrorist activity and pass the information on.”

Sheik Shami’s comments follow revelations in The Australian last week that Muslims were refusing to give national security authorities counter-terrorism tip-offs, fearing they might implicate themselves or be labelled traitors by fellow community members.

Sheik Shami said young men often became more enthused about seeking advice on jihad after seeing horrific images of fellow Muslims caught up in conflict.

Islamic Friendship Association of Australia president Keysar Trad admitted hearing young Muslims asking their cleric for advice on going to fight jihad overseas. He said some even went to more than one imam in the hope of getting a green light for joining the battle.

“Some people will shop around, what you might term as fatwa shopping, and I am yet to meet an imam who would say yes, go,” Mr Trad said. “My personal assessment of these kind of people is they want the imam to reassure them that staying here in luxury and comfort is OK, that’s all they’re doing. But then they go (and say), ‘I would’ve gone only if the imam let me’.”

Melbourne cleric Isse Musse said aspiring jihadis do not usually ask for fatwas from their imams to approve their departure for battle. And while the Somalian imam had never been approached by young Muslims wanting to join overseas terror outfits, he said in most cases people would only seek advice about such issues from their clerics.

Read also:

Putting the ‘Islam Shoe’ on the Infidels’ Foot 

Update on Jimmuh from the Ummah

Caption: President Carter receiving the International Zayed Prize for the Environment in 2001 from Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maklum, Crown Prince of Dubai and UAE Minister of Defence. The prize included $500,000. The following year President Carter refused the Wiesenthal Center’s request to repudiate the Zayed Center in Abu Dhabi for a symposium where it was asserted that the Nazi Holocaust was a ‘false fable’.

’Nuff said. Worth a thousand words.

From Gates of Vienna

*

Willie Clitman, Khadr’s brother in arms, did even better: He made about 40 million dollars in ‘speaking fees’- A lot, if not all of it from wealthy Arabs in the Gulf. But not enough: He aims for a second term in the white house through his egregious wife Pillary.

Clitman, just in case you have forgotten about it, went to the Arabs and said ‘the cartoons should have not been printed’- an excremental sell-out for freedom of speech, totally against the spirit of the constitution.

Who is a bigger whore: A 10$ street hooker or guys like these two former presidents?

*

My Trip to Kosovo and Bosnia

By Jesse Petrilla
FrontPageMagazine.com

I have recently returned to the U.S. from my trip through the Balkans which had an aim to see what the ever expanding Middle East into Europe looks like up close. Here is my after-action report for those who are interested in hearing about a situation which may chillingly parallel future events in America if we do not take action to prevent them today.

I landed in Kosovo on a flight from Istanbul directly into the Kosovo capital city of Pristina. This city is a showpiece for the Kosovo Albanians who often take visiting dignitaries and American politicians through a twisty roundabout path through the city, avoiding the many destroyed churches and other evidence of the less than tolerant attitudes so prevalent in the region. I went on a very different tour of Kosovo than what our politicians see. I didn’t stick to only seeing the few good parts of Pristina, I went to other parts of Kosovo where Christians are forced to live in military-like compound ghettos, with the terror and fear of death if they ever set foot outside of their enclaves without protection. I saw a rogue and wild west region with very little self built infrastructure, and vast amounts of foreign money flowing in from Saudi Arabia and other nations hell bent on exporting their extremist ideals. The only real infrastructure I saw were remnants of Tito’s Communist Yugoslavia, with the current flow of money primarily being dumped into new construction projects of Wahabi mosques and madrases. But what is scariest of all is that I saw America several generations from now if we continue to allow Islamism to spread through the socialist and naive policies so many American politicians have adopted.

Read it all…

After visiting several other churches destroyed as recently as 2003 and many vandalized in the last year, I headed for Bosnia not too far away. In Sarajevo I got a tour of the EUFOR Army base there, and was comforted to learn that although our politicians may not get it, the Army certainly understands who the enemy is today. A Sergent Major told me of villages in Bosnia where the women wear full Afghanistan style burkahs, and when a vehicle approaches the village all the women go run and hide, and the men surround the car and you must ask permission to enter the village. He told me what is scariest of all is that the people who live there are not foreigners, but Bosnian born and raised, right there in Europe. I learned from him and others that nearly all of the military activity involves problems with Muslims, and not the Christians, such a surprise…

Charges Against Guantanamo Bay Detainees Dismissed

NORTH GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba — AP

Incompetence brings the whole system to a screeching halt:

Military judges dismissed charges Monday against a Guantanamo detainee who chauffeured Usama bin Laden and another who allegedly killed a U.S. soldier in Afghanistan, marking a stunning setback to Washington’s attempts to try detainees in military court.
In back-to-back arraignments for Canadian Omar Khadr and Salim Ahmed Hamdan, of Yemen, the U.S. military’s cases against the alleged Al Qaeda figures dissolved because, the two judges said, the government had failed to establish jurisdiction.

They were the only two of the roughly 380 prisoners at Guantanamo charged with crimes, and the rulings stand to complicate efforts by the United States to try other suspected Al Qaeda and Taliban figures in military courts.

Salim Ahmed Hamdan

Hamdan’s military judge, Navy Capt. Keith Allred, said the detainee is “not subject to this commission” under legislation passed by Congress and signed by President George W. Bush last year. Hamdan is accused of chauffeuring bin Laden’s and being the Al Qaeda chief’s bodyguard.

The new Military Commissions Act, written to establish military trials after the U.S. Supreme Court last year rejected the previous system, is full of problems, defense attorneys argued.

The judges agreed that there was one problem they could not resolve — the new legislation says only “unlawful enemy combatants” can be tried by the military trials, known as commissions. But Khadr and Hamdan had previously been identified by military panels only as enemy combatants, lacking the critical “unlawful” designation.

The surprise decisions do not spell freedom for the detainees, who are imprisoned here along with about 380 other men suspected of links to Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

Khadr was 15 when he was captured after a firefight in Afghanistan in 2002 in which he allegedly killed a U.S. soldier and was wounded himself. He is now 20.

Khadr, appearing in the courtroom with a beard and wearing an olive-green prison uniform, seemed uninterested when Army Col. Peter Brownback, Khadr’s judge, threw out the case. Khadr focused on his own image on a computer screen that showed a live TV broadcast of the proceedings.

The chief of military defense attorneys at Guantanamo Bay, Marine Col. Dwight Sullivan, said the dismissal of the case against Khadr could spell the end of the war-crimes trial system hurriedly set up last year by Congress and Bush after the Supreme Court threw out the previous system.

But legal experts said Brownback apparently left open the door for a retrial for Khadr, and that the Defense Department can possibly fix the jurisdictional problem by holding new “combat status review tribunals” for any detainee headed to trial.

Sullivan said the dismissal has “huge” impact because none of the detainees held at this isolated military base in southeast Cuba has been found to be an “unlawful” enemy combatant.

“It is not just a technicality; it’s the latest demonstration that this newest system just does not work,” Sullivan told journalists. “It is a system of justice that does not comport with American values.”

The Military Commissions Act, signed by Bush last year, specifically says that only those classified as “unlawful” enemy combatants can face war trials here, Brownback noted.

The distinction is important because if they were “lawful,” they would be entitled to prisoner of war status, which under the Geneva Conventions would entitle them to the same treatment under established military law that U.S. soldiers would get.

A Pentagon spokesman said the issue was little more than semantics.

Bullshit by the truckload Link

Read it all

Debate Over New Mosque in Cologne Heats Up

* Critics of the mosque are immediately smeared as ‘ radical right wing’

* Death threats against Ralph Gioradano, an 84-year old writer and holocaust surviver, are ignored… “What kind of a state are we in that I can face a fatwa in Germany?” he asked.

