Britain: The “Struggle of Our Generation”
by Samuel Westrop/Gatestone
- “We’ve got to show that if you say ‘yes I condemn terror — but the Kuffar are inferior’, or ‘violence in London isn’t justified, but suicide bombs in Israel are a different matter’ — then you too are part of the problem. Unwittingly or not, and in a lot of cases it’s not unwittingly, you are providing succour to those who want to commit, or get others to commit to, violence.” — Prime Minister David Cameron.
- In a series of religious rulings published on its website, the Islamic Network charity advocated the murder of apostates; encouraged Muslims to hate non-Muslims; stated that when non-Muslims die, “the whole of humanity are relieved;” and described Western civilisation as “evil.”
- The Charity Commission’s solution, however, was to give the charity’s trustees booklets titled, “How to manage risks in your charity,” and warn them not to do it again.
On July 20, Prime Minister David Cameron outlined his government’s plans to counteract Islamic extremism, which he described as the “struggle of our generation.”
In a speech before Ninestiles School, in the city of Birmingham, Cameron articulated a view of the Islamist threat that, just a couple of years ago, few else in British politics would have dared to support.
In a report for BBC Radio 4, the journalist John Ware described Cameron’s speech, and the government’s proposed counter-extremism measures, as “something no British government has ever done in my lifetime: the launch of a formal strategy to recognize, challenge and root out ideology.”
Cameron’s speech was wide-ranging. It addressed the causes, methods and consequences of Islamist extremism Islam.
 (Image source: BBC video screenshot) |
We must recognize, Cameron reasoned, that Islamist terror is the product of Islamist ideology. It is definitely not, he argued, “because of historic injustices and recent wars, or because of poverty and hardship. This argument, what I call the grievance justification, must be challenged. … others might say: it’s because terrorists are driven to their actions by poverty. But that ignores the fact that many of these terrorists have had the full advantages of prosperous families or a Western university education.”
Continued below the fold…
They are just “migrants” now:
Note that the lame stream media no longer calls them ‘asylum seekers’ or ‘refugees’, its because they are neither. “Migrants” is the appropriate description according to the Quran. In reality, these men are military age conquerors, soldiers of allah, who are determined to kill and die to make allah’s religion the law of the land.
TWO migrants travelled to Britain with suitcases full of weapons in order to attack the new partner of an ex-girlfriend.
EXPRESS.CO.UK|BY PATRICK MAGUIRE
Oh, NOES! Australian Muslims claim to be in trauma over politics of war on Islamic terror. Islamic Council of Victoria’s president tells ‘anti-racism’ forum that proposed…
.
Related:
Archbishop Warda said: “All the statements (by U.S. government and media) have not condemned strongly what damage it is doing. What they are saying is just ‘This is not the true Islam. This is violating the picture of Islam.’ The issue for them is the image of Islam, but none of these statements speak about the victims, about what has been done to the victims, they are not even mentioned. And that is one of the questions our people have.”
Indeed so. But most of his coreligion…Continue Reading
JIHAD WATCH|BY ROBERT SPENCER
According to this purveyor of perverted truths, Israel “is amongst the vilest, inhuman and bloodthirsty regimes in the world.” I guess in the backward minds of Muslim preachers, going out of your way to avoid civilian casualties somehow makes you vile, inhuman and bloodthirsty. He did get one thing right, however. In light of the Obama Administration’s nuclear “deal” with Iran and the billions that the Islamic Republic is set to receive, America has now become the “biggest su
…See More
MIDNIGHTWATCHER.WORDPRESS.COM
Continue reading “Something no British government has ever done…”
