Yassmin Abdel-Magied’s taxpayer-funded tour was a wasteful disgrace

Miranda Devine: Sharia apologist’s taxpayer tour a wasteful disgrace

Miranda Devine

Muslim activist Yassmin Abdel-Magied’s taxpayer-funded book tour to repressive regimes in the Middle East is proof that the government is not serious about cutting its own wasteful spending.

Why on earth would we want to present an alluring image of Australia to repressive Islamic regimes, where little girls are circumcised, women are stoned for adultery, gay people are executed, and where our idea of “an open tolerant” society is decried as Western decadence?

Yassmin Abdel-Magied’s claim on Q&A that “Islam is the most feminist religion” ignores uncomfortable truths about Sharia law. (Pic: News Corp).

49 headbangers from the “Australian Islamic Mission” demanded that we all shut up at once and submit to Islam. Criticism verboten:

Islamophobia should not be tolerated, not in any workplace, and not in any forum.

Continue reading Yassmin Abdel-Magied’s taxpayer-funded tour was a wasteful disgrace

ISIL Headchopper Finds Refuge In Sweden

Horrifying footage of Syrian “refugee” “asylum seeker” in Sweden emerges showing him slaughtering seven men

Pamela Geller

This is what the leftist/Islamic conspirators are working furiously to being here to America. Trump’s ban would have stopped this savage.

It is impossible to work out who these people are or what they have done before they arrive in the West. Had he not posed for photos showing his evil work, the Swedish authorities would have been none the wiser.

SYRIAN ASYLUM SEEKER IS JAILED FOR LIFE IN SWEDEN AFTER HORRIFYING FOOTAGE EMERGED OF HIM TAKING PART IN THE EXECUTION OF SEVEN MEN IN 2012

  • Refugee Haisam Sakhanh, 46, was sentenced to life imprisonment Thursday
    Sakhanh had joined the armed group Suleiman Company in early May 2012, and shot a person dead with an assault rifle
    Sakhanh had confessed to the shooting but said he should not be prosecuted
    A judge said victim was shot dead along six others under ‘cruel circumstances’

By Kelly Mclaughlin For Mailonline and Associated Press, Daily Mail, February 17, 2017:

A Swedish court on Thursday sentenced a Syrian man to life imprisonment for participation in the 2012 mass execution of seven government troops in Syria.

The Stockholm District Court ruled that 46-year-old refugee Haisam Omar Sakhanh joined the armed group Suleiman Company in early May 2012, and shot a person dead with an assault rifle.

Judge Tomas Zander said the victim, who was not identified, was shot dead along with six others ‘under particularly cruel circumstances’.

The seven men who were shot were part of the Syrian regime who had been captured by the independent Islamist group, which was founded in 2011.

The Islamist armed group captured the men during an attack at the beginning of May 2012, and the seven were shot to death less than two days later, according to Stockholms Tingsratt.

In the years since the execution, it has been impossible to identify the victims.

Sakhanh had confessed to the shooting but said he should not be prosecuted because the death sentences had been made by a legitimate court, something the Swedish court rejected.

It also rejected his defense that he had been following orders.

The group Sakanh was part of, the Suleiman Company, is a Islamic rebel group independent of Free Syrian Army that was formed in 2011 during the Syrian uprising.

The group is mainly active in the Idleb countryside’s Jebel al-Zawiya region, and is led by former drug smuggler and Salafi militant Abu Suleiman al-Hamawi, according to TrackingTerrorism.org.

The court said Sakanh had been active in Italy in 2011 and 2012 where he protested against the Syrian government.

Sakhanh's arrest came after footage emerged of him taking part in in the 2012 mass execution of seven government troops in Syria (he's pictured above left)

Continue reading ISIL Headchopper Finds Refuge In Sweden

Popish Kuddelmuddel

Pope muddles Islam with warming

“Pope Francis Waves Wand: ‘Muslim Terror Does Not Exist’…“ (TROP)

Pope Francis makes a speech claiming “Muslim terrorism does not exist” does not exist but “disturbing warming of the climatic system” does. Did this confused cleric get his message exactly the wrong way around?
Pope in denial

Pope in denial

Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun/February 19, 2017

Did this confused cleric get his message exactly the wrong way around?

