Tag: Litigation Jihad

Moe's Inner Struggle Watch

cemetery-algeriaCatholic cemeteries are literally trashed in Algeria.   The government
 refuses to protect or maintain them unless the crosses are removed.

Italy: Abducted Muslim Terrorist Seeks €15 Million in Damages

“My client suffered distress that cannot be imagined by any human being,” Nasr’s lawyer Carmelo Scambia told a Milan court on Wednesday. More from Adnkronos

China Jihad:

China: Al-Qaeda urges jihad to “defend” Muslims

When a Muslim land is attacked, it becomes the individual duty of every Muslim to do what he can to participate in the jihad to defend it. That is the rationale behind Al-Qaeda’s call here, and the background of its grievance-mongering. Note the use of the common Homeric epithet “restive,” always a mainstream media favorite to describe a land engulfed by jihad activity, in the first paragraph. “China: Al-Qaeda urges holy war to defend Muslims,” from AKI, October 7 (thanks to JW):

RoP Links:

Jihad Watch:

Loons in the Lagoons:

Raymond Ibrahim/Pajamasmedia:

The  reason for waging jihad has nothing to do with Israel or U.S. foreign policy:

So long as Islam endures, the reconciliation of its adherents, even with Jews and Christians, and still more with the rest of mankind, must continue to be an insoluble problem. … For an indefinite future, however reluctantly, we must confine our political recognition to the professors of those religions which … preach the doctrine of “live and let live” (The Institutes of the Law of Nations, p. 124).

In other words, political recognition — with all the attendant negotiations and diplomacy that come with it — should be granted to all major religions/civilizations except Islam, which does not recognize the notion of “live and let live,” as evinced by, among other stipulations, the Koran’s commands to its adherents to “enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong,” (e.g., Koran 3:110), that is, enforce Sharia law upon the earth.

Page 1 of 2  Next ->

UK: Now they're going after the Christians…

Christian couple face losing hotel after criminal charges for offending Muslim woman

Update from this story:

UK: Christian couple charged with criminal offense after offending Muslims during discussion of religion

Yet another indication of the walking-on-eggshells that British authorities (and plenty of non-British authorities) are doing around Muslims these days. Absurd Britannia Update: “Christian hotel owners hauled before court after defending their beliefs in discussion with Muslim guest,” by Jonathan Petre for the Daily Mail, September 20 thanks to JW

Ben and Sharon Vogelenzang

Ben and Sharon Vogelenzang are awaiting trial accused of breaching public order by insulting a guest at their hotel in Aintree, Liverpool, about her religion. The couple, who are members of an evangelical congregation, were arrested by police after getting into a discussion with the woman about the differences between Christianity and Islam earlier this year.

Telegraph/H-T Counter Jihad

Christian nurse under fire over wearing cross

Shirley Chaplin

Telegraph – Caroline Gammell

Shirley Chaplin has been taken off the wards at The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust Hospital after refusing to remove her necklace… Christian nurse removed from frontline duty for wearing cross necklace

THE BRITISH TERRORIST STATE

Atlas Shrugs

UK Home Office staff officially warned not to eat in front of Muslims during Ramadan – in case it made them feel hungry

Muslims wait to break their fast at end of holy month Ramadan

Hungry Muslims…

MPAC plays the victim card while denouncing this document below, but nonetheless the organization has a point: this is the kind of walking on eggshells around Muslims that only creates resentment among non-Muslims in a land where there ought to be equality of treatment of all people, regardless of creed. Now if MPAC could come out across the board against special preferences and special treatment for Muslims, and work against all accommodation of Sharia provisions in Britain, we might be getting somewhere.

Absurd Britannia Update: “Don’t eat near Ramadan fasters, Home Office staff told,” by Jason Lewis in the Daily Mail, September 19 (thanks to JW)

Litigation Jihad: the Flying Imam's & the Hijabbed Abercrombie Bitch

As usual, CAIR,  the unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case is behind this:

Probing infidel resistance per Litigation Jihad:

* doesn’t work for Jedi’s: Jedi Forced Out in Wales

07.04.15.UnfriendSkies-X

A Web site, called “Flying While Muslim,” has been launched to seek support for the six American imams (Islamic religious leaders) who say their rights were violated in 2006 when they were removed from a US Airways flight in Minnesota and arrested.

