Year: 2016

Never Stop Lying

How to Pass as a ‘Moderate Muslim’ in the Media

Dean Obeidallah and Sam Harris on CNN with Don Lemon talking anti Muslim comments by Ben Carson

If you have ten minutes to spare, I recommend watching the above video, because it encapsulates better than most how difficult it is to even discuss the threat of political Islam.

My opponent was Dean Obeidallah. As incredible as it may seem, the man has since claimed that he mopped the floor with me in this exchange. I would not have thought such a degree of self-deception possible, but then I recalled Obeidallah’s response to my and Bill Maher’s encounter with Ben Affleck last year…

More @ Sam Harris

Paul Weston on the new Muslim mayor of London who calls moderate Muslims, “Uncle Toms”

Paul Weston, chairman of Liberty GB, reacts to the election of Sadiq Khan as Mayor of London. This is a man connected with numerous extremists jihadists, and who has an extremely questionable past.

JOIN LIBERTY GB TODAY! www.libertygb.org.uk/join

13124530_262603147422408_7662093528180216432_n

The Innocence of Sadiq Khan
by Paul Weston (via  Gates of Vienna)

When the prevailing ethos of a country’s political and media class is one of insanity and/or national suicide, no one should be too surprised when what was once thought unthinkable becomes a sudden and shocking reality. A good example of this is the crowning of Sadiq Khan as Mayor of London, which could be compared in terms of lunacy to the appointment of Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn as Chairman of the Friends of Israel Society.

I don’t necessarily think the smoothly urbane and thoroughly slippery Sadiq Khan is a potential leader of armed Islamic insurrection in London, but nor do I believe he is the benign and unthreatening sort of awfully-nice-Muslim-next-door-chappy that the BBC et. Al. would like us to believe. After all, if judged by the company Sadiq Khan has kept, he would appear to be yet another one of those Muslim politicians who say one thing to their Eloi English audience and quite another to their own community when well out of infidel earshot.

Consider the following: Mr Khan’s brother-in-law, Makbool Javaid, was a supporter of the terrorist organisation Al-Muhajiroun which became notorious for its September 2002 conference “The Magnificent 19” praising the September 11, 2001 attacks. Mr Javaid appeared alongside some of the country’s most infamous hate preachers, and in 1998 his name appeared on a fatwa calling for a “full-scale war of jihad” against Britain and the US.

Mr Khan’s brother-in-law went on to become head of Litigation Services at the Commission for Racial Equality… the further one looks down the multicultural rabbit hole of Britain, the more surreal the whole thing becomes. Mr Javaid is currently a partner at legal firm Simons Muirhead and Burton and lists amongst his Facebook friends CAGE director Moazzam Begg and fellow director Asim Qureshi, who described the Islamic State butcher Jihadi John as a “beautiful young man”. Sadiq Khan is intimately connected with all of these people, which is not something that could be said of Boris Johnson, London’s previous and altogether different type of Mayor.

Sadiq Khan was on the board of the “civil liberties” pressure group Liberty (NCCL) for three years, along with a certain Mr Azad Ali, who has excused the murder of British soldiers and was involved with the extremist organisations Islamic Forum of Europeand Jamaat e Islami. Azad Ali is currently Head of Community Development & Engagement at the organisation MEND which seeks to undermine the British government’s counter-terrorism strategy. And speaking of going down surreal rabbit holes, Azad Ali is an adviser to the police and Home Office on police procedure, a member of the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and sits on the Home Office’s Trust and Confidence Community Panel… and last but not least is a board member of the extremist boot-boy outfit Unite Against Fascism, which is also supported by the British Prime Minister David Cameron…

Continue reading →

OBAMA: INVADING COUNTRIES TO FIGHT TERRORISM IS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE

Daniel Greenfield

Cool story, bro. How is overthrowing governments to bring terrorists to power working out? We can ask whatever Libyans are still in the country. The Egyptians don’t seem like fans.

“The ideology has not been extinguished,” Obama acknowledged in an exclusive interview with CNN’s Peter Bergen on Monday night. “The world is still dangerous. In many ways, the Middle East is in a more chaotic situation.”

But — without directly referring to President George W. Bush’s decisions to send U.S. troops into Afghanistan and then Iraq — Obama said such large-scale operations, which continue to reverberate in the current presidential race, would only make the fight against extremism harder.

Obama said the idea of “sending 100,000 troops to invade every country where an organization like this appears going be counterproductive and, in some ways, feeds the kinds of ideology that we’re fighting.”

Whatever that ideology is. We could name it, but then we’d just be feeding it. Also we can name Obama, but we’d just be feeding him.

All these years later, Obama is still running against the Iraq War. You would think he would have stopped after actually making Iraq worse. His claim that withdrawal would lead to a political solution worked out rather badly. Unless he considers ISIS a good outcome. His illegal regime change operation in Libya, minus the 100,000 troops, worked out also really badly. Unless he considers ISIS a good outcome.

Pat Condell: If you pollute the river you kill all the life in it

Charlemagne wouldn’t like what they’re doing in his name:
Pope Francis has been presented the International Charlemagne Prize for his 'commitment to European Unity'.

Pope Francis has been presented with the International Charlemagne Prize, one of Europe’s most prestigious prizes, for his, ‘message of hope and encouragement’.

The award is given out to those who ‘promote European unity.’

Francis held a private audience on Friday morning with European parliament president Martin Schulz, a former Charlemagne Prize recipient, EU Commission President Jean-Claude Junker and EU Council President Donald Tusk, before the midday ceremony.

He also met German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

The Charlemagne prize is awarded annually by the German city of Aachen for contributions to European unity.

Previous winners include former US President Bill Clinton and St John Paul II, who received a special edition of the prize in 2004.

The Holy Roman emperor Charlemagne once ruled a large swath of western Europe from Aachen, near the Belgian border.

Why saying “Muslims are the new Jews” is wrong, factually — and morally

EZRA LEVANT

I hear it a lot: “We have to support the wave of mass Muslim migration to the west because of what happened to the Jews 75 years ago. The Muslims are the new Jews. You wouldn’t send the Jews back to Hitler’s Germany, would you?”

Except that, 75 years ago, Jews were fleeing the Holocaust, Hitler’s “final solution” to kill every Jew in the world.

Today, there is no Holocaust against Muslims. That whole “wipe out other people thing”? It’s pretty much the Muslims doing it.

The would-be Hitler today is Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the dictator of the Islamic State. They’re slaughtering a small religious group called Yezidis.

Yes, they kill some other Muslims, too. But that’s not “genocide.” It’s civil war.

Secondly, in the Nazi Holocaust, the Jews had nowhere to flee.

While today, there are 22 countries in the Arab League, and 57 countries in the Saudi-led Organization for Islamic Cooperation.

More than a quarter of the countries in the world are Muslim — but they’re the ones refusing to take in “refugees.”

Back in January, some “refugees” said they wanted to go back to the Middle East already, because their accommodations in Canada were not as luxurious as they’d hoped.

Could you imagine a Jew fleeing the Holocaust and coming to Canada, then complaining that his hotel accommodations weren’t good enough — so he was thinking of going back to Berlin?

I’ve got a much more accurate analogy for today’s situation.

WATCH and see what it is…

Video of beheading of Canadian hostage John Ridsdel by Abu Sayyaf

Thanks to the Rebel Media
Beheading of John Ridsdel

WARNING: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS GRAPHIC CONTENT. This is the actual video of the decapitation by knife of Canadian hostage, John Ridsdel. It is a difficult thing to see, even though much of it is blurred by a grey translucent square.

The reasons for posting this are two fold:

A CBC documentary about the Abu Sayyef whitewashd the ideological basis for this act of terrorism, to preserve the narrative that Islam is perfectly suitable for Canada, and perhaps even preferable to Christianity.

In fact, they include an interview with possibly the only person in the Philippines who believes that these are just “thugs with guns” and have no ideology at all.

In the video below, the Abu Sayyef terrorists can clearly be seen making the Islamic State salute, and chanting “Allah hu ackbar” (“Our god Allah is greater than your god”.)

Therefore, this murder is purely an ideological act, even if a ransom was requested, because kidnapping for ransom was how, historically, jihad has been funded by Muslims.

Continue reading Video of beheading of Canadian hostage John Ridsdel by Abu Sayyaf

Londonistan’s got its first Muslim mayor

Muslim turnout was about 130% in the enriched areas.

Thanks to the Religion of Peace.

Sadiq Khan

Here’s what the Brits are saying about the hard-core Islamist past of London’t new Mayor:

Heat Street brought America the news that Sadiq Khan defended the 9/11 killer Zacarias Moussaoui, and called moderate Muslims “Uncle Toms”.

Sadiq also spoke at a CAGE rally – the extremist group that nurtured British Isis killer Jihadi John.

More here.

Imagine what Londonistan look like in four years!

Pamela Geller:

UK banned me from the country. It is already acting like a defacto Islamic state. That a man who has shared a platform with open Jew-haters could still be elected Mayor of London is an indication of how far gone Britain already is. In Sadiq Khan’s campaign, his opponents brought this up as a blot on his record. Soon enough in Britain, however, it will be a selling point for candidates appealing to an increasingly Muslim electorate.

Did anyone think the notoriously anti-semitic UK would vote for his opponent – a Jew? London is overrun – voter fraud in Muslim precincts is rampant. Not that you would need it.

Muslim Anti-Semite Elected London Mayor Jihad Khan 
“Cameron accused Khan of sharing ‘a platform with an extremist who called for Jews to drown in the ocean.’” This apparently wasn’t enough to keep Khan from…| Pamela Geller

…young man misbehavin’

The AfD in Stuttgart: “An enlightenment of Islam is neither possible, nor desirable”

by Baron Bodissey

As a follow-up to JLH’s translation from Stern, here’s a video showing part of the proceedings at the recent AfD (Alternative für Deutschland, Alternative for Germany) convention in Stuttgart.

Many thanks to Egri Nök for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Transcript:

Continue reading →

Egyptian-German Scholar Hamed Abdel-Samad: Our Hatred of Jews Has Poisoned Us

H/T Gates of Vienna

Too polite to say exactly which young man we’re talking about

Andrew Bolt

Ninemsn passes on a police request for witnesses:

A young man has been charged after several people including a woman were allegedly punched during a series of attacks in an Adelaide shopping centre…

Six hurt, woman hospitalised after man’s ‘king hit’ rampage
Man on the run after randomly attacking shoppers in supermarket one by one.–AU.NEWS.YAHOO.COM–Share
.

Police Investigators are still seeking witnesses or other victims that have yet to come forward.  If anyone is able to assist in the investigation please contact Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

Did you see a young man at the shopping centre?

Oh. Yes, you’re right, yet again we’re given a description that lacks so much detail it’s nearly useless.

Odd, given that the pictures make clear the most distinctive characteristic that would aid identification and jog memories.

Why not mention it? Better to be polite than to aid justice?

Iran To Let Women Prisoners Choose How Many Men Gang-Rape Them To Death

“The new procedure strikes an elegant balance between giving the condemned some freedom of choice and ensuring the mandated outcome.” 

IRAN-WOMEN-PRISONERS-e1412926481219-890x395

Iran To Let Women Choose How Many Men Gang-Rape Them To Death (PreOccupied Territory)
~ Elder Of Ziyon

Tehran, May 4 – In a move aimed at making the country and society more progressive, the government of Iran announced this morning it would implement new sentencing guidelines for women convicted of capital crimes such as marital infidelity, and henceforth would allow those women to select the specific number of men who would perform the mandated fatal gang-rape.

In a ruling issued by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, since normal, progressive countries naturally have positions with such a title, the government decreed today that as of Wednesday at 1 PM local time, any capital punishment meted out against women would be preceded by a procedure in which the woman chooses a number between fifteen and thirty. That number will then determine the number of court-appointed men who will repeatedly force themselves upon her and beat her until she expires.
Representatives of the Ayatollah touted the progressive nature of the new procedure. “No other nation in the region allows a convicted criminal to choose the method of punishment,” boasted Saad Isti. “Not even the supposedly enlightened, liberal countries of Europe have a law such as this one. It is yet another demonstration that when it comes to actual progressiveness and openness, the West is all talk and no action.” He added that Israel, ostensibly a bastion of morality in a sea of backwardness, would never dream of instituting such a liberal policy.
Legal experts explained the range of gang-rapist/executioner numbers in practical terms. “Ideally, the condemned woman would be able to pick any number, but beyond the obvious logistical and space considerations, there’s simple efficacy,” said Shau Vinisti, who writes about legal affairs for the Tehran Times. “Pick too low a number and the executioners will wear themselves out before the criminal is dead. Too high a number and, aside from crowding, some of the men will be unfairly left out. The new procedure as it is, I think, strikes an elegant balance between giving the condemned some freedom of choice and ensuring the mandated outcome.”
Isti said that if the program shows promise, other capital criminals will similarly be permitted to make choices regarding the specifics of their punishment. Homosexuals, for example, instead of simply being hanged from cranes, will be given the choice of what crane manufacturer will have the honor of providing the equipment. Additionally, the Jewish community in Iran will be allowed to choose between the ever-present threat of persecution if the slightest hint of Zionism creeps into their behavior and the ever-present threat of government-sanctioned massacres for any reason whatsoever.