In an impassioned defence of all faiths, the leader of the Catholic Church argued religion promotes peace and the danger of radicalisation exists in all religious beliefs.

He said: “Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist…”

No, the groups quoting the Koran as they kill are simply victims of inequality :

The poor and the poorer peoples are accused of violence yet, without equal opportunities, the different forms of aggression and conflict will find a fertile terrain for growth and will eventually explode.
.
Having explained away groups such as the Islamic State – note the word “Islamic” in its title – the Pope turns to man-made warming:
.
The leader of the Catholic Church also condemned the denial of global warming, urging his audience that “the ecological crisis is real”.

He said: “A very solid scientific consensus indicates that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system. 

“We know what happens when we deny science and disregard the voice of nature.”

The “voice of nature”? He’s an animist now? A pan-theist?

Pope parrots pieties

So what is this “voice of nature” saying, and where can I hear it? There has been some mild warming over the past century, but where is the evidence of this “ecological crisis”?
Yet the Pope has the hide to denounce the political correctness to which he himself subscribes:

.

Pope Francis also used his speech to denounce “the guise of what is politically correct or ideologically fashionable”. He added: “The system’s gangrene cannot be whitewashed forever because sooner or later the stench becomes too strong.”

The one thing with which I agree.

Mass rapes of non-Muslim women are “normal”

If you still watch the Fake-Stream-Media you cannot escape the BS stories about the “Rohingya”, the “most persecuted people in the world”. There are constant claims that the Buddhists are raping their women, and that Bangladesh, where they originated, doesn’t take them back. (Why not?) Curiously,  it is not a Buddhist ideology to rape and to plunder; this is something that comes straight from the teachings of Muhammad. Knowing what we now know we should call their bluff and suspect being hoodwinked by projection.

Remember when we were inundated with similar stories from Bosnia, where Muslims claimed they were raped by the Christian Serbs? Could it be that we were similarly duped then?

Islamic State jihadi says mass rapes of non-Muslim women were “normal”

In Islamic law, it is normal: the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)

The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:

Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

Continue reading Mass rapes of non-Muslim women are “normal”

Merkel says Europe must take MORE refugees and Islam ‘isn’t source of terror’

Merkel has among her staff a Soros operative who seems to call the shots. Could that be the reason for Merkel’s strange behavior?

GERMAN Chancellor Angela Merkel has launched a staunch defence of her refugee policy.

The embattled leader says Europe has an obligation to take displaced people from Syria and Iraq.She also said Islam “is not the cause of terrorism” and that combatting extremism needs the cooperation of Muslim countries.In a wide-ranging speech at a Munich security conference, the German chief also vowed to work closely with Vladimir Putin’s Russia in the fight with ISIS in the Middle East.

Is this pope delusional or does he have a nefarious agenda?
Pope Francis: ‘Muslim Terrorism Does Not Exist’ 

This pope’njay is not kosher.

In an impassioned address Friday, Pope Francis denied the existence of Islamic terrorism, while simultaneously asserting that “the ecological crisis is real.”
“Christian terrorism does not exist, Jewish terrorism does not exist, and Muslim terrorism does not exist. They do not exist,” Francis said in his speech to a world meeting of populist movements.– Breitbart

…See More

Angela Merkel and crowd of refugees in Hungary
STANCE: Angela Merkel has remained committed to taking in more Middle East refugees
Mrs Merkel has come under fire for taking in up to one million refugees amid security concerns and a string of migrant sex attacks across Germany.After the Berlin lorry attack at a Christmas market in December, ex-UKIP leader Nigel Farage said events such as that will be “Merkel’s legacy”.Mrs , saying she had “deep regrets” about it.

She will go to the polls in September against Social Democrat candidate Martin Schulz, the former European Parliament President.

