Will Bloggers Turn the Tide?

The exposure by blogs of bad and/or biased mainstream media reporting has shaken and stirred the PC-filth and their Mohammedan ‘special interest’ stringers. While Michelle Malkin and others are still looking for the  elusive Iraqi police-stringer ‘captain Jamil Hussein’ the MSM is still reeling over ‘green helmet guy’, remember? The guy who was leading the obliging western news-teams to every bomb crater and held up recycled children’s bodies wherever a bomb hit during the recent Israel/Hezbollah war?

Here’s more:

EU Referendum: The Corruption of the Media
About Those Israeli ‘Chemical Weapons…’
All Your Fakes Are Belong To Us
Zombie: The Red Cross Ambulance Incident
BBC Admits Engaging in Staged Photos
Perlmutter: Photojournalism in Crisis
Green Helmet Admits Staging Photos
Still More Photo Staging Identified
Lebanese Autos Miraculously Survive Airstrikes
Photographer Alleges Unearthing of Bodies
LA Times: Take a Closer Look
CAIR’s Fauxtography Scandal
AP Stands Behind Green Helmet Guy
LGF Exclusive: How Much Does It Cost to Buy Global TV News?
Multi-Use Buildings
Reuters Doctoring Photos from Beirut?

The show must go on, but the bloggers have exposed some of the worst excesses in falsehood and anti-Israel reporting. Congratulations to Charles Johnson from Little Green Footballs and the very courageous Michelle Malkin who is very much onto exposing the MSM’s biased, negligent and vicious distortions, which nowadays passes as ‘reporting’…


Boyz of the Taliban

Famous poets in Arabia glorified homosexuality. As an example I am including a poem in ‘Perfumed Garden’ by Abu Nuwas: 
O the joy of sodomy! 
So now be sodomites, you Arabs. 
Turn not away from it–
therein is wondrous pleasure.
 Take some coy lad with kiss-curls
 twisting on his temple 
and ride as he stands like some gazelle
 standing to her mate. 
A lad whom all can see girt with sword 
and belt not like your whore who has 
to go veiled.
 Make for smooth-faced boys and do your 
very best to mount them, for women are 
the mounts of the devils….

There’s lots more available in the X-rated paradise of Islam, check out this link:


But to get a better idea of the schizoid love-hatred relationship among the Arabs and the Afghans (Pakistanis and Indian Muslims included) with homosexuality you might wanna read this article from Frontpagemag:

‘Boyz of the Taliban’, quite an eye-opener:


The Ignorance of Infidels

From the horses mouth: From ‘Islamic Awakening.com…’

Read it and weep: This is the mindset of the people we have allowed to settle in our midst, who are given health care, free schooling and welfare without gratitude, who are hostile and hateful as only our worst enemy can be and openly threaten to kill us if we don’t submit or live as dhimmies, subjugated people, in our own lands:

The Ignorance of Infidels: Myths, Prejudice and Propaganda About Islam and the West

“He [Allah] created life and death that He might put you to the test and find out which of you acquitted himself best.” 67: 1-2 Interpretation of Meaning

All Praise and All Thanks are for Allah Subhanahu wa Ta’ala to whom we shall all return to be judged on The Last Day.

Part One: The Fundamental Myth

The most fundamental myth of the infidels (the kuffar) – and a mark, a sign, of their prejudice and arrogance – is that they believe and accept that their values, the values of the West, are “universal values”; that is, that these kaffir values are right, objective, and can and should be imposed upon everyone, everywhere.

Let us be quite clear, at the outset, that the values, the perspective, of Islam – of Deen Al-Islam – are not those of the West. They are fundamentally different. We do not share a set of “common values” with the kuffar, with the West, just as our perspective, our view of the world, is not that of the kuffar, of the West. In addition, Deen Al-Islam is not compatible in any way whatsoever with the ways of the West, with the perspective of the West, with the “life-style” of the kuffar…

Read it all:



The Deadly Ceasefire

by Carlos

December 25, 2006 – This past Thursday a rocket crashed through the living room of a home in northern Gaza and exploded in the bedroom where three children were sleeping. Samir al-Masri, two years old, had both his legs broken. His four-year-old sister and three-year-old brother were also injured by the blast.

The rocket that nearly killed these children was fired by Palestinians. It was meant for Israel.

There was supposed to be a ceasefire since November 26. Israel has observed it, stopping the interventions it had taken in Gaza to prevent the firing of rockets. But the rockets continue to fly. Since the so-called ceasefire began, Palestinians have fired nearly 50 rockets and counting into Israel. Those rockets have already killed several people. They have destroyed homes and businesses. The people of Sderot, Ashkelon, and the western Negev, especially the children, suffer from traumatic stress. Yet the press minimizes this story, to the extent it reports the story at all.

