German police raid 30 mosques to confiscate wife-beating books

Hmm, presumably one of these ‘how to’ books that are freely available just like these youtube vid’s on how to whack your wife(s) properly without  breaking her bones.

Curiously, they didn’t confiscate the uncreated words of the Koran, which gives muslims a clear mandate to beat their wife(s), for all time, just like in the bad old day’s of Moe:

The Qur’an (4:34) tells men to beat their disobedient wives after first warning them and then sending them to sleep in separate beds. This is, of course, an extremely controversial verse, and many Islamic spokesmen and others in the West deny that it has anything to do with wife-beating, so it is worth noting how several translators render the key word here, وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ, waidriboohunna.

Pickthall: “and scourge them”
Yusuf Ali: “(And last) beat them (lightly)”
Al-Hilali/Khan: “(and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful)”
Shakir: “and beat them”
Sher Ali: “and chastise them”
Khalifa: “then you may (as a last alternative) beat them”
Arberry: “and beat them”
Rodwell: “and scourge them”
Sale: “and chastise them”
Asad: “then beat them”

A Commentary on The Qur’an 4:34

wives51

Stuttgart – Police raided 30 mosques in Germany on Wednesday to seize all copies of a Saudi book which encourages wife-beating.

M & C
In the southern city of Stuttgart, police said Germany’s national office for checking harmful books had objected to the German translation from Arabic of the book, entitled Women under the Protection of Islam.
Under German law, its chapter on corporal punishment of women was both discriminatory to women and an incitement to assault, a police spokesman said.
Police all over the country, including the capital Berlin, visited mosques and Islamic community offices to seize the book and also took away computers and discs as part of an inquiry.

Update:

Why are Islamic spokesmen in the West lying about the Qur’an’s “wife-beating” verse?

Jihad Watch

It is worth noting how several translators render the key word in the Qur’an’s notorious verse sanctioning the beating of disobedient women (4:34), وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ, waidriboohunna.

Pickthall: “and scourge them”
Yusuf Ali: “(And last) beat them (lightly)”
Al-Hilali/Khan: “(and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful)”
Shakir: “and beat them”
Sher Ali: “and chastise them”
Khalifa: “then you may (as a last alternative) beat them”
Arberry: “and beat them”
Rodwell: “and scourge them”
Sale: “and chastise them”
Asad: “then beat them”
Dawood: “and beat them.”

Laleh Bakhtiar, in a new translation that has received wide publicity, translates it as “go away from them.” However, in light of this unanimity among the translators, both Muslim and non-Muslim, this seems difficult to sustain – all of these authorities got the passage wrong until Bakhtiar? But her impulse is understandable, as many Muslims today regard this verse with acute embarrassment. Muhammad Asad adduces numerous traditions in which Muhammad “forbade the beating of any woman,” concluding that wife-beating is “barely permissible, and should preferably be avoided.”

Unfortunately, however, this is not a unanimous view. Sheikh Syed Mahmud Allusi in his Qur’an commentary Ruhul Ma’ani gives four reasons that a man may beat his wife: “if she refuses to beautify herself for him,” if she refuses sex when he asks for it, if she refuses to pray or perform ritual ablutions, and “if she goes out of the house without a valid excuse.” Also, Muhammad’s example is normative for Muslims, since he is an “excellent example of conduct” (Qur’an 33:21) – and Aisha reports that Muhammad struck her. Once he went out at night after he thought she was asleep, and she followed him surreptitiously. Muhammad saw her, and, as Aisha recounts: “He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?”

And now a questioner at Yahoo Answers asks a question that most don’t know to ask and that few among those who do know dare to ask:

Why do non Arabic speaking Muslims try to delude themselves & others that 4:34 means ‘leave” not beat?Quran 4:34 has historically been translated as hit, strike or beat, until modernity when Muslims became ashamed of Allah’s perfect marital problem solving principles, so Yusuf Ali first added “lightly” after beat, then others went further & started claiming that it means “leave”.

As the majority of Muslims globally are non Arabic speakers, and as most converts to Islam are keen to swallow all lies to save their faith, they managed to fool quite a few.

Here are examples of the word:

Verse: 8.50 Object: Human Faces
If thou couldst see, when the angels take the souls of the Unbelievers (at death), (How) they smite their faces and their backs, (saying): “Taste the penalty of the blazing Fire-

Transliteration: Walaw tara ith yatawaffa allatheena kafaroo almala-ikatu yadriboona wujoohahum waadbarahum wathooqoo AAathaba alhareeqi

Qur’an 8:50
yadriboona wujoohahum literally meaning “hit their faces,” which is translated by Muslims as “beat their faces.”

Verse: 47.27 Object: Human Faces
But how (will it be) when the angels take their souls at death, and smite their faces and their backs? Fakayfa itha tawaffat-humu almala-ikatu yadriboona wujoohahum waadbarahum

Qur’an 47:27
yadriboona wujoohahum literally meaning “hit their faces.” Also translated correctly by Muslims

Comparing the two terms
Beat them and leave them are different phrases in Arabic. The arabic word idribohunna driven from the root word Darab does not have any other meaning than Beat when it comes to mean “Yadreb Ahadan” = Hit someone. Idriboohunna (أضربوهن) means beat them (for female plural). Adriboo Anhunna (اضربوا عنهن) is the one that means abandon or leave them. According to the Arabic lexicon

Arabic Transliteration Meaning
ضرب Zarb Beat
أضربوهن (used in 4:34) Idriboohunna Beat them
اضربوا عنهن Adriboo Anhunna abandon them, leave them

Quran 4:34 says Idriboohunna أضربوهن, not Adribu Anhunna اضربوا عنهن. These two phrases have different meanings.

The vast majority of Muslims in the world don’t speak Arabic, many converts to Islam don’t learn sufficient Arabic first.

Why try to fool themselves that a circle is a square because this verse jeopardizes their faith?

Why not examine this verse & other unpleasant verses & then decide to take a courageous step of quitting?

Wilders Trial: the establishment will structure the trial so that the truth is no defense…

Police stand guard as demonstrators rally in support of Wilders outside the court.

In any case,  the Wilders witch-hunt is the last nail in the coffin of the once  tolerant Netherlands.

Spiegel innuendo here>> WaPo sux, as usual>> Wilders on trial, supporters protest against ‘legal jihad’

Update:

Al Jizz confirms that Wilders is on trial for “hate speech”

Al-JazWilders.jpg

Check out the photo that Al-Jazeera chose to accompany its article on the Wilders trialhere (thanks to Robert Spencer & JW).

Could it be that maybe Wilders is not unjustified in sounding the alarm about the Islamization of Europe when Muslims demonstrate against him holding signs saying things like “Islam will be superior,” “Islam will dominate the world,” and “Freedom can go to hell”?

Islamo-fascism rules:

From one of one of Wilders’ prosecutors:

“It is irrelevant whether Wilder’s witnesses might prove Wilders’ observations to be correct. What’s relevant is that his observations are illegal.”

The unholy inquisition against Geert Wilders begins!

LIVE stream & detailed updates  (inclusive brandnew videos) on pi-news.net or here on this site

Wilders’ tormentors seem to have forgotten JFK’s dictum: “When we make peaceful revolution impossible, we make violent revolution inevitable.” The same applies, of course to resistance.

Robert Spencer is approved as a witness in the trial against Geert Wilders just a minute ago: http://nos.nl/nieuws/live/journaal24/

Pamela covers it here:

Geert Wilders Trial Live Now

Geert Wilders: “If a politician is not allowed to criticize an ideology anymore this means that we are lost, and it will lead to the end of our freedom”

Bosch_Geert.jpg

Cartoon courtesy of Bosch Fawstin.

Note the standard use below of the “far-right” epithet, which is mainstream media-speak for “frightens children, barks at other people’s dogs, and makes Cratchit work on Christmas.” Nonetheless, Wilders’ argument as quoted below ought to be compelling to any reasonable member of a free society. The prosecution of Wilders is indeed a politically motivated attempt to silence him, and a short-sighted move that will come back to haunt the Dutch authorities who are bringing the case, when they find the precedent they have set can hamstring their own ability to speak without fear.

“Far-right MP Geert Wilders on trial for discrimination against Muslims,” by David Charter for the Times Online, January 20:

Continue reading Wilders Trial: the establishment will structure the trial so that the truth is no defense…

STFU Erdogan!

In Saudi, Erdogan seeks to score points with Islamic world, voices support for Pali Arabs

Erdogan takes the Turkish begging bowl to Arabia: AFP – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan expressed support for the Palestinians and called on Saudi businessmen to invest in his country during a trip to the Middle Eastern oil giant.  (from Islamization watch)

“Turkey no longer needs a close relationship with Israel”

“Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews…” — Qur’an 5:82

Thus with Turkey’s turn toward Islamic supremacism and Islamic rule, its new enmity toward Israel comes as no surprise.

“‘Turkey no longer needs a close relationship with Israel,'” from Haaretz, January 19 (thanks to JW):

The rift in Israeli-Turkish relations is the result of Ankara turning away from secularism and toward more radical Islam, Israel’s military intelligence chief said on Tuesday.The comments to a parliamentary committee by Maj. General Amos Yadlin reflected wider concern in Israel and followed a high profile visit to Turkey on Sunday by Defense Minister Ehud Barak that was meant to help mend the relationship after a sharp diplomatic row.

“Turkey no longer needs a close relationship with Israel,” a parliamentary official quoted Yadlin as telling the foreign affairs committee of the Knesset.

“They are currently in the midst of a fundamental process of moving further away from the secular Ataturk approach, closer to a radical approach,” Yadlin said, adding that key factors had been an easing of Turkish concerns about Syria and Ankara’s failure to clinch membership of the European Union….

Continue reading STFU Erdogan!

Newsflash

Frank Zappa Quote of the Day:

“There’s a big difference between kneeling down and bending over…”-- The Bottom Line:  The obvious values clarification is if respect is being demonstrated, kneeling is the reply. If instead someone is expected to be a brown-noser, then, bending over is the reply.

UK: bending over for Islamic terrorists:

The Government is secretly supporting an attempt by UK-based Islamists to have their names removed from an international terror blacklist / Telegraph/UK

BRITAIN has the greatest number of Islamic extremists linked to al-Qaeda of any Western country and poses a grave risk to international security, the US Government believes. The Age has more>>

Mark Steyn nails the dhimmified complaceniks of EUrabia:

“We do not negotiate with terrorists. We just accede to their anticipated demands.”

We Eurabia types aren’t predicting a Muslim conquest on a set date in 2025 but a remorseless, incremental surrender. And, actually, we’re not predicting it, because it’s already well under way.

Israeli woman escapes  Muslim husband

Woman who married Arab and moved to Rafah re-enters Israel through Erez border crossing along with her four children

Jihad Watch News links:

The “Allah” war widens in Malaysia: Non-Muslims could face fines, jail for using list of 35 terms now reserved to Islam

Nigeria: Muslims set church filled with worshipers on fire: Showing respect for the People of the Book. “Nigeria: Religious Violence Kills 27,” fromAP, January 18

Iraq: Targeted execution of Christians continues, media and government silent

Yemeni jihadists: “The duty of our Muslim nation is to declare jihad against the infidels…As they declared it to be an open war on the people of Islam, we must declare an open war against them”

Career Diplomat  Franco Frattini suddenly understands:

Italy: North Africa poses ‘greatest terrorist threat’

Helping to fix the problem he  created:

“We consider these terror cells the real threat because the region is much closer than say Afghanistan and because they are infiltrating illegal immigrant trafficking with the greatest of ease,” Frattini said.

Rome, 19 Jan. (AKI) – Al-Qaeda linked terrorist groups based in North Africa pose the greatest threat to Italy and are infiltrating people smuggling gangs in the Mediterranean, according to the country’s foreign minister Franco Frattini. The minister made the comments in an interview with Italian magazine, ‘A’, due to be published on Wednesday.

He called for a united approach for defeating illegal immigration, calling it “terrorism’s new frontline.”

“We must move sooner rather than later. Italy and Europe have underestimated the threat or may not have understood it at all,” he said. More from AKI

Chickenshit Society

Shunning Kurt Westergaard

by Baron Bodissey/Gates of Vienna

Kurt Westergaard, the man behind the most famous Mohammed cartoon, offered a piece of his artwork to a charity auction for victims of the Haitian earthquake. The charity rebuffed his offer due to fears of violence.

“We value the safety of our employees quite highly”-

read it and weep!

Our Danish correspondent TB has collected and translated the material for this post, but I’ll post his appeal for the charity first, since the auction is on Saturday, and this is therefore time-sensitive:

I urge everyone to spread this web address. This is where you can bid on Kurt Westergaard’s painting or just leave money for the kids of Haiti.

Use this form to place a bid.

Here are the two men behind it. The headline above the picture reads: “Everybody loves Kurt, except Lauritz!”

Next is a brief news story about what happened, and below that is a press release from Galleri Draupner.


What is notable about the news story below is Lauritz’ explanation that “[w]e value the safety of our employees”. This is the customary reason given for self-censorship under the dhimmi regimes of the Islamized West. Yale University Press, Borders bookstores, various newspapers and television stations, the publishers who refused the novel about Aisha — all of them moderated their actions based on a perceived need to keep their employees safe.

Their rationale may be restated thus: “We fear that violent religious thugs will injure or kill us. Therefore we will accede to their demands in advance, in order to make sure that no one gets hurt.”

Jihad is not even necessary. The lickspittle craven cringing cowards of our cultural elite are ready to cry uncle before the first sword leaves its scabbard.

From The Copenhagen Post:

TV2’s morning lifestyle programme Go’morgen Danmark was the latest in a long line of those trying to help the victims of the Haitian earthquake. The show organised an auction through auctioneers, Lauritz.com, and asked well known politicians and personalities to donate personal items for the charity fundraiser.

A signed copy of Bill Clinton’s book dedicated to the head of the Social Democrats, concert and sports events tickets and a porcelain doll owned by Pia Kjærsgaard, head of the Danish People’s Party, are already listed in the auction.

Read it all, here>>

Thai Jihad

A quick update:

FrontPage Magazine – Whitewashing the Thai Jihad

Update:

Muslim insurgency in Thailand grinds on

The Star.com

Mohammedans kill 10 in Thailand

Note the apologetic BS by this reporting dhimwit:

PATTANI, Thailand – Suspected Muslim rebels killed 10 civilians in a flurry of attacks in insurgency-plagued southern Thailand, the army said today on the fifth anniversary of a bloody assault by security forces against militants at a mosque. (Thai security forces didn’t cause a “bloody assault”- they tried to restore law and order in a jihadist infested area/ed)

Thai security officials blamed Muslim insurgents bent on stirring up communal tension between Buddhists and Muslims. (That much is true/ed)

Insurgent attacks – which include drive-by shootings and bombings – are believed to be intended to frighten Buddhist residents into leaving the area. They also target Muslims who the rebels believe have collaborated with the government, including soldiers, police, informants and civilians. (Typical Mohammedan warfare. Call it jihad./ed)

Now it comes,  BS on the double:

The identity and precise goals of the insurgents have never been publicly declared, and responsibility is rarely claimed for attacks. They pursue an ill-defined agenda that sometimes seems to call for an Islamic state separate from Buddhist-dominated Thailand, but is mostly a reaction to a history of discrimination.

“The identity and precise goals of the insurgents have never been publicly declared…”- BS on the double: as you can see here, we have reported years ago on who  is behind this insurgency and what the goals of these motherfuckers are:

Thai Jihad: Muslim rebel leader calls for referendum on independence for ‘restive’ southern Thailand

Why isn’t anybody listening?

Southern Muslims have long complained of discrimination, especially in education and job opportunities, in Buddhist-dominated Thailand.

Mohammedans always complain of discrimination when they’re not on top. Their religion teaches that they are entitled to exploit the unbelievers, extort the jiziya, humiliate and rape them. If they’re  unable to exploit the dhimmies their world is out of kilter and they resort to terrorizing the kuffars.  This is a pattern that repeats itself as long as the ideology of the profit rules over people.

If the soldiers of allah would  get off their lazy asses for once and work for a living it might  help them get over it.

"War is a challenge to law, and the law must adjust…"

‘In a terror war, to hell with international law’

From Carl in J’lem

An important ruling has come down from the United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. If it stands, I hope that Israel will implement it too.

Former Gitmo inmates who returned to jihad

The 2-1 ruling was handed down in the case of a Guantanamo detainee seeking release through a constitutional, or habeas, review of his case. But instead of being a paean to the power of the writ of habeas corpus, language in the opinions supporting the ruling may instead serve as a rallying cry for those who say it is time for the president and Congress to face reality and recognize the old rules no longer apply.

U.S. Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown wrote the majority opinion, and a separate concurrent opinion agreeing with the majority document. In that second opinion, in a highly unusual departure from judicial custom, Brown sets out a chilling vision of the stakes and new tactics in the war against terror.

“War is a challenge to law, and the law must adjust,” Brown wrote. “It must recognize that the old wine skins of international law, domestic criminal procedure or other prior frameworks are ill-suited to the bitter wine of this new warfare. We can no longer afford diffidence. This war has placed us not just at, but already past the leading edge of a new and frightening paradigm, one that demands new rules be written. Falling back on the comfort of prior practices supplies only illusory comfort.”

Not absurd at all. Little did we know how pampered these Gitmo apes are….

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is sometimes called the second highest court in the land. It reviews all cases arising from Guantanamo claims, and its decisions in that venue must be followed by the other U.S. circuit courts of appeal.

The case before it was brought by Ghaleb Nassar al-Bihani, a Yemeni citizen, who has been held at the U.S. detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, since 2002.

Continue reading "War is a challenge to law, and the law must adjust…"

Follow the Dutch Inquisition vs Geert Wilders on Moe's Jihad News!

Newsflash from ZIP: Obama sock-puppet OUT! Conservative wins Kennedy throne in Mass…

From today we’ll cover  the inquisition against Geert Wilders on Moe’s Jihad News.

The Trial of Geert Wilders: A Symposium

Has Wilders broken the law?

Geert Wilders’ inflammatory anti-Muslim statements are well known. Are they illegal?

By Folkert Jensma

Rumour has it that Geert Wilders, the leader of the populist PVV party, hopes to call Mohamed B., the man who killed Theo van Gogh, as a witness in his up-coming trialm which starts this Wednesday. Probably to establish the connection between the Koran and violence that Wilders assumes. The prosecution, however, will focus on the Dutch criminal code, particularly the two articles the politician is alleged to have violated: 137 c and d. Wilders is charged with slandering a group and sowing hate, and discrimination on the basis of race or religion. He has targeted muslims on the basis of their religion, the prosecution will argue, and non-western migrants or Moroccans on the basis of their race. The trial is expected to last months.  More from Handelsblad>>

Does Wilder’s accuser Gerard Spong call for Islamic law Holland?

The man bringing the case against Geert Wilders is left-wing lawyer Gerard Spong. In 2009 he caused controversy when he took part in a Dutch television show featuring a mock-trial where he convinced a TV jury that Bin Laden’s connection to Sept 11 was a product of “Western propaganda”, that there was insufficient evidence to prove Bin Laden was the real leader of al-Qaeda – in the end the TV jury ruled that Bin Laden was a “terrorist who has misused Islam.” [+]

With this mindset he and fellow students at the university where he works brings Wilders to trial from insulting Islam.

The following is what Radio Netherlands has been able together on Spong’s views. More from Islamization Watch:  Gerard Spong

IDF misses target rich environment in Beirut

Hundreds attend terrorist conference in Beirut

Over the weekend, Beirut proudly hosted a large gathering of the world’s most notorious terror leaders and their supporters.

The Hezbollah news site describes the scene:

Friday, January 15, 2010, the Arab International Forum for the Support of the Resistance held its opening ceremony in the UNESCO Palace in presence of hundreds of participants from all over the world. Representatives from the Arab world were present, in addition to some representatives from Europe, the United States, and many other countries, who came to express their support of the resistance.

Hizbullah Secretary General, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, gave a speech showing his support for the forum, stating the importance of the resistance world wide- whether the Lebanese, Palestinian, or Iraqi – as well as representing the historical roleof the resistance and what it has done.

As for Hamas’ Khaled Meshaal, he stated his total support for the resistance, and thanked Iran for the support it has been giving.

Continue reading IDF misses target rich environment in Beirut

Oh noes! Teh Juice iz Stealing Organz in Haiti!

You knew this was coming: from the Vicious Babushka

‘Israelis stealing organs in Haiti’

Jawa Report: Yes we admit it. We took Haiti to rob her of her vast oil wealth and tons of pure gold.

Baroness Tonge and Israeli Organ-Harvesting

Yes that’s right the US has invaded and occupied Haiti on orders from the advance party of Zionist baby organ snatchers.

The Telegraph: The French minister in charge of humanitarian relief called on the UN to “clarify” the American role amid claims the military build up was hampering aid efforts.

Even as IDF travels across world to extend hand to country in need, there are those who take opportunity to spread slander, blood libel against Jewish state. Seattle resident, who presents himself as black activist, explains incendiary video he uploaded to YouTube

WASHINGTON – Even when Israel  puts itself on the front lines of medical and humanitarian aid  sent to the ends of the earth and wins great praise for its professionalism in doing so, there are those who prefer to transform the act into an opportunity to spread hatred and lies at the expense of those suffering in Haiti.

Here’s what the Israeli’s are (really)  doing:

Praise for Israeli mission in Haiti: ‘Only ones operating’: Israeli field hospital earns accolades as one able to do complex surgery in devastated country

American doctors in Haiti jealous of Israeli field hospital

And of course, the usual suspects accuse the US of A of wanting  to “occupy”  Haiti:

OBAMA AUTHORIZES MILITARY OCCUPATION OF HAITI

thelastcrusade

Here’s what Muslims are doing:

Haiti, Islamic Relief, UNICEF & the Scientologists

While Israel was one of the first countries to deploy to Haiti to help relief efforts there–and, in fact, the Israeli mobile unit set up on a football field is essentially the only working hospital in Haiti–extremist Muslims and the Church of Scientology are engaged in far weaker efforts in Haiti that are somewhat frightening. By Debbie Schlussel

An American resident of Seattle, Washington uploaded a video to YouTube on Tuesday accusing soldiers in the IDF delegation to the earthquake site in Haiti of being involved in stealing organs from their patients.

The man, who calls himself T. West, fronts a group called AfriSynergy Productions, whose declared goal is to empower the black man. The video purports to present something to think about while exploiting the horrible tragedy that has befallen Haiti to recycle false claims that IDF soldiers engage in organ trafficking.

The bizarre host of the video collected praises broadcast on television channels regarding the advanced equipment and treatment the Israeli teams are providing in Haiti. After about a minute and a half of such praise, the man looks straight into the camera and made the claim that there are people operating in Haiti who do not have a conscience and are members of the search-and-rescue teams, including, he claimed, the IDF.

Read more at YNet.

Aw jeez, not this shit again.