Month: February 2010

US Prison Jihad: MUSLIM CHAPLAIN ARRESTED FOR SMUGGLING BOX CUTTERS INTO PRISON

Totally harmless, of course. They were only meant to circumcise new converts, “reverts” in Islam speak, to the Religion of Peace. How dare you imply anything else, you Islamophobe, you!

Atlas Shrugs: Pious Muslim Chaplain

Frank Sinatra: the box cutter song

The prisons have become as holy as the mosque in the recruitment of jihadis. These are breeding grounds for soldiers for allah, much like the mosques and the madrassas.

Zul-Qarnain Shahid, 58, a Muslim cleric with the city Department of Corrections, was busted Wednesday for trying to sneak three razors and a pair of scissors into the Tombs.

A Muslim jail chaplain who is also a convicted murderer brought razors and a pair of scissors into one of the city’s most dangerous lockups, officials said.

Sources said Abdu-Shahid – who used to go by the name Paul Pitts – was convicted of a 1976 murder in Manhattan. He served 13 years in prison and was on parole until 2001, state records show.

Read more: Daily News

Muslim chaplain ‘smuggled’ box cutters into jail By REUVEN BLAU and DAN MANGAN NY Post

A Muslim chaplain for the city Department of Correction was arrested this morning for allegedly trying to smuggle in three box-cutters to a lower Manhattan jail.

The imam, Imam Zul-Qarnain Shahid, has worked as a DOC jail chaplain for three years, according to department sources.

Several sources said Shahid was caught this morning attempting to bring three box-cutters into the jail known as the Tombs during a visit there. It was not known why he was visiting the jail.

What is interesting (!) is what follows – the writers bring in a totally unrelated “Rabbi” story.

A DOC chaplain assigned to the Tombs – politically connected rabbi Leib Glanz – resigned last year after The Post exclusively revealed that he had organized a bar mitzvah party within the jail’s walls for the son of an inmate. The bar mitzvah featured catered food and a live band, as well as dozens of non-inmate guests.

WTF does that have to do with Islamic terror?

Continue reading US Prison Jihad: MUSLIM CHAPLAIN ARRESTED FOR SMUGGLING BOX CUTTERS INTO PRISON

German Prosecutor: 'The accused have damaged Islam. They have given new nourishment to the reservations held against the world's second largest religion…'

How so, mister prosecutor?

The prosecutor, like many non-Muslim officials before him, took it upon himself to defend something he clearly knows nothing about — Islam.

Picture thanks to the always alert and vigilant Tundra Tabloids

The prosecutor continued, adding that “few people shared their fundamentalist Wahabi views….”

Aren’t you sick and tired of these mental gorilla’s who are too intellectually lazy to educate themselves about the RoP? What does it take, apart from a few hours here and there to read the Koran, the hadith, or to read a bit on the Islam section of this blog? But no, even 9 years after 9/11 we have to bear the ignorance of our bureaucrats and  officials, who just won’t learn. A sad state of affairs. An intolerable state of affairs….

German jihadists misunderstood Islam, planned mass murder

Will the Islamophobia never end? “Prosecutor: German Islamists planned mass murder,” from DPA, February 3 (thanks to JW):

Defendants Daniel Schneider, Atilla Selek, Fritz Gelowicz and Adem Yilmaz, from left to right, are seen in a courtroom in Duesseldorf, western Germany.

The fact that these creeps are mostly ‘reverts’ is especially galling…..

Dusseldorf – The chief prosecutor in the German trial of four alleged Islamists said on Wednesday that they had planned ‘mass murder’ on a scale unknown in Germany.State prosecutor Volker Brinkmann said the members of the so- called Sauerland Group were driven by an overwhelming hatred of US soldiers and by a desire to carry out mass murder, and would not have shied away from killing innocent women and children.

The group, consisting of Daniel Schneider, Fritz Gelowicz, Adem Yilmaz and Attila Selek, is accused of planning attacks on US military bases in 2007.

