Poverty, Bacon, Mosques & “Extreme Feelings”

Poverty not source of terrorism, ex-CSIS specialist tells Hamilton forum

The typical (Islamic) terrorist in Canada, he said, has a post-secondary education, good employment, came from a stable home environment, is in a relationship, has no criminal record and no history of mental illness.

How many ‘experts’ does it take to change a lightbulb?

No jail for bacon:

Woman Gets 5-Year Ban from Social Media over Bacon at Mosque…

“…she harbored extreme feelings…”

But now they will straighten her out:

Kirk-Coehlo has already spent some time in jail. Along with her probation, part of her sentencing includes restorative justice, which means she will have to come to the mosque to learn more about the community she attacked, under the supervision of the DA office.

In other news from the Religion of Peace:

AUS Army’s Top Imam Supports Sharia, Opposes Fighting ISIS…
‘Massive’ Muslim Peace March in Germany Draws 1000…
France: Islamists Targeting Polling Stations, Bars, & Conservative Pols
Jobless ‘Asylum Seeker’ Runs Over Pensioner with BMW…
Syrian ‘Refugees’ Throw Rocks at Canadians Who Welcomed Them…
Islamists Threaten to ‘Break Every Bone’ of Lawyer in Statue Row…
Toronto Critic of Islamism Told: ‘I Have a Gun For You’…

“Human Rights are detrimental to successful (Muslim) refugee settlement in Australia’’

Shrinks tell us we have to be culturally sensitive to men who bash their wives.   I say importing Islamic savages makes us a savage nation.

WHO LET IN THE BROTHERS FOR LIFE?

The Qaumi family were refugees from Afghanistan. Now two brothers have been sentenced to decades in jail for shootings and murder by their Brothers For Life gang. How did such a troubled family get let in? And now a government study tells us to be culturally sensitive to refugees who bash their wives, too.

Continue reading “Human Rights are detrimental to successful (Muslim) refugee settlement in Australia’’

IDF kills three Islamic assassins after stabbing

Israeli policewoman stabbed to death in Jerusalem

BBC pulling an Al Jazeera. Three terrorists killed after attacking with knives & guns.

“Islam is an open-ended declaration of war against non-Muslims”

A return to reality by a single priest in the increasingly irrelevant Roman church:

Islamic extremists who carry out acts of terror are simply applying what their faith requires of them, according to Jesuit Father Henri Boulad, an Islamic scholar of the Egyptian Greek Melkite rite.

In an interview with the National Catholic Register, Father Boulad said that “Islam is an open-ended declaration of war against non-Muslims” and those who carry out violent jihad are true Muslims who are applying exactly what their creed demands.

In other news:

Continue reading “Islam is an open-ended declaration of war against non-Muslims”

Kindergarten Bombing in China Kills Eight People Including Bomber

Seems to be the same mental illness that is spreading throughout the West:

An explosion at a kindergarten in eastern China that killed eight people and injured dozens more Thursday afternoon was a deliberate attack by a mentally unstable man, Chinese state-run media reported.

The bombing at the front gate of a kindergarten in eastern China that killed eight people, including the suspected bomber, is the latest in a string of attacks on Chinese schools and students. Most are blamed on people with mental illnesses or who fault society or neighbors for failures in life.

Experts cite stress and feelings of inadequacy resulting from a highly demanding and rapidly changing society as contributing factors, along with shortcomings in diagnosing and treating mental illnesses.

A look at some recent incidents:

Continue reading Kindergarten Bombing in China Kills Eight People Including Bomber

STONES OF STUPIDITY

PRETENDING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT  (islamic) TERRORISM

Andrew Bolt:

My editorial from The Bolt Report: our politicians wouldn’t barricade our borders, now they must barricade our squares and malls. What uselessness is this?

Stones of stupidity
Stones of stupidity

This brand new SteynPost was taped hours before this morning’s shooting of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and others at a GOP team practice for the Congressional baseball game. Mark looks at recent examples of political violence, and the left’s preference not for winning the debate but for shutting down the debate – by any means necessary.

FREE RIDE

FREE RIDEWe keep letting them in and then, even when they are discovered to be liars and frauds, we keep letting them stay.

And then we end up putting them in jail:

A fake Pakistani refugee who raped a female customer he picked up while driving an Uber was in Australia only because a court stopped the federal government from kicking him out of the country.

In the latest judiciary citizenship bungle, The Daily Telegraph can reveal Muhammad Naveed was a fake refugee with bogus documents who once returned to ­Pakistan — even though he had said going home would put him in danger.

