Since when did the US require “Free Speech Zones” to carry out a First Amendment right?

Kaffir Canuck: As far as I know, all of the US was a Free Speech Zone. What happened to us?

Rabbi Nachum Shifren’s 2010 California State Senate District 26 Candidate picture

Terry Jones and the Surfin’ Rabbi Shifren

First, here’s the speech of the most curageous rabbi in America today:



Video streaming by Ustream

Here’s Terry Jones:

“We must obey the Constitution of the United States of America.”

Since his Quran burning stunt, which brought out into the open all the dhimmis who fear offending Muslims and would prevent such free acts of expression just to appease them, was sidelined by ridiculous concerns the act would put ISAF forces in peril overseas. It also brought out other patriots, such as Ann Barnhardt, to simply read out the offensive bacon-bookmarked-passages before burning it as well. It is well known that the religion-of-perpetual-rage-and-anger-over-the-cause-célèbre-of-the moment is more likely to continue its Jihad regardless of who threatens or actually does burn a Quran.

“We will not allow Sharia Law to be instituted in any form,” Jones added. “We will soon be instituting a stop Obama campaign. He is the worst president in the history of the United States of America. Islam has never been a part of the American story. Thomas Jefferson said there are two enemies of the people: criminals and government. He is one of the smartest people in our American story. Islam will go on. We demand they confront these nations. Force these nations to adapt human rights, civil rights, freedom of speech. I will be back so please don’t go away.”

At one point, Pastor Jones walked toward the barricades as he was delivering the Pledge of Allegiance. Then, counter protestors threw items such as shoes and water bottles at his supporters. They also held up copies of the Quran as Jones as speaking. The Dearborn Police SWAT team was called in. They were wearing riot gear with shields. A few arrests were made, however it is unclear if they will face any charges.

Sharia Uber Alles

Obama’s Bridge to Islam

by Daniel Greenfield

All the old familiar names pop up when we take a closer look at the advocates and the money behind the push for sharia in the US of A.

(Israelnationalnews.com) Obama has announced the appointment of Azizah al-Hibri to the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. Al-Hibri (full name, Azizah Yahia Muhammad Toufiq al-Hibri) is a Muslim professor and the granddaughter of a Sheikh, who claims that the Koran inspired Thomas Jefferson and the Founders and that the Saudi criminal justice system is more moral than the American one because it accepts blood money from murderers.

Appointing a Muslim scholar to a commission on international religious freedom is only justifiable if that scholar recognized that much of the injustice in the world originates from Islamic law. But Al-Hibri has made her career whitewashing Islamic law and even presenting it as superior to American law.

While she has been called a reformer, her call in 2001 for a return to the fundamentals echoes Wahhabi rhetoric. Rather than examining the incompatibilities of Islamic law and the modern world, and urging the appropriate adjustments, as genuine reformers have done, Al-Hibri instead builds myths that uphold the Islamist agenda.

The imam Justin Elliott explains Islam for you (courtesy the Saudi-funded John Esposito)

Please read this, as another braindead lefty loon looks to Saudi funded propagandists to explain Islam….

Continue reading Sharia Uber Alles

The Carnita Matthews Case: the Word “Racist” is Now Not a Complaint But a Weapon

“Racist?” Is it ‘racist’ to wrap yourself in shrouds and spit venom at your own people or is it ‘racist’ for a policeman to make sure that such an unhinged creature is booked in accordance with the law?

Islam is not a race. The policeman who booked her is not ‘racist’ to do his job.

Carnitha Matthews is a white Anglo-Saxon ‘revert to Islam. She bought into the ‘hate the kafir’ cult and turned against her own people, in order to make Islam the dominant religion in Australia.

Andre Bolt Column – Only now is the deal unveiled

I’VE been around a while, but can’t recall a multiculturalist offering their deal before this sale.

I mean this deal: that if we take in more refugees and other immigrants we’ll have to suck it up if some go feral.

We’ll have to accept that a little violence and us-against-you tribalism is just the inevitable way.

I’m sure many of us would have said, well, in that case shut the doors now.

Continue reading The Carnita Matthews Case: the Word “Racist” is Now Not a Complaint But a Weapon

Germany: Radical Headbangers Burn Own House Down in Victimhood Stunt

Sven Lau, right hand Banana of the Islamic hate-preacher Pierre Vogel, was arrested in Moenchengladbach after arson in a multi-family house. Lau and other Muslims  committed  arson last weekend to  present themselves as  victims of an Islam-hostile attack. (more from PI)

Full article here in German from PI:

Continue reading Germany: Radical Headbangers Burn Own House Down in Victimhood Stunt

UK: The Day Will Come When We Will Conquer the White House, Cameron and Obama Will Be on Their Knees, and Queen Elizabeth Will Wear the Veil

Here we go again: Muslims tell us every day what their intentions are, and loudly so. If we repeat what they say, the leftist bacteria calls us racist bigot Islamophobes. WTF is wrong with our society?