Continue reading German Prosecutor: 'The accused have damaged Islam. They have given new nourishment to the reservations held against the world's second largest religion…'

Geert Wilders Inquisition: "This Court is not interested in the truth. This Court would not be out of place in a dictatorship."

Wilders: “This Court is not interested in the truth. This Court doesn’t want me to have a fair trial. I can’t have any respect for this. This Court would not be out of place in a dictatorship.”

Geert Wilders reacts to the Amsterdam’s District Court’s disallowing of all but three of his witnesses. “Reaction to the decision in the pre-trial review,” from his new Geert Wilders Trial website, February 3/Jihad Watch also has this:   Dutch court railroading Wilders: disallows all but three of his witnesses

Geert Wilders: No fair trialThe Amsterdam District Court apparently doesn’t want to hear the truth about Islam. Nor is it interested to hear the opinion of top class legal experts in the field of freedom of expression. In one swift move, the Court brushed aside fifteen of the eighteen expert-witnesses the defence had requested to be summoned.

Only Hans Jansen, Simon Admiraal and Wafa Sultan were allowed to be heard as expert-witnesses. Their testimony will be heard in a session behind closed doors. Apparently the truth about Islam must remain a secret.

Geert Wilders: “This Court is not interested in the truth. This Court doesn’t want me to have a fair trial. I can’t have any respect for this. This Court would not be out of place in a dictatorship”.

The Court also brushed aside the preliminary objections concerning its jurisdiction and the admissibility of the Public Prosecutor.

Nevertheless, Geert Wilders remains extremely motivated to seek justice: “I’m still counting on an acquittal”.

Holland Needs a Revolution

“The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive.”

“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.”

“A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both, and deserve neither”

“Every generation needs a new revolution.”

–Thomas Jefferson

Australia's Socialist Media Still Promotes the "Global Worming" Scare

Andrew Bolt:   Why is this hysteric still head of the IPCC?

Rajendra Pachauri, head of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, explains why critics of hisvested interests, flawed science and deceits are wrong:


They are people who say that asbestos is as good as talcum powder – and I hope they put it on their faces every day.

That’s it. Goodbye.

How the 7.30 Report nobbled Monckton

Summing up: the ABC finds it almost impossible to hold an honest debate on global warming. Warmists are allowed unchallenged air time, while sceptics are made examples of. Yet even then warmist scientists and activists cannot find an argument to save themselves from the few sceptics who finally get half a hard word in edgewise.

Your (ABC) news is being manipulated, but you can now see the fraud backstage though the gaping cracks.

The Age of barbarians

‘Mad Monk’ meets Monckton
Tony Abbott meets the world’s most famous climate change sceptic, Lord Christopher Monckton.

Could The Age declare its politics – and it’s reliance on childish abuse – any more clearly?

Tim Blair is too stunned to even laugh.

My Kruddness: Facebook censors Rudd’s critics

Iran

Top cleric says women without veils must die

Tehran, 19 Dec. (AKI) – A top Muslim cleric in Iran, Hojatolislam Gholam Reza Hassani said on Wednesday that women in Iran who do not wear the hijab or Muslim headscarf, should die.

“Women who do not respect the hijab and their husbands deserve to die,” said Hassani, who leads Friday prayers in the city of Urumieh, in Iranian Azerbaijan.

Amazing. Didn’t Yvonne Ridley and all her  shrouded co-religionists just tell us that they have all ‘chosen’ to wear  the hijab out of their own ‘free will?’  More from AKI

Iranian Parliament Speaker: Hey, all Islamic states should have nuclear technology!

Larijani: Man of peace

Just think how peaceful the world would be in that event!

“Iran’s speaker urges Islamic states to possess nuclear energy technology,” fromXinhua, February 2/JW

“Dutch wrong to ban Iranian nuclear students,” Hague court rules

Here is where rights and national security conflict. The UK also bars some students from taking certain subjects if they feel that national security could be threatened. Likely the Dutch court ruling will not be the end of it.

