Is The Call For Jihad From American Mosques Protected Free Speech?

  • Sure. It must be. Jihad is peaceful ‘inner struggle’, don’t-cha know? What could go wrong?

liberty147w2

The trial and convictions reported in the story below raise a question that America is going to have to grapple with in the next few years:  At what point does the constitutional protection of free speech no longer apply to those who speak about carrying out violent jihad?

For instance, is an imam’s call to jihad, echoing throughout an American mosque, constitutionally protected speech?

Lawyers who we have talked to say the question comes down to an assessment of whether or not the call to jihad is incitement to violence that amounts to an “imminent threat.”  Yelling “fire” in a crowded theater is an example of speech that creates an imminent threat of injury to the moviegoers, and is thus not protected speech.

* This “fire in a crowded theatre” canard has been masterfully plucked by Mark Steyn, here…

At what point does calling for jihad become the equivalent of yelling “fire” in a crowded theater?  We in America deeply cherish the right to free speech, but are we at risk of enabling the seeds of our own destruction by erring too far in the protection of speech that calls for jihad against us?

Continue reading Is The Call For Jihad From American Mosques Protected Free Speech?

Euro Jihad: Who "Hijacked" the Religion of Peace?

UK releases al-Qaeda operatives who plotted to bomb shopping centers

  • Lets turn ’em all lose, what could go wrong?

“If such a plot was carried out, it would almost certainly have been Britain’s worst terrorist attack, with the potential to cause more deaths than the suicide attacks of July 7, 2005, when 52 people were murdered” (from this story). “Pakistani men ‘part of al-Qaeda network planning attacks in Britain,” by Duncan Gardham for the Telegraph

Italy charges two French nationals, including an imam, in al-Qaeda plot

Eurabia Alert: There are also connections to Britain, Belgium and Malika El-Aroud, the jihad propagandist who was collecting “unemployment” benefits. “Italy charges two Frenchmen with Al-Qaeda terror plots,” from Agence France-Presse

MuhammadCartoon.jpg

PM Erdogan/Turkey:  “ISLAMOPHOBIA IS A HUMANITY CRIME”

  • I guess he actually meant to say “Islam is a crime against humanity”– but we’re not quite there yet.
  • He said it before, he is merely repeating himself. Keep in mind that ‘humanity’ for Muslims means the Muslim ummah only, because unbelievers are the “vilest of creatures”

ISTANBUL (A.A) – 12.05.2009 – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Tuesday that Islamophobia was a humanity crime.

“Every policy, which is based on this humanity crime or carries traces of this understanding, is wrong and will be destructive,” added Erdogan who spoke at the inauguration of the 7th Eurasia Islamic Council meeting in Istanbul.

  • “Destructive”  is anything that doesn’t help to spread Islam in this context.

Continue reading Euro Jihad: Who "Hijacked" the Religion of Peace?

Treatment of Christians in Muslim Occupied Territories

MIDEAST ISRAEL PALESTINIANS POPE* A Muslim and a Christian: When pictures are worth a thousand words

An Excellent Response to Larry Derfner’s Highly Dubious J-Post Article on Pali Christian-Muslim Relations…….

With thanks to the Tundra Tabloids

anti-christian-muslim_banner

In Muslim controlled areas of the P.A.,
“in your face contempt” is a daily occurrence

Last week Thursday, J’lem Post columnist, Larry Derfner, wrote an article about Palestinian Christian-Muslim relations that to some extent, soft peddled the situation of oppression and intimidation by Muslim Palestinians towards their Christian in both areas of the disputed territories. Christians face a “systemic racism on a daily and hourly basis” at the hands of the majority, and columnists like Derfner, instead of really dealing with the issue as it really is, helps to further extend their misery by repeating blatant regurgitated Muslim talking points.