On Putin, she said Europe’s ties with Russia remained challenging, but it was important to work with them in the fight against Islamist terrorism.

Australian Headchopper Khaled Sharrouf First to Lose Citizenship

Australia: Islamic State Jihadist Khaled Sharrouf Becomes First to Lose Citizenship Under Anti-Terror Laws

As reported for the ABC by Jane Norman and Caitlyn Gribbin. (Thanks to the intrepid Cristina McIntosh)

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-11/islamic-state-fighter-khaled-sharrouf-stripped-of-citizenship/8262268

“Islamic State Fighter Khaled Sharrouf Becomes First to Lose Citizenship Under Anti-Terror Laws.”

That should be “Counter-Jihad Laws”. – CM

‘Australian (sic: “Aussie-passport-holding” – CM) Islamic State (IS) fighter Khaled Sharrouf has become the first dual-national to be stripped of their [Australian] citizenship, under the Federal Government’s anti-terror laws.

‘National security sources confirmed to the ABC that the 35 year old’s citizenship had been revoked, meaning that he cannot legally return to Australia if he chooses to leave the Middle East.

Excellent news.  That’s one sorted.  Now for all the others... CM

‘The convicted terrorist slipped out of Australia in 2013 using his brother’s passport, and travelled to Syria with fellow Sydney man (that would be “Sydney-resident Muslim man” – CM) Mohamed Elomar to join the Islamic State terrorist group.

Indulging their bloody Caliphate dreams. – CM

“The pair shot to global infamy (well, infamy at least amongst Infidels; the Muslim reaction was not necessarily one of horror, I would hazard the guess – CM) the following year when photos were posted online of them, and Sharrouf’s seven-year-old son, holding the severed heads of pro-Syrian Government soldiers.

Murdered because of being deemed infidel/ apostate. – CM

“Amid concerns (understatement of the year; I would have said, rather, “well-founded fears” – CM) about the threat posed by returning foreign fighters (‘by Aussie-passport-holding Muslim jihadi terrorists “blooded” in overseas jihad hotspots’ – CM) Federal Parliament passed tough counter-terrorism laws in 2015, giving the Immigration Minister the power to strip the citizenship from dual-nationals involved in terrorism.

‘A spokeswoman for Immigration Minister Peter Dutton confirmed that a person involved in overseas terrorism had had their citizenship cancelled, but would not reveal that person’s identity.

‘Sharrouf is one of Australia’s most notorious terrorists.

‘Arrested in 2005 as part of ‘Operation Pendennis’, he was later convicted over the biggest terrorism plot (Muslim plot to mass-murder Infidels – CM) in Australian history, and served nearly four years in prison.

“Nearly four years”???  A mere slap on the wrist.  He should have been stripped of his Aussie citizenship and deported, back then, at the end of that first jail sentence. Better still, he – or his Muslim parents – should never have been let into Australia in the first place.  Got Muslims? Got Jihad. 

Continue reading Australian Headchopper Khaled Sharrouf First to Lose Citizenship

Hirsi Ali reads the Koran to Yassmin

It would be far better to throw the book at Yassmin and all her coreligionists.  But don’t expect such a move from the Turncoat gubmint.  Btw: I just heard through the grapevine that ABC darling Wally was also on an Oz-promotion tour to the Middle East. WTF is supposed to be achieved with this cocksuckery?

Andrew Bolt, Herald Sun

The Sudanese-born Ayaan Hirsi Ali suggests Abdel-Magied must also have read the Koran with her eyes shut:

Yassmin Abdel-Magied, an Islamic activist, has been paid by the Australian government to visit countries such as Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Qatar, it is said, “to promote Australia”. Far from offering criticism of the misogynistic sharia laws on the books in those countries, Abdel-Magied recently stated that Islam is “the most feminist” of all religions.

Confronted with the abuses that are committed against women in the countries she visited, Abdel-Magied replied: “I’m not going to deny, some countries run by Muslims are violent and sexist, but that’s not down to sharia. That’s down to the culture and the patriarchy and the politics of those … countries.”