Wake up, and listen to Islam’s plan for America and for the world at large. Here is a video clip of them telling you what they are going to do, how they are going to do it, and when it’s going to happen. If you can watch this video and still think that Islam is a ‘religion of peace’, then you will deserve what you get when it happens. And remember, what you are about to see is an unedited video of Islam telling you what’s coming, just like Hitler did in 1928 when he wrote Mein Kampf.

Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by British Islamist Abu Waleed at a London demonstration. The address was posted on the Internet on May 25, 2011. From MEMRI

British Islamist Abu Waleed: The Day Will Come When We Will Conquer the White House, Cameron and Obama Will Be on Their Knees, and Queen Elizabeth Will Wear the Veil


Abu Waleed: These infidels – they fear the most when you come out and say: Allah Akbar. By Allah, our words are like arrows on the chests of the enemies of Allah. This is why these infidels fear us so much – not because we come out and incite any violence. We are not the terrorists, my dear brothers. We know very well who is a terrorist. The Americans have massacred Muslims as well as non-Muslims, for far too many years. Go and ask the Indians inside America. Go and as the Filipinos. Go and ask the Vietnamese people. How many people have been massacred under the guise of democracy and freedom?

Continue reading UK: The Day Will Come When We Will Conquer the White House, Cameron and Obama Will Be on Their Knees, and Queen Elizabeth Will Wear the Veil

Weiner's Marriage Blanc to the Muslim Brotherhood

Weinergate: Sleeping with the Enemy, Part II

Spencer interview: Abedin/Weiner: A Marriage Made by Hillary Clinton and the Muslim Brotherhood?

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) has now officially resigned from the House of Representatives —

In “A Marriage Made by Hillary Clinton and the Muslim Brotherhood?” in FrontPage tonight Jamie Glazov interviews Robert Spencer about the strange case of Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner and Hillary Clinton:

Shrillary with Lesbian Lover Huma

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Robert Spencer, the director of Jihad Watch and the author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad.Frontpage: Robert Spencer, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

I would like to talk to you today about Anthony Weiner’s marriage to his Muslim Brotherhood wife, Huma Abedin.

How is it exactly that a Muslim woman who is connected to the Muslim Brotherhood is married to a Jewish man? Something is not fitting here is it?

Spencer: Jamie, Islamic law prohibits a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man. A Muslim man may marry a non-Muslim woman, but not the other way around. This is yet another manifestation of Islamic supremacism: the idea is that a wife will become a member of her husband’s household, and the children will follow the religion of the father. Thus, Muslim men marrying non-Muslim women ultimately enriches the Islamic community, while the non-Muslim community must forever be made to diminish.

Continue reading Weiner's Marriage Blanc to the Muslim Brotherhood

Shame on you, Judge Jeffreys !

Scandalous: An ‘Allahu akbar’ screaming mob of  Koranimals gets Carnita Matthews to walk out of court.

Judge caves in to blackmail and intimidation

“Culturally appropriate Allahu akbar….”

Well, plenty of people will kindly explain you just need to become more tolerant, while other people will demonstrate you should also become deaf and blind:

A MUSLIM woman sentenced to six months’ jail for making a deliberately false statement that a racist policeman tried to forcibly remove her burka has been freed on appeal.

Judge Clive Jeffreys said he was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt it was Carnita Matthews, a 47-year-old Muslim woman from Woodbine, NSW, who accused the police of racism because the person who handed in the complaint to police was wearing a burka at the time.

To reach the level of proof of identity to prove the case, it appears Mrs Matthews would have been required to identify herself by lifting her burka at the police station to prove her identity – which is what started the uproar in the first case.

More than a dozen Muslim supporters linked arms and began chanting “Allah Uh Ahkbar” as they stormed out of Downing Centre, Sydney, with Mrs Matthews concealed behind them.

Tempers soon rose and they began jostling with police after several members of the group began attacking TV cameramen.

Mrs Matthew’s lawyer Stephen Hopper defended them, saying: “They are obviously happy with the result and are expressing it in a way that is culturally appropriate to them”.

I did not know that taking in immigrants, including refugees, required us to accept “culturally appropriate” ways of expressing pleasure that involved fighting police and attacking journalists. If this deal had been explained front-up, I rather suspect Australians would have voted to slam shut the door. (Andrew Bolt)

Beating the law by virtue of a burqa

Paul Kent From
The Daily Telegraph via Aussie News & Views

Aussie News & Views: Muslim Savages seen here, in various forms of Middle Eastern garb, salivating and  invoking their Paedophile Prophets and Head Hunter’s Death Chant of “allah ackbar”, rampage out of Sydney Court building onto street, following the appeal of Lying Carnita Matthews been upheld.

