Trouble is, its not theirs. But in Muslim minds, and the minds of useful idiots like Andrew Reinbach, the world and everything in it belongs to Allah. Â Who are we to argue?
Garbage in, garbage out:
Don’t send your kids to Sonoma State University, unless you want to get them indoctrinated with mental acrobatics like “the Moral Depravity of Capitalism“ and “Why Michael Jackson’s Death is Heartbreaking for me… “
Now, the Asst. Prof. of Political Science, Consultant on Nonviolent Action and Strategy, Cynthia Boaz, is wiping all your fears away, and really, there’s nothing to worry about Islam, and anyhow, we got it all wrong; all we need is tolerance and understanding, you see, and all that violent jihad will somehow turn into peaceful inner struggle. Â Read it and weep:
Anger and intolerance are the enemies of correct understanding. – MK Gandhi
Within minutes of learning that last November’s Fort Hood shooter had an Arab name and an Islamic background, commentators at the major media outlets were engaging in wild speculation that the killer’s motive was “jihad” and that the murders fell into the category of political terrorism. For many Americans, these reflexive conclusions also confirmed what they’d decided long ago: that Muslims want to do them harm. Although it is more appropriate to try and understand perpetrators of terrorism by their political (rather than religious) identifications and grievances, the tenacity with which interchangeability of the concepts of Islam and terrorism holds on – and is perpetuated in mainstream discourse – is doing damage to the idea that the United States and its people represent the most open, tolerant society the world has to offer.
Here is the card that majorÂ Muslim Nidal Hasan gave to the infidels along with a quran before killing 14 of his fellow soldiers and wounding another 35, all the while screaming “allah akbar…”
So reporting the fact that the mass-murdering psycho shrink Hasan Malik was a jihadist and self-proclaimed ‘soldier of Allah’ is doing damage to the idea that the US is Â the worlds most tolerant society? You read that right. There is more hair raising garbage like that. But don’t take my word for it: read it just to see how deluded the twitterers are who teach your kids……
Why “under-reported?” ? Because most of these pathetically manufactured ‘hate crimes’ are done by the Muzz themselves…..
Safia Z. Jilani was indicted for faking an assault. She said a gunman pistol whipped her after she spoke at a diversity rally. (FreeRepublic)
- Michelle Malkin Â» FAKE MUSLIM HATE CRIMES: WHERE’S THE APOLOGY, CAIR?
- Nashville Muslims need to get their stories straight about “hate …
- A Partial List Of Faked ‘Hate Crimes’ 2006-7 | Sweetness & Light
- Hamas-linked group that has publicized fake anti-Muslim hate …
- Hamas-linked group that has publicized fake anti-Muslim hate …
- Mosque vandalized in Bedouin village nearÂ Haifa
- More Muslim “Hate Crime” Myths :: Daniel Pipes
We have seen the faking of hate crimes in the U.S. as well: the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has claimed that “anti-Muslim hate crimes” have risen sharply in the U.S. since 9/11. In fact, the rate of such crimes has actuallyÂ dropped. CAIR knows well that victimhood is big business: insofar as they can claim protected victim status for Muslims in the U.S., they can deflect unwanted scrutiny and any critical examination of how jihadists use Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and supremacism.
That’s most likely whyÂ CAIR and others have not hesitated to stoop even to fabricating “hate crimes.” TheyÂ want andÂ need hate crimes against Muslims, because they can use them for political points and as weapons to intimidate people into remaining silent about the jihad threat.
Puff Ho Muslima Â Sumbul Ali Karamanli explains jihad and claims credit for “the Muslim Senegalese man who raised the alarm about the smoking car”,
“Violence in the name of Islam these days has many complex, varied causes, most of which have nothing to do with religion…
Terrorists are not “jihadists,” though they want you to believe they are. The U.S. government has stopped calling terrorists “jihadists,” because so doing legitimizes the terrorists’ violent behavior and makes it easier for them to recruit people. “ Read it and weep….
More from this slick Islamo-agit-prop Sumbul Ali Karamanli: Opposing Islam & Islamic terrorism makes us just like Â them….
Politically correct Islamo-propaganda, endorsed by lefty loons and Â political scumbags. Â But that’s the Obambi party line……
So who was it who alerted the police?
A veteran rises to the occasion all over again. On the other hand, as forÂ Comedy Central, it is clear their act of cowardice did not protect anybody from those who are determined to attack. Will they respond with more censorship, or decide now is the time for the gloves to come off?
“3 cops, street vendor stop Times Square car bomb from detonating; Gas, clock found inside car,” by Allison Gendar, Rocco Parascandola, Kevin Deutsch, and Samuel Goldsmith for theÂ New York Daily News. Jihad Watch has more/ nobody knows anything about “a Senegalese Muslim man who raised the alarm….” Sumbul Ali-Karamanli must have dug it out of her ass…..
When is Arianna Huffington going to have her Clitoridectomy and don’s the burqa? I can’t wait!
