How much did Britain pay to have Gillian Gibbons ‘pardoned?’

* The criminal Islamaniac scum of Sudan ‘issues a pardon’ to have a British teacher released for allowing her pupils to name a teddy bear ‘Mohammed’.

Sudanese President Omar al-Beshir on Monday pardoned a British woman teacher jailed for 15 days for insulting religion and she will be released in an hour, a presidential advisor told AFP.

“She was pardoned thanks to the mediation of Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi. She will be released in about an hour,” Mahjoub Fadl Badri told AFP.

* Always eager to help when it comes to screwing their host country out of funds to help the ummah along, those ‘British Muslims’…

A Sudanese court on Thursday jailed Gillian Gibbons to 15 days in prison for insulting religion by naming a teddy bear after the Prophet Mohammed at the exclusive English school where she taught in Khartoum.

Two British Muslim peers, Lord Nazir Ahmed and Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, from the upper house of parliament, were on Monday meeting Beshir at the Republican Palace after flying to Khartoum in order to secure a pardon.

The arrest and jail sentence of the 54-year-old mother of two sparked outrage in Britain and a diplomatic crisis between London and Khartoum, further straining relations already frayed over nearly five years of war in Darfur.

Hugh Fitzgerald deplores the cowardice of our Western ‘leaders’ 

Not a single Presidential candidate, not a single official in the American government, has uttered a single word about the telling sentence handed down to the now-pardoned — for “image” reasons –by that Muslim despot and fanatic Bashir, who thinks nothing of mass-murdering the blacks in Darfur, and the Christians in the south of the Sudan)– hapless Mrs. Gibbons.

Not a word. Not a syllable.

Why not?

Can’t think quite what to say, quite how to put it?

I’ll write it for you, just ask!


* Send in the troops and turn these Islamic extortion-bandits out!

* Robert Spencer comments on the Muhammad Teddy Bear teacher

* How to pay the jiziyah with willing submission:

“The dhimmi stands with his head bowed and his back bent. The jizya is placed in the balance and the taker seizes his beard and hits his chin.”

While Islamic law does stipulate that the jizya is not to be collected from women and children, reality in many cases has been different. According to the pioneering historian of dhimmitude, Bat Ye’or:

The poll tax was extorted by torture. The tax inspectors demanded gifts for themselves; widows and orphans were pillaged and despoiled. In theory, women, paupers, the sick, and the infirm were exempt from the poll tax; nevertheless, Armenian, Syriac, and Jewish sources provide abundant proof that the jizya was exacted from children, widows, orphans, and even the dead. A considerable number of extant documents, preserved over the centuries, testify to the persistence and endurance of these measures. In Aleppo in 1683, French Consul Chevalier Laurent d’Arvieux noted that ten-year-old Christian children paid the jizya. Here again, one finds the disparity and contradiction between the ideal in the theory and the reality of the facts. (The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam, pp. 78-9).

Read it all


Clitorectomy is all good’ sez African ‘Anthropologist’

* Hold on to your vaginas, ladies, this is the future:

On the surface, female circumcision sounds like sexual abuse: it is the removal of a young woman’s clitoris practiced by some African cultures as an initiation ritual. While FGC (female genital cutting) has been roundly condemned by many Western women, several African scholars will be arguing in favor of the ritual at the American Anthropological Association’s annual meeting. Dr. Fuambai Ahmadu of Sierra Leone, a post doctoral fellow at the University of Chicago, is one of the scholars who is pro-FGC, and even had her own clitoris cut with fellow members of the Kono ethnic group as an adult. Ahmadu says that her Western “feminist sisters insist on denying us this critical aspect of becoming a woman in accordance with our unique and powerful cultural heritage.”

* Yes doctor. We deny you this ‘critical aspect of becoming a woman’ – and if you insist on your ‘powerful cultural heritage’ piss off to Africa and get some more until it comes out from the other end.

Another proponent of FGC, Dr. Richard Shweder, says that Westerners conveniently ignore the fact that they produce their own kinds of genital mutilation in the form of the vaginal rejuvenation of women and circumcision for boys. Shweder says that, “‘First World’ feminist issues and political correctness and activism have triumphed over the critical assessment of evidence.” Ahmadu also has an essay called “Ain’t I a woman too?: challenging myths of sexual dysfunction in circumcised women”, where she insists that women who have undergone FGC still experience orgasm and a great deal of sexual pleasure.

I asked a friend who has lived in Liberia and works for a post-conflict justice association what she thinks about FGC, and she points out that “There are lots of versions of the procedure. The most severe being cut off the clit, the inner labia, and SEW CLOSED the vaginal hole.” That sounds like straight abuse to me. But according to my friend, some modified versions only involve pricking the clitoris. “It’s about degrees and when the practice, in its entirety is accepted, there are no ways to moderate the procedure.”

