Author: sheikyermami

With thanks to Mullah

‘Sheik Haron’- Who the hell is this creep? Heaven knows when and how he got into Australia, but he is here, and ‘here to stay’- and he’s got himself a website.

* But not only that: Besides writing hurtful and disgusting s*it to families of fallen Aussie diggers who died fighting Muhammedan headbangers in Afghanistan, his sheikness writes a lot of equally revolting crap to Australia’s politicians.

Take a look:

30 July 2007
Report of terrorist acts to DPP

Letter of Sheikh Haron to Mr. Damian Bugg

6.2 KB
6 August 2007
It is not my business. Report it to AFP

Facsimile to DPP, Mr. Damian Bugg

10 KB
7 August 2007
I haven’t heard from you, did you get my report about terrorism?

Facsimile to ASIO, Mr. Paul Osullivan

4.5 KB
7 August 2007
Have you received the report of terrorist acts?

Facsimile to Attorney-General, Mr. Philip Ruddock

4.5 KB
9 August 2007
Why are not Non Muslim terrorist victims taken seriously?

Facsimile to Director of Public Prosecutions, DPP

10 KB
10 August 2007
We give your terrorism report to AFP, only if you give permission!

Letter of Director of Public Prosecutions, DPP, to Sheikh Haron

4.3 KB
15 August 2007
Go ahead with DPP, if unsatisfied then go to ACMA

Letter of Senator Joe Ludwig, Shadow Attorney-General to Sheikh

3.6 KB
16 August 2007
A message for Prime Minister

Letter of Sheikh Haron to Mr. John Howard

Dear Prime Ministerif the war against terrorism is not a war against Islam, you and your
government should prove it by your behaviour not by words. If your war is not a war against
Islam, but it is only against terrorism, why Non Muslims are free to commit terrorist offence
in Australia but Muslims are not allowed? If your war is not a war against Islam, so please
tell me why only and only Muslims victims are targeted and beeninterrogated? Why Non
Muslims who were instructing terrorism on 4thJuly 2007 in Sydney Australia have not been
interrogated yet. We do not expect them to be in custody, we at least expected your Attorney-
General to interrogate or investigate about the case. If Australian Government condemns
discrimination, as Mr. Philip Ruddock has mentioned in his letter, it must be proved by action
not just by words.

* Our Muhammedan overlords call the shots?

9.1 KB
17 August 2007
Has ‘Sunrise’ damaged the Australian society?

Letter of Sheikh Haron to ACMA, Mr. Chris Chapman

4.4 KB
24 August 2007
ACMA is appropriate authority for your terrorism report, not ASIO!

Letter of ASIO to Sheikh Haron

5.4 KB
30 August 2007
Paul ! Please do your duty. It’s your job

Letter of Sheikh Haron to ASIO, Mr. Paul Osullivan

* Besides, sheik Haron issues fatwas, and councels the believers:

Q: A Christian girl loves to marry my Muslim friend. She is like most of Christians who believe Jesus is the son of God. My friend wants to know whether or not he can marry this Christian girl?

A: The marriage with Mushrik is religiously false and can’t be in order. It is Haram to sexually touch the Mushrik partner even after marriage.

Check it out

*

‘There Are No Moderates”

Of course not. The assassins, the suicide bombers are the Muhammedan stormtroopers. They are the ‘tiny, tiny minority of extremists’ and ‘we cannot tar them all with the same brush’ – right? Because Islam is a ‘Religion of Peace’- but when you draw a silly cartoon about the pedophile ‘profit’ Muhammad every Muslim will tell you that you have just insulted 5 gazillion Muslims and that they all have a duty to kill you, you filthy kuffar, how dare you!

Abu Hamza and footsoldiers

Don’t call me radical. Don’t call me moderate. Call me Muslim.

Let me make something clear for you:

We do not have “radical” and “moderate” in Islam. Muslims are Muslims. Muslims are not divided to two kinds of “radical” and “Moderate”. These names and divisions are made by man, not by God or religion. Radical Muslim and moderate Muslim do not exist. Muslims are Muslims even if they have different interpretation of the religious texts. In Islam there is another division. 1. The Muslims who follow the Quran and practice the religion. 2. The Muslims that believe in God and the messenger of God, Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him), but they do not follow the Quran and do not practise the religion. They just carry the name of Islam. So this division is not only in Islam, we can see it in all other religions. There are practising Christians and non practising Christians. They are not called radical Christians or moderate Christians.

Radical Muslims do not exist. Moderate Muslims do not exist. Extremist Muslims do not exist. According the order of Allah in the Quran we are not allowed to call any name on our religion but Islam, and any name on ourselves but Muslim (I refer you to Chapter 30, Verse 32 of the holy Quran). If a Muslim doesn’t follow the Quran, do not call him/her moderate, but call him a Muslim who is not following the rules of his/her religion. Islam is not divided to two types of hard and soft, radical and moderate. Also the Quran is one unique holy book. There are not few versions of the Quran. I understand that there is variety of different interpretations of verses which are not clear enough and need to be explained by an expert, but that is completely different subject and will not result in division of radical and moderate, and secondly those verses are the minority. The majority of the verses are very clear and without any interpretation and explanation they give one particular guideline to the Muslims and no need that any cleric explain about them. The guidelines of the Quran are very clear. Unfortunately those who follow the Quran and practise their religion are called radical Muslims or extremist or Islamist or fundamentalist. And those who only carry the name of Muslim and Islam without following the orders of Allah in the Holy Quran are called moderate Muslims or understanding Muslims or open minded Muslims! “A part of the letter of Sheikh Haron to the Prime Minister John Howard 14 November 2007”

* Glad we cleared that up, your sheikness. Now, Mr. Rudd, what are we going to do about this?

* We hate to suspect any ‘innocent Muslims’- we never tar all Muslims with the same brush because ‘Islam is not a monolith’ and we can’t condemn 5 gazillion Muslims for the actions of the tiny, tiny minority of extremists that is so small that the combined ummah of 5 gazillion Muslims does just about anything to cover up that they exist at all, you Islamophobe, you!

Anyhow:

All that is known at this point is that the shooter was a black white male, possibly wearing a black ski mask, approximately 6 feet tall and that he is also among the dead. There may have been multiple shooters. At least 8 people are dead victims. The total number of dead is 9 including the dead gunmen.

