US-Israel relations hit low after Jewish state rejects White House demand

* Barack Obama set to meet Mahmoud Abbas today
• Israel rejects demand to end settlement construction
Muslim POTUS pushes Islamic agenda:
Obama greets Abbas with a gift: “a toughly-worded, categorical US demand for Israel to stop settlements in Palestinian territories”
There was, of course, no corresponding gift to Netanyahu — only challenges to make various accommodations.
“Obama, Abbas talk peace,” by Farah Stockman for the Boston Globe, via JW
- Pali ‘police’ gets 79 cars, new transmitters worth 5 million Euro’s from EU dhimmies
- Hamas chief roasted during arrest operation
- Hamas Backers Jailed in Texas
- Chrysler’s ‘Hit List’ Targets GOP Donors
- U.S. On the Road to Becoming Zimbabwe
Hillarity Clinton told to get stuffed:
JERUSALEM (AFP) – Israel dismissed on Thursday a blunt US call for a halt to all Jewish settlement building on occupied Palestinian land, the latest sign Washington is hardening its tone towards its close ally. More>>
What “settlements?” Judea & Samaria has always been Jewish land. Who are the Palistanian usurpers?
What settlement freeze commitment?Â
By Ted Belman
Everyone assumes that Israel is committed to freezing settlement activity without preconditions. Not so. Here’s why.
The Roadmap demanded that Israel “immediately dismantle settlement outposts erected since March 2001″ and provided that “Consistent with the Mitchell Report, GOI freeze all settlement activity (including natural growth of settlements)”.
The Mitchell Report was prepared in response to the terror unleashed by Arafat, after he turned down Barak’s genererous offer at Camp David. It’s goal was to make recommendations to end the violence.
It is important to understand the context and the wording of the Mitchell Report because the settlement freeze demanded by the Roadmap had to be consistent with it.
Continue reading Obambination turns nasty on the Jewish state

What “settlements?” Judea & Samaria has always been Jewish land. Who are the Palistanian usurpers?
                   No “Moderates” here…