What do you think? Is the pro-FGC argument just cultural relativism? Or is the issue more nuanced than Westerners have realized?


* Nothing to think about. No debate. No bullshit. No cultural relativism. No fake equivalence: clitcutting is a crime against humanity. Those who engage in it must know they will rot in prison and will be stripped of citizenship and deported to some cultural desert in Africa where they can engage in it. We have laws and if you want to live here you abide by the law. Our law.

No can do.

What say you?

* Hundred comments here..

US: No Feminist Support For Imprisoned Teddy Bear Teacher

* It must be the ‘glass-ceiling’ that is preventing these dames to get in on the action.

Not that anyone should be surprised by this, at least I know none of us are. This is a fantastic article from Fox News, basically outlining what we’ve been saying for years now, that feminists are a bunch of hypocritical half-wits who are nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Democratic party….

Teddy Bear Case Exposes Failure of American Feminist Leaders

By Tammy Bruce


It took a teddy bear . . .

British schoolteacher Gillian Gibbons, an unimposing woman of 54, was found guilty of “inciting religious hatred” and sentenced to 15 days in jail and deportation by a court in Sudan’s Khartoum after allowing her 7-year-old students to name a teddy bear “Muhammad.”

In the meantime, Islamist fundamentalists have called for her execution, and her safety is in constant jeopardy. Demonstrations have increased, with crowds carrying machetes, shouting in part: “Execute her! Kill her, kill her by firing squad.”

She is under such threat, Sudanese authorities have moved her to a secret location to ensure her safety.

Apparently, naming a cuddly bear Muhammad insults the prophet, while mass-murdering homicide bombers named Muhammad don’t.

During the past 14 years at least, certainly since Usama bin Laden declared ‘war’ on Western civilization in 1993, we’ve all been exposed to the literal madness of Islamic fundamentalism. We’ve seen the curtain pulled back on how craven American leftists can be as well. Yes, it took a teddy bear to highlight more clearly than ever the psychosis of the enemy, and the failure of the feminist establishment.

There has been appropriate international outrage over the treatment of Gibbons, from virtually everyone except American “feminists.” Multiple Muslim groups in the U.K. have condemned the sentence. Even the popular little boy in Mrs. Gibbons’ class who suggested the name for the bear came to her defense, explaining that he named the bear after himself.

Yet, when asked by FOX News for a comment about the situation, a National Organization for Women spokeswoman said they were “not putting out a statement or taking a position.”

This is how depraved the American left has become. A little Muslim boy in Sudan shows more courage and conviction for a woman under fire than a bunch of women sitting in Washington, D.C., who preen themselves on being the premiere “advocates” for women.

Read more?

Shems Cartoon Rage



More Taqiyya From The Muslim Quarter


Shiraz Maher

* “Islam is not to blame”, sez Shiraz:

A few weeks ago Rod Liddle participated in a debate about whether Islam is good for London. His message, in a nutshell: I don’t have a problem with Muslims, I have a problem with Islam. I don’t share his views, though many do – and I can see how they’ve got there.

* He doesn’t share these views, you see? Its not Nazism that is to blame, its….. what exactly? The Nazi’s? But no, they’re also not to blame. It must be the Gestapo then? But did they follow a different ideology from the Fuhrer? Which one is it, Shiraz?

* At last, he nails it:

And when people associate Islam with the kind of barbarism we see around the world, it’s not because Muslims have stayed quiet for too long – but because we’ve failed to challenge and defeat the ideology which promotes it.

* Agreed. Now lets defeat the ideology, okay?

* Then, he denies it:

Another participant in the debate about the merits of Islam in London was Ed Husain. He explained that, unlike Rod Liddle, he didn’t have a problem with Islam, but with Muslims. I agree.


* He doesn’t have a problem with the ideology but ‘only with the people who follow it?’

Back to smoke and mirrors:

“…we’ll only have ourselves to blame when people conflate Islam with Islamism. And that’s something I take offence to. “

* So do we, Shiraz. We also take offence at being hoodwinked.

* Because there is no ‘Islamism’- there is no fundamentalist Islam, militant Islam, hijacked Islam or moderate Islam. There is only Islam. Ask any good Muslim, he’ll tell you….


Why are these creeps in the West?

UK Muslim Professor: Christians Shouldn’t Teach Muslims….