* The MSM reports only in in the most euphemistic ways how the new mosque would ‘enrich the multicultural diversity’ of the new Germany…

* Muslims, as usual, are whining and see themselves as victims of ‘Islamophobia:’

“At the moment the situation is terrible,” said Bekir Alboga, who is in charge of inter-religious and inter-cultural co-operation at DITIB. “People pray out here in the car park, even in winter when it’s cold, snowing or raining, because it is a very small prayer room. And where are Muslims meant to pray, while Christians or Jews are in their pretty, representative houses of God? Should our Muslims really pray on tarmac in the blazing summer sun?”

* No mention that there are already some 45 mosques in and around Cologne

Does Germany make life hard for its Muslims?

Link

Another link in German

And if you speak or read German, here is Giordano :

“Ich wehre mich gegen ein Erpresserpotential, das uns unter islamischer Beobachtung halten will.” Ralph Giordano (Foto: blankenese.de)

Ralph Giordano: “Ich will sagen dürfen: Stoppt diese Moschee!”

K ö l n (PRO) – Der Publizist Ralph Giordano hat im Streit um die geplante “Zentralmoschee” in Köln nachgelegt. In Bezug auf Morddrohungen gegen ihn, die offenbar von Islamisten stammten, schrieb er in der Freitagsausgabe der “Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung”: “Ich bin der Traditionen, Sitten und Gebräuche überdrüssig, die jede Kritik in Beleidigungen umfälschen, selbst aber höchst verschwenderisch mit Verbalinjurien gegen Andersgläubige zur Hand sind.”

Angefangen hatte es mit Giordanos Erklärung, gegen den Bau der Großmoschee an der Venloer Straße in Köln Ehrenfeld zu sein. Dort will die “Türkisch-islamische Union der Anstalt für Religion” (Ditib) den knapp 35 Meter hohen Kuppelbau mit zwei 55 Meter aufragenden Minaretten errichten. Der bisherige Sitz der Ditib ist in einem ehemaligen Fabrikgebäude an dieser Stelle. Die Bauarbeiten sollen im Spätsommer dieses Jahres beginnen und 2009 beendet sein. Noch läuft das Planungsverfahren. Die Ditib ist Dachverband für rund 870 Moscheevereine in der Bundesrepublik und wurde in engem Kontakt mit dem Ministerium für religiöse Angelegenheiten in der Türkei gegründet.

Im Internet-Fernsehen des “Kölner Stadtanzeigers” hatte Giordano Mitte Mai heftige Kritik am Islam geübt und sich vehement gegen den Moschee-Bau ausgesprochen. Zur Premiere der Sendung “Streit im Turm” hatte die Zeitung Giordano und Bekir Alboga von der Ditib eingeladen. “Stoppt den Bau dieser Moschee”, sagte Giodano in der Sendung. “Es ist ein falsches Signal. Wahr ist, dass die Integration der muslimischen Minderheit in Deutschland gescheitert ist. (…) Immigranten haben nicht nur Probleme, sie machen auch Probleme. Es gibt eine Kultur hier, die nicht akzeptabel ist, aber mitten unter uns ist.” Die Sendung gibt es hier als Video und hier als Skript zum Nachlesen.

“Ich will auf deutschen Straßen keiner Burkaverhüllten begegnen”

Ihn mache stutzig, dass die Bevölkerung bei einem “solchen Großprojekt” und diesem “Religionsausdruck einer fremden Kultur” mitten in Köln nicht gefragt wurde. “Ich prophezeie, wenn diese Großmoschee gebaut wird, gibt es Unfrieden und Unruhe.” Die Quelle des islamistischen Terrors liege seiner Meinung nach “in den Schwierigkeiten der islamischen Gesellschaft bei der Anpassung an die Moderne”. Auf den Einwand Albogas, dass es selbstverständlich “Kirchen, Synagogen und auch Moscheen” in Deutschland gebe und “Artikel vier und fünf unseres Grundgesetzes, die Religions- und Meinungsfreiheit ohne Wenn und Aber” akzeptiert werden müssten, antwortete Giordano: “Die Argumentation kennt man ja: Sie setzen christlich-jüdisches Traditionsgut gleich mit muslimischem. So geht es nicht. Es ist nicht alles Friede, Freude, Eierkuchen.”

