Slip slidin’ away:
Pic thanks to ZIP
No need for this burka debate!
The burka comes as a package deal. As such, the burka has no place anywhere.  There is no place in the world where jihad, wife-beating, FGM, honor-killings, killing of infidels killing of apostates or homosexuals,  or mass-murder on Jews  is justified. There is no place for Islamic law, the sharia, and there is no place for child-marriage, polygamy, rape of infidel women, or Islamic terrorism. The burka is just another manifestation of  Islamic misogyny  Qur’an (4:34) - “Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other).  And finally, the burka is the cloak to cover it all up.
* Â More below*
The burka is a tool to terrify and to alienate  increasingly agitated and irritated infidels, (that’s us!)  who have -somehow- (how exactly?) been fooled to allow large numbers of hostile Mohammedans to  invade  and settle amongst us. The price for this invasion is too high. This cannot be allowed to continue.
Muslims who insist on whacking their chattel into “portable seclusion” should be encouraged to pack up and  ship out.
If it wasn’t for the incessant dumbing down of the general population by multi-culti fanatics, the perversion of tolerance, Â commie university professors and subversive polit-props who support Islamic immigration, Â (while telling us flying our flag is offensive) we wouldn’t need to waste time with bad rubbish such as this.
There can be no compromise.Â
Andrew Bolt, while looking for some kind of way out, presents 6 opinions. The above is mine. Read it all and let us know with whom you agree.Â
Rod Liddle:
As Sarkozy has said, the burqa is merely symbolic of female subjugation — so what is the point of taking action against a symbol? The real subjugation comes from within Islam, from within the Koran and the way it is most usually interpreted. It is the ideology to which the politicians — both here and in France — should object, not its symbolism, or indeed the blameless actions of the majority of women who wear the burqa because they feel comfortable, among their peers, so doing. And yet here, both governments have gone out of their way to insist that Islam is a lovely, peaceable religion which we should all (by law in Britain) respect.
You cannot have it both ways. You cannot have French writers or British politicians hauled before the courts because they say uncomplimentary things about Islam and then, as president or politician, start slagging off the burqa and insisting that it should be banned from the country. The right thing to do, I would suggest, is to make it absolutely plain that there is no compulsion to respect Islam as either a religion or a political ideology and that our governments, both of which are liberal democracies, will at every juncture attempt to counter the poisonous sexism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, misogyny and furious reaction to apostasy which is more or less inherent in even the more moderate strands of this religion. But, these being free countries, people should be allowed to believe whatever rubbish they like — be it Islam, Scientology, Rastafarianism — and dress accordingly if they wish, without being bullied.
* Although Rod Liddle makes more sense than the others, the last sentence is still mush because it implies choice. The last thing Islamofascists offer their womenfolk is choice, in fact they force their women under the burka so we cannot see their bruises.
Lets see if the others make more sense:
Â
- BBC NEWS | Europe | Sarkozy burka debate: Your comments
- Big burqa debate – Israel Opinion, Ynetnews
- The French Burka Debate – Putting an end to Islamic Fundamentalism ?
- “The Spread of the Veil in Europe is a Very Clear Indicator of the Spread of Islamism”: “Iran Has Imposed the Veil on All Women, Including Christian and Jewish Women”
Continue reading The "Burka Debate"
Atlas Shrugs:
                         by taxing you to death…
Musli-culti coolness…