The Netherlands is wrong to refuse Iranian students places on nuclear engineering masters programmes, a Hague court has ruled.   Read more…

Italy’s Berlusconi compares Ahmadinejad to Hitler

If only we had a politician in America who was this honest and forthright. “During visit, Berlusconi draws parallel between Ahmadinejad and Hitler,” by Nir Hasson forHaaretz, February 2 (thanks to Pamela)  Carl reports that Berlusconi is in Israel at the moment, but remains rather skeptical…

Ahmadinejad threatens blow to ‘global arrogance’

Given the fact that Ahmadinejad is really seeking a war to help usher in his religious belief of the Imam Mahdi, a figure whom he believes has supernatural powers to bring about a world domination of the Muslim religion, Mullen’s comment looks like it has the potential to come sooner rather than later.  And if an uprising were to get as far as Israel, the Old Testament book of Zechariah  warns in chapter 12 that Israel will be more of a “cup of trembling” and “burdensome stone” than the nations realize. Read more>>   Ahmadinejad threatens blow to ‘global arrogance’

Puff Ho offers soapbox to Oxford student who calls LSE professor "Islamophobic"

Abdulrahman El-Sayed/Doctoral student, Oxford University

Is Your Professor an Islamophobe?

Satoshi Kanazawa is an evolutionary psychologist and professor at the London School of Economics. Although his research as a scientist has ruffled some feathers in the past, his attempts as a “public intellectual” are indisputably inflammatory. In a recent article entitled, “What’s Wrong with Muslims” published in his blog hosted by Psychology Today, Kanazawa wrote:

Major Nidal Malik Hasan is a native-born American citizen, trained military officer, and educated MD and psychiatrist. Yet none of these things matters for him; first and foremost, he is a Muslim…They are all united in their values and goals by their singular identity of being Muslims. It’s tempting to dismiss these observations by saying that [he and others implicated in terrorism plots] are all ‘extremists’ or ‘Jihadists.’

That would be politically correct and comforting, but factually inaccurate.

(Of course, Abdulrahman El-Sayed never tells us whats factually inaccurate, just like we never find a Muslim who can explain the peaceful Islam from the violent one. But that doesn’t matter. What matters is that he gets Puff Ho to print this garbage and that some PC types lap it up/ed)
In his very next article he boasts:

No, not all Muslims are terrorists, but…half of Muslims worldwide are terrorists and active supporters of terrorism, who would encourage their sons, brothers, and nephews to blow themselves up in an airplane or in a crowded market.
Kanazawa is just one in a growing number of academics using his intellectual identity to promote intolerance and xenophobia against Islam and Muslims.

No. We don’t see why we should tolerate the intolerant who call us sons of apes and swine who are cursed, despised and must be killed.  I take issue with Puff Ho for printing this puff piece. How bout you?

Read more: Abdulrahman El-Sayed in the Huffington Post, 2 February 2010

Litigation Jihad over "Muslims should hate non-Muslims' fails

Well, we all know that hating the infidel is the essence of Mohammedanism. The irony is, that, if we report it and refer to Islamic scriptures or to what they’re saying in the mosques, the multiculturally afflicted, the Muslim invaders and  their freshly hijabbed  reverts get hissy fits and call us “ignorant, haters, wacists, bigots or Islamophobics”-  and loudly call for our  extermination.

But in some rare cases it backfires, like here:

Win One, Lose One:

Islamist hardliners lose another libel action

By Andrew Gilligan

One of the key tactics Islamist hardliners use to suppress reporting of their activities is to hassle those who write about them with libel actions, Press Complaints Commission complaints, and so on. Thankfully, there is growing evidence that this tactic is failing.