Continue reading Treatment of Christians in Muslim Occupied Territories

Saudi Legal Expert Basem Alem: We Have the Right to Wage Offensive Jihad to Impose Our Way of Life

  • And we have the right to carpet bomb Mecca… and Medina…
  • Misunderstanders of Islam all around us. Any chance that our resident trolls take it up with these misguided creatures and straighten them out?

    cam-el-keffiah1

MEMRI

Following are excerpts from an interview with Basem Abdallah Alem, a Saudi legal expert, which aired on Iqra TV on March 26, 2009:

Video here

Basem Abdallah Alem: If former U.S. President George Bush thinks that by virtue of the cultural supremacy in which he believes, he has the right to invade your home or mine, in order to impose a certain way of life upon us, then as a member of the true religion, I have a greater right to invade [others] in order to impose a certain way of life, which history has proven to be the best and most just of all civilizations. This is the true meaning of offensive Jihad. When we wage Jihad, it is not in order to convert people to Islam, but in order to liberate them from the dark slavery in which they live. We force them to conform to a general order authorized by Allah. You can remain a Christian, a Zoroastrian, or whatever you like.

Interviewer: How can you do this, when you are so weak?

Basem Abdallah Alem: We have abandoned Jihad…

Interviewer: That’s another matter. Are you calling for Jihad?

Basem Abdallah Alem: It’s not that I’m calling for Jihad. Jihad is in itself the key to the solution.

[which means he does…]

There is no such thing as Western justice – the justice of the culture that has political hegemony over the world. This justice applies only to the racist Christian white man, and does not apply to people of other races or religions.

Spain, Al Andaluz

  • 2 articles on Spanish double standards:
  •  More of  “Stop hurting us, see how nice we are?” policies at play here:

Spanish court convicts 4, frees 10 in terror trial

Thanks to ZIP/Taiwan News

Their faces kept saying “we’re innocent, pay no attention to 200 people dead” – and it worked.

PD*28774805

Israel and the US should now put to trial prosecutors and judges from Spain for abusing 4 poor innocent Muslims who did nothing wrong but murder 200 people at train stations.

Spanish court convicts 4, frees 10 in terror trial

  • Oh yea, Islam had nothing to do with 14 people plotting mass murder. Pure coincidence.

During wiretapped conversations, the men discussed an attack on Charles De Gaulle airport outside Paris and spoke of the need to “strike at the British”, Italian police said.

Bassam Ayachi, 62, a Syrian imam with French citizenship, and Raphael Frederic Gendron, 33, a Frenchman who converted to Islam, were allegedly part of an al-Qaeda cell operating in Europe.

Continue reading Spain, Al Andaluz

Paks will not release location of nukes to US

Jawa Report:

big-spending-negro7            “Think they’ll like us if we throw a bit mo money around?”

“U.S. aid has not been enough”, Zardari said.  (Never enough. Pakistan is a black hole…)

In all fairness to Pakistan, no nation would disclose the location of its nukes to any other country. But then again no other nuclear armed nation is on the edge of falling to suicidal terrorists.

So in the event that Pakistan falls to the taliban, US special forces which are on stand by to secure Pakistan’s nukes will not be able to get all of them.

What do you do with a nuclear armed taliban? Bloomberg

Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari said his country isn’t adding to its nuclear arsenal and doesn’t have to disclose the location of its weapons to the U.S.[…] 

Asked whether Pakistan would tell U.S. intelligence officials where all its nuclear weapons are located, to allow for a joint strategy to keep them secure, Zardari said Pakistan is a sovereign country.

“Why don’t you do the same with other countries yourself?” Zardari said in the interview taped May 7. “I think this is a sovereignty issue, and we have a right to our own sovereignty.”

Only thing is, Pakistan has been ceding parts of its sovereignty to the taliban. Probably because Pakistan doesn’t have enough money to fight the taliban.

U.S. aid has not been enough, Zardari said.[…] 

Zardari said the additional aid shouldn’t come with any conditions.

“I think it’s doubting an ally before you go into action together,” the Pakistani leader said. “We should have a result-oriented relationship, where I should be given a timeline and I’ll give you all a timeline, so we can both give each other timelines and meet the timelines on the positive.”

So $11 billion US in aid isn’t enough for Pakistan. Maybe it’s because most of that aid money has actually gone to the taliban! Zardari dares question our doubt about Pakistan’s commitment to fighting the taliban. 