Read it all

Translation please, any volunteers…?

With thanks to PJ we have  a translation, but it still needs some improvement:

6. P.J. Says:
   June 5th, 2007 at 9:39 am ehttp://www.ksta.de/html/artikel/1179819731442.shtmlWORDING of Ralph Giordano
   PROVIDES 01.06.07, 10:59 h

   My demand on the political line of the city to stop the plans for the building of a central large mosque in Cologne honour field because they sketch a wrong picture of the true relations between Muslim minority and majority company in view of the failed integration, brought in, unmistakably heavy murder threats for me and in Turkish language (with which I want to place this part of the minority not under general suspicion).

   In addition I explain binding: I will turn also further tabooless against all Basic Law-adverse and thus integration-hostile conditions and conditions within the Muslim minority, everything in front against the inakzeptable position of the woman (like her nobody documented more shaking, as the Turkish Soziologin Mrs. Dr. Necla Kelek, in the name of all other entwürdigten and threatened suffering companions). I will also further critically take position against those Imams and federation functionaries, which use the liberal framework and the tolerance of the liberal condition, in order to implement totalitarian opinions of state and religion in its enclaves; those the rules of right-national writingness undermine, with anti-western Indoktrination Scharia oriented instruction give and the standards of the democracy – like Koedukation, Sexualunterricht, sport, class travels, sex equality – refuse.

   I will persist also further in my cultural self-determination, in a way of life, which my is and which does not agree in manifold regard with the Muslim. And I want to be allowed to say, undisturbed. I want to be allowed to say that I don’t want to meet Burka or chadorwearing veiled females on German roads neither, nor do I want to hear the call of the Muezzin from huge Minarets near me. Also I want to be allowed to object publicly over the fact that the European Union allowed a Turkish minister of foreign affairs to let his daughters study in Germany, because they can do here, what in Turkey is officially forbidden to go i.e. unhindered with the head cloth into the lecture. Whereby I will please the executive committees of most Muslim federations in Germany, under it the Ditib, not for clearing-up, because I from this side nothing when masking expects.

   I will also not adapt my opinion of liberty of opinion to an Ungeist, which lays her out in such a way: “All do not have the right to express their opinion freely in a way those the Scharia contrary-run.” No and three times no! The Scharia, the law Islam, is notoriously Basic Law adverse (unconstitutional), a scandalous anachronism, the fossil of an outdated mankind epoch and a heavy obstacle on the way to the reformation and modernization Islam. It is included by me just as naturally into the critical method as the Koran, the biography Mohammeds and old persons and the new will. And I want to say, write, to think may – official Fatwa threat, unofficial ago.

   Where are we that we would have to consider ourselves, whether our doing and acting please radical Muslims or not? Where are we that we could be prescribed in hurrying ahead obedience of religious and other fanatics, what we say may or not? Where are we, dasswir into the knees go before those obviously at any time from any local Imamen callable Islamic anger and indignation collectives between Cairo and ball, how the controversy over the Danish “Mohammed caricatures” demonstrated them us? I am überdrüssig the traditions, habits and habits, each criticism in offenses umfälschen,

   even however with insults against Andersgläubige to the hand are most wasteful.

   I resist a blackmail-potential, which wants to hold us under Islamic rule and its tentakels from central and interior Asia into the center of Europe ejected: Those who do not submit live dangerously! Am I to now be silent and to betray all my fought for and suffered criteria, because also with murder one threatened to me? What, Germania, ran here wrongly that today must be asked in such a way? Thus I on that professional Multikulti Illusionisten, xenophile lawyers come from the left liberal corner, like Hans Chrisian Str̦bele and Claudia Roth, merciless deniers of justified self-interests of the majority company and large those any realistic estimate of the situation of the immigrant problem Рthey are to be kept in the eye. I stand for this name anyhow at the side all secularized mash lima and Muslime, who want to free the way to an integration with reforms, earned Рa goal, from which we are still far distant. Which does not prevent me to bring it with my molecule more near. Because a peaceful alternative to integration does not exist.