The Qassam rockets are called “home-made.” People seem to think the Palestinians are shooting firecrackers. But those rockets are deadly, and the Palestinians keep trying to improve them. Even if Israel continues to observe the “ceasefire,” the death toll will certainly increase. Rockets have slammed into schoolyards. It may just be a matter of time until a rocket hits a school while children are present.

The Palestinians have it both ways. They expect Israel to behave, but they can do whatever they want. If rockets continue to menace Israeli civilians, they say, “Oh, don’t blame the Palestinian government. The trouble comes from Islamic Jihad, or the “military wing” of Hamas, or some other bunch of extremists.” Israel is supposed to continue taking fire without doing anything to defend itself. No country in the history of the world has ever accepted such terms.

The Palestinians’ excuses are nonsense. They expect Israel to act like a responsible nation state while they follow the rules of the jungle. People have always defended the Palestinians this way: Israel is a state, the Palestinians aren’t, so don’t expect as much from them. Such excuses for terrorism were never acceptable. This is especially true today, because now the Palestinians have their own government. They must meet the same standards they expect of Israel. If “extremists” are violating Palestinian government policy, then the Palestinian government must put a stop to it. But the Palestinian government is Hamas, a terrorist group, so of course it does nothing. Not for one minute would the Palestinians accept such a dereliction of responsibility from Israel.

But why should the democratically elected Palestinian government try to restrain the terrorists, when it sympathizes with them and has said so?

The Palestinian “firecrackers” have already destroyed lives and livelihoods:

– A marketplace in Sderot was demolished. Ten stores were damaged, five completely obliterated. The streets were littered with pieces of merchandise.

– A single mother who owned a children’s clothing store had to clean up what was left of her 30-year-old business, now destroyed. She wonders how she is going to make money to feed her children.

– In Sderot, a family of Ethiopian Jews continues trying to live in a home in ruins, with some rooms uninhabitable. They have no money to make repairs.

These are just a few of many similar incidents. This is life under a Palestinian “ceasefire,” with terrified people running for cover when they hear the missiles coming. What will life be like when the Palestinians call off their “ceasefire”?

All during these acts of aggression Israel has acted with remarkable restraint. But no ceasefire can hold if only one side observes it. Israel has the moral obligation to protect the lives of its citizens. Eventually it will have to act. But when it does, because these Palestinian offenses have been trivialized and under-reported, Israel will no doubt be portrayed as the bully and the Palestinians will win even more sympathy. And that will only perpetuate the conflict, since excusing terrorist attacks only encourages more of them.

The Palestinians excuse their brutality by claiming to resist an “occupation” or, to use the slogan du jour, “apartheid.” This is a lie. The last thing Israel wants is sovereignty over the Palestinians. Israel withdrew from Gaza over a year ago with no intention of ever returning, and its only involvement with Gaza since then has been to try to stop terrorist attacks originating there. In addition, the Olmert government had plans to withdraw from most of the West Bank settlements, but had to put those plans on hold since Israel finally learned the hard lesson that every concession of land is met with an increase in Palestinian violence. If the Palestinians truly want an end to this “occupation,” it is hard to fathom why they appear to be doing everything in their power to prevent that from happening.

The lenient double standard by which the Palestinians continue to be excused is absurd. It must be condemned if there is to be any chance of peace. Imagine the outcry if Israel fired missiles into populated areas with the intent of killing innocent people. The Palestinians demand self-determination. When will they be held to the same standard as any civilized nation? They are in fact guilty of a double war crime: firing from civilian areas into civilian areas. When will they be held to account?

It is way past time to strip the Palestinians of their claim to victim status. The claim has no moral justification whatsoever; it is both a deception and a self-deception the Palestinians use to make the destruction of a neighboring state acceptable. All too often, there is no greater abuser than a self-proclaimed victim.


Associated Press. “Errant Palestinian Rocket Wounds 2-Year-Old Boy Sleeping at Home.” International Herald Tribune, December 21, 2006.

Barzak, Ibrahim. “Behind the Headlines: Kassam Fire Goes On Despite Ceasefire.” Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, December 21, 2006.

Bedein, Noam. “On the “Ceasefire” Front.” Sderot Media Center, December 5, 2006.

“Gunbattles Rage Between Hamas and Fatah.” Washington Post, December 21, 2006.