Obviously we will be following this story closely.

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — A man with a rifle opened fire at a busy shopping mall Wednesday, killing eight people before taking his own life, police said. Five more people were wounded, two critically.
Shoppers and employees ran screaming through the mall and barricaded themselves in dressing rooms after hearing gunfire. The gunman was found dead on the third floor of the Von Maur department store.
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.
OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — A gunman opened fire Wednesday at a busy Omaha shopping mall, killing nine people before taking his own life, police said. Five more people were wounded, two critically.

*

* Update: Turns out that this was, for once, not jihad related, but rather a f*kced up- disturbed kid. Since we don’t hear much in the media perhaps we shouldn’t jump to conclusions.  Now the Muslims will tell us that ‘everyone can be a terrorist’ and indeed, there are a lot of ratbags out there with evil intentions. But they don’t have a ‘holy book’ that tells them to kill unbelievers and to ‘strike terror in the hearts of the enemy’- so no need for apologies. It would have been better for all of us if it had been a Muslim, because it forces lazy, complacent kuffars to learn something about the threat that we’re facing.

*

Annapolis Breakthrough Revisited

Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent of The Times

Hat tip Weasel

A British imam’s daughter is living in fear of her life under police protection after she received death threats from her family for converting to Christianity.

*  ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'” Muhammad

The young woman, aged 32, whose father is a Muslim imam in the north of England, has moved house 45 times to escape detection by her family since she became a Christian 15 years ago.

Hannah, who uses a pseudonym to hide her identity, told The Times how she became a Christian after she ran away from home at 16 to escape an arranged marriage.

The threats against her became more serious a month ago, prompting police to offer her protection in case of an attempt on her life.

* Obviously none of the British dhimmi’s in government or immigration have considered internment and deportation for her clan.
She was speaking on the eve of the launch of a new charity in London today to promote greater religious awareness. Muslims in Britain who wish to convert to Christianity are living in fear of their lives because of Islamic apostasy laws, a senior Church of England bishop will warn at the invitaton-only launch in west London.

The Bishop of Rochester, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, will claim “freedom to believe” is under threat in Britain because of Islamic hostility to conversion.

Hannah, now employed in multi-faith youth work and who gives talks to churches on Islam, is the daughter of a Lancashire imam whose seven other children are demanding she return to Islam. She has been in hiding,

since her home was attacked by a group of men armed with knives, axes and hammers, in 1994. She will describe today how she is in fear of her life after the death threats against her were recently renewed.

She said: “I left home and I had nowhere to go. My religious education teacher gave me somewhere to live. Even though she tried to make me stay at home on Sundays, I am quite rebellious by nature and I started to go to church with her out of curiosity.”

She said she had been in hiding, on and off, ever since, and has now been given a telephone number she can call for an instant response by police should she need help. The latest threat was a text message from one of her brothers, warning he could not be responsible for his actions if she did not return to Islam.

Hannah said she was looking forward to getting married so she could change her name and escape detection by her family. Not all Muslims in Britain are this extreme, she believes.

“It is representative of some Muslims. I know the Koran says that anyone who goes away from Islam should be killed as an apostate so in some ways my family are following the Koran. They are following Islam to the word. But I do not think every Muslim would actually act on that.”

Earlier this year, a Policy Exchange study found that 36 per cent of British Muslims aged between 16 and 24 believed those who converted to another religion should be punished by death.

Dr Nazir-Ali will speak out on behalf of Hannah and others suffering persecution for their beliefs in the UK at today’s launch of Lapido Media, a new charity which is seeking to promote “religious literacy” in world affairs.

The Bishop is expected to describe how sharia law in many countries, including parts of Britain, punishes apostasy with death and is viewed as treason by theocratic governments. Dr Nazir-Ali will call on society to offer greater protection, by increasing understanding of what makes people vulnerable.

Pakistan-born Dr Nazir-Ali, who has a Christian and Muslim background, is patron of Lapido Media, funded by donations and trusts including the Jerusalem Trust. The word ‘lapido’ means ‘to speak up for’ in the Acholi language of Northern Uganda. The charity has been named in honour of the courage of Acholi church leaders who campaigned for an end to a little-reported 20-year war there, involving the abduction of 25,000 children

*

The Odyssey of Ayaan Hirsi Ali

* A Rice surprise: who would have guessed?

Ayaan claims Rice helped her get a green card.

The US Secretary of State, she says, expressed her admiration for everything Hirsi Ali “has done for women and freedom.” Rice even helped her obtain a green card, she says proudly. It is quite possible that money to pay for her bodyguards over the past few weeks has been paid by associates of the Bush administration.

Former Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali is worshipped by foreign intellectuals, but not always welcome at home. Her opinions provoke Muslims as well as the European left, and she’s been living in very public exile from the Netherlands for over a year.

Even her clothing is provocative, though not at first glance. Ayaan Hirsi Ali wears a soft brown designer jacket with an embroidered floral pattern. When she takes off the jacket, though, there’s a black T-shirt. A black T-shirt underneath reads, in several languages (including Arabic): “Neither Whore Nor Submissive.”
She smoothes the T-shirt, stretches and says: “It’s a fantastic slogan, isn’t it?”

Who can be surprised that this woman polarizes people? That some consider her a kind of Joan of Arc, while others see her as an incorrigible radical? As someone who says that she wants to help oppressed Muslim women, and yet may do more them more damage than good? The daughter of a Somali opposition politician who fled to the Netherlands to escape an arranged marriage, Hirsi Ali is an expert at offending others. A rebellious spirit lurks beneath her graceful exterior and designer clothing.

Since the murder of Theo van Gogh, with whom she produced a film critical of male dominance in Muslim families three years ago, the 38-year-old Hirsi Ali has been traveling the world without a place to call home. She now lives in the United States, but recently came to Europe to promote her autobiography, which has just come out in paperback in Germany.

One of the reasons Hirsi Ali travels so much is a dispute over her personal protection that has been raging for weeks. After calling the Prophet Muhammad a pedophile and a tyrant, Hirsi Ali has become the target of Muslim fanatics.
And the threats are serious. Mohammed Bouyeri, a Dutch citizen of Moroccan descent, shot van Gogh as he was riding a bike down an Amsterdam street in November 2004. In a note he pinned to his victim’s chest with a knife, Bouyeri also threatened to kill Hirsi Ali. By then she already had bodyguards, paid for by the Dutch government. After Van Gogh’s murder the protection was heightened, and three years later Dutch intelligence still considers the risk to her life to be very high.

But she moved to the United States in September 2006, and after a year abroad, was told by the Netherlands that government money for her protection would be canceled — she would have to pay for it herself. The bodyguards who protected Hirsi Ali’s life 24 hours a day, seven days a week, had already cost The Hague €2 million ($2.93 million).

Read it all

‘Sheikh’ tells dead Digger’s dad the loss was for nothing

By Mark Schliebs

* Dead soldier’s father told his son “died for nothing”

* “Hurt” John Worsley says “we were proud of our boy”

* Private Luke Worsely “saved lives of others”

A MAN purporting to be a Muslim cleric wrote to the father of slain Australian soldier Luke Worsley telling him he “can’t be proud” of his son who “died for nothing” – then posted the letter online.

John Worsley, father of 26-year-old commando Private Luke Worsley who was killed by the Taliban in Afghanistan last month, received the letter from “Sheikh Haron” just days after news broke of his son’s death.

“We were hurt (by the letter),” Mr Worsley told NEWS.com.au.

“We’re very proud of our boy.”

Former adviser on to John Howard on Islam, Dr Ameer Ali, said that the letter was ridiculous.

“(Pte Worsley) did his duty, like any other public servant would,” Dr Ali said.

“This man (who wrote the letter)… does not respect the lives of other human beings.”

The letter – topped with Mr Worsley’s home address – has been posted on the internet by the mystery “Sheikh”.

“Dear Mr Worsley,” the letter reads. “It is painful but we should be proud when we loose (sic) our dear kids for defending our country while we are unjustly attacked by another country.

“But it is more painful and we can’t be proud when we loose (sic) our kids for nothing!

“We loose (sic) our dear kids for nothing if we unjustly attack to (sic) another country and our kids are killed while the other country is defending itself.”

NEWS.com.au emailed the author through the website where the letter was published but did not receive a response.

Pte Worsley was farewelled at a funeral in Sydney yesterday.

The letter said “it would be nice” if Mr Worsley asked the Department of Defence to organise a ceremony “for the respect of innocent civilians, whether they have been killed by Australians or not”.

“It was nice of Chief of (the) Defence Force Air Chief Angus Houston that (sic) has extended his sympathies to your family… but I don’t know why he has not had any comment for the family of three innocents who were killed in that operation.”

Pte Worsley was killed during a fire-fight against the Taliban on November 23. He was part of an operation against insurgent bomb-makers in the dangerous Oruzgan Province.

At his funeral yesterday, Pte Worsley was described as a “hero” who saved many lives and was an inspiration to his comrades.

“Luke was the first man of the team through the door and was met by enemy forces who opened fire at close range, resulting in Luke being killed almost instantly,” Lieutenant Colonel Mark Smethurst said.

“Luke’s actions upon entering the room, warning of the enemy threat, almost certainly saved the lives of other members of his team.”
Dead soldier’s father told his son “died for nothing”
“Hurt” John Worsley says “we were proud of our boy”
Private Luke Worsely “saved lives of others”
A MAN purporting to be a Muslim cleric wrote to the father of slain Australian soldier Luke Worsley telling him he “can’t be proud” of his son who “died for nothing” – then posted the letter online.

John Worsley, father of 26-year-old commando Private Luke Worsley who was killed by the Taliban in Afghanistan last month, received the letter from “Sheikh Haron” just days after news broke of his son’s death.

“We were hurt (by the letter),” Mr Worsley told NEWS.com.au.

“We’re very proud of our boy.”

Former adviser on to John Howard on Islam, Dr Ameer Ali, said that the letter was ridiculous.

“(Pte Worsley) did his duty, like any other public servant would,” Dr Ali said.

“This man (who wrote the letter)… does not respect the lives of other human beings.”

The letter – topped with Mr Worsley’s home address – has been posted on the internet by the mystery “Sheikh”.

Do you know more about Sheikh Haron? Email us at news@news.com.au or SMS / MMS 0429 300 245

“Dear Mr Worsley,” the letter reads. “It is painful but we should be proud when we loose (sic) our dear kids for defending our country while we are unjustly attacked by another country.

“But it is more painful and we can’t be proud when we loose (sic) our kids for nothing!

“We loose (sic) our dear kids for nothing if we unjustly attack to (sic) another country and our kids are killed while the other country is defending itself.”

NEWS.com.au emailed the author through the website where the letter was published but did not receive a response.

Pte Worsley was farewelled at a funeral in Sydney yesterday.

The letter said “it would be nice” if Mr Worsley asked the Department of Defence to organise a ceremony “for the respect of innocent civilians, whether they have been killed by Australians or not”.

“It was nice of Chief of (the) Defence Force Air Chief Angus Houston that (sic) has extended his sympathies to your family… but I don’t know why he has not had any comment for the family of three innocents who were killed in that operation.”

Pte Worsley was killed during a fire-fight against the Taliban on November 23. He was part of an operation against insurgent bomb-makers in the dangerous Oruzgan Province.

At his funeral yesterday, Pte Worsley was described as a “hero” who saved many lives and was an inspiration to his comrades.

“Luke was the first man of the team through the door and was met by enemy forces who opened fire at close range, resulting in Luke being killed almost instantly,” Lieutenant Colonel Mark Smethurst said.

“Luke’s actions upon entering the room, warning of the enemy threat, almost certainly saved the lives of other members of his team.”

Pte Worsley was the third member of the Australian Defence Forces killed in Afghanistan in the past two months, following the deaths of SAS Trooper David Pearce and Sergeant Matthew Locke in October.

In 2003, SAS trooper Sergeant Andrew Russell died when his vehicle hit a landmine.

*

“Islamophobia” Wankfest in Istanbul

* The usual suspects will whine at each other how misunderstood their Islam is, and if it weren’t for the ignorance of the kuffar everything would be just swell….

Hugh Fitzgerald has more:

There is “Lord” Ahmed, fresh from Khartoum, no doubt expecting to be basking in gratitude from the non-Muslims of Great Britain, for though Al-Bashir had decided to free Gibbons before Ahmed and his traveling companion (a Muslim woman, not married to Lord Ahmed, whom some fellow Believer should not forget to punish for her crime) arrived.

There is the hysterical, ex-nun Karen Armstrong, who needs no introduction, and who believes that Muhammad’s essential function was that of Peacemaker. She apparently still has not figured out that she really must reread the Qur’an, and then find out all about the Hadith (and how their “authenticity” has been ranked to Muslim satisfaction) and the Sira — for Aisha, the Khaybar Oasis, the decapitation of the Banu Qurayza, the murders of Abu Afak and Asma bint Marwan are just of the few of the things that Armstrong forgot to mention, much less to comprehend, in her guide to nothing and nowhere, Islam: A Short History.

There is the crazed antisemite Norman Finkelstein, for whose parents — Holocaust survivors — we must feel sorry. About him nothing more need be said except that at such gatherings one completely lunatic Jewish person is de rigueur, and apparently Israel Shamir was otherwise occupied.

* Islamio- agit prop and parvenu Israel Shamir on Swedish welfare sails under false flag as a pretend Jew.

There is Tariq Ramadan, about whom see Frere Tariq, a book-length study of his soft-voice taqiyya (but listen for the hiss underneath at all). He is determined to make sure that the confusion and fog of war continue while Muslims make themselves as comfortable as possible in the Lands of the Infidels, settling in for the long haul and the demographic conquest that, if nothing is done, is assured. It is Tariq Ramadan who promises a new Islam, a “European Islam” that he carefully never defines. He never explains what that “European Islam’s” canonical texts will look like, or how they will differ, those texts and then those tenets of Islam, from the Islam we have all seen, and grown correctly to fear, in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran, Pakistan, indeed everywhere in the Muslim lands, among all those Muslims who take their Islam seriously — which is to say, almost all of them, though they are very good at finding westernized, plausible, smooth-talking representatives to fan out to the capitals of the West to deny, obfuscate, and sometimes, in their own persons, to offer a false view of Islam.

More

* Pamela Geller from Atlas has a take on the intelligence debakel designed to discredit Bush and to stop an attack on the mad Mullah’s of Iran, who can now peacefully assemble their nuclear bombs…

Who is in charge? The NIE report on Iran’s cessation of their nuclear program is a thinly veiled attempt to change the direction (if there is one) on how we handle Iran’s nukes. And that has clearly succeeded.

The permanent bureaucrats in these intelligence agencies are notoriously partisan and their intel is poor at best. These guys are running the country now? Yes, that’s a 21st century coup. Bush will not be able to get anything nothing done on Iran.

This, IMAO is sabotage, sedition. And it’s a very scary turn of the knife.

More here:

John Bolton on the O’Reilly Factor last night

Iran Declares Victory, IAEA Agrees

By Reza Derakhshi

TEHRAN (Reuters) – Iran’s president declared victory over the United States on Wednesday and the head of a U.N. watchdog said Iran had been “somewhat vindicated” by a U.S. report that it halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

President George W. Bush called for Tehran to “come clean” on its nuclear activities and stop its enrichment of uranium which can potentially be used to make atomic bombs.

But Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran would press ahead with its nuclear program which the Islamic Republic says has only peaceful civilian aims.

“Today, the Iranian nation is victorious but you (the United States) are empty-handed,” Ahmadinejad said in a televised speech to a rally in the western Iranian city of Ilam.

Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said the report gave Iran a chance to resolve the crisis and former chief UN arms inspector Hans Blix said it meant there would be no military action against Iran “in the intermediate future”

The UN’s blind nuclear watchdog, sounding as usual like a sleazy apologist for Iran, agrees:

Mohamed El-Baradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the report gave Iran a chance to resolve the crisis.

“It opens a window of opportunity for Iran now because Iran obviously has been somewhat vindicated in saying they have not been working on a weapons program at least for the last few years,” El-Baradei told a news conference in Brazil’s capital.

* Hans Blix, as we all know is a completely deluded jackass. Anyone who reads this blog knows that Muhammad Al Babbledai supports the global jihad. This guy is in the opposite camp and we pay him to deceive us. The world is on skid row…

More

*

Israel Not Buying the NIE

Israeli ambassador Dan Gillerman on the NIE

Simple question: Why would Iran, which floats on an ocean of oil, choose to invest in a nuclear energy program instead of upgrading its refining capacity so that it doesn’t have to import gasoline? He fears there’s only one answer. So does Israeli intelligence: “If one looks at the investment, if one looks at the nature of the project, if you look at the cost to the Iranian economy, there is no logical explanation other than that the Iranian program is not benign.” Even the Times acknowledges that mastering enrichment, which will Iran will now certainly be allowed to do, is the hard part of building a weapon; ElBaradei himself estimated just a few weeks ago that if they’ve worked out the kinks in their 3,000-centrifuge cascade, they could have a bomb in a year. The cause for celebration, especially on the left, isn’t that Iran is no longer a threat, it’s that it’s a threat that Bush has no grounds for confronting militarily and is unlikely to be able to pressure diplomatically. It’s the next president’s problem now.

By Gethin Chamberlain in Mitrovica, Kosovo, and Bojan PancevskiTelegraph UK

Kosovo mon amour:

The legacy of Clitman’s support for the jihad against the Christian Serbs:

Tens of thousands of Serbs are preparing to flee the troubled Balkan province of Kosovo because of fears that the region is on the brink of a devastating war.

Talks to find a political solution to the future of the region collapsed last week, eight years after Nato intervened to end violence that left more than 2,000 dead.

With Kosovo’s new Albanian-led administration poised to declare independence from Serbia, the old hatreds are resurfacing. Many Serbs – who account for less than 10 per cent of the population – are packing their bags, fearing a new wave of “ethnic cleansing” at the hands of the Albanian majority.

Read it all…

*

Fjordman: Why We Should Oppose an Independent Kosovo

I have said repeatedly that I believe the Balkan wars were far more complex than we are led to believe by the political establishment, and I fear that we out of ideological blindness have come to support some pretty dangerous Muslim forces. I respect Mr. Rustad for exposing the bias against Israelis in the mainstream media, and I am sad to see that he accepts uncritically a similar bias against the Serbs. My point is that you cannot understand recent history in the Balkans without taking the previous seven centuries of Islamic oppression into account.

Sir Jadunath Sarkar, the pre-eminent historian of Mughal India, wrote this about dhimmitude, the humiliating apartheid system imposed upon non-Muslims under Islamic rule: “The conversion of the entire population to Islam and the extinction of every form of dissent is the ideal of the Muslim State. If any infidel is suffered to exist in the community, it is as a necessary evil, and for a transitional period only. (…) A non-Muslim therefore cannot be a citizen of the State; he is a member of a depressed class; his status is a modified form of slavery. He lives under a contract (dhimma) with the State. (…) In short, his continued existence in the State after the conquest of his country by the Muslims is conditional upon his person and property made subservient to the cause of Islam.”

More 

F*kcwits in Parliament:

Democratic presidential candidates explain why Muslims hate us

* The result of shallowness and ignorance. The result of not learning, and not teaching history. The result of indulgence, complacency and the age of stupid.

From “Why do Muslims Hate us?” by Bonney Kapp at Fox (thanks to Hot Air, where there is audio of the complete exchange):

“Because we are trusted so little” – Joe Biden

*
Because of “the bullying, selfish, abusive behavior” of President Bush and his administration. – John Edwards

“John’s point is right, but I want to broaden it a little.” If you were a Muslim overseas listening to Rudy Giuliani saying they want to come over here and kill you, you would get the impression that we don’t want to talk. – Barack Obama

“This has been a vacuum for a long time.” We don’t know their culture. – Chris Dodd

Why are they ethnocentrists? Because no one said anything like, “They hate us because of Islam. They hate us for reasons arising from their core values. They hate us because they suck the hatred in with the mothers milk.”

No, instead they assume that their hatred for us is entirely our fault and our responsibility. It never enters their mind that Muslims might be free agents who act on their own initiative, and not just as passive reactors to American actions.

*

Hugh Fitzgerald has answers and questions:

Questions to be raised every time this “they hate us because we do this or we do that” business rears its idiotic head:

1) Why have Muslims been beating to death Hindus walking by mosques after Friday Prayers in Bangladesh? Why has the Hindu population, relative and absolute, gone from 15% to 1.5% in Pakistan, and from 34% to 7% in Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan)? Why, in that same period since Partition, has the Muslim percentage of the population in India gone, on the other hand, steadily up?

2) Why are Christian Assyrians and Chaldeans massacred in Iraq? Why were 100,000 Assyrians killed in 1933, six months after the British left, taking with them a guarantee from the local Arabs that no harm would befall the Assyrians?

3) Why did Muslim Turks (and Kurds) kill hundreds of thousands of Christian Armenians, not during the “wartime conditions” that the apologists for Turkey like to invoke, but twenty years before, in 1894-96?

4) Why did the Muslim Turks mass-murder Christian Armenians and Christian Greeks in the period 1915-1920?

5) Why did the Muslim Turks commit the Bulgarian Atrocities that so inflamed Gladstone and others in the advanced Western world, in 1876?

6) Why did Muslims massacre Maronites in Damascus in 1860?

7) Why did Muslims massacre every last Jew in Grenada in 1066, during that supposed “convivencia” in Islamic-ruled Spain that we hear so much about? Why did Muslims continue to massacre Jews, in Spain and then in Fez and Marrakech? What led Maimonides to write his “Epistle to the Yemen” in which he described the murderous hatred of Muslims for Jews as worse than anything else they had ever endured?

8) Why have Copts enjoyed the only relative freedom, and semi-equality, in modern Egypt during the period of Lord Cromer’s adminstration, and then during a few decades after, when the European, and especially English influence and power, were at their height, and ever since Nasser and the other colonels overturned Farouk it has been steadily downhill, as first pan-Arabism (a subset of Islam) and then Islam itself, without the intermediate step of pan-Arabism, has taken over — so that the meretricious and corrupt regime of Mubarak, with his Family-and-Friends Plan, is almost certain now to be replaced by the forces supporting the Ikhwan, the Muslim Brotherhood. Why, when Copts enjoy the freedom of living in the advanced West, do they often throw off the islmochristian mentality and start telling the truth about Islam, and about Egypt — that they find so difficult and dangerous a thing to do in Egypt itself?

9) Why did Pakistani and Saudi engineers help the Taliban blow up the Bamiyan Buddhas?

10) Why before the blowing up of the Bamiywan Buddhas had there been the wholesale destruction of Buddhist statues, and of stupas, all over Central Asia and India, at Muslim hands?

11) Why did Muslim conquerors kill between 60 and 80 million Hindus, even after they had conquered India and there was no danger of a revolt? Why did Muslims destroy Jain and Buddhist and Hindu temples and temple complexex, by the thousands, and often build mosques right on top of the ruins?

12) Why did the first Umayyad caliph deliberately choose Jerusalem as the site of the “furthest mosquye” (al-masjid al-aksa) mentioned, without more, in the Qur’an, from which Muhammad is said to have travelled to, and back from, seventh heaven on his magic steed al-Buraq?

13) Why did the Caliph Al-Hakim in 1009 order that the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem was to be razed? Why did Muslims attack Christian sites and Christian pilgrims with increasing boldness throughout the eleventh century, culminating in the ferocious attacks by the Seljuk Turks, a century of attacks that led, in the end, to the calling of the Crusades to recover the Holy Land, and not any other part of the vast lands that had been conquered by the Muslims over the previous four hundred years?

14) Why did Muslim Turks destroy so many of the churches in conquered Constaninople? Why did they leave Hagia Sophia, but vandalize all of its Christian pictures inside, and turn it into a mosque? Why has it not, even to this day, been turned back into a church?

15) Why was the population of Turkey 20% non-Muslim in 1900, and today is far less than 1% non-Muslim?

16) Why did people in Western Europe, over the past thousand years, build watchtowers on their coasts? Who was Thomas Pellow, and why does it matter? What was the extent of Muslim raiding up and down the coasts of Christian Europe, and how many Christians were taken in slavery back to Muslim domains? (Note: an estimate will do). How many slaves were seized by Muslims on raids in the Slavic lands, and in the Caucasus and Georgia, for women to be taken back to harems?

17) When did the Arab slave trade in Africa begin, and when did it end? How many victims did it claim, and what was the relative size of the Arab slave trade as compared to the Atlantic Slave Trade? Why was it mostly young black males who were seized, and what made their rate of survival so small?

18) In what respect have the canonical texts of Islam, the Qur’an, and the Hadith, and the Sira, been changed, or re-interpreted, so as to conform more with the moral sense of the modern world, and with the need to live in peace with the 85% of the world that is non-Muslim? List specific verses in the Qur’an, or stories in the Hadith, that have either been eliminated altogether, or been made subject to radical re-interpretation, or downgraded, in the case of certain Hadith, to a much lower level of “authenticity” based on a revisiting of the relevant isnad-chain?

* Islamic Jihad members

19) What is the status, at present, of the concepts of Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb? What is the duty of Jihad? What is the goal of Jihad? What are the permissible instruments of Jihad, in the state of permanent war that Muslims are taught exist between Believers and Infidels?

20) What, in all that has been written in the previous 19 questions, has to do, has anything at all to do, would not exist but for, the admittedly wasteful, naive and sentimental, administration of George Bush, and its dreamy belief that the problem with the Islamic states and peoples has absolutely nothing to do with Islam, a perfectly peaceful and splendid “religion” (and all “religions” are to be respected, are they not?) that has been so badly misrepresented by a handful, or possibly just more than a handful, of “extremists” who have “hijacked a great religion” for their own nefarious purposes?

I could list another 80 questions, but I think this is quite enough for today. After all, the presidential candidates have so much campaigning to do. And during the past six years and three months, since 9/11/2001, they just haven’t had a minute to spare to begin to study, really study and thing about, either the texts and tenets and attitudes of Islam, or to find out very much, anything in fact, about the 1350-year history of Muslim conquest of non-Muslim lands, and about the subsequent subjugation of so many different non-Muslim peoples — Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Hindus, Jains, and others from smaller and less well-known communities — who are in the end treated, at best, in remarkably similar, and often unendurable ways.

Is it really too much to expect that the candidates would have done this studying, and done it a bit more seriously than buying some work by a known, and venal, apologist for Islam, such as the ridiculous Karen Armstrong, or the sinister John Esposito?

If candidates are unwilling to do the absolute minimum amount of study necessary to understand the contents, and menace, of Islam, when they have had more than six years to prepare, then how can they ask to be supported, how can they presume to be capable of instructing, and protecting us?

What nerve. What self-satisfied ignorance. What intolerable nonchalance.

Posted by: Hugh

*

No Mo Clitman’s!

From the Byzantine Sacred Art Blog

What Hashim—The Snake—Thaci Buys With Millions of Heroin/Human Trafficking Dollars: Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton

Billary’s Statement on future status of southern Serbian province of Kosovo-Metohija

“On December 10, the US-EU-Russian troika seeking a mutually acceptable settlement of the future status of Kosovo will make its report to the United Nations and to the world.

“Given the current position of the Russian government, it is unlikely that any agreement will be reached. If this is the case, I believe that further delay would be highly inadvisable. This process, which started far too late thanks to the neglect of the Bush Administration in its first term, has run its course. With Russia threatening to veto any arrangement submitted to the U.N. Security Council, we must be prepared to strongly support the will of the majority of the people of Kosovo. If the government in Pristina decides for independence, I would strongly support prompt U.S. recognition, and I would urge the European Union to do the same. I also congratulate the people of Kosovo on the orderly, peaceful election they have just completed.

“In supporting the independence of Kosovo, I want to stress the high importance that I attach to full protection of the rights of all minorities in Kosovo, especially the Serbs. This is an absolute necessity as Kosovo goes forward.

“I am also concerned about the deterioration of the situation in Bosnia. Twelve years after the Dayton Agreement ended that war, a combination of American neglect, European Union weakness, and Russian and Serbian obstructionism threatens the stability and future of Bosnia. I urge the Administration to pay more attention to this issue, so that it does not once again become a major threat to European stability, especially at the same time as the Kosovo situation approaches a historic juncture.”

Read the whole shameful thing

From ‘the slime from the video’ department

* Another perceived ‘moderate’ who is, when we take a closer look, not moderate at all, but much more so a ‘good Muslim’- which comes, of course, with all the mental baggage including the inbred Jew hatred.

In 2005 Lord Ahmed hosted a book launch in the House of Lords for anti-Zionist author Israel Shamir. On the 22nd March, Stephen Pollard, in a guest editorial appearing in the Times, lambasted the event. In his piece entitled ‘Lord Ahmed’s Unwelcome Guest’, Pollard opines that Shamir “is, in fact, a Swedish-domiciled anti-Semite also known as Jöran Jermas.” Pollard goes on to characterize the speech entitled ‘Jews and Empire’ as containing anti-Semitic references such as “Jews control … a big share of mass media”; ‘the Jewish supremacy drive’ as the one reason for wars in the Middle East, and that ‘Jews love Empire’. Shamir also suggested that the large Muslim population in Britain was important to turn the tide of ‘Judaic Values’ in Britain. Lord Ahmed refused to comment on the remarks of Shamir.

* “Israel Shamir” is in reality a Muhammedan parvenu and asylum parasite who sucks off the Swedish welfare department while writing anti-semitic s#*t under false flag.

In August 2006 he was a signatory to an open letter to Tony Blair, the Prime Minster, criticising the UK’s foreign policy. In 2007 he responded to the award of a knighthood to Salman Rushdie by claiming he was appalled, stating that Rushdie had ‘blood on his hands’.

Lord Ahmed reportedly said: “What would one say if the Saudi or Afghan governments honoured the martyrs of the September 11 attacks on the United States?” . He was criticized by some for apparently besmirching free speech and for showing an a lack of tolerance for criticism of Islam, something that called into question his appropriateness for the privilege of sitting in the House of Lords.

Lord Ahmed pumps out the usual drivel like “there is “a constant theme of demonisation of the Muslim community”, he told the BBC’s Sunday programme, the politicians and some people in the media have used this (presumably terrorism) for demonisation of the entire communities…’ and Lord Ahmed called on ministers to address deprivation in Muslim communities, which simply means ” you pay the jiziyah and we Muslims take care of the rest”…

*

* Now, Lord Ahmed is again in the news, the last time we saw him on ‘Undercover Mosques’ when he frequented the same radical mosques where channel 4 took some footage of the hate spewing clerics. This time the good lord presents himself as a good Samaritan, because he went to Sudan along with Baroness Warsi, another beknighted Muhammedan at Lord Ahmed’s behest, and singlehandedly had British school teacher Gillian Gibbons pardoned and released from gaol, because she she committed the uspeakable offence to allowe her pupils to name a teddy bear ‘Mohammed’- punishable by at least 40 lashes. But the Muhammedan mob in the Sudan screamed for her blood.

Lord Ahmed, from Britain’s ruling Labour Party, and Baroness Warsi, an opposition Conservative, visted Khartoum and had a meeting with the President of Sudan. Following this the President pardoned Ms Gibbons and she was allowed to return to the UK.

* That’s all we get in the news. Lord Ahmed the savior. See, these Muhammedans are not all bad, can’t paint them all with one brush, you know: Islam is not a monolith, you know, and if we just help them along maybe one day, one day, they might just become like us, don’tcha think?

NOT!

“She was pardoned thanks to the mediation of Lord Ahmed and Baroness Warsi. She will be released in about an hour,” Mahjoub Fadl Badri told AFP.

* Always eager to help when it comes to screwing their host country out of funds to help the ummah along, those ‘British Muslims’…

Good cop, bad cop routine. Are we all suckers?

How much did Britain pay to have Gillian Gibbons ‘pardoned?’

Why does this charade remind me of catmeat sheik Hilali?

*

Update: Gillian Gibbons Not Safe In Britain

FREED teddy bear row teacher Gillian Gibbons jetted out of Sudan last night, but may fly into a new danger.

The British mum-of-two received a presidential pardon for allowing a stuffed bear to be called Mohammed.

She was yesterday believed to be returning home via Dubai. But senior Government sources last night warned that her ordeal may not be over.

One said: “Gillian may be coming home, but there are still fears that someone here may want to attack her.

“The threatening protests over the Danish cartoons in Britain in 2006 highlighted how many extremists are still in our midst.”

*

Gillian Gibbons returns to Britain

*

Fitzgerald: The freeing of Gillian Gibbons 

We, as Infidels, know that Lord Ahmed, unlike those Sudanese calling for the death of Mrs. Gibbons, has a much greater knowledge of the outside world, of how Infidels think, and of how Infidels can get angry, and how there are certain danger signs that possibly the Infidels are getting just a little too fast, too large a dose of the real Islam — and not what the smylers with the knyfs under their clokes present as the real Islam. He was protecting his own position, and the position of Islam, in Great Britain. Don’t let him or the well-heeled Muslimah who went with him get away with this. They are, in their own way, furthering the Jihad, indeed furthering it far better than are those who wanted Gibbons punished, or even killed, for her act of sweet innocent all-too-understandable non-Muslim ignorance of the nature, and scope, of the menace of Islam. 

*

“Not to worry”, sez the Bungla-wussie of the ‘ancient rulings’

Inayat Bunglawala, spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, agreed that the pardon was “wonderful news”.

He said: “Gillian should never have been arrested in the first place, let alone held in jail. She had done nothing wrong.

* The truth will set you free, Bungla!

“I am sure she will be welcomed by Muslims and non-Muslims after her terrible ordeal at the hands of the Sudanese authorities.”

* Not so sure about that. I wouldn’t trust you with a ten foot pole…

Bunglawussie Watch

Skid Marx of Melbourne sez:

We had Inayat Bunglawala laying into the man from the Sudanese Embassy on Newsnight.
We had Anjem Choudhary (the man who called 9/11 ‘magnificent’ and wants to see the UK under the heel of a Caliphate) insisting that there is nothing offensive about giving that name to an ‘item of endearment’.
We’ve had statements in support of Gillian Gibbons from the Muslim Council of Britain, the Ramadhan Foundation and the Islamic Society of Britain.
And we had a demo at the Sudanese Embassy on Saturday by Muslims carrying ‘NOT IN MY NAME’ placards and attempting to hand in a ‘goodwill teddy’ to Embassy staff, who refused to accept it.

*
These Muslims living in Great Britain have not for one minute ended their attempt to defend Islam from critical scrutiny, and to continue to fool and confuse Infidels. It is just that when something like this happens, and cannot be explained away, and has to be dealt with, then they go into full “war is deception” mode and act outraged, and indignant. It is nonsense. If they thought such behavior by the Sudanese government could be gotten away with, they would have done nothing. They object not morally but only in terms of public relations—the damage to the “image” of Islam in Great Britain, and possibly elsewhere in the West. Otherwise, they do not give a damn.

*

No one should allow himself to be fooled.

A delegation of British Muslims—having met with the Sudanese—apparently expected her to be pardoned. Muhammad Abdul Bari of the Muslim Council of Britain said: “There was clearly no intention on the part of the teacher to deliberately insult the Islamic faith.” But what if there had been? If Gibbons had named the teddy bear Muhammad in order to mock the Muslim prophet, would Muhammad Abdul Bari have approved of her being arrested, imprisoned, lashed or even executed?

*
This business of Muslims in this or that Infidel land taking it upon themselves to go and attempt to free non-Muslim citizens taken by Muslims elsewhere will merely give Muslims, and some Kaffirs, the idea that “our” Muslims are “our secret weapon” for they, you see, can always be sent out to prevent the worst from happening. And it will give them a quasi-official role, and instead of being regarded as part of the problem of Islam, they will be regarded as part of the solution. Lord Ahmad and Tory Baroness Sayeeda Warsi are nothing of the sort. They were merely, by attempting to free the Gibbons lady, to promote Islam, to burnish the image of Islam, in Great Britain.
We, as Infidels, know that Lord Ahmed, unlike those Sudanese calling for the death of Mrs. Gibbons, has a much greater knowledge of how Infidels think, and of how Infidels can get angry, and how there are certain danger signs that possibly the Infidels are getting just a little too fast, too large a dose of the real Islam – and not what the ‘smylers with the knyfs under their clokes’ present as the real Islam. He was protecting his own position, and the position of Islam, in Great Britain. Don’t let him or the well-heeled bint who went with him, get away with this. They are, in their own way, furthering the Jihad, indeed furthering it far better than are those who wanted Gibbons punished.

*
Meanwhile, a clueless, non Qur’an/hadith/sira studying Gibbons said she was sorry if she caused any “distress.”

“I have a great respect for the Islamic religion and would not knowingly offend anyone,” Gibbons said.

In other news:

UK: Nurses ordered to drop everything and turn Muslims’ beds toward Mecca five times daily

Quality health care. “Nurses Told To Turn Muslims’ Beds To Mecca, by Paul Jeeves in the Daily Express thanks to DW

OVERWORKED nurses have been ordered to stop all medical work five times every day to move Muslim patients’ beds so they face towards Mecca.
The lengthy procedure, which also includes providing fresh bathing water, is creating turmoil among overstretched staff on bustling NHS wards.

But despite the havoc, Mid- Yorkshire NHS Trust says the rule must be instigated whenever possible to ensure Muslim patients have “a more comfortable stay in hospital”.

More ? Read it and weep…

Perhaps Gillian Gibbons could appease our muslim friends by doing voluntary work in the Dewsbury hospitals moving the beds round.

Ever wondered what Muslims worship?

* Inspired by Shiva

The Black Stone (Kaaba)
Doesn’t take much imagination to figure out what it resembles

Well, first of all Muslims worship Muhammad, who was the perfect man, (uswa hasana, al insan al kamil) a model of conduct for all mankind, for all time. Without Muhammad no Muhammadanism, and his alter ego, ‘Allah’- or Al-Ilha, as the moon-god of the pagan Arabs was called, would probably still be one of the statues among many others in the kaaba in Mecca.

Muslims will vehemently deny that they worship Muhammad, but at the same time they will tell you ‘we love our prophet more than our own children,- we will kill and die to defend the honor of our profit’– etc. You saw the obsessed, fanatical f*kcwits in Sudan ready to clobber a British teacher to mince-meat because she allowed her pupils to name a teddy bear Muhammad. You remember the reaction about these ridiculous Muhammad cartoons in Denmark? You will see the same obsession about the Koran, when they go ape-shit over stories that a Koran was kicked or thrown in a toilet or somehow mishandled by a kufar.

So what you have essentially is a trinity: Muhammad is the role model to be emulated in every possible way by every muslim, the Koran, which is the ‘Mein Kampf’ of Islam, and last not least the imaginary ‘Allah’- which is an abstract concept. In the Koran Allah threatens the believers with hellfire and grievous punishments if they don’t follow Muhammad, and Allah grants Muhammad every wish (how convenient) and sends down the heavenly sura’s just at the right time for Mo to justify raiding caravans, stealing, looting, wiping out other tribes, killing their men, raping their women and selling their children into slavery.

More here…

Islam is a monumental black hole… 

Iran Focus

London, Dec. 03 – The following photos of police brutality in Iran were sent to Iran Focus by Iranian opposition activists.

The State Security Forces (SSF) are presently carrying out a nationwide crackdown primarily targeting youths and women under the guise of combating “trouble-makers” and “mal-veilers”.

The nationwide clampdown began in April. Some images of the crackdown have been aired daily on state television in what numerous Iran analysts believe is to spread fear in society. So far, both the European Union and the United States have been by-and-large silent toward the government-orchestrated crackdown.

More here

*

Expect more crack-downs from the ‘Islamic Police of Morality’

* This is been going on for a long time. The lunatic Shiite clerics are terrorizing their people with ‘dress-codes’ – among other things.

Iran: “Considering the start of the cold season and its special way of dressing, police will start early next week a drive against women who wear improper dress.”

Grab your coat, grab your hat, your chador, and your running shoes, and then leave your worries on the doorstep (maybe). It’s not just summertime that presents the possibility of running afoul of the Iranian police. “Tight trousers targeted in Iran clothing crackdown,” from Al Reuters via DW

TEHRAN (Reuters) – Iranian police will crack down on women in Tehran flouting Islamic dress codes with winter fashions deemed immodest, such as tight trousers tucked into long boots, an officer was quoted as saying on Saturday.
“Considering the start of the cold season and its special way of dressing, police will start early next week a drive against women who wear improper dress,” Tehran police chief Ahmad Reza Radan was quoted as saying by state news agency IRNA.

*
“Tight trousers tucked inside long boots while wearing short overcoats are against Islamic codes,” the police chief said.

*
“Wearing a hat or cap instead of scarves is also against Islamic dress codes.”

More

*

Thailand Religion of Peace Watch:

Bomb kills 6, wounds 25 in Thai Muslim south

PATTANI, Thailand, Dec 4 (Reuters) – A motorcycle bomb exploded outside a busy restaurant in Thailand’s rebellious Muslim south on Tuesday, killing six people, including two boys, government officials said. Two Muslim men died instantly when the bomb, left in a motorcycle parked in front of the restaurant, exploded in Pattani, one of four southern provinces where more than 2,600 have been killed in nearly four years of insurgency, an army spokesman said.

*
“We suspect the two dead men might have been the bombers who failed to escape before the bomb exploded,” Acra Tiproch said by telephone from the Muslim south.
Two women and two boys died at the hospital where 25 wounded people were being treated, Pattani’s deputy governor Vinai Kruvanapat told reporters at the hospital.
The southern violence is centred in the region bordering Malaysia, a Malay-speaking former sultanate annexed by Thailand about a century ago.

* Note how Al Reuters snuggles this ‘former sultanate annexed by Thailand about a century ago’- into each and everyone of their reports lately? Preparing the ground for the ‘liberation’ by the Islamofascists, are we? “Malay-speaking” is absolute bullshit, they speak Thai and not Malay in Sauthern Thailand.

Since July, security forces have launched almost daily raids on suspected insurgent hideouts in villages and towns and have detained dozens of people without charge.

*
Human rights groups say detainees are exposed to potential abuses by the army, which is operating under martial law that grants soldiers immunity from prosecution. (Reporting by Khemin Guagoon; Writing by Nopporn Wong-Anan; Editing by Martin Petty and Alex Richardson)

* Unbelievable how these far left wacko-journo’s side with the Islamic enemy of Thailand to smear the police and the army.

A member of the bomb disposal squad inspects the bodies of Buddhist state officials in Pattani province November 21, 2007. Suspected Islamic rebels killed four Buddhist state officials on Wednesday in a roadside gun attack in Thailand’s rebellious Muslim south, police said. REUTERS/Stringer