The 41-year-old was convicted of a sickening 2015 rape on Tuesday and sentenced to a minimum of six years and four months in jail.

Allowing him to stay obviously put his victim in great danger. Yet authorities, despite abundant evidence of Naveed’s fakery, overturned a deportation attempt:

His visa application was rejected by the government in 2013 but that decision was overturned later that year by the Refugee Review Tribunal, now part of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

The AAT has been embroiled in controversy since The Daily Telegraph recently revealed it had stopped several murderers, rapists and other hardened criminals from being deported.

Naveed’s visa was cancelled again after Pakistani officials confirmed he had fabricated numerous documents on which he relied to claim his brother had been kidnapped and he was under threat.

Naveed returned to Pakistan for a month in 2015.

He returned again two months before he was charged with raping his ­female passenger.

Use the word “tranny” in Australia and you’ll face a government investigation. Lie to immigration officials and everyone’s like: “Hey, give the guy a break. What’s the worst that could happen?”

Isil fanatic emailed the PM’s office threatening to ‘wage jihad’ before getting job on Crossrail 
 The bit to take notice of is this: After Ahmed was arrested a probation officer told him that Islam was a “peaceful and respectful” religion, but he replied: “No. It is a religion of war.”? I believe him. Why won’t the authorities believe jihadists when they tell us this?  An …Read More…From the Telegraph

Moutia Elzahed won’t stand for anyone but Allah

Muslim woman Moutia Elzahed, charged over refusal to stand in court, considers challenge

ABC

A woman wearing a niqab.© AFP PHOTO / FADEL SENNA A woman wearing a niqab.

The lawyer for a Muslim woman who was charged after she refused to stand in court for a judge says she is considering a constitutional challenge.

Moutia Elzahed, 49, from Revesby, is facing nine charges of disrespectful behaviour in court for not standing when Sydney District Court Judge Audrey Balla entered or left the court room during a civil hearing in November and December 2016.

Ms Elzahed had brought a lawsuit against the NSW and Federal Police, claiming she was assaulted during a counter terror raid at her home in 2014.

She is the wife of convicted Islamic State recruiter Hamdi Alqudsi, who is currently serving a six-year jail sentence for helping young Australians travel to Syria to fight.

Ms Elzahed is the first person in NSW to be charged with the offence of disrespectful behaviour in court since it was introduced last year.

During the civil hearing, Ms Elzahed’s barrister Clive Evatt told the court his client “won’t stand for anyone except Allah”.

Today Ms Elzahed’s solicitor Zali Burrows said she has been speaking to two barristers about launching a constitutional challenge but could not provide any more details at this stage.

She said her client had not been disrespectful.

Ms Elzahed was supposed to appear before the Downing Centre Local Court today, but Ms Burrows said her client was unwell and could provide a medical certificate.

The matter will return to court on July 20.

Qanta Ahmed lies her a$$ off for Islam, just like imam Rauf….

Qanta Ahmed lies her ass off while her befuddled interviewer helps her deceive American viewers:

1,) Michael Leiter, the former director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center, argued that sharia law is compatible with the American Constitution.

2.) Harvard Law School Prof. Noah Feldman called sharia “a meaning-making effort.”…

Ground Zero Mosque imam Feisal Abdul Rauf assures us Sharia is nothing to be concerned about

No one is concerned about Sharia because they don’t want Muslims getting married according to Islamic rituals or praying in an Islamic manner. The only reason why people are concerned about Sharia is because of its denial of rights to women and non-Muslims, its denial of the freedom of speech and the freedom of conscience, and other aspects of it that contradict American law and principles of human rights. But unsurprisingly, the erstwhile Ground Zero Mosque imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, he of the spectacularly sinister mein, disingenuously misrepresents opposition to Sharia in the U.S., and the nature of Sharia itself.

As always, these dishonest snake-oil salesmen get mainstream platforms to spread their deceptions. More below.

“The silly American fear of sharia law,” by Feisal Abdul Rauf, New York Daily News, June 8, 2017:

“Most Americans would be shocked to hear Israel imposes sharia law. But it does for some 60 years.” These are the words of Israeli writer Yossi Gurvitz, opening an article he wrote for +972, an online periodical….

The religious courts belong to the Israeli court system. The Israeli government enforces their decisions. This is called legal pluralism — and Israelis inherit it from the Ottoman Empire.

Why, then, is the very idea of sharia so consistently vilified in our country?…

Continue reading Qanta Ahmed lies her a$$ off for Islam, just like imam Rauf….