Muslims have rejected civilization in their own lands and have shown a manic obsession to reject it in any Judeo Christian Nation they have colonized, quickly “uncivilizing” their host nation by their insistence of carrying out their Religious obligation of implementing TERROR in all the lands of the “Infidels”….

Burqa’ed Muslima Accused of Lying about Police Trying to Tear her Burqa off Avoids Jail — Because Her Identity Could Not Be Proven (Atlas)

Wear the freedom sack and instantly turn into another ‘race’:

Burqa wearing revert Carnita Matthews was charged with making a false complaint that used the Muslim victimhood card in her defense — “All cops are racist” — what race? Covered from head to toe in a burqa, with just a slit through which to see, the Muslima charged with makinga false complaint to police then claimed that she had been a victim of mistaken identity.

Wearing a full face veil is a political statement, and it should be illegal.

We have seen the weaponizing of the veil and the use of the veil to commit crimes, escape detection, kidnap and rape young girls and keep them hidden; the Elizabeth Smart case should be the catalyst for such legislation.

The judge saw through the claim of Carnita Matthews, a 46-year-old mother of seven. Magistrate Robert Rabbidge described her crime as “deliberate, malicious and ruthless. There is not a shadow of doubt in my mind, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she knew that the complaint she was making was false,” he told Campbelltown Local Court back in November.

“You look at me and see me wearing this and you couldn’t handle it. All cops are racist,” she says.The magistrate rejected her lawyer’s argument that the prosecution could not prove it was Matthews herself who made the complaint and signed the declaration.But police prosecutor sergeant Lisa McEvoy said there was no doubt.”Her signature on that affidavit coupled with the signature on her driver’s licence is exactly the same,” she told the court.

The burqa’ed civilizational jihadist appealed — and won, remaining inside her cloth coffin.

Race row woman avoids jail by remaining behind her burqa News.au.com

Muslim woman Carnita Matthews escapes jail by remaining behind her burqa (Telegraph)

Supporters fighting police and attacking journo’s outside the court….

Obviously, the French have the same problem:

France’s burka ban descended into farce when the first women to be summoned before a European court for illegally wearing the garments were refused entry, because they would not remove their face coverings.

French burka ban descends into farce

French authorities wouldn’t let the burqa-clad Muslima into court unless she removed her face covering. But that’s why she was under arrest in the first place: for refusing to remove her face covering. The French desire to preserve and defend their own culture is laudable, but they are going to have to go back to the drawing board on this one. “French burka ban descends into farce,” By Peter Allen in the Telegraph, June 17

New York Slimes Promotes Sharia (and Communism)

Islamic supremacist group MPAC, New York Times spreading soothing falsehoods about Islamic law

Yesterday the New York Times had this: “Defend Muslims, Defend America,” by Aziz Huq, an assistant professor of law at the University of Chicago.

When will the Times give equal time to someone who will make the case for the anti-Sharia legislation? Around the time hell freezes over, of course. That case is not fit to print. New York Times spreading soothing falsehoods about Islamic law (JW)

Shariabenign.jpgSpencer: Is Sharia Really Benign? Wake up.

In Human Events this morning I take apart one of the many whitewashes of Sharia that are being published these days:

When I cut out a woman’s clitoris, this is Sharia-compliant Islam.  When I forbid non-Muslims to practice their faith openly, this is Sharia-compliant Islam.  When I count a non-Muslim’s life as less valuable than a Muslim’s, that is Sharia-compliant Islam.  When I brutally lash a woman, this is Sharia-compliant Islam.  When I smash musicians’ instruments and threaten them, saying they better not play music again or else, this is Sharia-compliant Islam.  When I wage war against and subjugate unbelievers, this is Sharia-compliant Islam….

There is more.

Beck Calls Out Washington Post ‘Liars’

On Friday, the Washington Post published and opinion piece blasting Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) for saying he would try and join Glenn Beck in Israel for Beck’s Restoring Courage event. According to the author, Beck is a “creature” who is “the leading purveyor of anti-Semitic memes in the mass media.” Not surprisingly, that didn’t sit too well with Beck. And he made that quite clear.

You can listen to most of his reaction here: WaPo lies

Glenn Beck to Commie Van Jones: “We’ll Debate When You’re Honest” (Video)

This past weekend at Nutroots 2011, communist Van Jones attacked Glenn Beck and challenged him to a debate.

Van Jones

On his Monday radio show, Beck repeated his charges against Jones, and said he had never made any untruthful claims about him.