Iftikhar Ahmad, of the London School of Islamaniacs, also claims that the demonstrators who called for her death are simply a response to Iraq and the dreaded Danish cartoons of blasphemy. Unreal, and they wonder why we don’t trust them… want them gone…

Link to Weasel Zippers

Islamic Court: Rape Not A Crime

Turkish Court: Marital Rape Not A Crime; Turkish Columnist: Decision Turns Women Into Sex Slaves

Source: Turkish Daily News


* How could it be? A man owns his wife just like he owns his goat, or his dog or his camel. Besides, there are the traditions from the ‘noble hadith’- which are absolutely authentic:

* If a man is in a mood to have sexual intercourse woman must come immediately even if she is baking bread at a communal oven.

(TR. P 428)

In response to a ruling by Turkey’s Supreme Court of Appeals that marital rape is not a crime, Ä°smet Berkan wrote in his column in Radikal that because of the ruling, if a woman “resists and is killed by her husband in the end, his penalty even could be reduced due to ‘grievous provocation!’

We learned [about] this during the ‘Stop Violence Against Women’ week…”

He continued, “Unfortunately, the court’s decision has the effect of turning women into sex slaves in marriages… Forcing someone into sexual intercourse is called ‘rape.’ In Turkey, which is making efforts to end violence against women, the Court of Appeals decision must have been a really bad coincidence…”

* Coincidence? You think?

* A woman in many ways is deprived of the possession of her own body. Even her milk belongs to her husband.

(Bukhari P 27)

* Majority of women will go to hell.

(Muslim P 1431)

“Allah’s Apostle said, “If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.”

— Bukhari, 4.54.460


Islamic teachings link


There’s more, much more:

“Your women are a tilth for you (to cultivate) so go to your tilth as ye will,”

(Qur’an 2:223).

On the “divine” right to polygamy and having sex slaves:

“If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice,”

(Qur’an 4:3).

* Here’s more. You know there’s always more, don’t you?

* Yeah, because there’s Mo himself, the ‘perfect man’- uswa hasana, al insan al kamil- the most excellent example of conduct for all mankind, for all time. Right?

Right. See if you can follow that:

On taking for one’s pleasure the wives of those you’ve just slaughtered:

“…we reached Khaibar; and when Allah enabled him to conquer the Fort (of Khaibar), the beauty of Safiya bint Huyai bin Akhtab was described to him. Her husband had been killed while she was a bride. So Allah’s Apostle selected her for himself and took her along with him till we reached a place called Sad-AsSahba,’ where her menses were over and he took her for his wife…” (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 143).

On Mohammed’s raping his nine-year-old “wife” — Allah ordained it:

“My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left. The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old” (Tabari 9:131).



That’s why every believing Muhammad worshiper is eager to emulate his profit

This Afghan has found his child bride already


Refresher course: Saudi Cleric Explains Wife Beating in Islam to Young Muslims

Islam, Slavery and Rape

By Jamie Glazov

All morality in Islam is patterned after the example of Mohammed. Everything that he did and said defines what is permitted or “good”. Mohammed repeatedly sanctioned forced sex (rape) with kafir females after they were captured. The Hadith clearly reports that he got first choice of the women. In one case, he repeatedly demanded one particular woman for himself and swapped two other kafir slave women for his choice. So if Mohammed was involved in the rape of kafirs, then rape is a virtue, not a sin or error.

When Mohammed destroyed the B. Qurayza tribe, all of the adult male Jews were beheaded, so that no husbands were left. Mohammed then took the children and gave them to Muslims to raise as Muslims and he sold off the Jewish women as slaves.

We know from another story that the women were divided into sex slaves and domestic slaves. In one scene, a jihadist is trying to obtain a high ransom for a woman and he is told that her breasts are flat and her mouth is cold, so her value was less. In short, she was only good for work around the house, not in the bedroom.

The Hadith tells of another story where the Muslims used coitus interruptus to avoid impregnating the kafir sex slaves. The reason was purely for business. If the kafir sex slave was pregnant, then she was worth less money.

Islamic doctrine says that kafir women should not be used for prostitutes, only for the pleasure of the master.

Muhammad was a white man who owned black slaves

Q: Mohammed was a white man and had black slaves, correct? Isn’t there a racism here? Where is all the leftist indignation against Islam on this issue?

A: The relationship between blacks and slavery is ironic. A standard approach of Islam to blacks is that Christianity is the religion of the white man and Islam is the natural religion of the black man. They add that Mohammed’s second convert was a black slave, Bilal, who was Mohammed’s companion and the first muezzin (the man who calls to prayer).

The Hadith, however, goes out of its way, many times, to tell the world that Mohammed was a white man. The Hadith also tells us the race of the kafirs that Mohammed enslaved. And Mohammed had many black slaves in his household. One of his slaves was a black man called, Anjasha.

