All Because of Israel… Really?

Caught on camera: The moment a suicide bomber blew himself up at a Sri Lankan mosque, killing 14

Daily Mail/H/T ZIP

This astonishing sequence of pictures shows the moment a suicide bomber blew himself up behind a crowd of people at a Sri Lankan mosque.

Fourteen people died in the blast.

While fighting rages in the north, the suicide attacker struck in the southern town of Akuressa as six ministers led a procession toward a mosque for a ceremony to commemorate the Prophet Muhammad’s birthday.

Television footage showed men in white robes and caps slowly parading down the street before the blast sent them running in all directions. 

* Mall Bomb Plotter: ‘I’m a Muslim – I Support al-Qaeda’…

* (Scotland) Muslims #1 – at Taking Public Funds…

Scroll down for more

expliosion  

Prelude: Unsuspecting worshippers walk towards the mosque

 

expliosion  

A split-second later, the first flames pour out from the blast epicentre

 

expliosion  

The blaze of light widens…

 

expliosion  

… But those at the front of the procession have not yet heard the explosion

 

expliosion  

Material is hurled upward by the force of the bomb

 

expliosion  

Finally, still a fraction of a second after the initial blast, the impact reaches the front of the procession

Afterward, charred bodies lay scattered among their torn clothes and severed limbs just outside the mosque compound’s gates.

‘I heard a huge sound, and then I saw people had fallen everywhere. They were covered with blood and flesh, and the wounded people were screaming,’ Ahamed Nafri, 29, said by telephone from the hospital in the nearby town of Matara.

Police and bystanders hauled the badly bleeding Minister of Posts and Telecommunications Mahinda Wijesekara into a van. He was later flown to the capital for treatment to a head wound.

Dr. Hector Weerasinghe, director of Colombo National Hospital, said the minister underwent three hours of surgery and was still in serious condition late yesterday.

The government said the attack killed 14 people and wounded 45 more.

President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s office said selecting a mosque on an Islamic festival for the attack showed the rebels’ ‘hatred’ of Muslims and strengthened the government’s resolve to defeat them.

The government blamed Tamil Tiger separatists for the blast, which wounded 45 other people.

Officials claimed the rebels had grown desperate in the face of an army offensive that has driven them close to defeat after more than 25 years of civil war.

If the assault was carried out by the Tigers, it shows that the guerrillas can still launch strikes far from their traditional strongholds in the north and east even as they face battlefield defeat.

As the military has pushed the rebels into an ever-shrinking sliver of territory in the north, human rights and aid groups have voiced concern for the fate of the tens of thousands of civilians trapped in the pocket. 

Heavy artillery attacks yesterday killed at least 49 ethnic Tamil civilians and wounded hundreds of others, the top government health official in the war zone said.

There was no indication Muslims were specifically targeted yesterday. 

However, the Tamil Tigers used violence to drive many Muslims and ethnic Sinhalese, who are mainly Buddhist, from areas dominated by Tamils, who are mostly Hindu.

In one of the bloodiest incidents, suspected rebels attacked a mosque in an eastern town in 1990 with guns, grenades and machetes, killing 140 worshippers.

Muslims, many of them descendants of Arab or Indian traders, make up about 7 per cent of Sri Lanka’s population. Many speak Tamil but the community has largely stayed out of the war.

With most communication to the north severed, rebel spokesmen could not be reached for comment.

The Tamil Tigers have fought since 1983 for an independent state for the Tamil minority, which suffered decades of marginalization at the hands of governments dominated by the Sinhalese majority. 

More than 70,000 people have been killed.

Amsterdam: "Seven individuals of Moroccan heritage arrested over planned attack"

* Lets not mention Islam or Muslims, that could make them so angry they might resort to terrorism to defend their religion; can’t have that!

Dutch authorities foil terrorist attack planned by, uh, people

Who was going to do this? People. Men. Well, six men and one woman. Suspects. A person. Uh, Dutch people of Moroccan ancestry, and, er, one of them was a relative of one of the 2004 Madrid jihad attackers.

Hmmmm. What could have been motivating these people, these men, these suspects, these Dutch nationals of Moroccan ancestry? Could it be…the doctrines of Islamic jihad and supremacism?

What are you, some kind of Islamophobe?

“Dutch police arrest 7 suspected of planning attack,” by Toby Sterling for Associated Press, H/T JW

Bunglawussi Damage Control Watch

      inayat

* The comical spokesman for the MCB, Inayat Bunglawala, doesn’t like the negative publicity and the general resentment the Al-Muhajiroun headbangers have caused with their vile accusations against homecoming British troops. Don’t wake sleeping dogs, the Bungla tells us, don’t report it and don’t take any notice, because it might damage the stealth jihad in the UK: can’t have that!