Azad Ali

Last year the enlightened progressives at Harry’s Place still called  for the support of Azad Ali, this  magnificent “bridge builder”….. we reported, here: Muslim civil servant suspended over ‘kill British soldiers’ blog

Today, in a very significant judgment, a man named Azad Ali lost his High Court libel case against an article in the Mail on Sunday which described how he had been suspended from his job as a Treasury civil servant after writing a highly controversial post on his blog.

As I put it in my own story for my then newspaper, the Evening Standard, Ali praised a spiritual leader of al Qaeda, Abdullah Azzam, denied the Mumbai attacks were “terrorism” and quoted, apparently approvingly, a statement advocating the killing of British troops in Iraq.

He criticised those Muslims who “tell people that Islam is a religion of peace”. He described non-Muslims as “sinners” and said Muslims should “hate [non-Muslims’] disbelieving actions”.

In his ruling today, Mr Justice Eady said: “I would hold that [Ali]  was indeed, in November 2008 and for so long as the blog remained available, taking the position that the killing of American and British troops in Iraq (whether before or after the 2005 elections) would be justified…In those circumstances, the claim can be categorised legitimately as ‘bound to fail’ and as having about it an ‘absence of reality’.”

Interestingly, I and the Standard never received any complaint from Ali about my piece, nor were we ever threatened with litigation.

This is the second time in two months that Islamist hardliners have suffered a serious reverse in court. In November, the think-tank Policy Exchange won its long-running legal battle with the North London Central Mosque which alleged extremist influence there.

For the first time in a long while, something appears to be going right in the libel courts…

Muslims quitting regional Victoria due to lack of mosques

The Halal Racket

Jane Metlikovec from the Herald Sun is inconsolable:

Many are abandoning regional centres just weeks after they arrive because there are no mosques within hundreds of kilometres of their new homes.

Thanks to Mullah

There are more than 90,000 Muslims in Victoria, and only four mosques in regional areas. There are a further 32 mosques in Melbourne.

(Every mosque is a symbol for conquered territory./ed)

Mufti of Australia, Sheikh Fehmi Naji el-Imam, right, with Ahmad Allouche of the Islamic Society.

About 30 Muslim workers have recently left Warrnambool because the nearest mosque is in Geelong- almost 200km away.

The Islamic Council of Victoria said rural towns would suffer if they didn’t start providing devout Muslims with places of worship.

ICV executive committee member Sherene Hassan said four mosques in regional Victoria was not a large number.

“For devout Muslims a mosque is a central aspect of their lives,” Ms Hassan said.

“If Muslims are leaving towns because of this, then this is affecting these towns economically.”

Meanwhile, in Indonesia:

Indonesia: Muslim mob burns two churches, pastor’s home

“When worship continued unabated, a mob took matters into its own hands.”

Islamic Tolerance Alert from modern, moderate Indonesia/JW

Ms Hassan said the ICV would support any efforts to build new mosques, but said they must be built in consultation with the local community.

“We would want the wider community to support it, and would urge Muslims to consult as widely as possible,” she said.

Warrnambool Muslim community leader Mohamed Khanyari said about 30 workers he had encouraged to move to the state’s west last year had already returned to Melbourne because the area has no mosque.

Curiously, Jane Metlikovec from the Herald Sun doesn’t mention that  the “Warrnambool Muslim community” is nothing more than a bunch of halal butchers. Why not?

Mr Khanyari said plans to bring more migrant workers to the area would fail if a place of worship was not built soon.

“I am already bringing people here to work, but they just cannot stay, because they are very religious people and they must have somewhere to pray,” Mr Khanyari said.

No they  “must not have somewhere to pray”.  Anyhow, who is bringing these “very religious people” to Australia?

Mr Khanyari said Warrnambool was suffering.

“The people I am bringing here are good, skilled workers, but they simply leave because of the situation,” he said.

“It would be good for us, yes, but also good for the town and tourism.

