The Islamic duty to use lies and dissemination (taqiyya) to spread Islam

*  “The chief weapon in the quiver of all Islamist expansionist movements, is the absolute necessity to keep victims largely unaware of the actual theology plotting their demise. To complete this deception, a large body of ‘moderates’ continue to spew such ridiculous claims as “Islam means Peace” thereby keeping non-Muslims from actually reading the Qur’an, the Sira, the Hadith, or actually looking into the past 1400 years of history. Islamists also deny or dismiss the concept of ‘abrogation’, which is the universal intra-Islamic method of replacing slightly more tolerable aspects of the religion in favor of more violent demands for Muslims to slay and subdue infidels”

*  There is a whole army of Islamic apologists and liars in the West who become rather unhinged when knowledgable infidels, “Islamophobes”,  ask the wrong questions about the cult or the murderous ‘prophet’ who invented this horrid belief-system that shackles over one billion people. One of them is the very shrill and  hysterical Soumaya Ghannoushi who has been featured here repeatedly. As usual, that doesn’t stop the Guardian to provide a soapbox for her grievance theater:


Saying ‘Islamic threat’ over and over doesn’t make it real

“Years of peddled fear and demonisation have left vulnerable minorities more isolated and the world fixated by a myth”

* Creating myths:  “Not one Jew died [on 9/11]. That is what they say” Returning madrassa student tell about their indoctrination an a Paki-madrassa

“Myth?” 11.428 recorded Terror Attacks since 9/11 are a ‘Myth?’

Ghannoushi unhinged:

* Summaya paints a pussy on your cheek (if you let her)

Pick up any newspaper today in Britain or elsewhere in Europe, switch on the TV or tune in to any radio station, and you’re very likely to get the impression that “our societies” – if not western civilisation in its entirety – face an imminent Islamic threat, on a par with the old dangers of fascism. Since the terrorist bombings of New York, Madrid and London, the “fundamentalist peril” has become part of the air we breathe. It has become a rhetorical crutch for everyone from rightwing bigots to opportunistic politicians and repenting “former extremists”, each with their own agenda.

Today we live amid an explosion of discourse and imagery around Islam and Muslims. Sparked by al-Qaida’s lunatic atrocities, it has since fed on the politics of fear and suspicion. The victims have included objectivity, balance, and the ability to judge issues calmly and rationally. Flawed material is endlessly reproduced and recycled, so it is little wonder that the public’s understanding of Islam and the complex political problems of the Muslim world are limited at best.

Years of peddled fear and demonisation have had severe consequences: a widening of ignorance and bigotry, deepening mistrust between individuals and communities, and the resurrection of the pernicious language of racism and fanaticism – as journalist Peter Oborne illustrated in his Channel 4 Dispatches documentary earlier this week.

It is probably no exaggeration to say that Islam is now the religion closest to Europe and remotest from it. Islam is no longer an alien, distant religion. It is now woven into the very fabric of European society. Muslims are the largest of the continent’s minorities. Yet their physical proximity does not appear to have made them more familiar or better understood. If anything, to most European eyes they seem stranger, more distant, more ambiguous than ever.

The much hyped Islamic threat is one of the greatest lies of our time. The “Muslim world” – though no such bloc really exists – is politically fragmented and economically impoverished. It is reeling under the weight of crises and a long colonial legacy. Militarily, it is of scant significance. It is laughable that we should be discussing the Islamic threat when in the past seven years alone two Muslim countries have come under direct military occupation, ending hopes that the world had firmly closed this chapter of history decades ago.

I suspect many military experts must struggle to keep a straight face every time the subject of the “Islamic threat” is broached. They know that strategic threats are not founded on mere anxieties, imagination and illusions, but on concrete military and political facts. This is not to play down the seriousness of the dangers presented by al-Qaida and other violent groups. But these constitute a security problem to be dealt with through the intelligence and security services. Whatever its braggadocio, al-Qaida does not amount to a strategic military threat, let alone a menace to “western civilisation”.

The security risks posed by al-Qaida, moreover, face Muslims and non-Muslims alike. After all, al-Qaida has perpetrated more atrocities in Muslim countries than western capitals. Attacks in Casablanca, Bali, Riyadh, Algiers, Tunisia, Istanbul and Iraq have outnumbered those in New York, Madrid and London.