The “Flying While Muslim” site offers background information and updates about the six imams case and about racial and religious profiling of airline travelers. It also seeks donations to support the legal challenge to the airline. (shamelessly lifted from the Bunglawussi site)

CAIR press release, 18 September 2009

A popular national chain of clothing stores is being sued by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for allegedly not hiring a Muslim Tulsa teenager because she wears a hijab, a religiously mandated head scarf.

The EEOC filed the lawsuit Wednesday against Abercrombie & Fitch in U.S. District Court in Tulsa, citing the Civil Rights Act of 1964, modified in 1991, as the basis for the action.

The suit says that Samantha Elauf, 17, applied in June 2008 for a sales job at the Abercrombie Kids store in Woodland Hills Mall. A district manager allegedly told her that the hijab, which Elauf wears in observance of her religious beliefs, did not fit the store’s image.

freedom3

“Defendant refused to hire Ms. Elauf because she wears a hijab, claiming that the wearing of headgear was prohibited by its Look Policy, and, further, failed to accommodate her religious beliefs by making an exception to the Look Policy,” the lawsuit states.

Elauf went to the Council on American-Islamic Relations-Oklahoma, which helped her file a complaint with the EEOC in Oklahoma City.

Tulsa World, 18 September 2009

See also the Guardian, 18 September 2009

Australia: Former Gitmo ape Mamduh Habib does Litigation Jihad also:

rgn_habib_narrowweb__300x383,0Mamduh Habib

Australia: Lawyer Tells Court Habib Case Outside Its Jurisdiction
Australia: Habib Case Raises Complex Issues
Australia: Keep Courts Out of Habib Case: Government Lawyersjoel Gibson

Germany:

1-516

Islamic Supremacism: Muslim Teen Sues Abercrombie and Fitch

Atlas Shrugs:

Why would a Muslim teen in Islamic dress want to work at Abercrombie and Fitch? Think about it. It’s all about imposing Islam.

Continue reading Litigation Jihad: the Flying Imam's & the Hijabbed Abercrombie Bitch

Litigation Jihad vs Abercrombie & Fitch

TulsaWorld/H-T: Counter Jihad:

Abercrombie & Muslim Bitch

Abercrombie & Fitch

Lawsuit filed against clothing store over alleged religious discrimination

A popular national clothing store is being sued by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for allegedly not hiring a Muslim Tulsa teenager because she wears a hijab, or religiously mandated head scarf.
The EEOC filed a lawsuit against Abercrombie & Fitch Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Tulsa, citing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 1991 as the basis for the action.

Links:

In June 2008, 17-year-old Samantha Elauf applied to work in a sales position at the Abercrombie Kids store located in Woodland Hills Mall, the lawsuit states.

A district manager allegedly told her that the hijab, worn in observance of religious beliefs, did not fit the store’s image.

“Defendant refused to hire Ms. Elauf because she wears a hijab, claiming that the wearing of headgear was prohibited by its Look Policy, and, further, failed to accommodate her religious beliefs by making an exception to the Look Policy,” the lawsuit states.

The girl took her case to the Council on American-Islamic Relations-Oklahoma, which helped her file a complaint with the EEOC Oklahoma City. More from  GINNIE GRAHAM World Staff Writer

Saudi Arab Lawyer Issues Ultimatum For Danmark

Litigation Jihad

Gates of  Vienna

An apology must be issued from those newspapers that reprinted cartoonist Kurt Westergaard’s famous drawing of the prophet Mohammed

The Mighty MoOn behalf of an unknown number of the prophet’s descendants, the lawyer, Faisal A.Z. Yamani in Jeddah has sent his letter to the editors-in-chief of the newspapers that published the cartoon. He demands that they apologize and publish a disclaimer by the end of September.

“It must be a clear, public and unconditional correction and apology for the offence and damage that Your newspaper caused, when it reprinted Mr. Westergaard’s cartoon last year,” says Faisal A.Z. Yamani.

Saudi’s demand Apology in four languages, or else..!

JW:

Saudi lawyer wants apology for Motoons

Sure, as soon as you apologize for jihad

“It should be a clear, public and unconditional apology for the offence and harm caused by their newspaper,” Yamani said.

Continue reading Saudi Arab Lawyer Issues Ultimatum For Danmark

Bunglawussi Phobia Watch

A committee against Islamophobia

Anti-Muslim prejudice is finding expression in more hate crimes. We need to tackle the problem at a nationwide level…

More from the increasingly hysterical spokesman person from the MCB @ the Guardian for Muslims

Ziauddin Sardar rattling his cage:

Sebastian Faulks’ Qur’an remarks are symptomatic of a very British, blissfully self-assured ignorance

Alas, poor Sebastian Faulks! First he annoys the Muslims by declaring, in a Sunday Times interview, that the Qur’an is “the rantings of a schizophrenic” with “no ethical dimension”. Then he upsets the Islamophobes by apologising. The poor sod has been hit by a self-inflicted double whammy.

More>>

The Prophet Retains Counsel

Gates of Vienna

On behalf of Mohammed’s myriad descendants, a Saudi law firm has brought legal action against all the Danish newspapers that published the Motoons.

It’s important to bear in mind that this is another probe, like the “Flying Imams” in the USA several years ago. The Islamic world just keeps pushing and pushing against the kuffar to see how far they can get.

Every line of civilized defense is probed — military, police, media, social, legal, political — and if any weakness is found, the push in that direction is intensified. Or, if they meet resistance, they withdraw and push somewhere else.

This process continues all the time, patiently and relentlessly, never ceasing. It’s designed to wear the infidel down.

Read further…

Islamist Groups Threaten Free Speech RulingBy: Jamie GlazovWill we allow the enemy to destroy what so many of our countrymen died to protect? ….more

Bunglawussi stabs man in the back in self-defense, gets apology…$$$

Mail on Sunday apologises to Inayat Bunglawala

Compo Jihad

Previous links: 

The Mail on Sunday has today printed an apology to Inayat Bunglawala –  following a  story it ran about himon March 15 2009. The MoS apology – which also appears on the MoS website – reads as follows:

Continue reading Bunglawussi stabs man in the back in self-defense, gets apology…$$$

Fool Britannia

Britain was wrong to freeze assets of Abu Qatada, rules EU, clearing way for him to get compensation

By James Slack/Mail Online

Compo Jihad

Abu Qatada   

Controversial: Abu Qatada has been linked to Al Qaeda

EU judges today rode roughshod over the British Government and United Nations by unfreezing the assets of Al-Qaeda ambassador Abu Qatada.

The verdict by the EU’s Court of First Instance paves the way for the fanatic to receive a hugely controversial compensation payout awarded against the British taxpayer earlier this year.

Qatada – named in court as Omar Mohammed Othman – was placed on a list of terrorist suspects whose money and other assets in Europe are blocked in the wake of 9/11.

Continue reading Fool Britannia

Litigation Jihad

U.S. Bails Out Palestinian Terrorism…Again  

By: Rachel Ehrenfeld  The Obama administration militarizes the Palestinians, more>>

un-cartoon

* Now they go apeshit before it even happens:

“Islamic Jihad has two wings, one violent and one lawful which can operate apart but often reinforce each other. While the violent arm attempts to silence speech by burning cars when cartoons of Mohammed are published…the lawful arm is skillfully maneuvering within Western legal systems both here and abroad.”

Continue reading “Welcome to ‘Lawfare’—A New type of Jihad” by Brooke Goldstein

The Fanny Truchelut Case

The Gates of Vienna/ by Baron Bodissey

For several years Yvette “Fanny” Truchelut and her husband ran a hostel for holidaymakers in a rural area of France. In the summer of 2006 she was brought up on charges after requesting that female Muslim guests remove their veils in the common areas of her establishment. More>>

UK: Another Victory for the MCB

* Amazing stuff: now they’re suing the networks after the guests who speak out…similar to attacking bloggers over the comments. Litigation Jihad accelerates the Islamization of once great Britain:

BRITAIN TERRORISMBunglawussi jubilant:

BBC apologises to MCB over Charles Moore’s slurs

The BBC has offered £30,000 and an apology to the Muslim Council of Britain after airing accusations that it encouraged the killing of British troops.

The corporation offered the settlement after a Question Time panellist accused the council of failing to condemn attacks on British soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Charles Moore, a former editor of The Daily Telegraph, made the comments on the programme in March during a debate about Islamic protests at a soldiers’ homecoming parade in Luton. He claimed that the council thought it was a “good thing, even an Islamic thing” to kill troops.

* Of course they do. THEY can say that. But the kuffar must not say that; what’s the world coming to, you Islamophobe, you!

Continue reading UK: Another Victory for the MCB