That is absurd. Abdel-Magied fits into a familiar pattern, where the government of a free society such as Australia invests a considerable sum in an individual or a group in the hope that the person is a “moderate” Muslim and will advance the assimilation of their Muslim minority through constructive engagement. Then the supposed moderate the government has invested in is exposed as a closet Islamist, in this case sympathetic to sharia law. The government is left red-faced. Others simply see red…

Yet what set of principles is less safe for women than sharia? As a moral and legal code, sharia law is among the most dehumanising, demeaning and degrading for women ever devised by man:

• Under sharia law, a woman’s testimony is worth half of a man’s testimony in court (Koran 2:282).

• Under sharia law, men are the “guardians” of women; women are to be obedient to men, and husbands may beat their wives for disobedience (Koran 4:34).

• Under sharia law, a woman may not refuse sexual access to her husband unless she is medically incapable or menstruating, a teaching based partly on Allah himself saying in the Koran, “Your women are a tillage for you; so come unto your tillage as you wish” (Koran 2:223)

• Under sharia law, a woman inherits less than a man, generally half as much, again based on holy writ: “Allah enjoins you concerning your children: the male shall have the equal of the portion of two females” (Koran 4.11, 4.12).

• Under sharia law, men and women who commit fornication are to be flogged. As to the punishment for fornicators, the Koran says: “Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment” (Koran 24:2).

• Under sharia law, a man may unilaterally divorce his wife through talaq, whereas women are limited to divorce either under specific circumstances, such as the husband’s impotence, or with the husband’s consent and payment of a certain amount of money (khul).

• Sharia law permits fathers to contract binding marriages for their children so long as they are minors; and although a boy married against his wishes may exercise his power to divorce his wife unilaterally once he matures, a girl’s exit from such an unwanted marriage is much more difficult.

• Under sharia law, the custody of children is generally granted to ­fathers, and mothers lose custody if they remarry because their attention is supposed to go to their new husbands.

• Although majority-Muslim countries have in practice abolished slavery (Saudi Arabia did so mainly as a result of foreign pressure in 1962), slavery still has not been abolished in sharia law. Sexual slavery was common in Islamic history and is accepted by sharia law.

Defenders of sharia note that in some respects, Islamic law improved the position of women in 7th century tribal Arabia, for instance by categorically banning female infanticide. Yet surely, in the 21st century, we can set the bar higher than that?

Contrary to the claims of Abdel-Magied, the problematic tenets of sharia are not some relic left over from the cultural practices of the 7th century. Today, sharia law is applied in many countries as a matter of reality, and it is also enforced in many Muslim communities in matters such as marriage, divorce, custody and inheritance proceedings.

Indeed, the countries Abdel-Magied visited are proud to call their legal code sharia law.

Read on.

And here are women who fled the countries Abdel-Magied visited, with rather different accounts of how “feminist” Islam really is.

Jacqueline Maley shoots herself in the foot, again…

How anti-Muslim prejudice gets dressed up as feminism

The AGE

“… the fear of causing offence is the glue that holds civil society together.”

Jacqueline Maley is the twat that came to a Q-Society fundraiser to derail the whole purpose of the exercise. Her intention was to smear the Q-Society as a bunch of racist-bigot-Islamophobes and she nearly succeeded.  How? Because of a careless quip by Larry Pickering, a cartoonist who is on the kill list of Mohammedan assassins. He happens to dislike homosexuals because, as a young lad,  he was bashed and gang-raped by 14 of them.

Now here’s a gem from Jacqueline that would make every SJW jump for joy:

“… the fear of causing offence is the glue that holds civil society together.”

Right. We need to fear the speech police otherwise we won’t be civil. Thank you, Jacqueline. You are a beacon of light in a desert of ignorance.

She also accuses us of hiding our  “naked prejudice behind some sort of veil – and the veil of choice has become concern for the rights of women. So runs the line of much anti-Muslim sentiment in this country and abroad”.