Before coming to us demanding money, Zardari should first look to fix the pro taliban ISI and the Pakistan army which would rather fight Hindus than taliban ‘muslim friends’.

Muslim Woman wants the right to wear burka, "just like American women"

Female member of Muslim Brotherhood claims movement “would give more freedom for all aspects of Egyptian society, including women”

niqab_gallery__600x39202

  • Taking brainwashing to new hights:

Nor does it end there; according to her, “Islamic law would provide benefits for women similar to those of American women, such as equality between the genders … and the ability to choose what to wear without discrimination.” Obviously, she has another Islamic law in mind.

“A Woman in the Muslim Brotherhood,” from Jacksonville.com, via JW

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt would give more freedom for all aspects of Egyptian society, including women, if the movement achieved power in the country, a female member of the group said.

* Yep. The freedom of the burka. How good is that?

Continue reading Muslim Woman wants the right to wear burka, "just like American women"

Cairns Fishwrap: a Snake-pit of Jew-haters…

img0341

Well, its not as if they had any standards at the Cairns Post. Otherwise the header would have been “Cairns Post hits bottom, digs” – but they’re  in a deeper (immoral) hole than  KRudds  budget.

The Barkmeyer letter above, which  the Cairns Fishwrap chose to publish, is -you guessed it-  from a revert to the Religion of Peace. It just shows that those who associate and  adopt this vile ideology usually go the whole nine yards, and that includes revisionist history, spin, conspiracy theories and tons of  good old Islamic hate. Who would be surprised if Han Barkmeyer  were on his way to become Australia’s Nicky Reilly?’

* If you hate anti-Semitism and bigotry you are welcome to voice your displeasure with the Cairns Post here: <letters@tcp.newsltd.com.au>

Continue reading Cairns Fishwrap: a Snake-pit of Jew-haters…

CNN: Hired Muslim Shill Denies Wife-beating Verses in the Koran

*  Not for the first time. Its just amazing how eager the Western media is to propagate falsehoods like this. CNN along with the BBC are clearly totally infiltrated and have thus become tools for Islamic spin:

Guest commentary at CNN: “Nothing in Islam says you can(t) hit your wife”

black-eye1

Nothing. Not a thing. Except, well, Qur’an 4:34:

Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great.

In mainstream Islamic practice, the Qur’an is Allah’s own words, eternal, and direct — not simply inspired in its human transmitters who were influenced by their particular time and place. In the case of 4:34, this fact spells disaster for women’s rights in letter and in spirit: The text itself tells men to beat their wives. The fact that it is the third in multiple steps does not mitigate the fact that, after a man believes he has jumped through the appropriate hoops, the Qur’an says to hit your wife.

Related links:

Continue reading CNN: Hired Muslim Shill Denies Wife-beating Verses in the Koran

Yemen: "The Prophet Muhammad married 'Aisha when she was nine, and we follow the Sunna. It is very simple"

H/T Pamela:

Interviews with Two Girl-Brides Who Have Appealed to the Court Seeking Divorce. Watch how unruffled the first child is despite the badgering nature of the questions (particularly  by the women in full Islamic dress).

Child Marriage in Yemen: Interviews with Two Girl-Brides Who Have Appealed to the Court Seeking Divorce

Update: as usual, it didn’t take long for a Muselman to post a denial. Denial, however, does not shake the mountain of evidence:

nujood_ali                                                                                                                                           Nujoud

Following are excerpts from a TV debate on child marriage in Yemen, which aired on BBC Arabic TV on March 24 and April 1, 2009:

MEMRI

TV host: Welcome, Nujoud. How old are you?

Nujoud: Ten years old.

TV host: Tell us your story. How did you get married?

Nujoud: My father married me off. I refused, because I was still at school, but my father told me I had to. Then my father married me off in the village.

Shuqi Al-Qadhi, member of the Human Rights Committee of the Yemenite Parliament: How old were you when you got married?

Nujoud: I wasn’t even ten years old when I was married.

Shuqi Al-Qadhi: So how old were you?

Nujoud: More than nine, less than ten.

Continue reading Yemen: "The Prophet Muhammad married 'Aisha when she was nine, and we follow the Sunna. It is very simple"