Mohammed owned black slaves. It is that simple. His favorite wife, the child Aisha, had a black slave. But to be fair to Mohammed, he was not a racist about slavery. He enslaved Arabs, Africans, and Greeks. Islam enslaves all kafirs, independent of race.


Arab Muslim Slavetraders with  Merchandise “Booty”

Mohammed was politically incorrect about blacks and called them “raisin heads” in the Hadith. Thus it would be a compliment to call a black Muslim a “raisin head.” It would be Sunna and not offensive. Mohammed also said that Muslims are to obey the Islamic leader, “even if they were black.” A left-handed compliment, at best.

Read it all

Sydney: Islamic School Axed

Good News from Bankstown thanks to Mullah:

Heath Gilmore / SMH

A SYDNEY council is set to reject a proposed Islamic college as tension about religious educational facilities escalates across the city.

Bankstown City Council will determine the development application for the 1200-student Al Amanah Islamic College at Bass Hill on Tuesday night.

Nearly 2500 submissions were received from residents – 1829 against, 649 in support.

Council staff have recommended that the development – a primary and secondary school, a 30-place child-care centre with two residences for caretakers, a reception and convention hall, a sporting hall and an indoor pool – be refused.

Planning director Gerry Beasley said council had relied on advice from the Roads and Traffic Authority and the Department of Education and Training, and its own staff.

Thousands of residents have held meetings to stop Islamic schools being built across Sydney, including in Bass Hill. Last week two pig heads were rammed onto metal stakes, with an Australian flag between them, on the site of a proposed school in Camden.

* Something to suck on, Irf!


* Are these promotional tools for a 7th century cult desecrating the flag?

* Desecrating the flag does not make them Australians. 


Fitzgerald: Learning from Muslims themselves 

In this news article, one more of those young Muslims claiming that “Islamophobia” explains mistrust of Muslims and of Islam, and if only we “learned about Islam from Muslims themselves,” we would think differently. He is, in other words, full of the usual nonsense. 

The highly  erudite  Hugh Fitzgerald straightens him out, read it all 

Netherlands: More Muhammad Flicks In the Making

The Dutch are going with the one-two punch. Wilders film on the “fascist” Koran and Jami on the pedophile “Prophet.” Rage Boy’s gonna be in high demand….


Koranimal with knife

Ehsan Jami works on film on Islam

AMSTERDAM – Ehsan Jami, founder of the Committee for Former Muslims, has followed Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s example and made a short film about radical Islam, the Telegraaf reports.

The film entitled The life of Mohammed should be ready in February or March of next year and will cause more of a commotion than the Danish cartoons of Mohammed, the former Labour PvdA member says.

“I show how violent and tyrannical Mohammed was. This man murdered three Jewish tribes, killed people who left the faith, and married a 6-year-old girl, with whom he had sex when she was 9,” Jami says in comment on the contents of the 10-minute film.

The politician, who is still under heavy protection, says the film only shows the facts and does not aim to polarise the situation. “I will give EUR 50,000 to anyone who can refute these facts.”

Cool. Read it?


Koran rage, cartoon rage, Gitmo rage, Abu Ghraib rage, Pope rage, Mo rage, Teddy bear rage, Mof*k*%#dickrage…

Australia: Inmates using al-Qaeda Manual to Take Over the State’s Jails….

Heath Gilmore

ISLAMIC extremists are using an al-Qaeda training manual to give them instructions for taking over the state’s toughest jails, prison authorities have alleged.

Up to 40 inmates had established an internal organisational structure to maintain morale, resist interrogation and recruit members to Islam.

The prisoners had set up leadership groups in several maximum-security jails, with their activities governed by the code outlined in the al-Qaeda manual for incarcerated followers.

A number of Corrective Services staff have been targeted, some with violent threats by inmate groups. Other staff have been singled out for conversion to Islam.

NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos said an undisclosed number of inmates had been transferred to other jails in an attempt to disrupt the leadership groups.

Mr Hatzistergos said he was extremely concerned about the broader attempts to infiltrate the jail system, which were uncovered after sweeping changes to prison regulations allowed 24-hour monitoring of Muslim inmates.

The latest crackdown followed the disclosure this year that a third of the state’s most dangerous criminals held in the highest-security jail in Australia, the Super Max facility inside Goulburn jail, were Muslim fundamentalists or converts to Islam.

“The insidious nature of these activities remind us we have to be constantly vigilant to these types of threats for the security of our correctional system,” Mr Hatzistergos said.

NSW Corrective Services Commissioner Ron Woodham said international prison authorities had alerted Australian authorities to the existence of the manual three months ago.

Corrective Services staff had since uncovered patterns of behaviour among inmates consistent with instructions in the manual, including hunger strikes, group protests and claims of mistreatment, he said.

“There were hunger strikes and organised complaints about their treatment,” he said. “We have detected the leadership in groups across our maximum security jails [and] have moved in to segregate them and split them up.

“There is nothing wrong with conversion to Islam for the right reasons, but we believe there has been conversion taking place for the wrong reasons.”

* Me thinks their conversion is very wrong in any case.

* Because prison da’awa turns violent crims into violent fanatical jihad crims. How is that supposed to help them re-integrate in society?

The Security Threat Group Intervention Program, established in 2003 to stop ethnic and other criminal gangs exerting control within NSW jails, is now being used to identify and relocate the ringleaders who are applying the code outlined in the al-Qaeda manual, to counter the growing threat of terrorism.

Brigitte Gabriel on Hannity & Colmes

Brigitte Gabriel To Debate Muslim on”O’Reilly Factor” Tonight

* Just noticed that youtube & AOL pulled a lot of her video’s, looks like our Muhammedan friends have been rather active to censor her.

Brigitte Will Also Be On “Fox News and Friends” Saturday Morning and

“Hannity’s America” Sunday Night

Brigitte Gabriel will be on the “O’Reilly Factor” on the Fox News Channel tonight. The subject will be the rise of Islam and specifically the incident in Sudan in which British schoolteacher Gillian Gibbons was sentenced to 15 days in jail for allowing her students to name a teddy bear “Muhammed.”

Brigitte will also be a guest on “Fox News and Friends” around 9:15 Saturday morning and “Hannity’s America” on Fox News Sunday night.

* Watch this one while we wait for the latest:


Alas, here we have it thanks to Pamela from Atlas Shrugs:

The Muhammedan ‘Eric Vickers’ of course deposits a steaming pile of taqiyya in his first sentence:

Note the first Islamic lie — 7 million Muslims in America (more like 2 million).

Again the meme, only a “tiny number of extremists “— hundreds of million is a fraction of 1.3 billion but its a lot of jihad.

Vickers does the broken record routine: “Stereotyping…, blah blah, stereotyping…., we condemn….

Brigitte debated Eric Vickers of the American Muslim Council on Sudan
islamists calling for the death of Gillian Gibbons, the Brit teacher
jailed for allowing her 2nd Grade students to name a teddy bear

During her trial, a weeping Gibbons said she had intended no harm. Her students, overwhelmingly Muslim, chose the name for the bear, and Muhammad is one of the most common names for men in the Arab world. ..

But the case was caught up in the ideology that President Omar al-Bashir’s Islamic regime has long instilled in Sudan, a mix of anti-colonialism, religious fundamentalism and a sense that the West is besieging Islam.


Gallowswine Ejects ‘Zionist’ Journo’s 

Angry MP insists Hamas not terrorist, abruptly ends interview, deploys police 


Commie rat and closet Muslim ‘georgeous George’ proves once again that he’s a Jew-hating creep

Amid a volatile exchange over whether Hamas is a terrorist organization, the leftist British lawmaker George Galloway abruptly booted WND’s Jerusalem bureau chief Aaron Klein and radio talk-host Rusty Humphries from his London office and handed them over to Parliament police, claiming the two were Zionist operatives who had breached security by falsely presenting themselves as reporters.

The entire fiasco, which occurred in June, was recorded on audio tape.

Klein, author of the recently released book “Schmoozing with Terrorists,” said he and Humphries had refrained from releasing the tape until after the publication of “Schmoozing” for fear Klein would lose some Hamas sources. In the book, Klein conducts interviews with the chiefs of most major Palestinian terror organizations, including Hamas.

Click here 

Litigation Jihad Against Mark Steyn


Canadian Islamic Congress launches ‘human rights’ complaints against Maclean’s magazine for publishing an excerpt from Mark Steyn’s book “America Alone,” which the CIC labels not just “Islamophobic,” but flagrantly Islamophobic: Canadian Islamic Congress launches human rights complaints against Maclean’s.

* Please note that ‘Islamophobic’ is a bullshit word that doesn’t exist in any dictionary. Just like you can’t be ‘Christianophobic, Judeo-phobic or Hindu-or Buddhist-o-phobic’- such a thing simply doesn’t exist. No one should be accused of warning against Islam, a 7th century blood-cult.

* Whatever it takes to prevent the message from getting out. When has any Muhammedan ever given 5 cents for ‘human rights?’