“He is an unrepentant Communist revolutionary,” Beck said. “He is a guy who stands with cop-killers. Period.”

He also declined to debate Jones–for now.

Van Jones Commie Allures are a Nightmare, NOT A DREAM

Beck Attacked the American Dream?

van

Media Reports Jones’ Beck Debate Demand While Failing to Notice its Timing & Strange Claim Beck Attacked the American Dream, Matching Van’s Launch Rhetoric for His New Rebuild The Dream Group Exactly

Hysterical Commies

Now Van Jones Wants to Sue Fox?

“has not expressed any support for any form of Communist or Marxist ideology for many years”

The Lying F*#k!

Commie Van Jones Sends ‘Cease and Desist’ Letter to FOX News (GWP)

Jones used his Ella Baker Center for Human Rights to start ‘Freedom Fighter Music’, the label WarTimes appeared on. WarTimes is also the name of an anti-war-on-al-Qaeda propaganda newspaper Jones helped organize. The album featured cop killer Mumia abu-Jamal.

Verum Serum posted the Mumia abu Jamal – Van Jones rap song.

Now leftist radical Van Jones is threatening to take legal action if FOX News does not stop associating him with cop killers and pointing out his far left radicalism.
The Politico reported:

Almost two years since he was forced to resign his White House job, Van Jones is threatening legal action against Fox News and Glenn Beck, whose focus on exposing Jones’s past ties to radical movements played a leading role in firing up the conservative maelstrom that ultimately drove Jones from the administration.

Attorneys acting on behalf of the president’s former “green jobs” czar sent a letter to Fox News demanding that the network immediately cease using six characterizations about Jones and asked for a retraction from Glenn Beck by June 24.

The six characterizations described in the letter, obtained by POLITICO, are:

– Jones is a “communist”/”revolutionary”/”Marxist”
– “Jones is violent”/”spent time in jail”
– “Jones is a 9/11 truther”
– “Jones is a cop killer”/”supported a cop killer”/”hates cops”
– “Jones is a racist”/”hates white people”
– “Jones organized/attended an anti-American rally on 9/12/2001”

The letter includes examples of when each characterization of Jones was used and a refutation of those statements. Jones’s lawyer, Joseph E. Sandler, also writes that some of these characterizations are “inherently defamatory.”

Fartwa: "all your Holy Land are belong to us"

Just a reminder from Vlad Tepes:

Islamic doctrine states that once an area has been controlled by Muslims, it is forever more ‘Islamic Land’- Notice the clear reference to Spain. This is no joke. OBL also reffered to retaking Spain in at least one of his videos when he was still relevant. The price of Al Andaluz is a big one, and they will focus on it the moment they feel Israel is a done deal.

Here, in this MEMRI clip, former Jordanian Minister Ali Al-Faqir Vows to Conquer Spain and Rome and Declares: America and the EU Will Soon Come to an End …

“Jews have had no special merit that entitles them to any right over the Holy Land”

Robert Spencer:

I have in the past tangled with deceptive Islamic supremacists such as Khaleel Mohammed and Sheikh Abdul Hadi Palazzi, who have made a comfortable living speaking to Jewish groups and telling them that the Qur’an promises the Holy Land to the Jews. This is not the case, as I demonstrated here — and today an Islamic spokesman confirms the accuracy of what I wrote there.

“A Holy Land for Whom?,” from OnIslam, June 20:

A Holy Land for Whom?

Continue reading Fartwa: "all your Holy Land are belong to us"

Clever Trevor

UK Official Says Christians Are More Militant Than Muslims

Out with the old, in with the new:

What is it with blacks and Islam, the religion of their slavers? Is Trevor just a leftist loon or a revert? (Or both?)

UK Minister Trevor Phillips told reporters this week that Christians are more militant than Muslims.

There have been more than 17, 341 DEADLY Islamic terror attacks since 9-11.  The Telegraph reported, via GWP

Other ROP offerings:

In Scotland, the dirty kuffar must pay for the Muslims’ schools. In Australia, they must pay for their halal training center. It is the lot of the Infidel to pay for the Muslims’ enterprises, as specified in the Qur’an (9:29).

“Australian Muslim community demands ‘taxpayer-funded halal training centre,'” from ANI, June 20, thanks to JW.

The schools proposed here would seek state funding; issues that should be raised immediately in response are those of curriculum and oversight. The design of an “Islamic” curriculum promises a minefield of problems including advocacy for a state governed by Sharia (now part of the measure of “extremism” in Britain), and the issues of women’s rights, the rights of unbelievers, and Islamic supremacism in general. There is also the question of how well the standard British curriculum would be upheld: literature, art, and social studies included.

Continue reading Clever Trevor