Isn’t she already “feeling the pain?”
Leftist/Jihadist Alliance Alert: Abukar Arman is also aÂ columnist for the Huffington Post. There he has said of the Rifqa Bary case: “It should surprise no one that this case has attracted the ‘who-is-who’ among the usual suspects — the founder of paranoia fueling website JihadWatch, Robert Spencer.”
Abdulrahman El-Sayed/Doctoral student, Oxford University
Satoshi Kanazawa is an evolutionary psychologist and professor at the London School of Economics. Although his research as a scientist has ruffled some feathers in the past, his attempts as a “public intellectual” are indisputably inflammatory. In a recent article entitled, “What’s Wrong with Muslims” published in his blog hosted by Psychology Today, Kanazawa wrote:
Major Nidal Malik Hasan is a native-born American citizen, trained military officer, and educated MD and psychiatrist. Yet none of these things matters for him; first and foremost, he is a Muslim…They are all united in their values and goals by their singular identity of being Muslims. It’s tempting to dismiss these observations by saying that [he and others implicated in terrorism plots] are all ‘extremists’ or ‘Jihadists.’
That would be politically correct and comforting, but factually inaccurate.
(Of course, Abdulrahman El-Sayed never tells us whats factually inaccurate, just like we never find a Muslim who can explain the peaceful Islam from the violent one. But that doesn’t matter. What matters is that he gets Puff Ho to print this garbage and that some PC types lap it up/ed)
In his very next article he boasts:
No, not all Muslims are terrorists, but…half of Muslims worldwide are terrorists and active supporters of terrorism, who would encourage their sons, brothers, and nephews to blow themselves up in an airplane or in a crowded market.
Kanazawa is just one in a growing number of academics using his intellectual identity to promote intolerance and xenophobia against Islam and Muslims.
No. We don’t see why we should tolerate the intolerant who call us sons of apes and swine who are cursed, despised and must be killed. Â I take issue with Puff Ho for printing this puff piece. How bout you?
Read more: Abdulrahman El-Sayed in theÂ Huffington Post, 2 February 2010
CAIR spokesboy Ahmed Rehab deposits a few piles of steaming taqiyya on FOX and gets away with it:
Ahmed Rehab of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), fresh from aÂ victory over free speech at the American Library Association, claims that he supports the Constitution, but that’s the least of it. In this Fox News interview, he strews the path to any clear understanding of theÂ Hizb-ut-Tahrir Islamic supremacist conference in ChicagoÂ with red herrings.
Rehab says about Hizb-ut-Tahrir, “This organization has been on the record privately and publicly condemning terrorism.” (So has Rehab been in private contact with the leaders of Hizb-ut-Tahrir?) But terrorism is only part of the problem. Rehab has nothing of substance to say about Hizb-ut-Tahrir’s explicit desire to impose Islamic law upon the United States other than to assert blandly that he and others like him believe in the Constitution — which completely sidesteps the question of whether they want to exploit contemporary understandings of that Constitution’s protections and guarantees in order to bring elements of Sharia here.
He says he believes in capitalism, voting, and civic responsibility, but the reporters don’t ask him anything about Sharia. Nor do they ask him any probing questions about the fact that CAIR is anÂ unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case. Its operatives have repeatedlyÂ refusedÂ toÂ denounceÂ Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several of itsÂ former officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. Several of its other officials have madeÂ Islamic supremacist statementsÂ (Omar Ahmad and Ibrahim Hooper are quoted at the link). CAIR also wasÂ involved in the Flying Imams’ intimidation suitÂ against the passengers who reported their suspicious behavior.
I suspect that this video also shows whyÂ Rehab ducked me instead of meeting me on the ALA panelÂ — he could be reasonably sure that the Fox anchors here would not be informed enough to ask him uncomfortable questions, but I would not hesitate.
Robert Spencer has more:
In “The Islam-Basher and the Librarian Kerkuffle” at theÂ Huffington Post, July 14, Ahmed Rehab of Hamas-linked CAIR-Chicago, who just succeeded inÂ strong-arming the American Library Association into canceling a panelÂ on which I had been scheduled to appear, crows about his campaign against free speech and the truth about Islamic jihad.
Rehab Â left out a few facts about his employer. CAIR is anÂ unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case. Its operatives have repeatedlyÂ refusedÂ toÂ denounceÂ Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several of itsÂ former officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. Several of its other officials have madeÂ Islamic supremacist statements. CAIR also wasÂ involved in the Flying Imams’ intimidation suitÂ against the passengers who reported their suspicious behavior.
What the interviewers should have asked Rehab:
CAIR rep throws out red herrings on Fox News about Islamic supremacist group
What is the point to having someone on, and supposedly subjecting him to probing questioning, when there is no probing questioning, and cannot be, because the interviewers know little or nothing of the Qur’an, Hadith, Sira, know nothing of the 1350-year history of Islamic conquest, know nothing of the doctrines in Islam — taqiyya and kitman –that constitute religiously-sanctioned lying for the sake of protecting the Faith and the Believers, know nothing, either, about CAIR or about the individual, Ahmed Rehab, in question.Â
They are drunk only on their own media importance, and do not understand the responsibility they have to their audience, a responsibility that naturally includes being well-prepared not on everything that they must discuss, but certainly the gravest matters. And there is no matter as grave, and as ill-understood, by both the political and media elites, and by the masses whom they presume to protect and instruct, than Islam. They are not meeting their responsibility.Â
They are, as I noted, drunk with their station in life and the station which gives them prominence. And obviously, when they persist in remaining so inebriated with money and power and fame, they will never be able to deal adequately wtih, respond to inteligently, in any way even manage to get to…Rehab.
What would a well-prepared interviewer have asked Rehab?Â
Let’s take one example: Rehab’s insistence that he “supports” the Constitution. An intelligent and well-prepared interviewer would then attempt to probe further, to find out what this means or could mean.Â
He would ask:Â
1. Do you, as you put it, “support” the First Amendment fully, including the right to unhindered free speech (save for the exceptions made for speech or speech acts likely to lead to “imminent lawless violence”:), including the right to criticize any ideology, including those called “religions”?Â
2. Do you support the right of free speech enshrined in the First Amendment, including the free speech right which is generally recognized in the Western world, as in such countries as Denmark and the Netherlands, and which is not recognized in the lands where Muslims dominate?Â
3. For example, would you defend the right of Americans to publish those cartoons of Muhammad that, when published in Denmark, resulted in diplomatic and economic boycotts, in death threats against Danes, and actual attacks by Muslims on some Danish companies and offices abroad? Do you deplore such attacks and would you uphold the right of Americans to exercise their right of free speech?Â
4. Since you say you “support the Constitution” which is a remark that is vague, and is meaningless without further detail, a fleshing out of this assertion, could you tell me whether or not you recognize deep differences between the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which contains within it, in essence, the guarantees of individual rights in the American Constitution which is popularly known as the Bill of Rights, and the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights Under Islam, and whether you support, as you put it, the American and, more generally, Western version of such rights, or whether you support that very different “Islamic” version embodied in the Cairo Declaration? And please specifically address three guarantees of individual rights from governmwent interference: 1) Freedom of speech 2) Free exercise of religion and 3) the Establishment Clause.Â
That’s a start.
Chas Freeman Al Saud
Attention all those folks who voted for Obama not only because he promised America vital change, but because he swore to sustain foreign policy support for America’s long standing democratic allies – notably the State of Israel.
Take a close look at who’s just been appointed Chairman of his National Intelligence Council, the inner group that produces vital intelligence estimates for the President, his administration as well as the overall intelligence community. I’m talking of none other than Charles “Chas” Freeman, the former U.S, diplomat and pro-Arab lobbyist who is openly and loudly hostile to the Jewish state of Israel, is a defender of Chinese oppression, and hardly the man one might think Obama’s supporters would like buzzing in the presidential ear.
The Puff Hoe’s deliberate stupidity continues to plague the US Â even with the Obamessiah in charge: Â a whole lotta wingeing and whining, cries of “torture” and “injustice”, and the bleeding hearts can’t get enough of it:
From October 2003 until May 2005, I was illegally detained by the U.S. government and held in CIA-run “black sites” with no contact with the outside world. On May 5, 2005, without explanation, my American captors removed me from my cell and cuffed, hooded, and bundled me onto a plane that delivered me to Sana’a, Yemen. I was transferred into the custody of my own government, which held me — apparently at the behest of the United States — until March 27, 2006, when I was finally released, never once having faced any terrorism-related charges. Since my release, the U.S. government has never explained why I was detained and has blocked all attempts to find out more about my detention.
But Steve Emerson is not “discredited” and not “fake”. What’s fake is everything and everyone associated with Puff Ho, which engages in spin and slander Â while sucking up to our mortal enemies:
Congress’ first Muslim member, Rep. Keith Ellison was sworn into office on Thomas Jefferson’s copy of the Quran.
Fox News published a report Thursday slamming Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison by featuring a discredited “terrorism expert.” Ellison’s hajj pilgrimage to Mecca last month, an important part of his Muslim faith, was paid for by the Muslim America Society of Minnesota, an organization that has earned the respect of the Minnesota Council of Churches, the St. Paul Police Department and former Vice President Walter Mondale, but also has been a target by mainly right-wing blogs and think tanks.
Steven Emerson called the Minnesota nonprofit “the Muslim equivalent of the neo-Nazi party.” Of Ellison he said, “It’s very troubling that he is trying to project an image of moderation, but he is tied to these radical groups.” Fox News did not disclose Emerson’s ample volume of false reports, anti-Muslim diatribes, frivolous lawsuits and discredited statements.