Al-Muhajiroun’s little helpers

Abdul Bari’s phony apology

Al Guardian

The media should not reward the fanatics who protested against the Royal Anglian Regiment in Luton with the publicity they seek

The latest publicity stunt organised by some former members of the banned al-Muhajiroun outfit in Luton yesterday appears to have gone exactly to plan. It is a simple formula – hold up some offensive placards designed to get people’s backs up and call a local reporter to come along and capture some footage – that has reliably generated acres of media coverage for them in recent years.

Our TV channels and today’s newspapers have very obligingly given over a huge amount of precious broadcast time and expensive newsprint to report the antics of the tiny group of hooligans.

Here’s Pat Condell who tells the Bungla and his ilk to shove it…

Continue reading Bunglawussi Damage Control Watch

UK: Blackmailing Muslim Lord Ahmed Out of Jail After 16 Days!

MANSLAUGHTER NAZI AHMED WHO BANNED WILDERS IS FREED FROM PRISON

*  No Muslim should be punished for killing an infidel. Britain applies Islamic law…  Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Num. 283.

* He got 12 weeks and got out after 15 days. Was he disbarred from parliament? Don’t ask!

The Muslim who committed vehicular homicide and promised Muslim riots if Geert Wilders were allowed into Britain was freed after 16 days! I wonder how much prison time the great patriots will get who stood up for their country?

* The video is pathetic. Listen to the dhimmis. The Judge called the jihadi lord “a man of international integrity and repute”.
                 Ahmed prison2 

Lord Ahmed freed from prison  The Star H/T Pamela   

LORD Ahmed – the South Yorkshire peer who sent and received text messages on the motorway minutes before a fatal crash – is free from prison today after serving just 16 days of a 12-week sentence for dangerous driving.

It was a gross miscarriage of justice that Nazi Ahmed received 12 weeks for killing a man.

Fury as Labour peer jailed for texting at the wheel minutes before fatal crash to be freed after serving just 17 days
A Labour peer jailed for texting at the wheel shortly before ploughing into a car and killing its driver was today freed after Appeal Court judges decided his case was ‘exceptional.’
* Yes indeed. We’re dealing with exceptional Assholes here…

UN Parasites Attack Again: New U.N. resolution circulated today would define any questioning of Islamic dogma as Yuman Rites violation…

HUMAN RIGHTS LEADER LITTMAN OUTRAGED AFTER DEBATE CUT: “WE ARE CONSTANTLY STOPPED BY POINTS OF ORDER BY (MUSLIM) DELEGATES, IT IS VERY DEPRESSING TO BE CENSORED THIS TIME BY THE CANADIAN CHAIRMAN”

Get Out Of The UN, NOW!

                 

New U.N. resolution would define any questioning of Islamic dogma as a human rights violation

Here we go again. “Proposal at U.N. to criminalize ‘defamation of Islam,'” from UN Watch

* Andrew Bolt: Boycott this hate fest

                           

*  To add insult to injury: In Congress, UN chief  Ban Ki Moonbat calls US ‘deadbeat’ donor

* UNRWA: It’s Israel’s Fault That Our Schools Teach Kids To Be Terrorists

Geneva, March 11, 2009 — A new U.N. resolution circulated today by Islamic states would define any questioning of Islamic dogma as a human rights violation, intimidate dissenting voices, and encourage the forced imposition of Sharia law….

Continue reading UN Parasites Attack Again: New U.N. resolution circulated today would define any questioning of Islamic dogma as Yuman Rites violation…

1400 Years of Jihad = 270 Million Dead

                  

One thing is very clear, the enemy is no longer political Islam. The enemy of critical thought is the dhimmi. It is the dhimmis who carry water for Islam and do great damage to our civilization. 

* UK Approves Visit by Hezbollah Official…

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI). CSPI’s goal is to teach the doctrine of political Islam through its books and it has produced a series on its focus. Mr. Warner did not write the CSPI series, but he acts as the agent for a group of scholars who are the authors.

Dancing Terrorists: Galloway & Ishmael Haniyeh

Haniyeh presents Galloway with a
Pali “passport”…

Ismail Haniyeh makes first public appearance since Gaza assault

Continue reading 1400 Years of Jihad = 270 Million Dead

Another Honor Killing in Germany: but not to worry, its cultural. Nothing to do with Islam!

Honor killing in Germany: Girl’s face “beaten beyond recognition”

Honor killing: “Retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.” However, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” (‘Umdat al-Saliko1.1-2.) In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law.

                       G%FCls%FCm.jpg

She loved the wrong man, and should have submitted to an arranged marriage. Google translation of “Erschlagen, weil sie den falschen Mann liebte,” from Politically Incorrect, March 11 (thanks to Pamela) via Jihad Watch:

The young Turkish woman was beaten to death with a stick, her face unrecognizable, because she loved the wrong man and was pregnant with his child. Finally her parents searched for another man for her. She should have a traditional arranged marriage like her sister.There is no trace of the attacker, but her boyfriend Altin P. age 25 complains: “She must die, because she wanted to live like a normal woman!” An honor killing? That is what her acquaintances believe.

* Are Honor Killings Simply Domestic Violence?

