JIHAD DECADE COMETH

Atlas Shrugs

Even before Hesham Islam, the mole from the Muslim Brotherhood, managed to smear John Coughlin and got him fired,  Homeland Security was an infiltrated mess. Complete with Muslim prayer rooms, Eid-celebrations and lots of Mohammedan translators who refused to do their jobs. Because Translating documents that would  incriminate other Muslims is un-Islamic. Now, with the Muslim POTUS Obama  at the helm, the DHS  may as well become a mosque.

The fox is guarding the hen house:

DEARBORN, Mich. (myFOXDetroit.com) – You may not know this, but the CIA has been recruiting in Dearborn for seven years, and the agency has been very successful, so far. But right now, they are looking to recruit more Arab and Muslim-Americans to help keep our country safe from harm.

The CIA is once again using commercials to recruit, but this time it’s a little different.

“This is the most ethnically rich and diverse Middle Eastern community in the United States,” said CIA Recruiter Henry Medina.

The CIA made a special trip to Dearborn, reaching out to the the Arab and Iranian-American communities and inviting and encouraging people to think about careers in the CIA.

There are hundreds of good jobs for good people from translators, nurses, engineers and more.

“To be able to provide the intelligence that our president needs to safe guard our country,” Medina said.

Continued….

Atlas links:

Victor Davis Hanson lays the failure out surgically, although I think he is too easy on BO. There is more to it than a leftist ideal of utopia. He gives him a free pass on motive. I disagree.

Arab League/OIC Demands Bigger UN Role in Israel/Islamic War Process

Continue reading Minarets for the Pentagon!

Just in thanks to Darrin

Infiltration and  subversion: in the US, schoolbooks financed by Saudi Arabia, smear Judaism and Christianity while promoting Islam. It looks like this kind of “brainwashing” has now arrived in New South Wales schools:

HSC religious question unfair, students say

HSC candidates have accused the Board of Studies of setting an unfair exam by including questions that would analyse the role played by the revelation through the Prophet in the life of Muslims.” Read it here

School textbook fuels anti-Semitism

Israel practices polygamy, Jews are to blame for “conflicts in the world”-  Passover involves “slaughtering lambs, smearing the lintel on the front door with blood…” Do I smell  Muslim /Arabs behind this?

ANNA PATTY EDUCATION EDITOR/Sydney Moonbat Herald

THE NSW Jewish Board of Deputies has asked for the immediate withdrawal of a book that schools use as an HSC text, which it says contains anti-Semitic slurs.

The Board of Deputies said it had also asked for a chapter on Judaism to be rewritten and reissued to all schools that have bought the book, its chief executive, Vic Alhadeff, said.

He said senior staff members from a Jewish school had alerted the board to the book after they had begun using it in class.

“We have requested Cambridge University Press to withdraw the book immediately, given that every additional copy that is distributed means more teachers and more students are using it,” Mr Alhadeff said.

Then, there are the Muslim teachers doing da’awa>>

Continue reading WTF is going on in NSW Schools?

Conservatism is a tradition, not a pathology

There is a concerted effort to keep conservative Ph.D.’s out of jobs, to deny tenure to those who get through, and to ignore conservative books and ideas. It is an old answer, dating back to the 1970s, when neoconservatives began writing about the “adversary culture” of intellectuals. Horowitz is an annoying man, and what’s most annoying about him is that … he has a point. Though we are no longer in the politically correct sauna of the 1980s and 1990s, and experiences vary from college to college, the picture he paints of the faculty and curriculum in American universities remains embarrassingly accurate, and it is foolish to deny what we all see before us.

• OBAMA MARXIST MOLE STRATEGY ROOTS – MUST VIEW VIDEO/Yuri Bezmenov
• Ask David Horowitz: What Do We Need To Know About Maoism? »
• Jihad at Temple – by David Horowitz »
• Collaborators in the Campus War against Israel and the Jews: Joel Beinin – by Steven Plaut »
• “You can’t teach the Ten Commandments in public schools. But teaching the five pillars of Islam is A-OK.”

Marxist and Maoist Pond Scum Infests Our Best Universities

Over the past decade, our universities have made serious efforts to increase racial and ethnic diversity on the campus (economic diversity worries them less, for some reason). Well-paid deans work exclusively on the problem. But universities show not the slightest interest in intellectual diversity among faculty members. That wouldn’t matter if teachers could be counted on to introduce students to their adversaries’ books and views, but we know how rarely that happens. That’s why political diversity on the faculty does matter. As it stands, there is a far greater proportion of conservatives in the student body of typical colleges than on the faculty. A few leading thinkers on the right do teach at our top universities—but at some, like Columbia University, where I teach, not a single prominent conservative is to be found. More>>

Infiltration Watch:

Monash: Sex and Terror 101

Written by Cassandra/Islam Monitor

Monash University houses the Global Terrorism Research Centre. You would think from its title that it would research global terrorism and advise on ways to keep us safe. But maybe you would think wrong, as defending Islam’s reputation seems to be their number one priority.