* Because the sharia is ‘above man-made’ law. Because polygamy is not bad. Its only that we stupid infidels  are ignorant and ‘misunderstand’ Islam, you see.

And hey, why worry? Fewer than 20,000 Muslims in America practice it! Nothing to see here, move on, no need to wake up…

Sharia Alert from New Hampshire: polygamy is, like all of Islam, just great and severely misunderstood. “Multiple wives often misunderstood, Muslims say,” by Chloe Johnson for Foster’s Online, with thanks to Dhimmi Watch.
While the practice is not legal in the United States, polygamy is accepted in some parts of the world and permitted under certain circumstances in some religions, including Islam.

Harem

*
Abu-Ibrahim Mohamed, a member of the Islamic Society of the Seacoast Area in Dover, said Muslims look to their faith for guidance in life, including a perspective on polygamy.

“Islam presents a unique world view and a complete way of life,” he said in an e-mail to the newspaper.

Muslims look upon marriage as a scared institution and a serious commitment, he said.

Polygamy is a highly regulated contract that multiplies the vows of marriage. So it’s an additional challenge for the faithful, he said.

“Many times, polygamy is looked at as man’s right to legally marry more than one woman,” he said. “This is a totally flawed way of looking at the matter.”

He said people should consider looking at it as a woman’s right to be cared for and provided for, and to have the full legal rights of a wife.

The Quran regulates polygamy, like other aspects of life, he said.

* Sure. What he didn’t tell us is that a good muslim husband can throw the woman out in the street when he is fed up with with her…

Read it all…

The sympathetic tone of this writer is infuriating…

But here’s what its -really- all about:

Women’s Rights In Islam: Forced Sex Anytime, Anywhere

Women’s Rights In Islam: Married to Four Wives

An article in the Pakistan Daily Times makes interesting reading:

Usually Muslims, when confronted with the Koran or the hadith, come up with all kinds of excuses and weasel and lie and deny, in order to deceive the pesky, inquisitive infidel; Islam must not be questioned. But here we actually have an editorial that not only confirms this, but also that those who argue against the scriptures -where are they?- would commit blasphemy and you know what that means in a place like Pakistan:

There is a lot of confusion in Pakistan over understanding the nature of violence in the country. What the Taliban want in the Tribal Areas is articulated in the mosques of the big cities in the settled areas. At any given time in Lahore, for instance, you will hear demands for the setting up of precisely the kind of governance demanded by the Taliban and implemented in the tribal areas. Most of us think that this kind of worldview in Lahore comes from fringe elements, but on close examination more and more people are embracing this discourse as their key to replacing the present “America-enslaved” system.

Most of us shy away from disputing this worldview with the clergy because the clergy quotes the Quran and hadith, thus exposing us to the possibility of blasphemy through repudiating the scripture. This is the “winning” discourse in Pakistan and elsewhere in the Islamic world — and the expatriate Muslim communities now at odds with the societies in which they live. This discourse comes to the fore on a daily basis through the nostalgic Urdu columns praising the “Golden Age of the Taliban rule” when “you could travel across Afghanistan with a box of jewellery without being robbed”.

Read it all…

Immediately comes a steaming pile of taqiyya from Pakistans PM to put the minds of ignorant infidels at ease:

Here Shaukat Aziz repeats platitudes we have heard many times before, and yet again pretends that the problem of Islamic terrorism stems from “Islamophobia,” while never acknowledging or confronting the fact that the “few” who are committing terrorist acts are the ones who are making the equation between Islam and terrorism. If they would stop equating Islam and terrorism, non-Muslims would stop making the association also.

“Attempts to equate Islam with terrorism must be rejected: Shaukat Aziz,” from APP, with thanks to APP via  JW

The actions of a few should not influence perceptions about Islam and Muslims, the majority of whom are peace loving, responsible citizens across the world”, he added. 

And infidel wankers sit and listen to such drivel without a word of protest.

Read it all…