“There are many Muslim families here and we have many visitors who are disappointed when we tell them there is no mosque.”

Mr Khanyari said he would continue to lobby the local council about building a mosque in Warrnambool.

Of course.

Hirsi Ali calls on Americans to fight for the human rights of Muslim women

Robert Spencer discovers an old enemy agent among the Islamo-whiners who tried to discredit her speech:

Freedom fighter Ayaan Hirsi Ali spoke at the University of Wisconsin-Madison last night, and Rashid Dar, the head of the campus chapter of the Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim Students Association, in this article affects a posture of wounded victimhood, claiming that Hirsi Ali — who was raised a Muslim in a Muslim country — paints an inaccurate picture of Islam, and whining about that ever-present phantom backlash that never materializes. His name was familiar, so I hunted down my account of my own address at the same university in October 2008. And lo and behold, I found that a young man whom I described as an “arrogant and self-righteous lout” who tried to shout me down was none other than…Rashid Dar.

I expect that besides whining to this reporter, Dar was involved in the shouts of “Allah akbar” that were designed to intimidate Hirsi Ali and disrupt her speech.

This thug-in-training really ought to be disciplined by the university for his continual disruptions of talks by people who tell the truth about Islamic supremacism. But he won’t be, of course, because his world view meshes with that of the university administration, and Hirsi Ali’s does not.

“Controversial feminist speaks as part of DLS,” by Lydia Statz in the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Daily Cardinal, February 3/via JW

“Her entire agenda has been promoting Islamophobia,” –  more on Ayaan Ali Hirsi’s speech at Wisconsin’s Union Theater.

Police lead Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s lecture attendees through metal detectors at the Wisconsin Union Theater on Tuesday. Ali called the treatment of Muslim women “one of the world’s great inequalities.”

The Muzz whines:

“I see this as people slowly becoming suspicious of Islam, and suspicion leads to hatred and much worse things,” said Rashid Dar, president of UW-Madison’s Muslim Student Association.

“You shouldn’t take Muslims as a subversive fifth column group that is planning to one day take over and start cutting hands off. We’re normal people, too.”

Not when Muzz is in charge.  Then the fanatical frenzy  takes over. JS Online

The Ultimate Betrayal

“We were attacked treacherously. We came under fire from everywhere, but the rules of engagement prevent me from doing my job.”


The utterly wrongheaded policy that has American troops in Afghanistan devoting the bulk of their time to hearts-and-minds initiatives and to behaving like social workers is…killing American troops. When America pretends to have no enemies, its enemies do not fall into line and behave accordingly. And yet Americans are not allowed to fight back.

Yet another Which-Side-Is-Obama-On Alert: “US casualties in Afghanistan provoke rage and frustration,” by Jason Gutierrez in the Telegraph/via JW

There should be a full-scale investigation of this in Washington. But there won’t be, because most pols on both sides of the aisle still assume that it would be terrible to stop trying to be buddies to the Afghans and to fight a traditional war. They think we can actually win, i.e., create a stable and secure Afghanistan, by not fighting. Their naivete is probably incurable.

US Marine: “The Rules of Engagement Prevent Me From Doing My Job”

DianaWest

Someday, civilian and military leaders responsible for these rules of engagement, this policy of sacrificing American troops to make the barbarians of Afghanistan “like us” should come before at the very least a Congressional hearing, but at this point an out-for-blood people’s tribunal seems more appropriate. What they are doing to our military, our treasury, our power and our prestige is an unconscionable national betrayal.


The following news story describes the toll these rules, this policy is taking on our bravest young men — amoebas in a petri dish to the mad, see-no-Islam social engineers masquerading as American statesmen and generals.

From the Telegraph:

On a base near Marjah, a Taliban stronghold in Helmand province, Marines are grieving the deaths of a sergeant and corporal killed by the remote-controlled bombs that have become the scourge of the long-running conflict.

Continue reading The Ultimate Betrayal