Taxpayer Funded ‘Deradicalisers’ are closest in ideology to the jihadists

Three years ago, one of the Butt brothers was working for the Government to prevent terrorism, while the other went on the jihad warpath.

How the body set up to stop Muslims turning to extremism is wasting millions on gimmicks like rap workshops while ignoring real problems for fear of being ‘racist’

Surprise surprise!
The body set up to deradicalise jihadis, is run by none other than the brother of one of the UK terrorists.

“There can never be any reliable statistics on the number of people steered away from extremism, so success is hard to measure.”

How the body set up to stop extremism is wasting millions
Khuram Butt was stopped in his tracks by armed police during the London Bridge attack (pictured). But questions have been raised as how he slipped through…
.
  • The Young Muslim Advisory Group was set up in the wake of the July 7 bombings 
  • It was part of the £40million-a-year Prevent counter terrorism strategy 
  • But there’s a belief that Prevent has become a ‘cash cow’ for Muslim groups
  • Even attacker Khuram Butt’s brother was working with the Government 
  • The Home Office now plans to beef up the Prevent programme

London Bridge attacker Khuram Butt was shot dead by armed police in Borough Market

The initiative, launched in a blaze of publicity, was part of the taxpayer-funded £40-million-a-year Prevent counter-terrorism strategy, designed to fight radicalism’s root causes within communities; members of the group would later also receive money from the Association of Chief Police Officers.

One of the ‘personal advisers’ who regularly reported back to Blears and Balls in Whitehall was a young man called Saad Butt, now 29. ‘He was focused and very engaged in the whole concept of Prevent,’ said someone who worked alongside him.

Saad Butt was involved with the organisation up until around 2014. He even registered the Young Muslim Advisory Group to the Butt family home in East London. But how successful was it?

Perhaps that question is best answered with a simple statement of fact: Saad Butt’s 27-year-old younger brother is the infamous Khuram Butt — one of the London Bridge butchers.

Saad Butt is not implicated in any way in the massacre. But the revelation that, until as recently as three years ago, the Butt brothers — one working for the Government to prevent terrorism, the other pursuing a path to bloody jihad on the streets of the capital — were living under the same roof with their mother is almost beyond parody.

Continue reading Taxpayer Funded ‘Deradicalisers’ are closest in ideology to the jihadists

Egypt’s Muslims make another move to wipe out Christianity

Jail Threatened for Egyptian Parents Who Give Children ‘Western’ (Christian)  Names
Parents in Egypt who give their newborn children “Western”names such as “Diana”, “Peter” or “Mark” could soon face fines and/or imprisonment under new legislation being considered in the country.

Lawmakers have heard that abandoning traditional Arabic names will lead to an “undesired and radical change” in the Muslim majority nation and should therefore be expunged from society.

The Egpytian Parliament’s Complaints and Suggestions Committee met on Tuesday to discuss the draft law. It was introduced by MP Bedier Abdel Aziz, and seeks to prohibit the usage of “foreign” names for newly born babies in Egypt, according to the Egypt Independent.

“Using such Western names and abandoning Arabic ones will lead to an undesired and radical change in our society and culture,” Aziz was reported as saying.

He added: “Our sons will no longer be connected to their true identity” before claiming that non-Arabic names are difficult for Egyptians to pronounce.

Aziz said the punishment for disobeying the law should be a fine of between about $80 and $400 or a maximum jail sentence of six months. It is most likely to affect the dwindling number of Christians in the country who are more likely to choose traditional, biblical names for their offspring.

The Egyptian legislation is not entirely unique. According to Newsweek, other countries that have laws related to baby names include Saudi Arabia, which has banned 51 names, plus New Zealand and at least five countries in western Europe. Swedes, for example, are not allowed to name their children Ikea.

Just what we need: Newsweep making excuses for Mohammedan transgressions agains Christians, ignoring the fact that the Christian Copts of Egypt are the indigenous people suffering under the Mohammedan yoke.

In 2014, Saudi Arabia banned 51 names that had foreign origins, religious connotations or were not in line with “social traditions”. Among the 51: Emir, Linda, Laureen and Abdul Nasser (the name of an Egyptian president, Gamal Abdel Nasser, who was hostile toward Saudi Arabia).

In contrast, as Breitbart London reported, Muhammad was the most popular name given to newborn boys in London in 2015, marking the fourth year in a row that the name has topped the chart in the city. It also reclaimed the top spot in the West Midlands, second place in Yorkshire and the Humber, and joint third in the North West.