The Centre is headed by a Muslim (not that there is any hint of that in Lentini’s lengthy biography)(reference)

But Geoff Strong, in A Convert to Islam, spills the beans: Read it here

Questions, questions:

Australians concerned about the objectivity of our academic staff  should be keeping a close eye on that is happening.

Many questions need to be asked. Here are just a few for readers to ponder:

1. Why did Monash show its preference for Islam above all other religions by giving land for a mosque.? Despite many letters, VC Larkin refused to give a satisfactory reply . (see  Democracy Retreats from Monash University  )

2. When teaching about Islamic terrorism, should staff be Islamic?
Can an unrepentant Nazi teach objectively about the horrors of Nazism?

3. In relation to the sexual assault claims against Wright Neville, given the cosiness between members of staff, are there others involved who knew and looked the other way?

4. Were Wright Neville’s bias against Judeo-Christian values known at the time of his appointment? Should people with such extreme views which are hostile to our democratic values be allowed to indoctrinate our students?

5. Why are the rigorous standards for appointment of lecturers relaxed in the case of Muslims? (see Different standards for Muslims? )

Other News:

• Australian authorities have rescued 54 suspected asylum seekers from a stricken boat stranded north of the Cocos Islands./”We caused it, we are responsible for them…”/ed)

• TWO teenagers have been stabbed outside a pub in Sydney’s south./Police say the two, aged 17 and 18, were set upon by six males of Middle Eastern appearance outside a hotel on Forest Road, Hurstville, about 7.15pm (AEST) yesterday. They had been inside the hotel.

• F*kcwit alert: TREATING terrorists humanely may prove more effective than locking them up without charge, one of Australia’s foremost counter-terrorism experts says.

The cost of Mohammedan infiltration:

“300.000 Mohammedans will explode if you hold them accountable for welfare fraud!”

After the government in 2001 discovered massive welfare fraud and wanted to research the registers in Morocco, the social attaché of the Dutch embassy was threatened and was provided with private security. When the Dutch government proposed to stop the transfer of children’s allowance, the Moroccan Ambassador in the Netherlands threatened : “they should not enrage 300,000 Moroccans [in the Netherlands], they will explode.” The Dutch government (then PvdA, VVD and D66) stopped the research.

• The Price Tag on Dutch Multiculti- befuddlement
• Is Mohammedan immigration an asset or a liability?/I think we all know the answer to that…

Flemish correspondent VH has compiled a report on Geert Wilders’ recent call for an official government assessment of the costs of immigration. Here’s his summary (footnotes are all the way at the bottom of the post):

While the Belgian government is planning to hand out residence permits (and taxpayers’ money) to 50,000 or even 100,000 illegal “sans papiers” (the Dutch government did the same in 2007 with 27,500 asylum seekers), the PVV in the Netherlands demands a proper insight in the costs and benefits of immigration. All parties except the center-right VVD oppose the request, and we have yet to see whether the Jan Peter Balkenende government will sabotage the request or not.

Vlaams Belang requested the same a few years ago in Flanders. Though they did not get any answers from the government, they were still able to produce an outstanding report based on data collected by other means. Still, immigration continues: the immigrant share of prison population in the VB report is 38.4% (2006), but in the meantime it has risen to 48%(2009). (Minus three gangsters, Ashraf Sekkaki, Abdelhaq Melloul Khayari, and another one escaped in a helicopter Thursday night.)

The “traditional” parties, on the one hand, claim that immigration is a benefit to the economy and even a necessity, but on the other hand refuse to provide the data or help prove their viewpoint. In Flanders it became clear why: as it turns out, there is no benefit, but a loss of about €2 billion a year, a bill paid by the Flemish taxpayer.

The Migration Policy Institute, a think tank, states on this issue: “[…] Although public spending on immigration is rising in many countries […], there is very little comparative data on migration policy spending.” They further state that “evaluation is required to estimate the impact of policy on individual immigrants as well as on natives.”

VH follows this analysis with several translations from the Dutch-language media. First, from Elsevier:

Cost of Immigration in the Netherlands? At least 100 billion!

“Those who research the immigration costs will be discredited”

To this, the answer would be: “those who prevent the research into immigration costs will be discredited”- makes a lot more sense. what say you?

Continue reading Wilders: "Show Me the Money"