In the fog of the so-called war on terror, al-Qaida, terrorism, extremism and Islamism – the list of -isms goes on – have been employed as potent weapons in a range of battles. They have been deployed to demonise vulnerable minorities – their community groups and their leaders, mosques and faith schools. They have been adopted to eat away at civil liberties. And they have been exploited to target mainstream Islamist political parties. Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development party; the Muslim Brotherhood – the largest opposition in the Egyptian parliament; and Anwar Ibrahim’s People’s Justice party in Malaysia, are among the movements cast in one terrifying category labelled “Islamism”, alongside al-Qaida. The huge differences are wilfully ignored to justify this strategy of unrelenting confrontation. The consequences have been devastating for social stability and community coexistence, as well as for relations between the “Muslim world” and the “west” – something which, ironically, has been recognised by President Bush recently.

Political expediency and scaremongering has seen the propagation of the idea of a grave Islamist threat to the status of orthodoxy. But however easy it might be to surrender to this fiction, it remains just that: a myth fabricated by a few, exploited by a few, and consumed by many. No matter how widely circulated, or endlessly regurgitated, a myth remains a myth.

· Soumaya Ghannoushi will join John Esposito, Alastair Crooke, Martin Bright and Robert Leiken to debate “The Islamic threat: myth or reality?” (Don’t hold your breath: you will get more of the same…) at IslamExpo in London tomorrow. The expo runs from today until Monday at Olympia in Kensington




3 thoughts on “The Islamic duty to use lies and dissemination (taqiyya) to spread Islam”

  1. The only myth concerning this bunch is their idea of “islamophobia”. And calling this a myth is a stretch, since a myth often has a little truth in it.

  2. I put a comment up on Gushie’s thread in the Guardian. They removed it

    within an hour – also the comment immediately prior to mine, and the four

    immediately after it that referred to mine.

    The Guardian really is Stalinist when it removes you – they remove all

    trace of everything you said, especially other folks’ references to you.

    They really really don’t want Whitey to know what’s going on. Can’t be

    having that – Whitey might decide that defensive moves are in order.

    They’ll leave that until they think our position is untenable, then they wont

    care who knows. Too late you see.

    I’v noticed that if you post a heap of clinker, the Guardian leaves it up

    there and lets the rest of the pack tear you to shreds. It’s when you put up

    indisputable truth that they remove you.

    Looks like I might be heading for my fourth total ban from those pages.

    Below is the exact comment I made (I know the Guardian so I took a

    screen grab immediately I posted it). Can anyone tell me what is offensive

    about it? What it is that violates Guardian comment rules?
    Jul 11 08, 06:01 (1 minute ago)

    “The much hyped Islamic threat is one of the greatest lies of our time”


    That’s the number of Islamic terrorist attacks worldwide since 9/11.

    Relatively few of thosehappened in Iraq or Afghanistan.

    ” … al-Qaida has perpetrated more atrocities in Muslim countries than

    Western capitals. Attacks in Casablanca, Bali, Riyadh, Algiers, Tunisia,

    Istanbul and Iraq have outnumbered those in New York, Madrid and

    London. ”

    A bit of trickiness with words there eh? There have been more atrocities

    committed in Thailand alone than in Western CAPITALS.

    The country that has had the greatest number of individual attacks is India.

    More people are killed by Islamists each year than in all 350 years of the

    Spanish Inquisition combined.

    More civilians were killed by Muslim extremists in two hours on

    September 11th than in the 36 years of sectarian conflict in Northern


    Islamic terrorists murder more people every day than the Ku Klux Klan

    has in the last 50 years.

    19 Muslim hijackers killed more innocents in two hours on September

    11th than the number of American criminals executed in the last 65 years.

    These are all by people claiming to be acting for the greater good of

    Islam. Not Islamic extremism, not Islamism, not Islamo-facism … Islam.

    When someone tells you he’s going to kill you, and eloquently

    demonstrates 11,428 times in seven years exactly how he’s going to do it,

    then it might be a good idea to believe him.

    Don’t anyone try telling me Islam is no threat to me, because I simply do

    not believe you. Would you prefer me to believe what you say rather than

    trust the evidence of my own lying eyes?

    I was actually in Hama (Syria) in early 1982 when Hafez Assad’z apes

    were carrying out their atrocity. Were you?

  3. Sir Henry,

    The truth hurts, I guess. I’ve been banned from the Daily Express and The Times never prints my comments. It’s very disheartening.

Comments are closed.