A Top West London art gallery covered up two paintings last week at the request of the artist after Muslim visitors complained they were “blasphemous,” according to The Times.
Usama Hasan, head of Islamic studies at the think tank Quilliam, said the paintings were not only offensive but blasphemous and sacrilegious. “They are really dangerous,” he said. “It’s The Satanic Verses all over again.” –The Times
‘Dangerous’ for whom? Usama Hasan from Quilliam should be asked
One of the paintings by pseudonymous artist SKU features Arabic script from the “shahada” one of the pillars of Islam contained in the Quran – overlaid on Ingress’s Grande Odalisque, with stars of David completing a mock American flag. It is meant to represent the conflict between Islamic extremists and America, according to the Times.
Why should an art gallery appease Islamic savages to avoid accusations of ‘Islamophobia’?
@Saatchi_Gallery submits to blackmail: places a Burka over an artwork after complaints from Mohammedans.
The gallery has previously put works such as ‘Piss Christ’ — a crucifix submerged in urine — on proud display, flatly rejecting objections from Christians.

First, we feign outrage, then berate them to bow, then force them to kneel, then to grovel. Pity we can’t break them for they’re made of mush masquerading as men.
Continue reading Londonistan: “Dangerous Paintings” Covered Up to Avoid Muslim Terror










Muhammad Walid al-Quqa, the explosives chief of Hamas, reportedly blew himself up in what