Complaints were submitted to Human Rights Commissions in B.C. and Ontario on the grounds that “the article subjects Canadian Muslims to hatred and contempt,” according to a CIC press release. In the release, the CIC labels Steyn’s article as “flagrantly Islamophobic.”

Faisal Joseph is the CIC’s legal counsel on the matter. In Canada, we have 750,000 law-abiding Muslims,” he says. “When you read that article, it sounds to some people [like] there’s an attack from the ‘Muslim’ world against the ‘non-Muslim’ world. We take real issue with that type of characterization and the implications of it.”

* Indeed there is an attack from the ‘Muslim world’ against the non-Muslim world. We take issue with those who deny it.

* Furthermore: ‘law-abiding Muslims’- just by which law are they abiding? The secular law of the nation state of the sharia?

In response, a Maclean’s spokesperson provided the following statement: “Mark Steyn is a thoughtful and experienced journalist, and the piece was a commentary on important global political issues. It was not in any sense Islamophobic, and Maclean’s is confident that the Human Rights Commissions will find no merit in the complaints.”

Click here to read ‘The Future Belongs to Islam’


The future belongs to Islam

The Muslim world has youth, numbers and global ambitions. The West is growing old and enfeebled, and lacks the will to rebuff those who would supplant it. It’s the end of the world as we’ve known it. An excerpt from ‘America Alone’.

Click here to read ‘The Future Belongs to Islam’




“The chief weapon in the quiver of all Islamist expansionist movements, is the absolute necessity to keep victims largely unaware of the actual theology plotting their demise. To complete this deception, a large body of ‘moderates’ continue to spew such ridiculous claims as “Islam means Peace” thereby keeping non-Muslims from actually reading the Qur’an, the Sira, the Hadith, or actually looking into the past 1400 years of history. Islamists also deny or dismiss the concept of ‘abrogation’, which is the universal intra-Islamic method of replacing slightly more tolerable aspects of the religion in favor of more violent demands for Muslims to slay and subdue infidels”


Other News:

Taliban Wedding Party Implodes

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (AFP) – Four Taliban rebels were killed when their ammunition exploded during a wedding party they attended as special guests in a southern Afghan village, police said Saturday.


Italian soldiers in Paghman, some 25 kms west of Kabul

Eight other Islamic rebels were injured in the blast in southern Zabul province late on Friday, provincial police chief Mohammad Yaqoub told AFP.


From our ‘Fuckwits & Sensitive Pop tarts’ Department:

ChiTrib Blogger Asks if Sudan Teddy Bear Case Sent ‘Fair Message’ to Be ‘Sensitive’

“Should all have been forgiven or does the teacher’s sentence send a fair message that foreigners sholud [sic] be more sensitive when it comes to religion?” Brachear found space to hint that the British government may be to blame for nearly causing Gibbons to face the lash: If a grudge is to blame, foreign policy analysts say it’s one held against the British government for condemning the crisis in Sudan’s Darfur region. Millions of people in Darfur have been killed or driven from their homes, largely by the government-backed militia group known as the janjaweed. Muslim clerics in Sudan insist that Westerners are condemning more than the conflict in Darfur. They are attacking Islam and the teacher should be punished for being party to that, according to Islamic law.

Savage Update: Savage lawsuit calls CAIR ‘vehicle of international terrorism’

Accuses group of seeking ‘harm to those who speak against violent agenda’

A good attack is the best defense against the Religion of Peace.


Trend-setting radio talk show host Michael Savage has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Council on Islamic-American Relations, and has accused the organization of being a “political vehicle of international terrorism” that seeks to do “material harm to those voices who speak against the violent agenda of CAIR’s clients.”

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in California, seeks damages equal to the ongoing donations from CAIR supporters “who expect CAIR to act in this manner in exchange for continuing financial support” as well as “actual damages according to proof.”

A spokesman for Savage indicated the top-rated talk show host would have no further comment, saying the text of the lawsuit itself would answer questions.

The focal point of the lawsuit is a series of audio clips CAIR has been using in its promotions and fundraising efforts.

Those comments from Savage’s show include his criticisms of Islam and Muslims, including:

“I’m not gonna put my wife in a hijab. And I’m not gonna put my daughter in a burqa. And I’m not getting’ on my all-fours and braying to Mecca. And you could drop dead if you don’t like it. You can shove it up your pipe. I don’t wanna hear any more about Islam. I don’t wanna hear one more word about Islam. Take your religion and shove it up your behind. I’m sick of you.”

But the lawsuit maintains such comments, taken in context, are Savage’s verbal expression of the feelings of many Americans.