Really.

Continue reading Jacqueline Maley shoots herself in the foot, again…

Why does the ABC promote hijabbery?

Why does the ABC promote Muslim women covering up?

Abdel-Magied, Abdo and CarlandAbdel-Magied, Abdo and Carland

 

Why does the Left-wing ABC insist on promoting Muslim women who wear a veil or headscarf?

Caroline Overington on how the ABC sells out Muslim feminists who resent the pressure to cover up:

They place some of the blame for the pressure they feel on the well-meaning media, which promotes the voices of veiled Muslim women over the rest.

Do we do this in Australia? Well, last Monday, the ABC put two panel shows to air, and both — The Drum at 5pm, and Q&A later in the evening — featured Muslim women: Maha Abdo of the Muslim Women’s Association appeared on The Drum and Abdel-Magied on Q&A. Both women wore the headscarf.

There’s nothing wrong with that, of course. If you’re an adult woman and you want to cover up, knock yourself out, but as academic Zainab Salbi, writing in The New York Times, says: It’s important that women who do wear the hijab don’t “drown out the voices and identities of those who choose not to wear the hijab”.

What’s interesting is that when the ABC chooses Muslim men for its panels, they tend to be very moderate, such as Ed Husic, or else, like senator Sam Dastyari, they have given up Islam and now describe themselves as atheist.

They are fake ‘atheists’. When it comes to the crunch, they stand with the umma. Ed Husic swore his loyalty oath on the Koran!

Rarely indeed does Q&A invite a conservative imam, in a white robe and white cap, to sit on a panel and share his view on, say, how you’re going to hell if you’re in a same-sex marriage. That is not to say that the ABC never features Muslim women who aren’t veiled, because it absolutely does, including Ayaan Hirsi Ali…

Overington understates the ABC’s promotion of Muslim women who cover up.

Abdel Magied has actually been made host of an ABC television travel show. Carland is not only a regular ABC guest but was also made host of a documentary series called Assumptions, asking questions such as “We dismiss terrorists as crazy. But are they?” And Maha Abdo is a regular guest on The Drum.

Why?

Do conservative Jewish women get this promotion? Conservative Buddhist women? Conservative Christian women, who oppose abortion?

More on that feminist religion

On Monday night, Senator Jacqui Lambie and Muslim activist Yassmin Abdel-Magied had a screaming match, live on Q&A. They had completely conflicting views about migration and specifically the idea of deporting Muslims who support Sharia Law – Lambie thinks anyone who supports Sharia Law should be deported. It then turned into a shouting match over what Sharia Law was, culminating in Abdel-Magied screaming “That’s not my religion!” when Lambie suggested Islam meant women are treated like second class citizens and “gays are killed”. The Muslim activist then said that Islam was “the most feminist religion”.

.
With mounting pressure growing against Lambie, who didn’t appear to know the definition of ‘Islam’, to apologise, former PM Tony Abbott has now backed her up by attacking Yassmin Abdel-Magied, suggesting she must’ve been “blindfolded” during her speaking tour of the Middle East and Africa.

“If she’s right that ‘Islam is a feminist religion’, how come such terrible things are done to women in its name?” Abbott said.

Abbott said Abdel-Magied was “entitled to her view” but “she must have been wearing a blindfold on her taxpayer-funded tour”.

He is referring to the fact that the federal government paid for her to tour some of the world’s most repressive Islamic regimes, as reported by The Australian.

Bill Leak’s Cartoon from the Australian
Screeching about shari’a

Kirralie Smith’s article below the fold.

Australian politics in the age of Turncoat & Hanson:

Leftist heads explode when Trump gives a presser:

The Globull Worming Racket is coming to an end:

Trump is still battling it out with leftist judges:

Majority of Refugees Coming from Terror-Exporting Countries After Judge Strikes Down Trump’s Executive Order

Majority of Refugees Coming from SEVEN Terror-Exporting Countries After Judge Strikes Down Trump’s Executive Order

Continue reading More on that feminist religion