Given the vicious nature of their politics, Hizb ut Tahrir are rightly shunned by mainstream politicians and public figures. In most countries where they have been banned they quickly reappeared under other names. In England they manage to attract high ranking government officials to their meetings.
Here is an interesting take on their activities from ‘Harry’s Place’Â
From Reuters:
* This Jackass Jihadi who went to Afghanistan to ‘find a good school for his children’ is going to run for public office. Surprised?
No. Everything goes these days.
And what’s it all about? ‘Racism and Islamaphobia’- of course!
Come on out, all you infidelophobic Muslims! The jihad must be fought at the ballot box!
“One of the reasons we stepped forward is to confront racism head on and to confront Islamaphobia head on,” said Kaysar Trad, spokesman for Sydney’s Islamic Friendship Association.
“We owe it to this nation to stand up to racists and make a positive political stand,” Trad told Reuters.
* Yeah. ‘Racism’- ‘Standing up to racism’- should do it.
Why not? It worked with Cronulla, didn’t it?
Which ‘race’ is Islam again?
Not every Frenchman is quite ready to follow the frog in the picture:
There are some who understand what the Muhammedan invasion seeks to achieve and they are telling us that it is perfectly cool to dislike Islam.
Like David Thompson on the Charlie Hebdo verdict
One of the creeping, unanalyzed myths of our time is that it is somehow wrong to dislike Islam, or any part thereof, and wrong to take a dim view of its tenets and demands, and wrong to take a still dimmer view of the figure who founded it. I can practically hear the distant tutting and grunts of disapproval. Poor Islam. Poor Muslims. Their beliefs are being mocked. How hurtful. How ‘racist.’ How terribly unfair.
No. It’s not unfair at all. What’s unfair is a demand for unearned deference and a unilateral exemption from the testing of ideas. What’s unfair, indeed despicable, are efforts by Islamic groups to cow dissent and stifle criticism with a well-rehearsed pantomime of victimhood and the projection of false motives.
Read it all, click the links above…
Because Peanut Khadr let them get away with it before. They will keep doing it until they get hurt. Seriously.
JihadwatchÂ
A cartoon that’s appearing in German newspapers in reaction to the female judge in Frankfurt who ruled that the Koran allows wife beating:
Oh, it’s a custom from the old country?! Why didn’t you say so!
Even more than Ayaan Ali Hirsi, this outspoken survivor of Islamic terror spills the beans. The Islamic websites are seething. They try anything to smear and discredit her. She is an ‘Islam basher’ (who could blame her?) ‘another anti-Muslim extremist’- (LOL!) a ‘torture advocate’- who did her best to whip up as much hatred and loathing against Muslims as she could manage in a few minutes.’Â
* Just wondering: Those who suck the hatred in with the mothers milk, those who commit the worst atrocities daily in the name of Islam want to be ‘loved’ because of what exactly? Because they are Muslim? Because their Profit Mohammed was such a lovable guy?
* No surprises here. When shills for Islam call Ayaan Aly Hirsi a ‘bomb-thrower’ (was it Time magazine or Newsweep?) then you know that our society is seriously infiltrated and that somebody is trying to force feed us something that is not good for our health.
* We are trying to get Brigitte Gabriel to Australia. You can donate to this site to make it happen. Watch the video and let me know what you think:
Sounds familiar?
Look what Islam is doing to Europe. The same thing is happening all over again in the US:Â
“Islamic organizations are carefully orchestrating lawsuits, marches, large propaganda campaigns all across the nation. Islamic schools and mosques are being built in record numbers across the nation with Saudi oil money being funneled into the US legally. Islam is on the march. The submission of the great country of the United States to Islam has begun just as planned. Just as we were warned by Osama bin Laden, Islam is using Americas own laws and freedoms to destroy us.”
By Randy Taylor, Independent Analyst
You couldn’t make it up if you tried.
Surely it has nothing to do with the ‘Religion of Peace?’
From correspondents in Nimes, France
Article from: Agence France-Presse
A MAN who ripped out his wife’s eyes in a fit of rage was sentenced by a French court to 30 years behind bars today.
Mohamed Hadfi, 31, tore out his 23-year-old wife Samira Bari’s eyes following a heated argument in their apartment in the southern French city of Nimes in July 2003 after she refused to have sex with him.
Ms Bari, who had demanded a divorce before the attack, was permanently blinded.
Hadfi, a Moroccan, initially fled to Germany. He was finally arrested and sent back to France, where he was indicted for “acts of torture and barbarity leading to a permanent disability”.
Prosecutor Dominique Tourette demanded that Hadfi be sentenced to 30 years in prison, two thirds of which must be served in full, calling the defendant a “diabolic torturer”.
Once his sentence is served, Hadfi will be deported and barred from ever returning to France.
His lawyer Jean-Pierre Cabanes meanwhile insisted there were extenuating circumstances.
“This is the result of a marriage that was arranged, not chosen,” he said, pointing to the gulf separating his client, who came from southern Morocco, and his young wife, who had grown up in France.
Mr Cabanes begged the jury for leniency, claiming his client’s action “appeared to stem from a mental illness.”
* Rumor has it that western feminists are lining up in droves to ‘revert’ because Islam ’empowers’ women…Â
By Veit Medick and Anna Reimann from Spiegel Online
*
He beat her and threatened her with murder. But because husband and wife were both from Morocco, a German divorce court judge saw no cause for alarm. It’s a religion thing, she argued.
*
The judge rejected the application for a speedy divorce by referring to a passage in the Koran that some have controversially interpreted to mean that a husband can beat his wife. It’s a supposed right which is the subject of intense debate among Muslim scholars and clerics alike.”The exercise of the right to castigate does not fulfill the hardship criteria as defined by Paragraph 1565 (of German federal law),” the daily Frankfurter Rundschau quoted the judge’s letter as saying. It must be taken into account, the judge argued, that both man and wife have Moroccan backgrounds.
“The husband can beat his wife”
*
There have been more cases like this:
In one case dating back to 1967Â a young Turk raped (or seduced) the daughter of another turkish ‘Guestworker’- so the father of the girl went to the guys place and stabbed him to death. This was clearly premeditated murder, but the judge back then and there already applied another standard, since these people came from another ‘Kulturkreis’- (cultural background) the guy got away with 2 years.
A German (or non-muslim) would have got 12 to 15 years for the same thing.
What amazes is that female judges fall even more for this ‘cultural’ thing.
Left-leaning, ‘liberal’ types show more ‘understanding’ for this, which they don’t have for their own people. This judge may be in need of Nietsches Peitsche (whip) herself. Some people like it and don’t think its a bad thing at all….
(hope you appreciate my sarcasm, but in Germany everything goes these days…)
Palestinian Media Watch has more from Hamas TV; the terror gang with whom George Soros wants the US to “negotiate” has produced a short film showing the daughter of murderer Reem Riyashi singing to her dead mother as she arms herself with explosives. Pure unmitigated evil.
We also have a transcript here if you can’t play the video:
