Category: General

• The victims of the vicious attack at Bondi have been released from hospital. One of them is the JNF representative in Australia.

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog 

Wars are fought with steel and of words. To fight a thing, we have to understand what we are fighting and why. A blindness in words can kill as effectively as blindness on the battlefield.

Words shape our world. In war, they define the nature of the conflict. That definition can be misleading. Often it’s expedient.The real reasons for the last world war had very little to do with democracy. The current war does involve terrorism, but like fascism, it’s incidental to the bigger picture. The United States would not have gone to war to ensure open elections in Germany. It hasn’t been dragged into the dysfunctional politics and conflicts of the Muslim world because of terrorism.Tyranny and terrorism just sum up what we find least appealing about our enemies. But it’s not why they are our enemies. They are our enemies because of territorial expansionism. The Ummah, like the Third Reich, is seeking “breathing room” to leave behind its social and economic problems with a program of regional and eventually world conquest.Islam, like Nazism, makes a lot of utopian problems and pays the check for them through conquest. Like Communism, we’re up against a rigid ideology, brainwashed fanatics, utopian fantasies and ruthless tactics. And we can only win by being honest about that.We are not yet dealing with armies. This is still an ideological conflict. Terrorism is just the tip of a much more dangerous iceberg. It’s the explosion of violence by the most impatient and least judicious of our enemies.

Related:

Islam vs. Mankind (Molschky)

• The early Muslims who swore allegiance to Muhammad noted that they were pledging themselves to ‘war against all mankind’. Doesn’t that explain a lot?

Continue reading What Islamisation Means

If your stomach will sit still for this, you just might have been infected by moonbattery:

The Muslims are of course playing the liberal Jews for useful idiot suckers; no one who follows the news could doubt that when they have the leverage, they will kill every Jew on the planet. The liberal Jews manage to know this and yet not know it not only because they are eager to acquire allies to collaborate with against non-minorities, but because they are moonbats.

As the Thinking Housewife comments,

To the liberal Jew, the Muslim is “the Other,” the noble outsider, the heroic victim.

This perverse embrace of the hostile “Other” is how Obama was elected president of a white majority nation, not despite but in part because he had made his hatred of whites public knowledge in his autobiographies.

Jews are advised to keep this lethal strain of moonbattery in check. If it gets far enough out of hand, Israel will elect a Muslim president to oversee construction of the gas chambers. (Moonbattery)

“Extremists” are racist-bigot-Islamophobes like Spencer & Geller, we all know that. People like that could upset the cosy arrangements between British elites and colourful creatures like the Sultan of Brunei:

Brunei a throwback to an age of absolute monarchy

With a swing of his powerful arm, a prison guard landed a wicked-looking cane on the back of a dummy dressed in the white uniform of convicts in Brunei.

“It doesn’t hurt as much as you think,” he said.

That’s the farcical way that in the West Islam and its adherents are discussed. We invent something called “moderate” Islam, but never stop to define it.

Few who use the phrase, or who dismiss complaints about Islam as being wrong-headed because “it’s just the extremists” never think that they should be required to explain exactly what, in the beliefs of those “moderates,” allows us to be sanguine about them, to think they pose no danger to us.

Just because someone is not running around in caves in Afghanistan, or the wilder shores of the Hadramaut, or waving the black flag of Islam over a church in Aleppo, and may even ostentatiously deplore such things (and not feign such deploring but mean it) does not entitle one never to come to grips with the melancholy fact that the “moderate” Muslim’s beliefs remain quite close to those of the “extremists,” and “the extremists” are simply those Muslims who take the texts and teachings of Islam straight up, undiluted by local considerations of self-interest (as, for example, Muslims living in the West have to worry about how non-Muslims regard them, and what, if they should begin to fully grasp the nature of Islam, they might do about that Muslim presence), or other prudential reasons for conducting Jihad — the struggle to remove all obstacles to the spread, and then the dominance, of Islam — not through terrorism, or qital (combat), but using other instruments that require more patience, and that also, many Muslims have good reason to believe, will be more effective, and not endanger their status and presence in the Lands of the Infidels in Europe and North America.

Here’s the latest on the most extreme extremists in Syria — the ISIS fighters — who, by their activities and prominence, are now, so the report insists, making Jubhat Al-Nusra, another group that consists only of extreme extremists rather than of the most extreme extremists, look “moderate.”

 

When Islam’s prophet Muhammad, the very first Muslim immigrant, arrived at Yathrib, or Medina, he and his followers began military preparations and partook in a series of attacks, over 100 in one year. But against whom were all those preparations?

The answer was given by Muhammad himself: against all non-Muslims. And since then nothing changed; Islamic immigration is aimed against all non-Muslims in the host countries, with the final goal of converting them into countries ruled by Islam.

The persecuted Christians of Egypt are only one of Islam’s targets. (Source)

Continue reading Islam: Against All Mankind

A Wastepaper Basket and the Traitors Within

There’s a history of Muslim appeasement till 2004 and there’s the history of Muslim appeasement between 2004 and the present. The latter period has sown all the seeds of an impending implosion—if not civil war—of India if things continue to remain as they are currently. Pakistan’s singleminded pursuit of Zia ul Haq’s strategy has indeed yielded a rich harvest. Of course, this is not to mention the Indian state’s steady, all-round weakening—the NDA’s rule was a minor exception—which has only eased Pakistan’s ventures. One of the greatest successes happens to be the continuing radicalization of a dangerous number of India’s Muslims, a number that increases with each day. Of course, Saudi Arabia’s effort in this direction is also a major contributor.

Note On The Picture Above: At the Battle of Chamkaur Sahib, 40 Sikhs fought  the army of  the Emperor Aurangzeb said to number about 100,000 soldiers. Aurangzeb was a notorious fanatic  who carried on a lifelong policy of forced conversions. The picture shows Sahibzadah Ajit Singh, aged 17 years,  engaging the enemy.  In this battle, Sahibzadah  Fateh Singh aged 14 also laid down his life in battle. This battle ranks as the absolute apex of  Sikh heroism.

Prologue:  Sufi Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624), wrote several letters to the courtiers of Akbar and Jehangir protesting their “liberal policies towards Hindus”

Here is an excerpt from letter No. 163: “…The honour of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya (editor’s note: religious head tax) on them is to humiliate them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified and trembling. It is intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honour and might of Islam…” (Sikh Archives)

But what is even more worrying is the enemies and traitors within: the large tribe of human filth in the form of secularists of various hues in politics, academia and (chiefly) the English media who justify the actions of terrorists and radicalized Muslims. I’ve said this several times and I’ll say it again—this tribe of human filth not only enables terror attacks but fuels more.

Continue reading The Ongoing Jihad Against India