Dutch report concludes “radical imam” not a security threat

Nothing threatening here
“The controversial ultra-conservative Tilburger Ahmad Salam is not a direct security threat for Dutch democracy or order, but his fundamentalist religious convictions can clash with Dutch norms and values.”Â
But: “His mosque is considered a radical one,”Â
So he’s an ultra-conservative fundamentalist in charge of a radical mosque. But he’s o.k., he’s not a threat. On the other hand, another ultra-conservative, Geert Wilders, is a threat. Maybe Geert should get himself a mosque, then he’d be o.k. too.
Yet this is not a tale of total dhimmitude: “Fraction chairman Roel Lauwerier says that his party didn’t change it’s point of view. ‘Really, there is just one place where imam Salam belongs: with a one-way ticket in a plane to Syria.'”
“Tilburg: Radical imam not a security threat, hinders integration,” from Islam in Europe, via JW:
Continue reading No, he doesn't belong in the Netherlands, but what will it take to get him out?