Another statement targeted by CAIR, and subject of the lawsuit, was:

What sane nation that worships the U.S. Constitution, which is the greatest document of freedom ever written, would bring in people who worship a book that tells them the exact opposite? Make no mistake about it, the Quran is not a document of freedom. The Quran is a document of slavery and chattel. It teaches you that you are a slave.”

CAIR, however “expropriated” Savage’s comments, including those from the Oct. 29, 2007, show and used them “for fund-raising purposes” and “in a manner designed to cause harm to the value of the copyright material in the long and short term,” the lawsuit said.

“Michael Savage’s right to speech is protected by both the First Amendment and in Savage’s view is also biblically required. “Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. The lion hath roared, who will not fear? the Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy?” (Amos 3:7-8). It is essence of freedom that voices can be raised strongly and without fear of illegal retaliation,” the claim continued.

“CAIR attempted to silence Michael Savage by stealing his work, misrepresenting it and then seeking to have advertisers drop his show. This is a violation of Michael Savage’s rights to speech and to his religious beliefs,” the action said.And the action noted the FBI has concluded the IAP is “a Hamas front … (that is) controlled by Hamas, it brings Hamas leaders to the U.S., it does propaganda for Hamas.”

The action seeks a jury trial, plus “general and special damages” for the actions that were “wanton, willful and malicious.”

Right on, Savage! Read the whole thing here

* Savage, of course, lives in the land of the free and has a huge audience behind him. Also, the producers of his radio station are not cowards like so many others who cave in the moment a Muslim in Bangladesh gets a cough. That’s why we have this awful situation here in India:

Taslima Nasreen update

Indian Muslims to meet on Taslima row

* A shameful act by a corrupt, shortsighted government. India won’t protect her, so Taslima sees herself forced to rewrite her book and take the offensive passages out. Not that a Muslim would ever read it, but when the imam’s and the mufti’s call for jihad and the Muhammedan mob goes ape shit in the streets and does what good Muslims always do, the politicians run for cover. A bit like the despicable Dutch wankers who withdraw their support from Ayaan Ali Hirsi.


NEW DELHI – Hardline Indian Muslim groups said they would meet on Sunday to decide whether to keep up demands for the expulsion of Bangladesh author Taslima Nasreen, hounded into hiding by protests against her.

The Milli Ittehad Parishad, an umbrella alliance of 12 Muslim groups, on Saturday announced the meeting, a day after Nasreen promised to remove passages from her autobiography that some Muslims found offensive.

“The Milli Ittehad Parishad has called a meeting to take a unanimous stand on Taslima Nasreen,” Siddikulla Chowdhury, general secretary of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, one of the member organisations, told AFP.

The dozen groups have been demanding her deportation from India for “hurting the religious sentiment of Muslims in India.”

* Muslims have a long tradition of ‘hurting the religious sentiments’ of all other religious groups in India by bombing their religious festivals and a history of jihad with more than 100 million skeletons in the closet. India would be well advised to tell the Muslims to shove it. But they won’t.


Nasreen, who has lived in Kolkata since 2004, said on Friday she hoped the move to take out the controversial passages from her autobiography “Dikhandito” or “Split into Two” would enable her to to live peacefully in India.

The federal government has pledged to protect Nasreen and moved her to a safe house outside New Delhi last weekend after thousands of Muslims rioted in her adopted home city, demanding her ejection from India.

But the government warned her not to make any statements that might “hurt the sentiments of our people” — a reference to India’s 140-million-plus Muslims.


Here’s the story from Times Online

A feminist author is to rewrite her autobiography after she was forced to flee from Muslim extremists who placed a bounty on her head.

Taslima Nasreen, 45, a former doctor, said today that she hoped that the move would appease fundamentalist groups and end a controversy that forced her to leave Calcutta last week.

Ms Nasreen had claimed that the religious references in Dwikhandito, which means Divided, are sourced from “universally accepted” books on Islamic history.

Today she relented under pressure and said that “controversial lines” relating to Islam from the autobiographical novel would be removed.

* Right. But will that keep her safe?

A Savage Attack


The thugs from CAIR -the Council on American Islamic Relations- thought they could intimidate and scare off Michael Savage, a popular ‘right wing’ radio jock who sometimes goes over the top and really lets it fly. Unlike others before him who cowed and backed off, made apologies or lost their jobs, Savage goes on the attack and hits back:

Savage fights back, sues CAIR


Fibbi Hooper

With thanks to JW

The truth-challenged unindicted co-conspirators of the Council on American Islamic Relations have been targeting radio host Michael Savage, as they have targeted so many others before him. They’ve been pressuring advertisers to stop advertising on his show, and they’ve been succeeding. Background here.

But Savage, unlike Fox, unlike National Review, unlike so many others, is unwilling to play the dhimmi and kowtow to these lying Islamic supremacist thugs in their continued assaults on the freedom of speech. It’s about time that somebody with the resources to do so has fought back.

The text of Savage’s suit can be found here. A few highlights:

The conduct of CAIR (in addition to raising money) in violating the copyright interests of Michael Savage was to gain media attention and control so that CAIR would be seen as the “moderate” voice in the media. In fact CAIR is a radical voice that deliberately attempts to be seen as centrist so that media time goes to CAIR and once on the air, CAIR directs its rhetoric to the benefit of its extremist clients. This is a deliberate tactic and the theft of the copyright material was part of a pattern and practice advancing this tactic.

As set forth herein, CAIR is not a civil rights organization but is instead a political organization designed to advance a political agenda that is directly opposed to the existence of a free society that includes respect and dignity for all people and all religions.

The copyright infringement herein is part of this plan. CAIR’s fundamental purpose is to be a lobbyist for foreign interests.

Here you can listen to Savage on youtube



CAIR while claiming in its paperwork to be a civil rights organization was in fact co-founded in 1994 by Ibrahim Hooper, Nihad Awad, and Omar Ahmad, all of whom had close ties to the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP), which was established by senior Hamas operative Mousa Abu Marzook.


The director of the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation counter-terrorism unit has stated that IAP is “a Hamas front…(that is) controlled by Hamas, it brings Hamas leaders to the US, it does propaganda for Hamas.”


CAIR opened its first office in Washington, DC, with the help of a $5,000 donation from the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), a self-described charity founded by Hamas operative, Mousa Abu Marzook.


The bully boy Muhammad from CAIR

* This is how to do it. If more radio and TV-stations grow some balls and get with it, this spook can be over in no time. Let the counter jihad begin!

Read it all


What the Pal’s really think of Condi


Yeah baby, they call you a raisin head who is breeding a monkey. Now don’t hate me just because I’m telling you the upleasant truth….

(Nor do I wish to burst your bubble… but you better wake up before reality comes to bite you in the ass…)


Via Pali Media Watch

Above and beyond the steady anti-American hatred promoted by the Palestinian Authority (PA) leaders for years, they seem to have a special penchant for hating Condoleezza Rice. Some of the attacks have included expressions of racial hatred, as in an article this week referring to Rice as a “raven” and a previous article that referred to her as “the colored… the dark skinned… the black lady.” [see PMW Bulletin]

In another racist article attacking Condolezza Rice, the PA daily referred to her as the ”black woman” [three times], the “black spinster” and continues that he even considered the term “black widow” but rejected it. Her father is called the “black clergyman” [who filled her head with Bible stories] and Colin Powell is the “black man”, the “black gentleman” and even the “brave and moderate black.”

All appeared in the official PA daily, then controlled by Arafat, today under Mahmoud Abbas.


Soumaya Ghannoushi, always good for a laugh:

* Soumaya is a shrill Islamo-fascist shill in Londonistan, along the lines of the Bungla-spin doctor. This time she’s got it all worked out:

The teddy bear affair seems to have been the Sudanese government’s revenge against London. In a country whose national memory is still profoundly scarred by the massacres of Gordon and Kitchener, it does not take much to stir tension and suspicion against the British.

* Read it if you can be bothered…

* Sick of Soumaya Ghannoushi 


Oxford “Open Minds” Alert:


Jews and Muslims forge a bond in the Oxford mêlée

The Union of Jewish Students and Oxford University’s Islamic Society carried a huge banner marked with the symbols of both organisations. Some Muslim demonstrators carried posters proclaiming “Hands off our Jews”, while the Jewish Society carried others saying “Hands off our Muslims”.


* Useful Jewish idiots? Even their own mothers hate them.

* Jewiscidal Jews?

Deborah Lipstadt, whom Irving sued unsuccessfully for libel that led to him being labelled a Holocaust denier by the trial judge, said in a message read out during the demonstration: “Inviting these two men [to the Oxford Union] smacks of a stunt which gives them what they most need to survive: publicity.

“Some of those who have defended the Oxford Union have called for open minds. The problem with people with open minds is that sometimes their minds are so open their brains fall out — and that is the best that can be said of the organisers of this debate.”



Muhammad worshipers walk out on Daniel Pipes

Here’s the reception Daniel Pipes got this time around at UC Irvine, where the Muslim Student Union boycotts him and walks out. Menacing, but very much under control.

* Once again we see the Muhammadan’s refusing to listen to an opposing point of view…The Muslim Student Union fits right in with the modern American university liberal.