‘AL ANDALUZ’ Update: Mohammed-worshippers Demand Access to Pray in Cathedral

Spanish Cathedral Shuns Muslim Request
A request by Spain’s Islamic Board to allow Muslims to pray in Cordoba’s cathedral (a former mosque, before Cordoba was liberated from Muslim rule in the 13th century) has been denied by the Roman Catholic bishop. (Hat tip: LGF readers.)

The Roman Catholic bishop of Cordoba in southern Spain has rejected an appeal from Muslims for the right to pray in the city’s cathedral, a former mosque.

Juan Jose Asenjo rejected the request made by Spain’s Islamic Board in a letter to the Pope. It had asked that the cathedral become an ecumenical temple where believers from all faiths could worship.

The bishop said such a move would not contribute to the peaceful co-existence between people of different religions. On the contrary, he said in a statement late on Wednesday, the joint use of temples and places of worship would only generate confusion amongst the faithful. Shared use of places of worship could make sense in airports or an Olympic village, said the bishop, but not in a consecrated Catholic cathedral.

Spain’s Islamic Board, which represents a community of some 800,000 in a traditional Catholic country of 44 million, argued in its plea to the Pope that such a move in Cordoba could serve to “awake the conscience” of followers of both faiths and help bury past confrontations.

What we wanted was not to take over that holy place, but to create in it, together with you and other faiths, an ecumenical space unique in the world which would have been of great significance in bringing peace to humanity,” the letter said.

‘Time Bomb’ in Denmark:

Remember cartoon rage? Its not over, in fact it has only just begun.But read the article first:


Some Danes have woken up, some remain deluded, especially this US-official:

“Europeans are uncomfortable with Islam, and they see it as an alien body in their midst. … Europe’s got a huge problem, and they’re just getting their minds around it now.” many like him seem to believe that the problem lies entirely with the Europeans, he doesn’t tell us why, but

Hugh Fitzgerald has the answer ready:

“There’s kind of an unspoken assumption that they’re not really Dutch, not really Danes, and so forth,” reasons one senior U.S. official who follows the phenomenon. “Europeans are uncomfortable with Islam, and they see it as an alien body in their midst. … Europe’s got a huge problem, and they’re just getting their minds around it now.”
— from the article above

The tone of this “senior U.S. offical who follows the phenomenon” is troubling. He appears to think the problem is that of the Europeans, who are “uncomfortable with Islam” (as opposed, perhaps, to Americans who have such a much more extensive experience with Islam than do the people of Europe?). When he says of the Europeans that “they see it as an alien body in their midst” does he think that is wrong? Does he think it is the fault of those bad old Europeans, or does he think they made a terrible, a colossal, a life-threatening error in their heedlessness about Islam, when they let Muslims in in such numbers, and does he think that there is a lesson here for the United States? And does he think that perhaps the doctrines of Islam itself, which uncompromisingly divide the world between Believer and Infidel, and between Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, and preach the doctrine of endless war — not necessarily by open combat, for the money weapon, and “pen, speech,” and Da’wa, and now demographic conquest (discussed endlessly at Muslim sites and in the Muslim media, for everyone is keenly aware of this instrument of conquest in the Camp of Islam, if amazingly unaware in the Camp of the Infidels)– and the view that Europe is a land to be taken over, won for Islam, not a place where Muslims are to embrace, in the slightest, the doctrines or beliefs or legal and political and social institutions of permanently inferior Infidels — does this “senior U.S. official” understand that?

The distant, almost unsympathetic tone, suggests that he does not. And if that is true, he needs a short but intense course in Islam and in the history of Islamic conquest – and not from John Esposito, and not from Karen Armstrong, and not from anyone certified as a “Muslim Sensitivity Trainer” by CAIR.



Anyone wanting to see Esposito is action can click on this link to the Doha Debates website-

Doha Debates Link

He’s participating in a panel discussion focused on the nebulous term “extremism” along with Islamo-Christian cutie Dianna Buttu, the somewhat creepy “sheik” Hamza Yusuf and the (by now) comically irrelevent Bishop Desmond Tutu. As for Esposito, notice the meticulously cultivated “man tan”, the late 80’s Don Johnson attire with the leather sandals and the cotton slacks and the upper-class, disinterested “I could go either way” demeanor.

Something about middle-age men strutting about in sandals really puts me off.

UK Preparing for a ‘Dirty Bomb’ Attack

Tolerance of the intolerable leads to strange behavior patterns of the petrified polit-props who are failing in their duty to protect the British from their Mohammedan invaders:

As if this wasn’t bad enough: You don’t have to be a member of the secret service to know who and what’s behind it. Here’s an in depth analysis of what’s happening in the UK. But have you seen or heard of anyone willing to come forward to take on the invaders? Wake me up if you hear something, will ya?
Check this out: