Category: General

First,  watch this:

 

The continued emphasis by Muslim and non-Muslim apologists for Islam on a single verse — “There is no compulsion in religion” — is permitted not only because their Infidel audience has no idea either about what is said relevantly elsewhere, in hundreds of places, in the Qur’an and Hadith, and not only because they are unaware of the doctrine of abrogation or “naskh,” but because they are also unaware of the precise meaning that is given to that phrase “there is no compulsion in religion” by Muslim jurisconsults. If they did look into it, they would find that the “obvious” meaning of the words — that is, the meaning that we Infidels choose to endow that phrase with — is not what Muslim scholars mean at all. They mean that in the end one cannot force deep belief on people, though one can force them to comply outwardly, even on pain of death. And that is what Islam is in the business of doing: forcing outward compliance, on pain of punishment that may well include, has often included, death.

Continue reading Fitzgerald: There is compulsion in religion

* Exactly what Sheik Yer’mami has been saying all along:

Jihad Resistance. More on this story. “Does U.S. need legal protection from Jihad?” by Chad Groening for OneNewsNow, 

A Colorado Congressman has introduced legislation that would deny U.S. visas to advocates of so-called Sharia law, as well as expel Islamists already in the country. 

Republican Tom Tancredo calls his bill the Jihad Protection Act. He has introduced the measure amid disturbing revelations that the verdicts of Islamic Sharia courts are now legally binding in the United Kingdom. 

The legislation, according to Tancredo, is designed to protect the United States from a similar fate.

“There are situations where we really have to look at whether or not our system can accommodate everybody, including people who are determined to overthrow us. There is no way that the Constitution of the United States and Sharia law can co-exist,” Tancredo contends. “You cannot have one class of citizens — in this case, women, for instance — being able to be abused, battered, killed, because someone has written that that’s the right way to do it in their particular religious system, and then expect the Constitution of the United States to protect everyone else’s civil rights. It just simply doesn’t work.”

Tancredo says Great Britain and much of Western Europe has succumbed to the pressure for multi-culturalism, which the United States must avoid.

Continue reading US Congressman Tancredo: "There is no way that the Constitution of the United States and Sharia law can co-exist"