Pamela has additional details, and don’t miss also this Q-and-A with Phyllis Chesler about honor killing in National Review. An excerpt:

Continue reading Another Honor Killing in Germany: but not to worry, its cultural. Nothing to do with Islam!

Luton Muslim: "They are only about 10 to 15 hotheads. The best thing to do is just to ignore them. They do not represent the views of the community."

* Hmm, but the  “Muslim community” didn’t demonstrate in favor of the troops either. Neither did they declare their loyalty to the infidel nation state of Britain. What are the views of his community then? And why should we believe a guy who adheres to a religion that teaches “war is deceit?”

Brits call for crackdown on Muslims abusing returning soldiers

Muslim-extremists_1363821c.jpg

Not to worry, though: Akbar Dad Khan, of Luton’s Building Bridges organisation assures us that, “They are about 10 to 15 hotheads. The best thing to do is just to ignore them. They do not represent the views of the community.” More on this story.

“Calls for crackdown on parade Muslim extremists,” by Thomas Harding for the Telegraph, JW:

Politicians and families of dead soldiers have united in urging the Government to crack down on the outlawed al Muhajiroun organisation after British soldiers were abused by Muslim protestors in Luton.

Continue reading Luton Muslim: "They are only about 10 to 15 hotheads. The best thing to do is just to ignore them. They do not represent the views of the community."

America Derailed

Academic Responsibility

By John K. Wilson

The following interview with David Horowitz was conducted by John K. Wilson, the editor ofIllinois Academe, a publication of the American Association of University Professors. Wilson is the author of five books, including Patriotic Correctness: Academic Freedom and Its Enemies, Barack Obama: This Improbable Quest, The Myth of Political Correctness: The Conservative Attack on Higher Education, and Newt Gingrich: Capitol Crimes and Misdemeanors. He is the founder of the Institute for College Freedom.

JW: What, exactly, should be done to the professors teaching these classes? Should they be banned from teaching these classes? Should they be fired? Should their course readings be controlled by someone else?

DH: The university presents itself as an organization of professionals with standards of performance and excellence. If professors fail to meet these standards what is the remedy? Isn’t that a question for the organization itself to answer? Contrary to the misrepresentations of my efforts by many of my opponents I have never suggested that universities be governed by outside authorities whether governmental or otherwise. The best remedy in my view would be for these problems to be handled by faculty at the departmental level. However, that requires an interest from faculty in holding itself accountable. So far I have seen very little interest on the part of faculty in correcting the malpractices documented in One-Party Classroom. In some cases such as Women’s Studies, moreover, the violation of long-standing academic standards takes place at the departmental level itself. In these cases there would have to be an academic committee consisting of faculty peers at the level of the college, or even the university. However, I am optimistic by nature (otherwise I wouldn’t be spending my time banging my head against these stone walls) and don’t see why it shouldn’t be possible to change these attitudes and get on with the task.

Continue reading America Derailed

DURBAN II: Why are we going to this hate-fest?

* Islamophobia is not the same as anti-Semitism

* UN Watch: UN Considers Proposal to Criminalize Defamation of Islam…

Why are we going to this hate-fest?

Andrew Bolt 

Opposition Foreign Affairs spokeman Julie Bishop is right – there is no way the Rudd Government should go to the UN’s latest group hate against the West and Israel:


The Australian Government should not attend the United Nations Durban Review Conference, to be held in Geneva on 20-24 April, due to the obvious potential for a repeat of the anti-Semitism that marred the first Durban conference..

The Australian Jewish News is even more adamant:

The US has joined Israel and Canada in pulling out. Some European countries have also indicated they are considering not attending the conference in Geneva… Robert Goot, president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and Philip Chester, president of the Zionist Federation of Australia, both called on Australia to follow the US.

The US State Department agrees the draft document of the UN conference is clearly anti-Israeli, and suggests it is also biased against the West and its freedoms:

Sadly, however, the document being negotiated has gone from bad to worse, and the current text of the draft outcome document is not salvageable… It must not single out any one country or conflict, nor embrace the troubling concept of “defamation of religion.” The U.S. also believes an acceptable document should not go further than the DDPA on the issue of reparations for slavery.

So why is the Rudd Government so eager to go to such a festival of hatred against our values and allies? Writer Alan Gold is right – because a refusal to attend might offend Muslim and African countries whose UN votes Kevin Rudd is unnaturally eager to have:

Foreign Minister Stephen Smith hasn’t yet announced whether Australia will attend the review in Geneva. Much is at stake. Australia is a leading contender for a non-permanent seat on the UN Security Council and boycotting may affect how we are viewed at the tables of the world body.

How shameful a sell-out. As if it wasn’t enough that to toady for UN votes this Government has already voted for two anti-Israeli resolutions in the United Nations that the Howard Government wouldn’t support, and has now resumed aid even to Mugabe’s Zimbabwe.

Continue reading DURBAN II: Why are we going to this hate-fest?