Critics of proposed changes to Victoria’s anti-vilification laws have warned they could give the state government unfettered powers to censor free speech and risk radicalising schools, police and courts with “extreme anti-Australian ideology”.
.
Institute of Public Affairs executive director John Roskam said recommendations under consideration by the Victorian government could potentially make any speech unlawful as they relied on the experience of harm by the complainant.
.
“This is not only the most anti-free speech law ever proposed since section 18C, it will be many times worse,” he said.
“The recommendations give the government unlimited and arbitrary power to censor mainstream opinions.”
Until now, it was possible to believe that his administration was merely hopelessly naive, appeasement-minded or delusional as a consequence of its utopian liberal ideology, and that Israel just happened to be particularly vulnerable to its correspondingly bone-headed blundering in the Middle East. Now, however, there is evidence that the administration is driven by actual malevolence towards both Israel and Zionism itself, which lowers it into a pit of infamy fouler even than Obama’s hostility and disdain.
Poll: Majority of French Agree With Military Generals That the Country is Heading Towards “Civil War”
Nearly half want the military to be sent into multicultural banlieues to restore order.
A new poll has found that a majority of French people support the sentiments expressed in a letter signed by active duty and retired members of the military warning that the country is heading towards a “civil war” caused by failed multiculturalism and attacks on French identity.
Around 1,000 servicemembers signed the letter, including 20 retired generals, warning President Emmanuel Macron of “several deadly dangers” threatening France, including “Islamism and the hordes of the banlieue,” a reference to the fractured suburbs around major cities with high crime and immigrant populations.
The signatories also blame the “anti-racism” movement for seeking to create a “racial war” by attacking symbols of French cultural cohesion and identity, including statues.
The French government is derelict in their duty to protect the people from the invading Mohammedan hordes, who camp in the streets and live amongst the rubbish.
After blowing 300 Christians (“Easter worshippers”) to smithereens on their high holiday, the OIC, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, is bitching about the resulting “Islamophobia”. In a sane world these rabid dogs should be drowned int heir own vomit.
OIC’s human rights body calls on Sri Lanka to protect Muslims’ rights to practice their religion, free from any coercion
ANKARA
The rights body of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on Friday urged Sri Lanka to fulfill its international human rights obligations, calling majoritarian rhetoric and discriminatory measures in the country “clear manifestations of Islamophobia.”
The Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission (IPHRC) in a statement condemned the Sri Lankan Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and its recently enacted regulation titled “de-radicalization from holding violent extremist religious ideology”.
“[These] are contrary to the ideals of pluralism…”
Blah blah… there is no pluralism and there are no human rights in countries where Mohammedans have the upper hand. Civilised nations have to get rid of corrupt organisations that promote this garbage.
Apr 25, 2021
Sri Lanka arrests top Muslim leader over 2019 Easter attacks
Wealthy and well-educated: The bombers behind the Sri Lanka attacks
Death came to Sri Lanka in rucksacks worn by eight men.
The suicide bombers struck churches and hotels within minutes of each other, turning the innocence of Easter Sunday into scenes of terror.
Two days later Islamic State said it carried out the bombings, releasing a video of suspects pledging allegiance to its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
Image:The suspected bombers behind the Sri Lanka attacks
.
Only one face is unmasked. That of Mohammed Hashim Mohammed Zaharan, in his early 30s, a self-styled radical preacher and the suspected ringleader of the group.
He targeted the Shangri-La hotel in Colombo with another bomber.
Anyone who believes in stopping White replacement is a “violent extremist”
Mole.
NSN
There was an enormous amount of talk during the first day of public testimony of the extremism inquiry yesterday. The most important points were deliberately hidden behind euphemisms or buried in the midst of irrelevant waffle.
We can summarise what was said (and what was directly implied) by the head of ASIO, the head of the AFP and the Department of Home Affairs as follows:
1. Anyone who believes in stopping White replacement is a “violent extremist”, even if they have never committed violence and explicitly rejected it as a strategy.
